This is Philosophy of Science

This is Philosophy of Science
Автор книги: id книги: 2285303     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 3536,34 руб.     (38,57$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Математика Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119758006 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

A clear and engaging introduction to the philosophy of science, exploring the role of science within the broader framework of human knowledge and engagement with the world What are the central features and advantages of a scientific worldview? Why do even reasonable scientists sometimes disagree with each other? How are scientific methods different than those of other disciplines? Can science provide an objective account of reality? This is Philosophy of Science introduces the most important philosophical issues that arise within the empirical sciences. Requiring no previous background in philosophy, this reader-friendly volume covers topics ranging from traditional questions about the nature of explanation and the confirmation of theories to practical issues concerning the design of physical experiments and modeling. Incisive and accessible chapters with relevant case-studies and informative illustrations examine the function of thought experiments, discuss the realism/anti-realism debate, explore probability and theory testing, and address more challenging topics such as emergentism, measurement theory, and the manipulationist account of causation. Describes key philosophical concepts and their application in the empirical sciences Highlights past and present philosophical debates within the field Features numerous illustrations, real-world examples, and references to additional resources Includes a companion website with self-assessment exercises and instructor-only test banks Part of Wiley-Blackwell’s popular This Is Philosophy??? series , This is Philosophy of Science: An Introduction is an excellent textbook for STEM students with interest in the conceptual foundations of their disciplines, undergraduate philosophy majors, and general readers looking for an easy-to-read overview of the subject.

Оглавление

Franz-Peter Griesmaier. This is Philosophy of Science

THIS IS PHILOSOPHY

THIS IS PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. AN INTRODUCTION

Contents

List of Figures

Guide

Pages

PREFACE

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ABOUT THE COMPANION WEBSITE

1 PILLARS OF SCIENCE: REASONS, KNOWLEDGE, AND TRUTH

1.1 Epistemic Reasons

1.1.1 Conclusive Reasons

1.1.2 Defeasible Reasons

1.2 Reasoning from Evidence

1.2.1 Statistical Inference (SI)

1.2.2 Inductive Generalization (IG)

1.2.3 Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE)

1.3 Knowledge and Truth

1.4 Facts, Hypotheses, and Theories

1.4.1 “It’s True for You but Not for Me”

1.4.2 Perspectivism

1.5 Conclusion

Notes

Annotated Bibliography

2 EVIDENCE, OBSERVATION, AND MEASUREMENT. 2.1 The Promises of Evidence

2.2 Basic Evidence and Derived Evidence. 2.2.1 What We See

2.2.2 Causes and Evidence

2.2.3 Observation, Naked and Enhanced

2.3 Measurement

2.3.1 Measurement Scales

2.3.2 Operationalism

2.3.3 Theory-Ladenness of Measurement

2.4 Conclusion

Note

Annotated Bibliography

3 USES OF EVIDENCE. 3.1 From Observation to Hypothesis

3.2 Theory Appraisal

3.2.1 Confirmation through Predictive Success

3.2.2 Falsification to the Rescue

3.2.3 Ravens and White Chalk

3.2.4 On Flat Earth and Bending Light

3.3 The Demarcation Problem

3.3.1 Progressive Modifications

3.3.2 Basic Statements

3.3.3 Moving and Burning

3.3.4 Lucky Modifications

3.4 Conclusion

Notes

Annotated Bibliography

4 EVIDENCE, RATIONALITY, AND DISAGREEMENT. 4.1 From Weak to Strong Evidence

4.1.1 Anecdotes

4.1.2 Observational Studies

4.1.3 Natural History

4.1.4 Case Studies

4.2 Evidence and Rationality

4.3 Explaining Scientific Disagreement

4.3.1 Differences in Evidential Basis

4.3.2 Theory-Ladenness of Observation

4.3.3 Differences in Prior Probability Assignments

4.4 Conclusion

Note

Annotated Bibliography

5 THE NATURE OF PROBABILITY. 5.1 Basics of Probability

5.2 Interpretations of Probability

5.3 Probabilities as Credences

5.3.1 Probabilistic Consistency

5.3.2 Conditionalization

5.3.3 The Problem of Priors

5.3.4 The Problem of Old Evidence

5.4 Epistemic Probabilities

5.4.1 The Classical Interpretation

5.4.2 Bertrand’s Paradox

5.5 Probabilities as Objective Chances

5.5.1 Frequentism

5.5.2 Propensities

5.6 Probabilities and Defeasible Reasoning

5.7 Fallacies

5.8 Conclusion

Annotated Bibliography

6 DO NOT BE MISLED: CONFOUNDS AND CONTROLS. 6.1 Trials and Errors

6.2 Treatment and Control

6.2.1 Counterfactuals

6.2.2 Possible Worlds

6.2.3 Counterfactuals and Controls

6.3 Randomization

6.3.1 Bias

6.3.2 Unnoticed but Relevant Differences

6.3.3 Ethical Concerns

6.4 Conclusion

Annotated Bibliography

7 PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS AND THEIR DESIGN. 7.1 Historical Remarks

7.2 Setting Experimental Parameters

7.3 Dependent and Independent Variables

7.3.1 Stratifying to Isolate Relevant Factors

7.3.2 Determining Relevance

7.4 Learning from Experiment

7.4.1 Replication: How to Be Confident

7.4.2 Misleading Evidence: Cleaning up the Data

7.4.3 Data Reduction and Curve Fitting: Promises and Pitfalls

7.5 Types of Errors: Pick Your Poison

7.6 Relationships between Experiment and Theory

7.6.1 Crucial Experiments

7.6.2 Are Experiments Theory-Neutral?

7.7 Conclusion

Note

Annotated Bibliography

8 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS THAT THEY DON’T TEACH

8.1 Found and Natural Experiments

8.1.1 Found Experiments and Unplanned Treatments

8.1.2 The Role of Background Theory

8.1.3 Natural Experiments

8.2 Thought Experiments

8.2.1 Reasoning through Scenarios

8.2.2 Galileo’s Combined Weights and Ideal Spheres

8.2.3 Newton on Space (and Time)

8.2.4 Spinning Globes (TE-3)

8.2.5 Maxwell’s Demon (TE-4)

8.3 The Structure and Evidential Value of Thought Experiments. 8.3.1 Kinds of TEs

8.3.2 TEs as Imaginative Reasoning

8.3.3 TEs as Mental Evidence

8.4 Learning from TEs

8.4.1 Distant Worlds

8.4.2 TEs as Tools for Discovery

8.5 The Ubiquity of Thought Experiments

8.6 Are Computer Simulations Thought Experiments?

8.7 Conclusion

Notes

Annotated Bibliography

9 MODELS: USEFUL LIES AND INFORMATIVE FICTIONS

9.1 The Nature of Models

9.1.1 Models as Partial Isomorphisms

9.1.2 Mirror Models vs. Conjecture Models

9.2 Modelling Techniques

9.2.1 Approximation

9.2.2 Abstraction (Aristotelian Idealization)

9.2.3 Distortion (Galilean Idealization)

9.3 Analogies

9.3.1 Conceptual Shifts

9.3.2 Property Sharing

9.4 Learning from Models

9.4.1 Learning from Scale Models

9.4.2 Learning from Approximation Models

9.4.3 Learning from Fiction (i.e., Distortion Models)

9.5 Conclusion

Notes

Annotated Bibliography

10 CAUSATION AND CAUSAL INFERENCE. 10.1 What’s the Problem with Causation?

10.2 Hume’s Challenge

10.3 Causation as Mere Regularities

10.4 Conserved Quantities to the Rescue?

10.4.1 Can CQT Deliver on All Fronts?

10.5 Causation and Manipulation

10.5.1 Manipulation and Counterfactuals

10.5.1.1 The New Mechanism

10.6 Conclusion

Note

Annotated Bibliography

11 STRANGE CAUSATION – TIME TRAVEL AND REMOTE ACTION

11.1 On Influencing the Past

11.1.1 Basics of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR)

11.1.2 When One Twin Is MUCH Older than the Other

11.1.3 Basics of the General Theory of Relativity

11.1.4 The Grandfather Paradox

11.2 Quantum Mechanics and Locality

11.2.1 The Measurement Problem

11.2.2 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox (EPR)

11.2.3 Something Has to Give

11.2.4 Other Options

11.3 Conclusion

Notes

Annotated Bibliography

12 BUT IS ANY OF IT REAL? 12.1 Theories and Truth

12.2 A Map of the Views

12.3 Are Groups Real?

12.3.1 The Biological Species Concept

12.3.2 The Phylogenetic Species Concept

12.3.3 From Biological Species to All of Nature

12.4 Laws of Nature

12.4.1 Laws and Counterfactuals

12.4.2 Replacing Laws by Regularities

12.5 Is Everything Real Observable? 12.5.1 Observables vs. Unobservables

12.5.2 How to Name Unobservables

12.5.3 Describing Unobservables

12.5.4 Maybe It’s All Fictional?

12.6 Realism vs. Antirealism

12.6.1 Is Predictive Success Mere Coincidence?

12.6.2 Successful but False Theories – the Pessimistic Induction

12.6.3 Explaining Success

12.6.4 The Argument from Underdetermination

12.7 Structural Realism

12.8 Realism and Explanation

12.9 Conclusion

Note

Annotated bibliography

13 EXPLANATION AND UNDERSTANDING

13.1 The Deductive-Nomological (DN) Model

13.1.1 The Flagpole and its Shadow

13.2 The Causal Model

13.3 The Unificationist Model

13.4 The Pragmatic Model

13.5 What about Realism?

13.6 Conclusion

Annotated Bibliography

14 FUNDAMENTAL THEORIES AND THE ORGANIZATION OF SCIENCE

14.1 The Layer Cake Model

14.2 Classical Reductionism

14.2.1 Challenges for Neuroscience: Thought

14.2.2 Challenges for Neuroscience: Pain

14.3 Functional Concepts

14.3.1 The Problem with Disjunctive Laws

14.4 The Functional Model

14.5 Emergence

14.5.1 The Ontological Condition

14.5.2 The Epistemic Condition

14.5.3 The Mystery Condition

14.6 Interdisciplinary Research

14.7 Conclusion

Note

Annotated Bibliography

15 SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS

15.1 Science and Technology

15.2 Goals of Science

15.3 Reduction in the Limit

15.4 How Theories Are Born

15.4.1 Theory Modification

15.4.2 Theory Replacement

15.5 What Kind of Progress?

15.5.1 Scientific Revolutions

15.5.2 Kuhn’s Cyclical Model

15.5.3 The Rationality of Revolutions

15.6 From Theories to Research Programmes

15.7 Methodological Anarchism

15.8 Incommensurability

15.8.1 New Worlds?

15.9 Structural Realism and Progress

15.10 Conclusion

Annotated Bibliography

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Series editor: Steven D. Hales

JEFFREY A. LOCKWOOD

.....

Thus, even if you are very creative in generating hypotheses, you might generate really awful ones and shouldn’t believe any one of those. This has prompted some to eschew the use of IBE altogether, especially insofar as it pertains to unobservables (things we can’t directly see or otherwise sense, such as electrons or magnetic forces). In short, IBE can provide some reason for accepting a claim (we use it in forensic sciences all the time, for example, when we try to find the person whose presence is the best explanation of all the clues, and infer that the person who best fits the clues is the perpetrator), but it certainly doesn’t guarantee our knowing the truth.

Finally, it is important to point out that IBE cannot be reduced to other forms of inductive inference. Inferring the presence of a stray cat in my attic as the best explanation of the noise I am hearing does not (need to) involve prior observations of stray cats in my attic and their behavior. Thus, this inference is different from a statistical inference, which, if you recall the example of koalas, does rely on observations of the feeding habits of a number of koalas to infer something about what other koalas will eat. Neither am I trying to establish any sort of regularity when I infer that a cat must have gotten into my attic. I am simply interested in explaining this particular and odd event by evaluating various hypotheses as to their plausibility in light of my background knowledge about cats, none of which I need to have oberved in an attic.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу This is Philosophy of Science
Подняться наверх