Who Is a Muslim?

Who Is a Muslim?
Автор книги: id книги: 2043313     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 3910,36 руб.     (42,65$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Историческая литература Правообладатель и/или издательство: Ingram Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9780823290147 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Who Is a Muslim? argues that modern Urdu literature, from its inception in colonial institutions such as Fort William College, Calcutta, to its dominant iterations in contemporary Pakistan—popular novels, short stories, television serials—is formed around a question that is and historically has been at the core of early modern and modern Western literatures. The question “Who is a Muslim?,” a constant concern within eighteenth-century literary and scholarly orientalist texts, the English oriental tale chief among them, takes on new and dangerous meanings once it travels to the North-Indian colony, and later to the newly formed Pakistan. A literary-historical study spanning some three centuries, this book argues that the idea of an Urdu canon, far from secular or progressive, has been shaped as the authority designate around the intertwined questions of piety, national identity, and citizenship.

Оглавление

Maryam Wasif Khan. Who Is a Muslim?

CONTENTS

NOTE ON TRANSLITERATION

Vowels

Consonant

Introduction

Orientalism and Secular Critique

Confronting the Literary Canon

The Postsecularist Politics of Populism

A History of Literary Populisms

1 / Mahometan/Muslim: The Chronotope of the Oriental Tale

Reframing the Mahometan: The Politics of the Oriental Tale

The Mahometan on the Move: Trade and Masquerade in the Oriental Tale

Dark Magic and Transmigration: The Indic Undoing of the Mahometan

2 / Hindustani/Urdu: The Oriental Tale in the Colony

William Jones and the Mahometan Chronotope: India Against Islam

John Gilchrist and the New Vernaculars of India

The Oriental Tale in Hindustani/Urdu: The Case of Mir Amman’s Bāġh-o Bahār

Against Hindustani: The Dāstān, the Qișșā, and Fort William College

Literature in Colony: Creating a Canon for Hindustani

“The Best and Cheapest Book in the Hindustani Language”: Bāġh-o Bahār, Textbook and Translation

3 / Nation/Qaum: The “Musalmans” of India

New Tales for Old: Nazir Ahmad’s Mirāt al-‘Arūs and the Invention of a Muslim Domesticity

The Repentant Mahometan: Taubat an-Nasūĥ and the Invention of a Modern Muslim Literature

Mothers for the Muslim Qaum: Altaf Hussain Hali’s Majālis un-Nisā, or the Assemblies of Women

Empires for the Qaum: Abdul Halim Sharar’s Invention of a Popular Muslim Past

4 / Martyr/Mujāhid: Muslim Origins and the Modern Urdu Novel

Rashid ul-Khairi, the “Painter of Sorrow”: Tragedy, Didacticism, and the Threat of Women’s Emancipation

Kingdom and Conquest: Nasim Hijazi, the Novel, and Muslim Origins in India

The (Nation-) State of Sin: Razia Butt and the Feminine Martyr

5 / Modern/Mecca: Populist Piety in the Contemporary Urdu Novel

Pious Poverty: Humsafar and the Religio-Class Politics of Post-9/11 Pakistan

Overcoming Jahiliyyā: Conversion in Umera Ahmad’s Shehr-e Zāt and Nimra Ahmad’s Jannat kē Patē

The Hypocrites: Minority in Umera Ahmad’s Pīr-e Kāmil and Bushra Rehman’s Pārsā

Epilogue: Us, People / People Like Us

1971: A History from the Peripheries

Zindā Bihār: Nationalisms of the Stateless

Zindā Bahār Lane: Other Stories, Other Histories

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

NOTES. Introduction / Who Is a Muslim?

1 / Mahometan/Muslim: The Chronotope of the Oriental Tale

2 / Hindustani/Urdu: The Oriental Tale in the Colony

3 / Nation/Qaum: The “Musalmans” of India

4 / Martyr/Mujāhid: Muslim Origins and the Modern Urdu Novel

5 / Modern/Mecca: Populist Piety in the Contemporary Urdu Novel

Epilogue / Us, People / People Like Us: Fehmida Riaz and a Secular Subjectivity in Urdu

INDEX

Отрывок из книги

WHO IS A MUSLIM?

for my Amma, Zeba Aziz; and my Abu, Wasif M. Khan, who love me in the bravest and best of ways.

.....

While Mahmood admits that the assumption of a pure religious reclamation is “easy to dismiss,” she asks her readers to refrain from casting doubt in a “context where the distinction between the subject’s own desires and socially prescribed performances cannot be easily presumed and where submission to certain forms of (external) authority is a condition for achieving the subject’s potentiality.”30 Mahmood’s defense of piety movements and attendant teachings, thus, is premised on the condition that the observer refrain from questioning the paradigms and social formations within which the subject exercises desire. By sequestering off the terms with which piety movements establish authority, Mahmood absolves herself of the task of both critique and historicization, but also seems to suggest that others also refrain from such intellectual exercises. Mufti has called this tendency “ethnographic philanthropy,” or the condition by which the “postcolonial liberal Western subject … closes off in advance any possibility of engagement and critical involvement in the postcolonial societies and communities in question.”31 Mahmood’s gesture, the closing off of critique, though clearly an example of this kind of philanthropic orientation, eludes the task of delving into the historical processes that have created these socio-ethical conditions.

My use of the term “religio-populist” to describe these evangelical novels, the socio-political influence they exercise, and the associated revivalist ideologies that they prescribe should not be read as a testimony of the secular humanist’s “commitment to the poetic resources of the Judeo-Christian tradition,” but rather as a means of comprehending the ultimate and most present iteration of the long orientalist literary project in North India.32 From different vantage points, Mufti and Abbas separately remind us that modern Islam, above all its Sunni rendition, with its legalistic-theological leanings, its totalizing tendencies, its claims of pure origin, and its condemnation of all other claimant forms of practice, Shi’ism included, is symptomatic not of “a return of religion, but of its historical transformations under the conditions of late, postcolonial capitalism.”33

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Who Is a Muslim?
Подняться наверх