Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience

Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience
Автор книги: id книги: 2190874     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 4009,43 руб.     (43,73$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Философия Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119530633 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

The second edition of the seminal work in the field—revised, updated, and extended  In  Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience,  M.R. Bennett and P.M.S. Hacker outline and address the conceptual confusions encountered in various neuroscientific and psychological theories. The result of a collaboration between an esteemed philosopher and a distinguished neuroscientist, this remarkable volume presents an interdisciplinary critique of many of the neuroscientific and psychological foundations of modern cognitive neuroscience. The authors point out conceptual entanglements in a broad range of major neuroscientific and psychological theories—including those of such neuroscientists as Blakemore, Crick, Damasio, Dehaene, Edelman, Gazzaniga, Kandel, Kosslyn, LeDoux, Libet, Penrose, Posner, Raichle and Tononi, as well as psychologists such as Baar, Frith, Glynn, Gregory, William James, Weiskrantz, and biologists such as Dawkins, Humphreys, and Young. Confusions arising from the work of philosophers such as Dennett, Chalmers, Churchland, Nagel and Searle are subjected to detailed criticism. These criticisms are complemented by constructive analyses of the major cognitive, cogitative, emotional and volitional attributes that lie at the heart of cognitive neuroscientific research.  Now in its second edition, this groundbreaking work has been exhaustively revised and updated to address current issues and critiques. New discussions offer insight into functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the notions of information and representation, conflict monitoring and the executive, minimal states of consciousness, integrated information theory and global workspace theory. The authors also reply to criticisms of the fundamental arguments posed in the first edition, defending their conclusions regarding mereological fallacy, the necessity of distinguishing between empirical and conceptual questions, the mind-body problem, and more. Essential as both a comprehensive reference work and as an up-to-date critical review of cognitive neuroscience, this landmark volume:  Provides a scientifically and philosophically informed survey of the conceptual problems in a wide variety of neuroscientific theories Offers a clear and accessible presentation of the subject, minimizing the use of complex philosophical and scientific jargon Discusses how the ways the brain relates to the mind affect the intelligibility of neuroscientific research Includes fresh insights on mind-body and mind-brain relations, and on the relation between the notion of person and human being Features more than 100 new pages and a wealth of additional diagrams, charts, and tables Continuing to challenge and educate readers like no other book on the subject, the second edition of  Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience  is required reading not only for neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers, but also for academics, researchers, and students involved in the study of the mind and consciousness.

Оглавление

P. M. S. Hacker. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNATIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE

Contents

List of Illustrations

List of Tables

List of Plates

Guide

Pages

Foreword to the Second Edition

Notes

Foreword to the First Edition

Notes

Acknowledgements to the Second Edition

Acknowledgements to the First Edition

Introduction to the First Edition

Introduction to the Second Edition

Part I Philosophical Problems in Neuroscience: Their Historical and Conceptual Roots. Preliminaries to Part I. 1 Philosophical Problems in Neuroscience: Their Historical Roots

Galen

Nemesius

Thomas Willis

Clinico-pathological correlations in the nineteenth century

Single neuron investigations and fMRI in the twentieth century:primacy of behaviour

Misascription of psychological attributes to parts of the cortex andto neurons

2 Philosophical Problems in Neuroscience: Their Conceptual Roots

Psychological attributes are attributes of the sentient creature as a whole

Notes

1 The Growth of Neuroscientific Knowledge: The Integrative Action of the Nervous System

1.1 Aristotle, Galen and Nemesius:The Origins of the Ventricular Doctrine

1.2 Fernel and Descartes:The Demise of the Ventricular Doctrine

1.3 The Cortical Doctrine of Willis and Its Aftermath

1.4 The Concept of a Reflex:Bell, Magendie and Marshall Hall

1.5 Localizing Function in the Cortex: Broca, Fritsch and Hitzig

1.6 The Integrative Action of the Nervous System: Sherrington

1.6.1 The dependence of psychological capacities on thefunctioning of cortex: localization determined non-invasivelyby Ogawa and Sokolof

1.6.2 Caveats concerning the use of fMRI to determine the areas of cortex involved in supporting psychological powers

Notes

2 The Cortex and the Mind in the Work of Sherrington and His Protégés. 2.1 Charles Sherrington: The Continuing Cartesian Impact

2.2 Edgar Adrian: Hesitant Cartesianism

2.3 John Eccles and the ‘Liaison Brain’

2.4 Wilder Penfield and the ‘Highest Brain Mechanism’

Notes

3 The Mereological Fallacy in Neuroscience. 3.1 Mereological Confusions in Cognitive Neuroscience

3.2 Challenging the Consensus: The Brain Is Not the Subject of Psychological Attributes

3.3 Qualms Concerning Ascription of a Mereological Fallacy to Neuroscience

3.4 Replies to Objections

Notes

4 An Overview of the Conceptual Field of Cognitive Neuroscience: Evidence, the Inner, Introspection, Privileged Access, Privacy and Subjectivity

4.1 On the Grounds for Ascribing Psychological Predicates to a Being

4.2 On the Grounds for Misascribing Psychological Predicates to an Inner Entity

4.3 The Inner

4.4 Introspection

4.5 Privileged Access: Direct and Indirect

4.6 Privacy or Subjectivity

4.7 The Meaning of Psychological Predicates: How They Are Explained and Learned

4.8 Of the Mind and Its Nature

Notes

Part II Human Faculties and Contemporary Neuroscience: An Analysis. Preliminaries to Part II. 1 Brain–Body Dualism

2 The Project

3 The Category of the Psychological

Notes

5 Sensation and Perception. 5.1 Sensation

5.2 Perception

5.2.1 Perception as the causation of sensations: primary and secondary qualities

5.2.2 Perception as hypothesis formation: Helmholtz

5.2.3 Visual images and the binding problem

5.2.4 Perception as information processing: Marr’s theory of vision

Notes

6 The Cognitive Powers

6.1 Knowledge and Its Kinship with Ability

6.1.1 Ability and know-how

6.1.2 Possessing knowledge and containing knowledge

6.2 Memory

6.2.1 Declarative and non-declarative memory

6.2.2 Storage, retention and memory traces

Notes

7 The Cogitative Powers

7.1 Belief

7.2 Thinking

7.3 Imagination and Mental Images

7.3.1 The logical features of mental imagery

Notes

8 Emotion. 8.1 Affections

8.2 The Emotions: A Preliminary Analytical Survey

8.2.1 Neuroscientists’ confusions

8.2.2 Analysis of the emotions

Notes

9 Volition and Voluntary Movement. 9.1 Volition

9.2 Libet’ s Theory of Voluntary Movement and Its Progeny

9.3 Refutations and Clarifications

9.4 Conflict-Monitoring and the Executive

List 9.1Varieties of ignorance in performance

9.5 Man and Machine: Doing Something Like an Automaton, Automatically, Mechanically, from Force of Habit

9.6 Taking Stock

Notes

10 Intransitive and Transitive Consciousness. 10.1 Consciousness and the Brain

10.2 Intransitive Consciousness and Awareness

10.2.1 Minimal states of consciousness or responsiveness

10.3 Transitive Consciousness and Its Forms

10.3.1 A partial analysis

Notes

11 Conscious Experience, Mental States and Qualia, Neural Correlates of Consciousness. 11.1 Extending the Concept of Consciousness

11.2 Conscious Experience and Conscious Mental States

11.2.1 Confusions regarding unconscious belief andunconscious activities of the brain

11.3 Qualia

11.3.1 ‘How it feels’ to have an experience

11.3.2 Of there being something which it is like …

11.3.3 The qualitative character of experience

11.3.4 Thises and thuses

11.3.5 Of the communicability and describability of qualia

Notes

12 Neural Correlates of Consciousness, Integrated Information Theory, Global Workspace Theory. 12.1 The Integrated Information Theory of Tononi

12.1.1 Axiomatizing Integrated Information Theory

12.1.2 The ambiguity of ‘information’

12.1.3 Unclarities about experience again

12.2 Global Workspace Theory

12.2.1 Analysis of Dehaene’ s example

12.2.2 On Dehaene’ s misconceptions of consciousness and information processing

12.3 On Finding One’ s Way through a Conceptual Jungle with Worthless Tools

12.4 What Is Necessary for Neural Correlation

12.5 Where to Find the Explanations

Notes

13 Puzzles about Consciousness. 13.1 A Budget of Puzzles

13.2 On Reconciling Consciousness or Subjectivity with Our Conception of an Objective Reality

13.3 On the Question of How Physical Processes Can Give Rise to Conscious Experience

13.4 Of the Evolutionary Value of Consciousness

13.5 The Problem of Awareness

13.6 Other Minds and Other Animals

Notes

14 Self-Consciousness and Selves, Thought and Language. 14.1 Self-Consciousness and the Self

14.2 Historical Stage Setting: Descartes, Locke, Hume and James

14.3 Current Scientific and Neuroscientific Reflections on the Nature of Self-Consciousness

14.4 The Illusion of a ‘Self’

14.5 The Horizon of Thought, Will and Affection

14.5.1 Thought and language

14.6 Self-Consciousness

Notes

15 Concepts, Thinking and Speaking. 15.1 Concepts and Concept Possession

15.1.1 Beginning again

15.2 Concept Possession as Mastery of the Use of an Expression

15.3 What Do We Think In?

Notes

16 Reductionism. 16.1 Ontological and Explanatory Reductionism

16.2 Reduction by Elimination

16.2.1 Are our ordinary psychological concepts theoretical?

16.2.2 Are everyday generalizations about human psychology laws of a theory?

16.2.3 Eliminating all that is human

16.2.4 Sawing off the branch on which one sits

Notes

17 Methodological Reflections

17.1 Linguistic Inertia and Conceptual Innovation

17.2 The ‘Poverty of English’ Argument

17.3 From Nonsense to Sense: The Proper Description of the Results of Commissurotomy

17.3.1 The case of blindsight: misdescription and illusory explanation

17.4 Philosophy and Neuroscience

17.4.1 What philosophy can and what it cannot do

17.4.2 What neuroscience can and what it cannot do

17.5 Why It Matters

Notes

Appendix 1 Daniel Dennett

1 Dennett’ s Methodology and Presuppositions

2 The Intentional Stance

3 Heterophenomenological Method

4 Consciousness

Notes

Appendix 2 John Searle

1 Philosophy and Science

2 Searle’ s Philosophy of Mind

3 Unified Field Theory

4 The Traditional Mind–Body Problem

Notes

Appendix 3 Further Replies to Critics

1 The Mereological Principle

2 Essentialism

3 A Priorism: Empirical Learning Theory or the Nature of Primitive Language-Games

4 Criteria and Constitutive Evidence

5 Foundationalism, Linguistic Conservatism, Conceptual Change, Connective Analysis, Tolerating Inconsistencies and Post-Modernism

Notes

Afterword to the Second Edition

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Reviews of Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience:

‘This remarkable book, the product of a collaboration between a philosopher and neuroscientist, shows that the claims made on behalf of cognitive science are ill-founded. The real significance of impressive recent developments in the study of the brain, they allege, has been clouded by philosophical confusion in the way in which these results have been presented. The authors document their complaint in a clear and patient manner. . . . They disentangle the confusions by setting out clearly the contrasting but complementary roles of philosophy and neuroscience in this area. The book will certainly arouse opposition. . . . But if it causes controversy, it is controversy that is long overdue. It is to be hoped that it will be widely read among those in many different disciplines who are interested in the brain and the mind.’ Sir Anthony Kenny, President of the British Academy (1989–1993)

.....

It is interesting to note the reason (or part of the reason) why Descartes concluded that the pineal gland is the locus of the sensus communis and of interaction between the body and the soul. It was because it is located between the two hemispheres of the brain and is not itself bifurcated. Consequently, he reasoned, it must be in the pineal gland that ‘the two images coming from a single object through the two eyes, or the two impressions coming from a single object through the double organs of any other sense [e.g. hands or ears] can come together in a single image or impression before reaching the soul, so that they do not present it with two objects instead of one.’53 These images or figures ‘which are traced in the spirits on the surface of the gland’ are ‘the forms of images which the rational soul united to this machine [i.e. the body] will consider directly when it imagines some object or perceives it by the senses’.54

It is noteworthy that Descartes warned that although the image generated on the pineal gland does bear some resemblance to its cause (immediately, the retinal excitation; mediately, the object perceived), the resultant sensory perception is not caused by the resemblance. For, as he observed, that would require ‘yet other eyes within our brain with which we could perceive it’.55 Rather, it is the movements composing the image on the pineal gland which, by acting directly on the soul, cause it to have the corresponding perception.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience
Подняться наверх