Transporters and Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug Toxicity

Transporters and Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug Toxicity
Автор книги: id книги: 2095348     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 20762 руб.     (206,22$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Медицина Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119170990 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

This book provides a comprehensive and up-to-date coverage of the relationship between drug metabolism enzymes and transporters on drug toxicity, along with methods to investigate their role on adverse drug reactions. Unites both the metabolism and transporter components of drug toxicity – two aspects not normally connected and the latter often neglected Familiarizes readers with the mechanism and species differences in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters Discusses promising approaches to accurately predict human drug toxicity via the incorporation of human drug metabolism in toxicity evaluation

Оглавление

Albert P. Li. Transporters and Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug Toxicity

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Illustrations

Guide

Pages

Transporters and Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug Toxicity

Preface

List of Contributors

1 Overview: Drug Metabolism, Transporter‐Mediated Uptake and Efflux, and Drug Toxicity

1.1 Drug Toxicity as a Challenge in Drug Development

1.2 Fate of an Orally Administered Drug

1.3 The Multiple Determinant Hypothesis for Idiosyncratic Drug Toxicity

1.4 Concluding Remarks

1.4.1 A Comprehensive Approach to Safety Evaluation in Drug Development

1.4.2 The Dose Makes the Poison – Paracelsus Updated

References

2 Transporter, Drug Metabolism, and Drug‐Induced Liver Injury in Marketed Drugs

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Hepatic Metabolism

2.2.1 Phase I Metabolism

2.2.2 Phase II Metabolism

2.3 Reactive Metabolite Formation and Assessment

2.3.1 Metabolism and Reactive Metabolites

2.3.2 Dose and Reactive Mtabolites

2.3.3 Structural Alerts for Avoiding Reactive Metabolites

2.3.4 Experimental Approaches for Assessing Reactive Metabolites

2.3.4.1 Covalent Binding Assay

2.3.4.2 Electrophile Trapping Experiments

2.3.4.3 Time Dependent Inactivation of CYP450 Enzymes

2.4 Hepatic Transporters

2.5 Genetic Variants and Their Impact for Pharmacokinetic Behavior and Safety

2.5.1 CYP3A4

2.5.2 CYP3A5

2.5.3 CYP2D6

2.5.4 CYP2C9

2.5.5 CYP2C19

2.5.6 CYP2B6

2.5.7 UGT1A1

2.5.8 NAT2

2.5.9 Hepatic Transporters

2.6 Summary

Acknowledgment

Disclaimer

References

3 Drug‐Metabolism Enzymes and Transporter Activities as Risk Factors of Selected Marketed Drugs Associated with Drug‐Induced Fatalities

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Acetaminophen

3.2.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.2.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.2.3 Risk Factors

3.3 Cerivastatin

3.3.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.3.2 Transporter and Toxicity

3.3.3 Risk Factors

3.4 Felbamate

3.4.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.4.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.4.3 Risk Factors

3.5 Flucloxacillin

3.5.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.5.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.5.3 Risk Factors

3.6 Nefazodone

3.6.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.6.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.6.3 Risk Factors

3.7 Obeticholic Acid

3.7.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.7.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.7.3 Risk Factors

3.8 Sitaxentan

3.8.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.8.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.8.3 Risk Factors

3.9 Sorivudine

3.9.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.9.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.9.3 Risk Factors

3.10 Tacrine

3.10.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.10.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.10.3 Risk Factors

3.11 Terfenadine

3.11.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.11.2 Transporter and Toxicity

3.11.3 Risk Factors

3.12 Troglitazone (Rezulin®)

3.12.1 Drug Metabolism and Toxicity

3.12.2 Transporter and Toxicity

3.12.3 Risk Factors

3.13 Trovafloxacin

3.13.1 Metabolism and Toxicity

3.13.2 Transporters and Toxicity

3.13.3 Risk Factors

3.14 Conclusions

References

4 Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Toxicity

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Drug‐Metabolism Enzymes Involved in Metabolic Activation and Detoxification

4.3 Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase (CYP)

4.3.1 CYP1A

4.3.1.1 Metabolic Activation

4.3.1.2 Drug Substrates

4.3.1.3 Inducers

4.3.1.4 Inhibitors

4.3.1.5 Individual Variations

4.3.1.6 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.2 CYP2A6

4.3.2.1 Substrates

4.3.2.2 Inducers

4.3.2.3 Inhibitors

4.3.2.4 Individual Variations

4.3.2.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.3 CYP2B6

4.3.3.1 Substrates

4.3.3.2 Inducers

4.3.3.3 Inhibitors

4.3.3.4 Individual Variations

4.3.3.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.4 CYP2C8

4.3.4.1 Substrates

4.3.4.2 Inducers

4.3.4.3 Inhibitors

4.3.4.4 Individual Variations

4.3.4.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.5 CYP2C9

4.3.5.1 Substrates

4.3.5.2 Inducers

4.3.5.3 Inhibitors

4.3.5.4 Individual Variations

4.3.5.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.6 CYP2C19

4.3.6.1 Substrates

4.3.6.2 Inducers

4.3.6.3 Inhibitors

4.3.6.4 Individual Variations

4.3.6.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.7 CYP2D6

4.3.7.1 Substrates

4.3.7.2 Inducers

4.3.7.3 Inhibitors

4.3.7.4 Individual Variations

4.3.7.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.8 CYP2E1

4.3.8.1 Substrates

4.3.8.2 Inducers

4.3.8.3 Inhibitors

4.3.8.4 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.9 CYP2J2

4.3.9.1 Substrates

4.3.9.2 Inhibitors

4.3.9.3 Inducers

4.3.9.4 Individual Variations

4.3.9.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.3.10 CYP3A

4.3.10.1 Substrates

4.3.10.2 Inducers

4.3.10.3 Inhibitors

4.3.10.4 Individual Variations

4.3.10.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4 Non‐P450 Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes. 4.4.1 Flavin‐Containing Monooxygenases (FMOs)

4.4.1.1 Substrates

4.4.1.2 Inducers

4.4.1.3 Inhibitors

4.4.1.4 Individual Variations

4.4.1.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.2 Monoamine Oxidase (MAO)

4.4.2.1 Substrates

4.4.2.2 Inducers

4.4.2.3 Inhibitors

4.4.2.4 Individual Variations

4.4.2.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.3 Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH) and Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH)

4.4.3.1 Substrates

4.4.3.2 Inducers

4.4.3.3 Inhibitors

4.4.3.4 Individual Variations

4.4.3.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.4 Aldehyde Oxidase (AOX)

4.4.4.1 Substrates

4.4.4.2 Inducers

4.4.4.3 Inhibitors

4.4.4.4 Individual Variations

4.4.4.5 Involvement in drug toxicity

4.4.5 Carboxylesterases (CESs)

4.4.5.1 Substrates

4.4.5.2 Inducers

4.4.5.3 Inhibitors

4.4.5.4 Individual Variations

4.4.5.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.6 N‐Acetyltransferase (NAT)

4.4.6.1 Substrates

4.4.6.2 Inducers

4.4.6.3 Inhibitors

4.4.6.4 Individual Variations

4.4.6.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.7 Glutathione Transferase (GST)

4.4.7.1 Substrates

4.4.7.2 Inducers

4.4.7.3 Inhibitors

4.4.7.4 Individual Variations

4.4.7.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.8 Methyltransferase (MT)

4.4.8.1 Substrates

4.4.8.2 Inhibitors

4.4.8.3 Individual Variations

4.4.8.4 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.9 Uridine Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)

4.4.9.1 Substrates

4.4.9.2 Inducers

4.4.9.3 Inhibitors

4.4.9.4 Individual Variations

4.4.9.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.4.10 Sulfotransferase (SULT)

4.4.10.1 Substrates

4.4.10.2 Inducers

4.4.10.3 Inhibitors

4.4.10.4 Individual Variations

4.4.10.5 Involvement in Drug Toxicity

4.5 Conclusions

References

5 Genetic Polymorphism of Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters in Drug Toxicity

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Drug‐Induced Liver Injury. 5.2.1 Background

5.2.2 Polymorphisms Affecting Drug Metabolism and DILI

5.2.2.1 Isoniazid

5.2.2.2 Diclofenac

5.2.2.3 Tolcapone

5.2.2.4 Ticlopidine

5.2.2.5 Efavirenz

5.2.2.6 Troglitazone

5.2.3 Polymorphisms Affecting Transporters and DILI

5.3 Drug‐Induced Skin Injury and Related Hypersensitivity Reactions

5.4 Statin‐Induced Myopathy. 5.4.1 Background

5.4.2 Cytochromes P450

5.4.3 Transporters

5.5 Conclusions

References

6 Acyl Glucuronidation and Acyl‐CoA Formation Mechanisms Mediating the Bioactivation and Potential Toxicity of Carboxylic Acid‐containing Drugs

6.1 Introduction

6.2 Phase II Metabolism. 6.2.1 Glucuronidation

6.2.2 Acyl‐CoA Thioester Formation

6.3 Chemical Stability of Phase II Metabolites. 6.3.1 Acyl Glucuronide Instability

6.3.2 Acyl‐CoA Thioester Stability

6.4 Phase II Metabolite Chemical Reactivity. 6.4.1 Acyl Glucuronide Reactivity with Nucleophiles In vitro

6.4.2 Acyl‐CoA Thioester Reactivity with Nucleophiles In vitro

6.5 Phase II Metabolite‐Mediated Covalent Binding. 6.5.1 Acyl Glucuronide‐Mediated Covalent Binding to Protein

6.5.2 Acyl‐CoA Thioester‐Mediated Covalent Binding to Protein

6.6 Phase II Metabolite Prediction of Covalent Binding. 6.6.1 Prediction of Covalent Binding to Protein by Acyl Glucuronides

6.6.2 Prediction of Covalent Binding to Protein by Acyl‐CoA Thioesters

6.7 Studies Directly Comparing Carboxylic Acid Drug Bioactivation by Acyl Glucuronidation and Acyl‐CoA Formation

6.8 Prediction of Drug‐Induced Liver Injury for Carboxylic Acid Drugs

6.9 Conclusions

References

7 Liquid Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry (LC‐MS) Quantification of Reactive Metabolites

7.1 Introduction

7.2 LC‐MS Methods Using GSH as a Trapping Reagent

7.2.1 LC‐MS Approaches at Positive Mode Using Constant Neutral Loss (CNL) Scan or Enhanced Product Ion (EPI) Scan

7.2.2 LC‐MS Approaches at Negative Mode Using Neutral Loss, Pre‐Ion Scan (PIS) and XoPI (Extraction of Product Ion)

7.2.3 LC‐MS Approaches Using Stable Isotopic‐GSH

7.2.4 LC‐MS Approaches Using Combined XoPI and Stable‐Isotopic GSH

7.2.5 LC‐MS Coupled with Software‐Assisted Approach

7.2.6 Using GSH Derivatives as Trapping Reagents for Detection and Quantitation

7.3 Using Other Trapping Reagents

7.4 Identification and Characterization of Rearranged GSH Adducts

7.5 Strategies for Optimization and Decision Tree

7.6 Summary

Acknowledgment

Abbreviations

References

8 Human‐Based In Vitro Experimental Approaches for the Evaluation of Metabolism‐Dependent Drug Toxicity

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Assays for Reactive Metabolites

8.2.1 Glutathione Trapping Assay

8.2.2 Covalent Binding Assay

8.3 Cell‐Based Assays for Metabolism‐Dependent Toxicity

8.4 Primary Human Hepatocyte Assays for Metabolism‐Dependent Drug Toxicity

8.4.1 In Vitro Screening Assays for Hepatotoxicity

8.4.2 Cytotoxic Metabolic Pathway Identification Assay (CMPIA)

8.4.3 Metabolic Comparative Cytotoxicity Assay (MCCA)

8.4.4 MetMax™ Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes (MMHH) Metabolic Activation Cytotoxicity Assay (MMACA)

8.5 Emerging Hepatocyte Technologies for the Evaluation of Drug Toxicity. 8.5.1 Human Hepatocytes ROS/ATP Assay for DILI Drugs

8.5.2 Long‐Term Hepatocyte Cultures. 8.5.2.1 999Elite™ Long‐Term Cultured Human Hepatocytes

8.5.2.2 Hepatocyte/Non‐Hepatocyte Cocultures

8.5.2.3 Human Hepatocyte Spheroids

8.5.2.4 Microfluidic 3‐Dimensional (3‐d) Hepatocyte Cultures

8.6 Integrated Discrete Multiple Organ Coculture (IdMOC®)

8.7 Conclusion

References

9 Mechanism‐Based Experimental Models for the Evaluation of BSEP Inhibition and DILI

9.1 Introduction. 9.1.1 Drug‐Induced Liver Injury

9.1.2 Bile Acid Homeostasis and Role of Bile Salt Export Pump

9.2 Membrane Vesicles to Study BSEP Inhibition

9.2.1 Membrane Vesicle Preparations

9.2.2 Membrane Vesicle Assays and Data Interpretation

9.3 Sandwich‐Cultured Hepatocytes to Study BSEP Inhibition. 9.3.1 B‐CLEAR® Assay

9.3.2 Uptake and Efflux Studies with Mechanistic Modeling

9.4 Other In Vitro Methods to Study BSEP Inhibition

9.5 Computational Methods Used to Predict BSEP Inhibition

9.6 In Vitro Models as a Predictor of Clinical DILI. 9.6.1 The C‐DILI™ Assay

9.7 Preclinical In Vivo Models for the Evaluation of BSEP Inhibition and DILI

9.8 In Vivo Clinical Biomarkers of BSEP Inhibition and DILI

9.8.1 Serum Bile Acids as Clinical Biomarkers

9.8.2 Clinical Biomarkers of DILI

9.9 Quantitative Systems Toxicology to Predict DILI

9.10 Conclusions

Funding Information

Conflict of Interest

Acknowledgments

References

10 Hepatic Bile Acid Transporters in Drug‐Induced Cholestasis

Abbreviations

10.1 Introduction

10.2 Bile Acid and DIC

10.2.1 Bile Acid

10.2.1.1 Bile Acid Synthesis

10.2.1.2 Bile Acid Transport

10.2.2 Cytotoxicity of Bile Acids and DIC

10.3 Hepatic Bile Acid Uptake Transporters in DIC

10.3.1 Sodium‐Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (NTCP)

10.3.1.1 Substrates of NTCP

10.3.1.2 Regulation of NTCP

10.3.1.3 NTCP and Cholestasis

10.3.2 Other Hepatic Bile Acid Uptake Transporters

10.4 Hepatic Bile Acid Efflux Transporters in DIC

10.4.1 Bile Salt Export Pump (BSEP)

10.4.1.1 Substrates of BSEP

10.4.1.2 Regulation of BSEP

10.4.1.3 Internalization of BSEP

10.4.1.4 BSEP and Cholestasis

10.4.2 Other Hepatic Bile Acid Efflux Transporters

10.4.2.1 MRP2

10.4.2.2 MRP3 and MRP4

10.5 Bidirectional Bile Acid Transporter OSTα/β

10.6 Summary

References

11 Role of Renal Transporters in Drug–Drug Interactions and Nephrotoxicity

11.1 Overview of Renal Transporters

11.1.1 Basolateral Transporters

11.1.2 Apical Transporters

11.2 Renal Transporters and Drug–Drug Interactions

11.2.1 Impact on the Pharmacokinetics of Drugs

11.2.2 Impact on the Drug PD

11.3 Renal Transporters and Nephrotoxicity

11.3.1 Nephrotoxicity Unrelated to Drug Transporters

11.3.2 Nephrotoxicity Related to Drug Transporters

11.4 Biomarkers and Nephrotoxicity. 11.4.1 Biomarkers for Detecting Glomerular Injury

11.4.2 Biomarkers for Drug‐Induced Injury to Proximal and Distal Tubules

11.5 Conclusion

References

12 Blood–Brain Barrier Transporters and Central Nervous System Drug Response and Toxicity

12.1 Over‐View of the Brain Barriers

12.1.1 Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB)

12.1.2 Blood–Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier (BCSFB)

12.1.3 CSF as Predictor of Drug Exposure in the Brain

12.1.4 Solute Carriers in the BBB

12.1.5 Drug Efflux Transporters in the BBB

12.2 General Influence of BBB Transporters on Drug Entry into the Brain

12.3 BBB‐Transporter Effects on CNS Drug Response

12.3.1 Influence of Efflux Transporters on Brain Disposition of Drugs. 12.3.1.1 Anticancer Agents

12.3.1.2 Opioids

12.3.2 SLCs and BBB Transport of Drugs

12.4 Transporter Considerations Influencing CNS Drug Response

12.4.1 Transporter Polymorphisms. 12.4.1.1 P‐gp Polymorphism

12.4.1.2 BCRP Polymorphism

12.4.1.3 SLC Polymorphism

12.4.2 Age‐Related Alterations in BBB Transporter Function and Drug Response

12.4.3 Disease‐Dependent Modulation of BBB Transporters and Drug Response. 12.4.3.1 Inflammation and Pain

12.4.3.2 Epilepsy

12.4.4 CNS Toxicity Caused by Drug Interactions at the BBB

12.5 Conclusions

References

13 Ototoxicity and Drug Transport in the Cochlea

13.1 Auditory System Anatomy

13.1.1 External, Middle, and Inner Ear

13.1.1.1 Anatomy of the Inner Ear

13.1.1.2 Hair Cell Anatomy

13.1.2 Blood–Labyrinth Barrier

13.2 Auditory System Physiology

13.3 Hearing Loss, Ototoxic Drugs, and Hair Cell Damage

13.3.1 Aminoglycosides

13.3.2 Platinum Chemotherapeutics

13.3.3 Salicylate

13.4 Drug Metabolism in the Ear. 13.4.1 The Importance of Drug Metabolism in the Ear

13.4.2 Studies of Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes in Ototoxicity

13.4.3 Drug Transporters in the Ear

13.5 Conclusion

References

14 Application of a PBPK Model Incorporating the Interplay Between Transporters and Drug‐Metabolizing Enzymes for the Precise Prediction of Drug Toxicity

14.1 Importance of the Consideration of Intracellular Concentration of Drugs in the Tissue for Estimation of Pharmacological/Toxicological Effects of Drugs

14.2 Extended Clearance Concept as a Tool to Explain Theoretically Transporter and Drug‐Metabolizing Enzyme Interplay

14.3 Theoretical Consideration of the Intracellular Concentration of Drugs in the Tissue

14.4 The Benefits of Using a PBPK Model for the Accurate Prediction of Pharmacological/Toxicological Effects of Drugs

14.5 VCT to Simulate the Distribution of Clinical Outcomes in a Specific Population with Defined Mean and Variability of Parameters in a PBPK Model

14.5.1 VCT of Docetaxel to Estimate the Effects on the Risk of Neutropenia of Genetic Polymorphisms in OATP1B3 and MRP2

14.5.2 VCT of Oseltamivir and Its Active Metabolite (Ro 64‐0802) to Estimate the Effects on Their Brain Exposure of Genetic Polymorphisms in Multiple Uptake/Efflux Transporters

14.5.3 VCT of Irinotecan and Its Metabolites to Estimate the Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms in Multiple Uptake/Efflux Transporters on Irinotecan‐Induced Side Effects (Neutropenia, Diarrhea)

14.6 Conclusions and Future Perspectives

References

15 The Extended Clearance Model : A Valuable Tool For Drug‐Induced Liver Injury Risk Prediction

15.1 Introduction

15.2 Application of the ECM to Estimate Kpuu Liver

15.2.1 Introduction to the ECM: Concepts and Application for the Prediction of Hepatic Clearance and Drug–Drug Interactions

15.2.2 Concept of Kpuu Liver

15.2.3 Estimation of Kpuu Liver from In Vitro Data Using the ECM

15.3 Relevant Concentrations for the DILI Risk Assessment

15.3.1 Maximum Plasma Concentrations

15.3.2 Maximum Hepatic Inlet Concentrations

15.3.3 Maximum Intracellular Hepatocyte Concentrations

15.4 Assessing the DIC Risk Using ECM‐Based Unbound Intrahepatic Concentrations and Accounting for BSEP Inhibition as a Single Mechanism

15.5 Assessing the DILI Risk Using the “1/R‐Value Model” to Account for the Inhibition of Multiple Pathways

15.5.1 ECM‐Based 1/R‐Value Model

15.5.2 1/R vs Safety Margin Relationship

15.6 Discussion and Outlook

References

Index

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

k

l

m

n

o

p

q

r

s

t

u

v

w

x

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Edited by Albert P. Li

.....

Following in vitro incubations, various analytical approaches such as LC‐MS, fluorescence or radiochemical detection could be used to analyze the trapped adducts and/or conjugates of RMs. Mass spectrometric methods are the most common approach. Taking advantage of specific fragmentation behavior of the peptide moiety of nucleophilic trapping reagents, stable trapping adducts, and/or conjugates of electrophilic RMs can be detected and characterized. For example, the neutral loss of 129 Da is commonly used by positive ion electrospray‐tandem mass spectrometry to provide a generic endpoint for GSH trapping and measurement. Without using the radiolabeled drugs, this protocol can provide semi‐quantitative estimates of adduct formation for RMs.

Occasionally the formed RMs (electrophiles) are so highly reactive that they cannot flow out from the active site of the P450 enzymes that catalyzed their formation. Electrophilic intermediates derived from drug molecules are so reactive that they can covalently bind directly to an active site amino acid residue in the CYP enzyme itself. Covalent modification in the active site of a P450 enzyme may lead to the loss of enzyme activity over time via the modification of the P450 apoprotein. Therefore, time dependent inactivation (TDI) of CYP450 enzymes and other drug‐metabolizing enzymes also indicates the generation of RMs during the drug metabolism process. Additionally, drug–drug interactions could be caused by this irreversible P450 inhibition. Covalent modification of P450 enzymes can also result in a neoantigen formation and trigger an autoimmune response in DILI.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Transporters and Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug Toxicity
Подняться наверх