Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
List of Prior Works by the Author
Non-Fiction:
Fiction:
Inspiration:
Introduction
Dramatis Personae (Characters)
Part A. Dr. Barbara Good & Husband Judge Kenneth Good; Dr. Nora Phillips
1. A Stupid Court Case
2 “Disgusted With My Court Powers.”The Case Of Dr. Nora Phillips, Targeted By O.P.C
3. Meet Dr. Phillips.A Medico-Legal Case Of Hers
4. More Costly Medical Decisions Of Dr. Phillips
5. Plans To Leave The StateAn Injunction To Stop O.P.C.’s Invasion Of Her Office
6. The Case Of Dr. Anthony Lennox
7
Part B. A TRAGEDY
8. Ramifications Of A Wrong Conviction
9. The Real Loss!
……………….
10. Back to Nora, her Records and OPC
11. HIPAA And Other Invented Hustles
12. Another Complaint To OPC Against Dr. Phillips
13. More Walking A Tight Medico-Legal Rope(This one on Erb’s Palsy)
14. Good Bye, New Work!(New Work or New York?)
Part C. A Scatter Of Souls. Relocations
15. Courtroom PoliticsAnd Other Legal Mumbo-Jumbo
……………
16. A Relocation And Possibilities Discussed
17. Ayes! A Vacation South Of The Border
18. We Don’t Want To Stay Here Either!
19. At More Than 10 Hours Away
20. And Next, Judge Kenneth Good
21. Downgraded From Judge To Public Defender
22. More Workings of Judge Good
Part D. CAN THE PHOENIX TAKE OFF?
23. A Mini-Convention Of Judges (And A Few Docs)
24. The Case Against Dr. ‘Montrose-A’
25. Less Power for Judges?
26. The Cases Against Dr. Phillips & Dr. Montrose-B
27. Mephistopheles And Faust
28. Courtroom Biases
29. Can Those Sacked Be Reinstated?
30. Comfortable Court Decisions and More Stuff Left FromDr. Lennox
……………………
Part E. YES, LET THE PHOENIX FLY!
31. Another Convention In Mexico
32 “Universal Professionals,” Eleven in Trouble?… Eleven Strong!
================================
33. Yes, Let The Phoenix Fly!
34. And what happened to the ‘mystery trunk’ of Dr. Lennox?
(All published with various pen names.
It does not include his scientific articles in the 1980s & 90s, Or his dozen industrial US Patents)
.....
A dead silence followed at that point in judge Good’s courtroom. They still had time for the closing arguments that Tuesday in late afternoon.
Their closing words did not bring to the judge’s or to the jurors’ ears anything new that they hadn’t heard already; the point of the triviality ‘of the hit’ in the insurance company’s opinion appeared clear; and so did seem equally clear the plaintiff’s complaints-with-medical-things-plus-experts-support. The judge called the day.
.....