Critique of Rights

Critique of Rights
Автор книги: id книги: 1887632     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 2529,1 руб.     (27,56$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Афоризмы и цитаты Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781509520428 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Modern political revolutions since the 18th century have swept away traditional systems of domination by declaring that ‘all men are created equal’. This declaration of equal rights is a fundamental political act – it is the political act in which the political community creates itself in relation to traditional systems of domination. But because it was generally assumed that the subject of these rights is the individual human being, the political community was subordinated to the individual. Marx discerned, rightly, that this was the paradox at the heart of the declaration of the rights of man. But while Marx was right to highlight this paradox, his proposed solution does not provide us with a sound basis for overcoming it. <br /><br />In this major new work, Christoph Menke adopts a different approach: he argues that we can address and overcome this paradox only by embarking on a fundamental inquiry into the nature of rights. Rights are a specific configuration of normativity: to have a right is to have a justified and binding claim. But with the equal rights declared by modern revolutions, rights assumed a particular form: the normative claim to equality was combined with an assumption about the factual conditions of social life. In this conception, society is the realm of private individuals pursuing their interests, and private interests are therefore seen as the natural basis for politics – what Menke calls ‘the naturalization of the social’. By laying bare this conception which lies at the basis of political literalism and modern law, Menke is able to criticize and move beyond it, opening up a new way of understanding rights that no longer involves the disempowering of the political community. <br /><br />This radical critique of rights and of modern law is a major contribution to critical theory and legal theory and it will be of great interest to students and scholars in social and political theory, philosophy and law.

Оглавление

Christoph Menke. Critique of Rights

CONTENTS

Figures

Guide

Pages

Critique of Rights

MARX’S PUZZLE

Notes

Part I History: The Legalization of the Natural

Notes

1 A PHILOSOPHICAL HISTORY OF RIGHT’S FORM

The Reversal of Primacy

A New Form of Government: “Modern Roman Law”

Excursus: The Politics and History of Civil Law (Weinrib)

From Athens to London

Notes

2 INTEREST IN SELF-PRESERVATION

From Share to Power. 1 Athens

2 Rome

3 London

Excursus: Ockham’s Defense of Poverty (Villey)

Right to the Extra-Juridical

Excursus: Rights and Interests (Raz)

Notes

3 INNER CHOICE

From Paideia to Sovereignty

1 Athens

2 Rome

3 London

Permitting Freedom

Excursus: Legal Choice (Kant)

Notes

4 ANTAGONISM OF PERFORMANCE

Excursus: The “Formal” and the “Material” Side (Ihering)

Notes

Part II Ontology: The Materialism of Form

Notes

5 LEGALITY’S GAP

Excursus: The Rule of Law (Neumann)

Distinction and Self-Reference

Gap, Violence, Exception

Self-Reflection

Excursus: Sovereignty or Play (Agamben)

Excursus: Reflection and Ritual. When is Modernity? (Douglas, Turner)

Notes

6 MATERIALIZATION

The Naturalization of the World

The Materialism of Form

Excursus: The Justice of Self-Reflection (Teubner)

The Basis of Rights

Excursus: The Biopolitical Context (Agamben)

Notes

7 THE CRITIQUE OF RIGHTS

Notes

Part III Critique: The Authorization of One’s Own

Notes

8 AUTHORIZATION

The Political Character of Private Rights

Excursus: The Political Presupposition of Private Law (Savigny)

The Ability to Exercise Discretion

Notes

9 SELF-WILL

Excursus: The “Given” – Juridical Empiricism (Kelsen, Schmitt)

Property Before Property

Capacity

Notes

10 THE PRIVATIZATION OF THE PUBLIC: TWO EXAMPLES

Claiming One’s Own

Excursus: Taking Legal Action as the “Result” of the Legal Claim (Windscheid)

The Declaration of Basic Rights

Excursus: Freedom of Opinion, for Example (Spinoza, Habermas)

The Government of Subjects

Notes

11 CONCLUSION: THE BOURGEOIS SUBJECT – LOSS OF NEGATIVITY

Excursus: The Pathology of Rights: Critique of Liberalism (Dworkin)

Foucault’s Diagnosis: The Regression of the Juridical

Notes

12 SUBJECTIVE RIGHTS AND SOCIAL DOMINATION: AN OUTLINE

Private Law and Capitalism

Excursus: Realization of Freedom as “Increase of Coercion” (Weber)

Social Law and Normalization

Bourgeois Domination: A Tableau

The Struggle for Law: Critique in Bourgeois Law

Notes

Part IV Revolution: The Dialectic of Judgment

Notes

13 THE APORIA OF THE BOURGEOIS CONSTITUTION

Constitutional Crisis

Social Constitutionalization: A Different Politics

Excursus: Proceduralization (Wiethölter)

Notes

14 SLAVE REVOLT: CRITIQUE AND AFFIRMATION

Without Rights: True Democracy

The Right to Passivity

Excursus: Causal and Legal Relation (Kant)

The New Man

Excursus: The Fact of Pluralism (Lefort and Gauchet, Rawls)

Notes

15 A NEW RIGHT

The Dialectic of Judgment

Counter-rights

Excursus: Politics and Police – The Possibility of the New (Badiou, Rancière)

The Justice of Splitting

Notes

LAW AND VIOLENCE

Notes

INDEX. A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

R

S

T

U

V

W

POLITY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Christoph Menke

Translated by Christopher Turner

.....

a) A has the droit [Tr. – the right] to act as he does; his action and the effect of this action constitute his subjective right, and he himself is the subject of this droit, [and] therefore a subject of droit in general (or a juridical person, either physical or moral).38

Rights only exist in juridical relationships, and juridical relationships only exist under laws [Gesetzen]: thus Kelsen’s twofold move here – similar to Wittgensteinian linguistic therapy – traces rights back to their logical or grammatical place in our juridical discourse. The revolutionary claim of a liberalism founded on natural law, which on Strauss’ interpretation is supposed to be expressed by the distinction of “right” and “law,”39 is that rights are the basis of law [Recht] or statute [Gesetz], and this claim is therefore rejected by Kelsen as ungrammatical and meaningless. To put Kelsen’s thesis into sharper contrast: rights can never be the basis of law, since they are only normatively binding, and thus obligatory, on the basis of law.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Critique of Rights
Подняться наверх