Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Devon Brickhouse-Bryson. Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation
Отрывок из книги
Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation
Devon Brickhouse-Bryson
.....
3 There are some debates over the exact nature of the epistemic value of theories. See, for example, Cartwright and McMullin (1984) and Slater (2008). And it is, of course, possible that there is more than one epistemic value that we use to evaluate theories. There is also the classic realist/antirealist dispute about how to understand the truth value of scientific theories. I mean the central claim here—that theories are principally evaluated according to epistemic goods—to be ecumenical with respect to these debates. I will continue to use “truth” as a stand-in for the core epistemic value of theories, but keep in mind that I mean this to be neutral with respect to debates over nature of the epistemic value of theories.
4 The arguments developed in this paragraph against the libertarian, radical egalitarian, and utilitarian theories of justice are, of course, the rudest sketches of arguments. It’s not my purpose here to seriously argue for one theory of justice over any other, we’re merely working through these sketched arguments to illustrate how the methods of theory evaluation we’ve considered work and how they can be deployed alongside one another in an attempt to get to a final answer as to which of the competitor theories is true. Rawls of course goes into much more detail in arguing for his theory. Indeed, he uses a more sophisticated method of theory evaluation—reflective equilibrium—to advance his preferred theory.
.....