Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation

Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation
Автор книги: id книги: 1624900     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 9555,17 руб.     (93,15$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Математика Правообладатель и/или издательство: Ingram Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781498597180 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

In Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation , Devon Brickhouse-Bryson argues that judgments of beauty are a justified part of theory evaluation of all sorts, including both scientific theory evaluation and philosophical theory evaluation. He supports this argument with an account of beauty—inherited from Kant and Mothersill—on which the distinctive nature of judgments of beauty is that they are unprincipled, yet possible. Brickhouse-Bryson analyzes two important methods of theory evaluation—reflective equilibrium and simplicity—and argues that these methods require making judgments of beauty understood. He further argues that these methods of theory evaluation are not anomalies, but that they point to a deeper lesson about the nature of theorizing and the necessity of using judgments of beauty to evaluate systems, like theories. This book has implications for the debate in philosophy of science over judgments of beauty and also prompts a reckoning in philosophy itself over the use of judgments of beauty in philosophical theory evaluation.

Оглавление

Devon Brickhouse-Bryson. Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation

Отрывок из книги

Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation

Devon Brickhouse-Bryson

.....

3 There are some debates over the exact nature of the epistemic value of theories. See, for example, Cartwright and McMullin (1984) and Slater (2008). And it is, of course, possible that there is more than one epistemic value that we use to evaluate theories. There is also the classic realist/antirealist dispute about how to understand the truth value of scientific theories. I mean the central claim here—that theories are principally evaluated according to epistemic goods—to be ecumenical with respect to these debates. I will continue to use “truth” as a stand-in for the core epistemic value of theories, but keep in mind that I mean this to be neutral with respect to debates over nature of the epistemic value of theories.

4 The arguments developed in this paragraph against the libertarian, radical egalitarian, and utilitarian theories of justice are, of course, the rudest sketches of arguments. It’s not my purpose here to seriously argue for one theory of justice over any other, we’re merely working through these sketched arguments to illustrate how the methods of theory evaluation we’ve considered work and how they can be deployed alongside one another in an attempt to get to a final answer as to which of the competitor theories is true. Rawls of course goes into much more detail in arguing for his theory. Indeed, he uses a more sophisticated method of theory evaluation—reflective equilibrium—to advance his preferred theory.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Judgments of Beauty in Theory Evaluation
Подняться наверх