Evidence for the Bible
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Elgin L Hushbeck Jr.. Evidence for the Bible
Evidence for the Bible. Consider Christianity Series, Volume 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Preface to the 2nd Edition
How To Read This Book
INTRODUCTION
HOW DID WE GET THE BIBLE?
The Text of the Old Testament
The Text of the New Testament
The Canon of the Old Testament
The Canon of the New Testament
The Gospel of Thomas
Conclusion
THE BIBLE AND MODERN CRITICISM
The Documentary Hypothesis
Support for Mosaic Authorship
The New Testament
Historical Criticism
Literary Criticism
On Shaky Ground
Conclusion
THE BIBLE AND ARCHAEOLOGY
Proof or Support?
A Question of Dates
Archaeology and the Patriarchs
Potential Problems
Archaeology and the New Testament
Conclusion
SCIENCE VS RELIGION?
Galileo
Science vs. the Bible?
Starlight, Starbright
Science Without Religion?
Only a Matter of Time?
Conclusion
SCIENCE AND THE BIBLE
Creation
The Big Bang
A Question of Time
The Heat of the Moment
In the Beginning. .
A Matter of Time
Evolution
Hide and Seek
By The Numbers
Conclusion
IS THE BIBLE RELIABLE?
Alleged Contradictions
Tests for Authenticity
Conclusion
THE WORD OF GOD. OR THE. SPECULATIONS OF MEN?
Test Everything
Korazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum
Israel
The Ministry of Christ
Conclusion
ENDNOTES. Introduction
Chapter 1 - How Did We Get The Bible
Chapter 2 - The Bible And Modern Criticism
Chapter 3 - The Bible And Archaeology
Chapter 4 - Science Vs Religion?
Chapter 5 - Science And The Bible
Chapter 6 - Is The Bible Reliable?
Chapter 7 - The Word of God Or The Speculation Of Men?
FOOTNOTES. Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Отрывок из книги
Elgin Hushbeck, Jr.
Revised and Expanded
.....
Still some point to the lack of the originals and the gap, however small, between the originals and the earliest manuscripts as evidence of unreliability. It is claimed that without the originals, we really can never be sure the text was not changed. The problem with such claims is that we do not have just a single line of manuscripts but many parallel lines, each confirming the others.
Figure 1.1 shows an example of this. From a single original, many copies were made and distributed. From the first generation copies, second, third and forth generation manuscripts were made. For this example, say that many years later, only three manuscripts remain (mss #1, #2, & #3), all fourth generation copies. Does this mean we cannot be sure of the text before the fourth generation? Not at all. By comparing these manuscripts, we can determine how accurately the text was copied.
.....