The London Transport Bombings of July 2005

The London Transport Bombings of July 2005
Автор книги: id книги: 2312070     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 1067,51 руб.     (10,41$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Документальная литература Правообладатель и/или издательство: Bookwire Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9783748520474 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Powerful explosions rocked three underground trains in London in the morning of July 7, 2005. Another explosion occurred shortly later on a double-decker bus at Tavistock Square. Fifty-two people reportedly died in the explosions and over 700 were wounded. Numerous individuals lost limbs in the explosions. The deadly operation manifested careful planning and coordination. Four young British Muslims were named as the suicide-bombers.
While the official account on the events of September 11, 2001 became etched in stone within 24 hours and remained unchanged ever since, the official account on the London bombings (hereafter 7/7) settled only after numerous modifications.
In this book, the official account on the London Transport bombings will be examined in great detail. How was that account established? How reliable was the evidence adduced by the authorities? Was that account coherent? How were the suspects identified? Who gained by this mass-murder?
This book demonstrates that the British authorities (a) did not demonstrate zeal in investigating events of 7/7; (b) did not produce conclusive evidence that the four accused died in the bombings and intended to kill themselves or others; (c) failed to prove that the explosions of 7/7 were caused by home-made explosives; (d) failed to carry out autopsies on the bodies of the alleged bombers and on victims; (e) failed to explain why so many security cameras did not work precisely on the morning of 7/7; (f) failed to explain the difficulties in counting the dead; (g) failed to explain why their timeline on the alleged bombers' movements was initially wrong; (h) failed to investigate the extraordinary coincidence between Peter Power's terror exercise and the actual events; (i) failed to explain what happened at Canary Wharf on the morning of 7/7.
Justice has not been rendered. The victims continue to be deprived of the truth on the events. The book attempts to remedy this failure.

Оглавление

Elias Davidsson. The London Transport Bombings of July 2005

Introduction

Part I: The Forensics

Mohammed Sidique Khan

Shehzad Tanweer

Germaine Lindsay

Hasib Hussain

8. Conclusions to Part I

Part II: Motive

11. Whose interests did the 7/7 bombings serve?

12. Did the accused possess a violent or criminal disposition?

Mohammed Sidique Khan

1. Family members

2. Friends

3. Colleagues

Shehzad Tanweer

Germaine Lindsay

Hasib Hussain

14.1 Mohammad Sidique Khan’s “martyr video”

14.1.1 Fakery

14.1.2 Was Khan working for British intelligence?

14.2 Alleged trips to Pakistan

14.3 When did the alleged bombers board the train at Luton?

14.3 Extraordinary coincidences (a) The Panorama program of the BBC

(b) The transatlantic Exercise Atlantic Blue

(c) Physicians’ emergency meeting scheduled for 7/7

(d) A film regarding the London Tube

(e) Finishing to set up a mortuary on July 6, 2005

(f) Exercise of terror bombs in the Underground conducted on the morning of 7/7

14.4 The crisis at Canary Wharf

The Disappearance of the alleged bombers

Отрывок из книги

Elias Davidsson

British media began immediately to promote unsubstantiated, unverified and unverifiable allegations regarding their alleged radicalisation, relying almost entirely on unidentified security sources. A typical example of such coverage was “Britain’s Enemy Within” by Scotland on Sunday of July 17, 2005. Apart from attributing the crime unreservedly to these four young Muslims who have not been found guilty by any judicial authority, the authors cited “some friends”, unidentified “Pakistani intelligence officials” or “US investigators” as sources for their allegations and used repeatedly phrases such as “X is believed to” or “Y is understood to” to establish their narrative. Throughout their piece they attempted to make the point that ordinary, nice, friendly young British Muslims are capable of concealing within their hearts murderous intentions and a willingness to carry out these intentions against random citizens that might include Muslims.

.....

I divide my conclusions into three categories: indicative, tentative and definite conclusions. By an indicative conclusion I refer to a reasonable suspicion that requires further research. By a tentative conclusion I mean one based on the preponderance of the evidence. Such a conclusion is usually sufficient for adopting policies but is insufficient for convicting a defendant. By a definite conclusion, I mean one that appears to be unassailable. It may be compared to “proof beyond reasonable doubt”, the highest standard of evidence in criminal law.

I consider the following conclusions of the present study as definite:

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу The London Transport Bombings of July 2005
Подняться наверх