Оглавление
Graham Richards. University Intellectual Property
Publishing details
About the Contributors
Preface
1. Introduction
2. The Confused Situation
Personal story
The first modern spin-out and IP Group
Patents
Copyright
Trade marks
Consultancy
Summary
3. Bayh-Dole-Thatcher
The Bayh-Dole Act
The Thatcher initiative
A current perspective
The National Academy of Sciences view
The Manchester Manifesto
The importance of balance
4. Academic Rogues
The Owen Case
A huge potential loss
The court case
The UK Patent Act
5. A Judge’s View
Endnotes
6. The Viewpoint of a Patent Attorney
Protecting art or Intellectual Property
Applying research to the real world
Attacking the patent system
The role of a patent attorney
What makes a good commercial patent?
Professor Ward and lithium polymer batteries
Maximising the commercial value of a patent
John Bissler and improved haemofiltration
Bundling patents
Strong patent drafting
The almost impossible task of a university technology transfer manager
Measuring success in the technology transfer sector
Putting a value on the IP
Patents versus know-how
Organon BV
Final thoughts
7. Technology Transfer Office: The Next Step
1. Dealing with the unusual collaboration
2. Handling complaints from industrial collaborators
The Multitasking Academic and the Pontius Pilate of the TTO
Lessons from this case study
The Invisible Data
Improving contracts
Dispute resolution
3. Providing entrepreneurial training
Conclusion
8. Waking a Sleeping Giant: Commercialising University Research
Knowledge transfer – not technology transfer
The third way of research commercialisation
The role of universities in the knowledge economy
The business model of a university
Knowledge transfer as social interaction
Developing a knowledge transfer system: creating leverage for cooperation and clusters
The mediating function of intellectual property rights
Case studies
Sources of funding. MIT, Berkeley, Oxford and Chalmers focus on research funding from: business and NGOs; funding for spin offs and revenues from consulting; and royalties and licences
Knowledge commercialisation strategies. All case study universities leverage many channels to commercialise university research
Realising value from knowledge. University research commercialisation initiatives
Conclusion
Successful research financing is multifaceted
Recommendations [29]
Provide incentive structures for knowledge transfer
Promote boundary spanning
Develop IP awareness raising programmes
Guarantee a high level of institutional support
Be creative in identifying new funding opportunities
Endnotes
9. Academic Research and Commercialisation
Background
Technology transfer and societal gain
The debate
Managing risk
Finance
Economics of societal gain
Conflicting terms, conflicting interests
The Lambert Review
Table 9.1 – summary of Lambert model research agreements [16]
Material transfer agreements
Conflicts of interest
Patent reform
Recommended reading
Endnotes
10. University Patenting and the Advancement of Knowledge
An introduction to the Manchester Manifesto
Expectations and realities
Table 10.1 – summary of the figures from the HEFCE study of KTT activities for 2009-10
Role of universities
Academic freedom
Problems and recommendations
Adjustments and alternatives
AUTM Global Health Initiative and Toolkit
UAEM Global Access Licensing Framework
Easy Access IP
BioBricks
Structural Genomics Consortium
Cambia/BiOS/Patentlens
Conclusions
References
Endnotes
11. Some Final Thoughts