Mineral Resource Economy 2

Mineral Resource Economy 2
Автор книги: id книги: 2211837     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 16824,4 руб.     (180,34$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Физика Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119882114 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

The challenges associated with the environmental impact of renewable energies are formidable and multiple. The exploitation of diffuse forms of energy will require us to reshape our lifestyles and infrastructures. Reducing their environmental impact is imperative and requires the mobilization of all available levers of action.<br /><br />Beyond the analysis of these challenges, this book presents an overview of the levers of action that should allow us to meet them, by crossing the fields of the human sciences, geosciences and engineering. The levers of action examined are both technical (through the substitution or use of low technology) and economic and social (through the development of recycling or decoupling). The book also addresses the question of their effectiveness and their overall impact.

Оглавление

Группа авторов. Mineral Resource Economy 2

Table of Contents

List of Figures

List of Table

Guide

Pages

Mineral Resources Economics 2. Issues and Action Levers

Introduction

I.1. The stakes: between legal rules, interdependence of nations and interests of local populations

I.2. The leverage for action: what can be expected and what remains to be explored

I.3. References

1. Toward a New Geopolitics of Raw Materials in the Energy Transition

1.1. Introduction

1.2. Measuring the criticality of raw materials and geopolitical risk. 1.2.1. Criticality, strategic materials and risks

1.2.2. The absence of a homogeneous theoretical framework

1.2.3. Criticality matrices

1.3. Geopolitics and geo-economics of raw materials of the energy transition

1.3.1. From measuring pressures on reserves to taking geopolitics into account in measuring criticality

1.3.2. Fear of cartelization or monopoly in commodity markets

1.3.2.1. Fear of cartelization in the lithium market?

1.3.2.2. A duopoly on the cobalt market?

1.3.2.3. China and the copper market: dependence or domination?

1.3.2.4. The issue of strategic dependence: the case of rare earth metals

1.4. How can we manage strategic materials supply risk?

1.4.1. The role of public policies

1.4.2. The issue of strategic stocks

1.4.3. Foreign investment through national companies

1.4.4. The logic of the Chinese barter

1.5. Conclusion: toward a new resource nationalism?

1.6. References

2. Legal Issues Regarding the Sustainable Management of Territorial and Extraterritorial Mineral Resources

2.1. National law regarding territorial mineral resources: the decisive issue of ownership

2.1.1. Ownership over mineral resources at the core of mineral law

2.1.1.1. The clarity of Chinese law: state ownership over mineral resources

2.1.1.2. The subtlety of French law: state administered mineral resources

2.1.1.3. The difficulty of U.S. law: a multiplicity of owners of property rights over mineral resources

2.1.2. A form of mineral ownership that may limit the government’s capacity to regulate the extractive sector for environmental reasons

2.1.2.1. Chinese law: toward a criminalization of environmental pollution

2.1.2.2. European law: the exclusive competence of the Member States over the conditions of exploitation of their energy resources

2.1.2.3. U.S. law: congressional jurisdiction in environmental matters limited for private- and state-owned lands

2.2. International law regarding territorial mineral resources: the central role of state sovereignty

2.2.1. The principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources for the benefit of international trade

2.2.1.1. A theoretically absolute principle

2.2.1.2. A principle limited in practice by the protection granted to foreign investments

2.2.2. A principle challenged by indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories and resources

2.3. International law regarding extraterritorial mineral resources: exploitation “for the benefit of mankind as a whole”

2.3.1. The legal status of the seabed and the subsoil, determined by states’ interests in the exploitation of mineral resources

2.3.1.1. The appropriation by coastal states of the mineral resources of the territorial sea, the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone

2.3.1.2. The so-called humanistic appropriation of the mineral resources of the international seabed area for the benefit of the economic development of states

2.3.2. The legal framework for the exploitation of Antarctic mineral resources, determined by ecological considerations

2.4. For a sustainable management of mineral resources

2.5. References

3. Mining and Societies

3.1. Introduction

3.2. Mines as a factor of settlement and landscape transformation. 3.2.1. Mining and the population

3.2.2. Mines, landscapes and the environment in pre-industrial times

3.3. Mining in the Industrial Age. 3.3.1. The transformations of the industrial energy system

3.3.2. Birth and development of coalfields

3.3.3. Conquest and development of new metal deposits

3.4. Contemporary mining transformations and challenges. 3.4.1. Geographic trends in mining

3.4.2. Decline and changes in former mining regions

3.4.3. Extraction boom and risks in new mining regions

3.4.4. The limits of “responsible” mining

3.5. Conclusion

3.6. References

4. Maintaining or Even Developing the Mining of Mineral Resources in Europe: The Case of Wallonia (Belgium)

4.1. Introduction

4.2. Geological resources in Wallonia

4.2.1. Extraction of mineral materials other than metals

4.2.2. Metal extraction: a problem on several spatiotemporal scales

4.3. Extension of sites/quantity of mining?

4.3.1. Exploit existing and well-characterized metal resources/reserves

4.3.2. Promoting a short circuit

4.3.3. Promoting alternatives to the sometimes deplorable extraction conditions in some regions of the world

4.3.4. Stimulating the local economy/employment

4.3.5. (Re)discovering a degree of supply independence for the industry

4.3.6. Creating the “substitution threat”: knowing that local potential exists

4.4. Decrease in sites/quantity of operations

4.4.1. Lack of local skills (being addressed)

4.4.2. NIMBY syndrome

4.4.2.1. Polluting, noisy and smelly extraction

4.4.2.2. The destruction of flora and fauna

4.4.2.3. The creation of an additional mode of transportation of goods

4.4.2.4. Alteration of the landscape during operation

4.4.2.5. Limiting the development of other assignments

4.4.2.6. The creation of landfills after operation

4.4.2.7. The enrichment of mining companies

4.4.2.8. Unacceptable social/societal conditions

4.4.2.9. Economic and geopolitical stress

4.4.2.10. Complex scientific jargon in a little-taught field

4.5. Some levers for action

4.5.1. Responsible extraction

4.5.2. Popularizing

4.5.3. Strengthening the administration and defining a clear public strategy

4.5.4. Consulting

4.5.5. Collaborating (private–public)

4.6. Conclusion

4.7. References

5. Substitution: Promises, Principles and Main Constraints

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Main economic foundations of substitution

5.2.1. The demand curve

5.2.2. The horizons of substitution: short, medium and long term

5.2.3. The shortcomings of the classical demand curve

5.3. Elements, components, systems: what are we really substituting?

5.3.1. Altenpohl hierarchy and principal forms of technical substitution

5.3.2. Normative substitution: what to substitute for?

5.4. The main obstacles to substitution

5.4.1. Technical obstacles

5.4.2. Economic obstacles

5.4.3. Barriers related to the physical availability of the resource

5.4.4. Cultural and historical barriers

5.4.5. Regulatory barriers

5.5. Other aspects to be taken into account

5.5.1. Impact of competition and industrial strategies

5.5.2. Is economic substitution also an ecological substitution?

5.6. References

6. Resource Consumption and Decoupling

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Global use of resources

6.3. Material consumption indicators

6.4. Decoupling the economy from resource consumption. 6.4.1. Evidence of decoupling

6.4.2. Saturation of resource use

6.5. Responsibility for resource consumption

6.6. Conclusion

6.7. References

7. The Economics of Recycling: Ambitions, Myths and Constraints

7.1. The recycling economy, an ancient history

7.2. Geological and urban mines, similarities and differences in logic

7.3. Understand the definitions and indicators of recycling in order to express its performance

7.4. A limited deposit because we can only recycle what we have consumed

7.5. Multiple factors influencing recycling and its effectiveness

7.6. The technical constraints of metal recycling

7.6.1. Preparation of materials

7.6.2. Recycling of base metals

7.6.3. Recycling of specialty metals

7.7. Environmental benefits of recycling

7.8. Conclusion

7.9. References

8. Low-tech: A Path Toward the Necessary Metallic Sobriety?

8.1. Cornucopians versus doomsdayers

8.2. The circular economy, mission impossible?

8.2.1. Invisible dematerialization

8.2.2. The systemic issue between energy and resources

8.2.3. The constraints of recycling

8.3. Toward a metallic frugality

8.3.1. Sobriety above all

8.3.2. “Advanced” eco-design

8.3.3. Moderate mechanization

8.4. A possible and desirable transition. 8.4.1. The role of the public authority, at all scales

8.4.2. Finding the right scale

8.4.3. Humans, the key to “repairability” and optimal recycling

8.4.4. Positive impacts

8.4.5. A “happy” transition or nothing

8.5. References

Conclusion

C.1. The challenge of access to primary resources

C.2. The challenge of circularity and recycling

C.3. The challenge of reducing our material footprint: decoupling or degrowth?

C.4. References

List of Authors

Index

A, B

C

D

E

F

G

H, I

J, K, L

M

N, O, P

R

S

T

V, W, Z

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Energy, Field Directors – Alain Dollet, Pascal Brault

.....

In a more macroeconomic perspective, Thierry Lefèvre (Chapter 6) develops in his contribution the questions related to the possibility of decoupling GDP and natural resources. This question of decoupling is complex and today mobilizes a large number of researchers, particularly within the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) International Resource Panel (IRP). The question of decoupling obviously refers to the tool of material efficiency, which aims to create more with less. By increasing the material productivity of our activities, we could gain in both ways: by continuing to increase GDP, while reducing our consumption of resources and the impacts left in its wake. This postulate of dematerializing the economy is an old one, notably through the concept of ephemeralization evoked by Philippe Bihouix (2019) in his latest book. We also come across it under the terms of decoupling, delinking or via the material Kuznets curve. But here again, the practical application shows poor results. Most of the time, decoupling is well below the scale effect of population and GDP per capita growth. On this point, the researcher’s contribution somewhat dashes our expectations by showing that the material footprint of most industrialized countries has grown over time.

Similarly, other studies conducted worldwide (Krausmann et al. 2017) also temper our expectations regardless of the raw materials studied. Thus, there seems to be no exception: economic growth always outweighs material productivity. Would it be enough to increase the speed of dematerialization in order to compensate for the increase in activity? Here again, the facts contradict this idea, particularly through the example of the increase in silicon productivity in the IT sector between 1970 and 2010, which, although without precedent (a factor of 10 million), has been associated with an increase in silicon consumption of a factor of 60 over the same period! Another study on sector productivity comes to the same conclusion (Dahmus 2014): sectors that have come closer (or have reached) absolute decoupling are not characterized by a high level of material productivity but rather by a low increase in their activity (scale effect). We should therefore once again either review our objectives or look at other leverage.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Mineral Resource Economy 2
Подняться наверх