The Craft of Innovative Theology
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Группа авторов. The Craft of Innovative Theology
The Craft of Innovative Theology
Contents
Guide
Pages
The Acknowledgments. From the Editors
From John Knight
From Ian Markham
Contributors
1 Introduction
Approaching the Book
Research Levels
For the Student: Basics of Writing for Publication
Every Good Piece of Writing is an Answer to a Question
Every Good Piece of Writing Has a Beginning, a Middle, and an End. A Beginning: The Introduction
B Middle: The Argument
C End: The Conclusion
Process
Read, Read, Read!
Decide on a Journal
Formulate a Good Question
Outline
Write
Revise
Proofread
Submit!
Revise and Resubmit!
Celebrate!
In Conclusion
Notes
1 Knowing God through Religious Pluralism
RESEARCH LEVEL 2. Editors’ Introduction
Radical Fallibilism: The Principle of Humility
Radical Flexibility: The Principle of Indeterminism
Radical Openness and Poesis: The Principles of Contingency and Attraction
Radical Risk: The Principle of Irony
Objections and Responses
Notes
2 Is It Possible for the Eternal Word to Be Made Manifest in a Person with Down’s Syndrome?
RESEARCH LEVEL 1. Editors’ Introduction
Christology, Intelligence, and Omniscience
Divine Wisdom
Incarnation and a Person with Down’s Syndrome
Incarnation and Jesus
Conclusion
Notes
3 Racial Stigma and Southern Baptist Public Discourse in the Twentieth Century
RESEARCH LEVEL 1. Editors’ Introduction
The Use of Biblical Teachings in Arguments about Slavery. Biblical Teachings on Christian Charity and the Golden Rule
Proslavery Arguments Concerning Christian Charity and the Golden Rule
Southern Baptists and Racial Stigma in the Jim Crow Era
Southern Baptists and Racial Stigma after the 1954 Brown Decision
The SBC’s Change of Heart: The 1995 Apology
Stigma: A Reciprocal Process
Conclusion
Postscript
Notes
4 The Plugged-in Church Is it Appropriate to Baptize Artificial Intelligence?
RESEARCH LEVEL 1. Editors’ Introduction
Mind and Body: The Debate
The History and Possibility of AI
Theological Implications
Anticipating the Future
Notes
5 Humanity Where on Earth Have We Come From and Where Are We Going To?
RESEARCH LEVEL 1. Editors’ Introduction
The Unique Status of Humanity
Ecological and Evolutionary Challenges to Human Uniqueness
Insights from Evolutionary Anthropology
Re-thinking Imago Dei
Concluding Remarks
Notes
6 What Challenges Does the Theory of Biological Evolution Pose to Christian Theology?
RESEARCH LEVEL 3. Editors’ Introduction
Notes
7 Sin and the Faces of Responsibility1 (see Box 7.1)
RESEARCH LEVEL 4
Editors’ Introduction
Introduction
Attempts to Resolve the Tension: Reconsidering Claims 1 and 3
Attempts to Resolve the Tension: Rejecting or Revising Claim 2
Responsibility Revisionism: Taking Stock and Further Implications
Conclusions
Works Cited
Notes
8 A Good Story Human–Animal Friendship and Meat Eating
RESEARCH LEVEL 2. Editors’ Introduction
A Good Story?
The Detour: Distancing Ourselves from Animals
Hachikō, the Famously Loyal Dog
Learning from Hachikō
Summary
The Biblical Story
Biblical Veganism?
Biblical Agriculture
Biblical Law
Summary
Domestication
Domestication and Meat
Evolution and Veganism
Summary
Is Domestication Slavery
Conclusion
Notes
9 Just Business It’s Not What You Think
RESEARCH LEVEL 2. Editors’ Introduction
Introduction
The Case of COVID-19
Just Business in Scripture and Tradition, Reason and Experience. Scripture
Tradition
Reason
Experience
What, Then, Is Just Business?
Notes
10 Relentless Love and the Afterlife
RESEARCH LEVEL 2. Editors’ Introduction
Extraordinary Reasons for Belief in the Afterlife
The Old Testament and Life after Death
The New Testament and Life after Death
The Logic of Love
Afterlife as Heaven or Hell
Universalism?
Annihilation?
Relentless Love
The Guarantees of Relentless Love
Notes
11 Hell Retributivism, Escapism, and Universal Reconciliation
RESEARCH LEVEL 3. Editors’ Introduction
Introduction
The Problem of Hell
Vagueness
Proportionality
Diminished Capacities
Morally Culpable Procreation
Religious Practice
Job Objection
Clarifying the Proportionality Objection to Retributivism and the Issuantist Alternative
A Skeletal Case for Escapism
Salvific Universalism: Dare We Hope?
Conclusion
Works Cited
Notes
12 Christ Will Come Again
RESEARCH LEVEL 2. Editors’ Introduction
Introduction
The Final Unity of All Things in Christ
The Prophetic Imagery of the Bible
The Vision of the Cosmic Christ
Works Cited
Notes
13 Theological Language and Method in Liberal Theology Schubert Ogden’s Response to the Falsification Controversy
RESEARCH LEVEL 4. Editors’ Introduction
Meaning, Reference, and the Falsification Controversy
Wisdom’s Parable and the Descriptivist Argument that Statements about God are Meaningless
Schubert Ogden on the Task and Method of Theology
Schubert Ogden’s Response to the Falsification Challenge
Concluding Remarks
Notes
14 Does Culture Determine Belief? The Relationship between the Social Sciences and Theology
RESEARCH LEVEL 3. Editors’ Introduction
Grounding Doctrine and Belief
Ecclesial Culture
Theology and Culture
Conclusion
Notes
15 Theological Reference and Theological Creativity in Judaism
RESEARCH LEVEL 4. Editors’ Introduction
Introduction: Theological Creativity and the Peculiar Contours of Jewish Theology
Theological Reference and Rabbinic Theology
The Restriction of Theological Reference in Modern and Contemporary Jewish Thought
Theories of Reference as a Source for Jewish Theological Creativity
Conclusion
Notes
16 Marshall’s Slingshot Truth Theory, Realism, and Liberal Theological Method
RESEARCH LEVEL 4. Editors’ Introduction
Introduction
Marshall, Postliberal Theology, and Correspondence
The Slingshot Argument
Marshall’s Use of the Slingshot Argument
Problems with Marshall’s Slingshot
Concluding Remarks
Works Cited
Notes
Glossary
Index
WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
Отрывок из книги
Argument and Process
Edited by John Allan Knight and Ian S. Markham
.....
Kierkegaard considered the basic facts of a religious life to be absurd. Christians are supposed to believe in an eternal, simple, infinite, transcendent God who simultaneously became incarnate as a temporal, composite, finite, human being. There are two possible responses to this paradox: to have faith or to take offense. What we cannot do, according to Kierkegaard, is to believe by virtue of reason. If one chooses reason, the absurdity of the choice causes offense and dismissal. If one chooses faith, one must suspend reason in order to believe in something which is higher than reason. Belief then can only be had by virtue of the absurd.25
What this means is that one must decide to believe, as an act of will, in something one knows to be unreasonable, illogical, preposterous, inappropriate, and incongruous: that is, the absurd. To do this one is required to regularly and constantly renew one’s commitment to God, repeating the decision to believe and form one’s life according to the teachings of Jesus. The act of belief is a continual, repeated, decision to follow Christ. Repetition is the substance of faith, for Kierkegaard, and the only way to become one’s true self. But in the face of absurdity these decisions cease to be decisions at all, for deciding in itself requires the existence of decidables, that is, options which express sensible propositions. The absurdity of the options amounts to either believing in something which is paradoxical, or taking offense at an irrelevant paradox. The former is clearly nonsensical, the latter utterly foolish. In either case these are not “live options,” as William James puts it.26 Absurdity evacuates the decision of its weight; it ceases to be a decision at all. The only way out of this conundrum is to embrace, as a knight of faith, irony.
.....