Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs

Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs
Автор книги: id книги: 1887898     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 13620 руб.     (158,84$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Юриспруденция, право Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119382010 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Fully revised new edition that completely covers intellectual property law—and many related issues—for engineers, scientists, and entrepreneurs This book informs engineering and science students, technology professionals, and entrepreneurs about the intellectual property laws that are important in their careers. It covers all of the major areas of intellectual property development and protection in non-legalistic terms that are understandable to technology and science professionals. New material includes a comprehensive discussion on the American Invents Act (AIA), coverage of many new high-profile topics, such as patent protection the mobile communications industry, and a new chapter on «The Future of Technology, Engineering, and Intellectual Property.» Now in its second edition, Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs enables inventors and creators to efficiently interface with an intellectual property attorney in order to obtain the maximum protection for their invention or creation, and to take steps to ensure that that invention or creation does not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. It includes patent, trade secret, mask work, and cybersquatting legal and procedural principles. The book also shows readers how to properly use new vehicles of intellectual property protection for novel software, biotech, and business method inventions. Additionally, it examines trademark protection for domain names, and other ancillary matters that fall within the genre of intellectual property protection. This informative text: Covers all of the major areas of intellectual property development and protection in clear, layman’s terms so as to be easily understood by technology and science professionals Provides detailed outlines of patent, trademark, copyright, and unfair competition laws Offers essays on famous and noteworthy inventors and their inventions—and features a copy of the first page of patents resulting from these inventors’ efforts Covers many new high-profile cases covering patent protection within the mobile communications industry  Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs, Second Edition is an excellent text for graduate and undergraduate engineering students, as well as professionals and those starting a new technology business who need to know all the laws concerning their inventions and creations.

Оглавление

Howard B. Rockman. Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

Guide

Pages

Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs

Foreword

Foreword to the First Edition

Preface. THE PROPER PERSPECTIVE—A FABLE

OVERTURE

Acknowledgments

Top Ten List of Intellectual Property Protection

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Eli Whitney. THE COTTON GIN

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Charles Babbage. THE DIFFERENCE ENGINE

1 Overview of Intellectual Property Law. 1.1 DEFINING “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”

1.2 SPECIFIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VEHICLES. 1.2.1 Patents

1.2.2 Trademarks and Service Marks

1.2.3 Copyrights

1.2.4 Trade Secrets

1.2.5 Mask Works for Semiconductors

1.3 WHICH FORM OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION TO USE?

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Frank J. Sprague. THE ELECTRIC STREETCAR

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Mary Anderson. WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADE

2 Brief Overview of the Law. 2.1 INTRODUCTION

2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES

2.3 DIVINE LAWS

2.4 THE FOUR TYPES OF LAW. 2.4.1 Constitutional Law

2.4.2 Statutory Law

2.4.3 Common Law

2.4.4 Business Custom

2.5 CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS

2.6 ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS

2.7 CHANGES IN THE LAW

2.8 EQUITY

2.9 U.S. COURTS, STATE AND FEDERAL

2.10 THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM. 2.10.1 The Supreme Court

2.10.2 Courts of Appeals

2.10.3 District Courts

2.11 STATE COURTS

2.12 JURISDICTION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Charles Goodyear. VULCANIZATION OF RUBBER

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. John Boyd Dunlop. PNEUMATIC VEHICLE TIRES

3. Introduction to Patents. 3.1 BRIEF HISTORY OF PATENT PROTECTION. 3.1.1 Early European Patent Custom

3.1.2 The British Patent System

3.1.3 The U.S. Constitution and the Development of the Present U.S. Patent Examination System. 3.1.3.1 Origin and Early Development of Patent Law in the United States

3.1.3.2 Initial U.S. Patent Laws

3.1.3.3 Inventions, Not Discoveries

3.1.3.4 Importance of Disclosure of the Invention

3.1.3.5 Present Patent Law, Rules, and Guides

3.2 TYPES OF PATENT COVERAGE. 3.2.1 What Is a Patent?

3.2.2 Article or Apparatus Patents

3.2.3 Method or Process Patents

3.2.4 Design Patents

3.2.5 Plant Patents

3.2.6 New Technologies

3.3 HOW TO DETERMINE WHAT TO PATENT AND WHAT NOT TO PATENT. 3.3.1 Broadly, What Can and Cannot Be Patented Under the Law

3.3.2 From a Business Standpoint, What Should Be Patented

3.4 BROADLY, WHAT DATA GOES INTO A PATENT. 3.4.1 Describing the Background and Essential Elements of the Invention

3.4.2 Claiming the Invention

3.5 WHAT A PATENT IS NOT

3.6 INVENTIONS RELATING TO ATOMIC WEAPONS

3.7 THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO PRACTICE YOUR PATENTED INVENTION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. George Westinghouse. STEAM‐POWER BRAKE DEVICES AND ALTERNATING CURRENT

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Gideon Sundback. ZIPPER

4 Introductory Comments on Patentable Subject Matter and Utility. 4.1 WHAT CONSTITUTES PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER? 4.1.1 Categories of Patentable Subject Matter

4.1.2 The Invention Must Be Useful and Work for Its Intended Purpose

4.1.3 The Invention Must Be Novel Compared to the Prior Art

4.1.4 The Invention Must Be Non‐Obvious as Compared to the Prior Art

4.1.5 The True Inventors Must Be Named

4.1.6 Brief Commentary on Notable Recent Developments Attempting to Determine Patentable Subject Matter

4.2 UTILITY — THE INVENTION MUST BE USEFUL

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. John Deere. HORSE‐DRAWN PLOW

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Erastus Brigham Bigelow. POWERED CARPET‐MAKING LOOMS

5 Novelty—The Invention Must Be New. 5.1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 Time Limits for Filing a Patent Application

5.1.2 Prior Art Activities of the Inventor and Others That Can Defeat Patent Rights

5.1.3 Prior Publications, U.S. and Foreign, as Prior Art

5.2 PRELIMINARY COMMENTS ON PROTECTING FOREIGN PATENT RIGHTS

5.3 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON EXPERIMENTAL USE VERSUS ACTUAL USE OF THE INVENTION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Alfred Nobel. DYNAMITE

6 Requirement of Non‐Obviousness for Patentability. 6.1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE STANDARD OF NON‐OBVIOUSNESS

6.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

6.3 SUPREME COURT CASES PREDATING THE 1952 PATENT LAW SECTION 103 NON‐OBVIOUSNESS TEST

6.3.1 Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, Supreme Court, 1850

6.3.2 Atlantic Works v. Brady, Supreme Court, 1882

6.3.3 Goodyear Rubber and Tire Company v. Ray‐O‐Vac Company, Supreme Court, 1944

6.3.4 Cuno Engineering Corporation v. Automatic Devices Corporation, Supreme Court, 1941

6.3.5 The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company v. Supermarket Equipment Corporation, Supreme Court, 1950

6.4 THE 1952 PATENT STATUTE AND THE CASE OF GRAHAM V. JOHN DEERE COMPANY (1966)

6.5 THE 2007 U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE OF KSR V. TELEFLEX

6.6 ILLUSTRATIVE NON‐OBVIOUSNESS ANALYSIS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Louis Pasteur. PASTEURIZATION PROCESS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Elisha Otis. SAFETY ELEVATOR

7 The Patenting Process. 7.1 WHO MAY OBTAIN A PATENT: INVENTORSHIP AND OWNERSHIP OF PATENT RIGHTS

7.2 PROPER DOCUMENTATION OF THE INVENTION

7.2.1 Conception

7.2.2 Reduction to Practice

7.2.3 Witnesses

7.3 THE INVENTION DISCLOSURE, AND THE INVENTION DISCLOSURE MEETING. 7.3.1 Preparation of a Complete Description of the Structure and Function of the Invention, How the Invention Operates, and What Advantageous Results Are Obtained by the Invention

7.3.2 Disclosing the Best Mode of the Invention

7.3.3 Dates of First Public Disclosure, If Any, and What Was Disclosed

7.3.4 Advantages of the Invention Over Known Devices/Processes

7.3.5 What Prior Art the Inventor is Aware of for Disclosure to the Patent Examiner

7.4 ADDITIONAL MATTERS DISCUSSED DURING THE INVENTION DISCLOSURE MEETING BETWEEN THE INVENTOR AND THE PATENT PROFESSIONAL. 7.4.1 Confidentiality of the Meeting

7.4.2 Does the Invention Qualify for Patent Protection

7.4.3 Preliminary Novelty Inquiry

7.4.4 Determining the Date of Invention

7.4.5 Will the Invention Work as Claimed by the Inventor?

7.4.6 A Brief Comment Regarding Foreign Patent Rights

7.4.7 What the Prior Art Lacks

7.4.8 Inventor’s Initial Concept of Novel Features

7.4.9 Non‐Obviousness

7.4.10 Enablement

7.4.11 The Best Mode Requirement

7.5 INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Alexander Graham Bell. TELEPHONE

8 The Patentability Search, Freedom‐To‐Use Search, and Other Searches

8.1 SEARCHING THE CONTENT OF THE PRIOR ART TO DETERMINE PATENTABILITY OF THE INVENTION

8.2 PATENTABILTY SEARCH PARAMETERS

8.3 ADDITIONAL TYPES OF SEARCHES

8.3.1 The Freedom‐to‐Use Search

8.3.2 State‐of‐the‐Art Search

8.3.3 Right‐to‐Use Search

8.4 DATABASE SEARCHES

8.5 U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE PATENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Thomas Alva Edison. THE LIGHT BULB

9 The Patent Application. 9.1 INTRODUCTION

9.2 REGISTRATION SYSTEM EVOLVING INTO AN EXAMINATION SYSTEM

9.3 GOAL OF A PROPERLY PREPARED PATENT APPLICATION

9.4 PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATIONS

9.5 REGULAR, NON‐PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION; NO NEW MATTER

9.6 CONTENT OF A REGULAR NON‐PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION

9.6.1 Title of the Invention

9.6.2 Cross‐Reference to Other Applications

9.6.3 Background of the Invention. 9.6.3.1 Definition of the Field of the Invention

9.6.3.2 Brief Description of the Problems That Exist in the Prior Art That the Invention is Directed Toward Solving

9.6.3.3 The Results, Objectives‚ and Advantages of the Invention Not Achieved by the Prior Art

9.6.4 Brief Summary of the Important Elements of the Invention

9.6.5 Brief Description of the Drawings That Illustrate the Invention

9.6.6 Detailed Description of the Illustrated Embodiment of the Invention

9.6.7 Claims Distinctly and Precisely Pointing Out the Definition of the Invention

9.6.8 The Abstract

9.7 YOUR REVIEW OF THE PATENT APPLICATION

9.8 EXECUTION OF THE DECLARATION, POWER OF ATTORNEY, AND ASSIGNMENT UPON COMPLETION OF THE PATENT APPLICATION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. George Eastman. PRACTICAL PHOTOGRAPHY

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Emile Berliner. DISC SOUND RECORDING

10 Claims of a Patent Application. 10.1 INTRODUCTION TO PATENT CLAIMS

10.2 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PATENT CLAIMS

10.2.1 Court Decisions

10.2.2 1836 Patent Law

10.3 WHAT CLAIMS ARE

10.4 YOUR REVIEW OF THE CLAIMS OF YOUR PATENT APPLICATION

10.5 DISTINGUISHING DIFFERENT TYPES OF CLAIMS

10.6 MORE ON METHOD OR PROCESS CLAIMS

10.7 COMPOSITION OF MATTER CLAIMS

10.8 DESIGN PATENT CLAIM

10.9 DEPENDENT CLAIMS

10.10 HOW TO READ AND UNDERSTAND PATENT CLAIMS DRAFTED BY YOUR PATENT ATTORNEY

10.10.1 Preamble

10.10.2 Transition Phrase

10.10.3 The Body of the Claim. 10.10.3.1 Elements

10.10.3.2 Functional Relationship of the Elements

10.10.3.3 Results Should Not Be Included in the Body of a Claim

10.10.3.4 The Two Dependent Claims of the Example

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Ottmar Mergenthaler. THE LINOTYPE® HOT‐TYPE COMPOSING MACHINE

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Theodore Maiman and Gordon Gould. LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION (LASER)

11 Examination and Prosecution of a Patent Application. 11.1 U.S. PATENT EXAMINATION PROCESS

11.2 THE PATENT EXAMINATION SYSTEM—A LITTLE MORE HISTORY

11.3 FILING THE PATENT APPLICATION WITH THE USPTO

11.4 EXAMINATION OF THE PATENT APPLICATION

11.5 RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION—THE “OFFICE ACTION”

11.6 YOU AND YOUR ATTORNEY’S RESPONSE TO THE OFFICE ACTION

11.7 FURTHER PATENT PROSECUTION

11.8 GRANTING THE PATENT

11.9 INFRINGEMENT DURING EXAMINATION OF THE PATENT APPLICATION

11.10 ADDITIONAL PROBABLE PATENT PROSECUTION EVENTS. 11.10.1 Continuation Patent Applications and the Request for Continuing Examination

11.10.2 Continuation‐in‐Part Patent Applications

11.10.3 Divisional Patent Applications

11.11 RE‐EXAMINATION OF AN ISSUED PATENT BY THE APPLICANT, THE INFRINGER, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

11.12 RE‐ISSUE PATENTS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Nicolaus Otto. THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Rudolf Diesel. THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE

12 Design Patents. 12.1 COVERAGE OF DESIGN PATENTS

12.2 THE DESIGN PATENT APPLICATION

12.3 INFRINGEMENT OF A DESIGN PATENT

12.4 IMPORTANCE OF DESIGN PATENTS

12.5 EXAMPLES OF DESIGN PATENTS

12.6 DESIGN PATENTS ON COMPUTER SCREEN ICONS

12.7 DESIGN PATENTS CONTRASTED WITH COPYRIGHTS

12.8 DAMAGES FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

12.9 THE HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL DEPOSIT OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (THE HAGUE SYSTEM)

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Nikola Tesla. AC INDUCTION MOTOR AND RADIO

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Clarence Birdseye. FROZEN FOOD

13. Protection of Computer‐Related Inventions. 13.1 INTRODUCTION

13.2 THE TORTUROUS PATH THROUGH THE COURTS

13.2.1 Gottschalk v. Benson, 1972

13.2.2 Parker v. Flook, 1978

13.2.3 Diamond v. Diehr, 1981

13.2.4 Arrhythmia v. Corazonix, 1992

13.2.5 In re: Alappat, 1994

13.2.6 The 1996 USPTO Guidelines

13.2.7 The 1998 State Street Case

13.2.8 The “Mathematical Algorithm” Exception Analysis of State Street

13.3 RECENT COURT DECISIONS AND USPTO GUIDELINES ATTEMPTING TO DEFINE PATENT‐ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER REGARDING COMPUTER‐RELATED INVENTIONS. 13.3.1 Bilski v. Kappos

13.3.2 Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank

13.3.3 CAFC Decisions Subsequent to Alice v. CLS Bank

13.3.4 Additional Exemplary Comments Regarding Patent‐Eligible Subject Matter and Computer‐Related Inventions

13.4 THE USPTO EXAMINATION PROCESS TO DETERMINE SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY OF A COMPUTER‐RELATED INVENTION

13.5 RECOMMENDED STEPS TO OBTAIN PROPER PROTECTION OF COMPUTER‐RELATED INVENTIONS

13.5.1 How to Prepare a Proper Patent Application Covering a Computer‐Related Invention. 13.5.1.1 Specification

13.5.1.1.1 Adequate Written Description

13.5.1.1.2 Enabling Disclosure

13.5.1.2 Claims

13.5.1.3 Determination of Whether a Computer‐Related Invention Defines Patent‐Eligible Subject Matter Under Patent Laws

13.5.1.4 Functional Descriptive Material: “Data Structures” Representing Descriptive Material per se or Computer Programs Representing Computer Listings per se

13.5.1.5 Non‐Functional Descriptive Material

13.5.1.6 Natural Phenomena Such as Electricity and Magnetism

13.6 STATUTORY SUBJECT MATTER. 13.6.1 Types of Claimed Subject Matter

13.6.2 Independent Physical Acts, or Post‐Computer‐Process Activity

13.6.3 Manipulation of Data Representing Physical Objects or Activities; Pre‐Computer‐Process Activity

13.6.4 Computer‐Related Processes Limited to a Practical Application in the Technological Arts

13.7 THE COMPUTER‐RELATED INVENTION MUST STILL BE NOVEL AND NON‐OBVIOUS

13.8 COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND A SUFFICIENT DISCLOSURE

13.8.1 What Constitutes an Adequate Disclosure in Computer Programming Patent Applications

13.8.1.1 Block Elements More Comprehensive Than a Computer

13.8.1.2 Block Elements Within a Computer

13.8.2 Affidavit or Declaration Practice

13.8.3 Referencing Prior Art Documents

13.9 THE PROTECTION OF SOFTWARE THROUGH CONTRACTS

13.10 PATENT ELIGIBILITY OF SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER‐RELATED INVENTIONS IN EUROPE. 13.10.1 Introduction

13.10.2 The EPO Examination Approach to Computer‐Related Inventions

13.10.3 Acceptable Claims for Software Inventions at the EPO

13.10.4 Software and Computer‐Related Inventions and Patent Eligibility in the UK

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Hedy Lamarr. SPREAD SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Herman Hollerith. TABULATING MACHINE

14* Biotechnology Inventions. 14.1 INTRODUCTION TO BIOTECHNOLOGY

14.2 HISTORY OF BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENT PROTECTION

14.3 PATENT‐ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

14.4 BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT

14.5 BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PATENT EXHAUSTION

14.6 BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GOVERNMENT REGULATION

14.7 PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT STRATEGIES

14.8 MEDICAL PROCEDURES

Note

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Rosalind Franklin, James Watson, Francis Crick, and Maurice Wilkins. DISCOVERY OF THE MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF DNA

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Stanley N. Cohen and Herbert W. Boyer. RECOMBINANT‐DNA (rDNA)*

Note

15. The Patenting of Business Methods. 15.1 THE EVOLUTION OF PATENTS FOR METHODS OF DOING BUSINESS

15.2 THE STATE STREET CASE

15.3 THE BILSKI CASE

15.4 WHAT IS A BUSINESS METHOD INVENTION?

15.5 THE USPTO GUIDELINES

15.6 RECOMMENDATIONS

15.7 UNDERSTANDING A SAMPLE BUSINESS METHOD PATENT CLAIM

15.8 THE COVERED BUSINESS METHOD REVIEW

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Yvonne Brill. SATELLITE PROPULSION SYSTEM

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Luther Burbank. PLANT BREEDING

16 Foreign Patent Protection. 16.1 INTRODUCTION

16.2 THE TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF OBTAINING FOREIGN PATENTS

16.3 THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

16.3.1 The Broad Provisions of the PCT

16.3.2 Options for Obtaining Foreign Patent Protection

16.3.3 The PCT, or International, Patent Application

16.3.4 The International Search Report and Opinion

16.3.5 The National Phase of the PCT

16.4 NATIONAL PATENT LAWS AND THE PCT: DIFFERENCES AND ALTERATIONS

16.5 THE EPC

16.6 THE EUROPEAN UNITARY PATENT AND UNIFIED PATENT COURT

16.7 PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN A U.S. PATENT ATTORNEY AND A FOREIGN NON‐ATTORNEY PATENT AGENT

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Wilbur and Orville Wright. CONTROLLED POWERED FLIGHT

17 Enforcement of the Patent Right. 17.1 THE PATENT CLEARANCE PROCESS

17.1.1 The Freedom‐to‐Use Search and the Non‐Infringement Opinion Letter

17.1.2 The “Right‐to‐Use” or “Knock‐Out” Search

17.2 THE ATTEMPT TO DESIGN AROUND THE CLAIMS OF A PATENT: MOST INFRINGERS DO NOT SLAVISHLY COPY THE PATENTED INVENTION

17.3 LITERAL INFRINGEMENT OF A PATENT CLAIM

17.4 THE “DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS” WHERE THE CLAIM IS NOT LITERALLY INFRINGED. 17.4.1 How the Doctrine of Equivalents Works

17.4.2 Limits on the Doctrine of Equivalents

17.5 DEFENSES TO A CHARGE OF INFRINGEMENT. 17.5.1 Non‐Infringement

17.5.2 Patent Invalidity

17.5.3 Unenforceability of the Patent

17.6 PENALTIES AND DAMAGES FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

17.7 MARKING THE PATENTED PRODUCT WITH THE PATENT NUMBER

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Robert Goddard. ROCKET PROPULSION AND CONTROL

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. C. Donald Bateman. GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM

18 The America Invents Act of 2011. 18.1 FIRST TO FILE AND THE DEFINITION OF “PRIOR ART”

18.2 THE NARROWED GRACE PERIOD

18.3 DISCLOSING THE BEST MODE OF THE INVENTION

18.4 PRIOR USER DEFENSE IN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS

18.5 PATENT MARKING

18.6 FILING A PATENT APPLICATION IN THE NAME OF THE ASSIGNEE

18.7 PRIORITY EXAMINATION FOR IMPORTANT TECHNOLOGIES

18.8 THIRD‐PARTY CHALLENGES TO PATENT RIGHTS

18.8.1 Pre‐Grant Submissions

18.8.2 Post‐Grant Submissions

18.8.3 Post‐Grant Reviews

18.9 INTER‐PARTES REVIEW OF AN ISSUED PATENT

18.10 SUPPLEMENTAL EXAMINATION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Charles Kettering. AUTOMOTIVE SELF‐STARTER

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Calvin Souther Fuller, Gerald Pearson and Daryl Chapin. EFFICIENT SOLAR CELLS

19 Ownership and Transfer of Patent Rights

19.1 INVENTORSHIP, OWNERSHIP, AND ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS

19.1.1 The Patent Right as an Asset

19.1.2 Initial Ownership of the Patent Right

19.1.3 Shop Rights

19.2 PATENT LICENSING

19.2.1 The Difference Between a Patent Assignment and License

19.2.2 When To Think “License”

19.2.3 Developing an Initial Relationship with a Licensee

19.2.4 The Selection of an Appropriate Licensee

19.2.5 Primary License Negotiation and Agreement Considerations

19.2.5.1 Exclusivity Or Non‐Exclusivity In The Covered Territory

19.2.5.2 Advance Against Royalties at Signing

19.2.5.3 Royalty Rate As Quid Pro Quo for the Grant of the License

19.2.5.4 To What Is the Royalty Rate Applied

19.2.5.5 Minimum Royalty Payments

19.2.5.6 Sales Goals or Minimum Production Goals

19.2.5.7 Territorial Extent of The License

19.2.6 Additional License Considerations

19.2.6.1 The Time and Form of Payment

19.2.6.2 Who Enforces the Patent Against Infringers

19.2.6.3 Defense of the Licensed Product Against a Charge of Infringement of a Third Party Patent

19.2.6.4 Term of the License

19.2.6.5 Indemnification

19.2.6.6 Acts Causing Termination of the License

19.2.6.7 Confidentiality

19.2.6.8 Grant Back Clauses

19.3 CONCLUSIONS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Philo Farnsworth. THE INVENTION OF TELEVISION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Robert Adler. ULTRASOUND TELEVISION REMOTE CONTROL

20 How to Read and Obtain Information from a Modern U.S. Patent. 20.1 THE INFORMATION PAGE

20.2 THE DRAWINGS

20.3 THE SPECIFICATION

20.4 CLAIMS

20.5 CAVEAT

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Willis Haviland Carrier. AIR‐CONDITIONING

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Ivan A. Getting, Roger L. Easton, Sr. and Bradford Parkinson. GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)

21 Employment Contracts and Non‐Compete Restrictions. 21.1 EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

21.2 OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. 21.2.1 Inventions

21.2.2 Copyrightable Works of Creative Authorship

21.3 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS OR NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS

21.4 OUTSIDE INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEE OR EMPLOYER

21.5 NON‐COMPETE PROVISIONS

21.6 ENFORCEABILITY OF A NON‐COMPETE AGREEMENT

21.7 INEVITABLE DISCLOSURE

21.8 FORM AGREEMENTS

21.9 CONSULTANTS

SAMPLE EMPLOYEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT

SAMPLE MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

SAMPLE CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE AND NON‐USE AGREEMENT (LONG FORM)

SAMPLE CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE AND NON‐USE AGREEMENT (SHORT FORM)

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Grace Hopper. COBOL COMPUTER LANGUAGE

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE

22 The Engineer and Scientist as Expert Witness. 22.1 THE ROLE OF AN EXPERT WITNESS

22.1.1 Need for Experts

22.1.2 The Standard for Admissibility of Expert Testimony—The Daubert Decision

22.1.3 Expert Assistance by Engineers and Scientists in Complex Litigation

22.1.3.1 Advice and Consultation

22.1.3.2 Trial Assistance

22.1.3.3 Opinion Testimony

22.1.4 Expert Report and Deposition

22.1.5 Deciding Whether You Can Provide the Requisite Expert Assistance

22.1.6 Expert Witness Fees

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. John Bardeen, Walter Brattain, and William Shockley. THE TRANSISTOR

23 Ethics. 23.1 THE PROFESSIONS

23.2 PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES

23.3 CODES OF ETHICS

23.4 BRIEF COMMENTS REGARDING THE NSPE CODE OF ETHICS FOR ENGINEERS

23.5 COMPARING THE LAW AND ETHICS

23.6 ETHICAL DILEMMAS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce. MINIATURIZED INTEGRATED CIRCUITS

24 Copyrights as a Vehicle for Technology Protection. 24.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF COPYRIGHT LAW. 24.1.1 Pre‐U.S. Constitution English Law

24.1.2 U.S. Constitution and Statutes

24.2 THE NATURE OF COPYRIGHTS. 24.2.1 What a Copyright Is, and Is Not

24.2.2 Intangible Rights in a Work Embodied in a Tangible Medium of Expression

24.2.3 Moral Rights

24.2.4 Protecting the Balance Between the Public and the Author

24.2.5 Requirements of Copyrightable Subject Matter

24.3 EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT

24.4 FAIR USE

24.5 INFRINGEMENT OF A COPYRIGHT

24.6 NOTICE

24.7 COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION AND ITS IMPORTANCE

24.8 THE DURATION OF INTANGIBLE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT

24.9 WORKS MADE FOR HIRE

24.10 COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION FOR COMPUTER PROGRAMS

24.10.1 Protecting Computer Programs That Do Not Contain Trade Secrets

24.10.2 Computer Programs Containing Trade Secrets

24.10.2.1 Entirely New Computer Programs

24.10.2.2 Revised Computer Programs

24.10.3 Screen Displays

24.10.4 Special Rules for Copyrighting Software

24.10.5 Patent, Copyright, and Trade Secret Protection of Computer Software

24.10.6 Contracts and “Shrink‐Wrap” and “Click” Licenses

24.11 COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION FOR AUTOMATED DATABASES

24.12 COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION FOR ONLINE WORKS

24.12.1 Revisions and Updates

24.12.2 Databases

24.12.3 Serials and Newsletters

24.13 ARCHITECTURAL WORKS. 24.13.1 The AWCPA

24.13.2 Avoiding Infringement of Architectural Copyrights

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Federico Faggin, Marcian Hoff, and Stanley Mazor. SINGLE‐CHIP CPU

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Josephine Cochrane. AUTOMATIC DISHWASHER

25. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA)—An Overview. 25.1 PURPOSE OF THE DMCA

25.2 THE GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE DMCA

25.3 CIRCUMVENTION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROTECTION MEASURES. 25.3.1 General Approach

25.3.2 Exceptions to the Prohibitions

25.3.2.1 The Original Exemptions

25.3.2.2 The Triennial Exemptions to the Circumvention Prohibitions

25.3.2.3 Fair Use, Non‐Infringing Uses, and Anti‐Circumvention

25.4 LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LIABILITY FOR ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDERS. 25.4.1 Background

25.4.2 The Notice and Takedown Procedures

25.4.3 Counter DMCA Notification Procedures

25.5 COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

25.6 REMEDIES FOR DMCA VIOLATIONS

25.7 EXAMPLE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Stephen Wozniak. PERSONAL COMPUTERS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Jaap Haartsen and Sven Mattisson. BLUETOOTH®‐SHORT DISTANCE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

26. Mask Work Protection. 26.1 INTRODUCTION

26.2 THE SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP PROTECTION ACT OF 1984

26.3 MASK WORKS GENERALLY

26.4 SUBJECT MATTER OF MASK WORK PROTECTION

26.5 OWNERSHIP, TRANSFER, AND LICENSING OF THE MASK WORK

26.6 DURATION OF PROTECTION

26.7 RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP IN A MASK WORK

26.8 LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS, REVERSE ENGINEERING, AND FIRST SALE

26.9 MASK WORK NOTICE

26.10 INFRINGEMENT OF MASK WORK PROTECTION RIGHTS

26.11 GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUT MASK WORK PROTECTION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Stephanie Kwolek. KEVLAR®

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Percy Julian. THE SYNTHESIS OF CORTISONE

27. Trade Secrets Protection. 27.1 THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADE SECRET LAW

27.2 THE NATURE OF A TRADE SECRET

27.3 THE DEFINITION OF A “TRADE SECRET”

27.4 THE CREATION OF AN ENFORCEABLE TRADE SECRET RIGHT

27.5 EVEN THREATENED TRADE SECRET THEFT CAN BE STOPPED

27.6 CREATING A VIABLE TRADE SECRET PROTECTION PROGRAM

27.7 DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIONS

27.8 CONFIDENCE

27.9 CAN TRADE SECRETS, AFTER USE, BE PATENTED?

Note

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Chester F. Carlson. ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY

28 The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. 28.1 INTRODUCTION

28.2 CIVIL SEIZURE

28.2.1 Requirements for Obtaining an Ex Parte Order for Civil Seizure

28.2.2 Elements of the Seizure Order

28.2.3 Protection from Publicity

28.2.4 Materials in Court Custody

28.2.5 Service of the Order

28.2.6 Seizure Hearing

28.2.7 Action for Damages Caused by a Wrongful Seizure

28.2.8 Motion for Encryption

28.3 REMEDIES

28.3.1 Injunctions

28.3.2 Award of Damages

28.3.3 Willful and Malicious Appropriation

28.3.4 Claim of Misappropriation Made in Bad Faith by Plaintiff

28.3.5 Period of Limitations

28.4 RIGHTS OF TRADE SECRET OWNERS

28.5 WHISTLE‐BLOWER PROVISIONS

28.5.1 Use of Trade Secret Information in an Anti‐Retaliation Lawsuit

28.5.2 Notice of Immunity

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Samuel E. Blum, Rangaswamy Srinivasan, and James Wynne. EXCIMER LASER SURGERY (LASIK)

29 Trademarks and Service Marks. 29.1 ORIGINS OF THE PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

29.2 TRADEMARK SELECTION AND ADOPTION PROCESS

29.2.1 Creating a Trademark

29.2.2 Screening or Narrowing Step

29.2.3 Clearance Process for Determining the Availability of a Trademark for Your Use

29.3 FILING FOR REGISTRATION OF YOUR TRADEMARK

29.4 PROTECTING AND MAINTAINING YOUR TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

29.5 TRADEMARK PROTECTION OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES

29.6 THE MADRID PROTOCOL—THE “INTERNATIONAL” TRADEMARK—AN OVERVIEW

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. John Mauchly and John Presper Eckert. THE ENIAC COMPUTER

30 Cybersquatting. 30.1 WHAT IS CYBERSQUATTING?

30.2 THE UDRP

30.2.1 Administration of the UDRP

30.2.2 Process for A UDRP Claim

30.2.3 UDRP Requirements

30.2.3.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar to a Trademark

30.2.3.2 No Legitimate Interest

30.2.3.3 Bad Faith

30.2.4 Remedies

30.3 THE ANTICYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER PROTECT ACT (ACPA)

30.3.1 Elements of an ACPA Claim

30.3.2 Remedies

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. George de Mestral. HOOK‐AND‐LOOP FASTENER (VELCRO®)

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. John A. Roebling. SUSPENSION BRIDGES

31. Engineering Management and Commercialization of Intellectual Property. 31.1 INTRODUCTION. 31.1.1 The Rapidity of Technological Change

31.1.2 People and Technology Development

31.1.3 Intellectual Property Strategy

31.1.4 Motivations Supporting Innovation. 31.1.4.1 Individual and Organizational Motivations

31.1.4.2 Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations

31.1.4.3 Economic Motivation

31.1.4.4 Socio‐Political Motivation

31.1.4.5 Possible Conflict Between Organizational and Individual Motivations

31.1.4.6 Developing Successful Motivations

31.2 INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BUSINESS STRATEGIES

31.3 OBJECTIVES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

31.4 THE SOLE INVENTOR IN AN ALIEN FIELD

31.5 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

31.6 DISGORGING PATENTABLE INVENTIONS

31.7 DETERMINING WHAT AND WHAT NOT TO PATENT

31.7.1 Patentability Search Results

31.7.2 Business Factors Determining Whether to Obtain Patent Protection

31.7.2.1 Importance of the Technology

31.7.2.2 Competitive Advantage

31.7.2.3 Enforceability

31.7.2.4 Commercial Value

31.7.2.5 Licensing Value

31.7.2.6 Foreign Markets

31.7.2.7 Defensive Patenting

31.7.2.8 Timing of Public Disclosure of the Invention

31.8 DETERMINING WHO WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE LICENSEE FOR YOUR INVENTION

31.9 DRAFTING STRATEGIC PATENT CLAIMS

31.10 DETERMINING WHERE TO OBTAIN PATENTS

31.11 DETERMINING OTHER INDUSTRIES THAT MAY BENEFIT FROM A LICENSE

31.12 ENSURING YOUR PRODUCT OR PROCESS DOES NOT VIOLATE THE PATENT RIGHTS OF OTHERS

31.13 POLICING THE MARKET FOR POTENTIAL INFRINGEMENTS OF YOUR PATENTS

31.14 THE ENFORCEMENT OF PROCESS PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST AN IMPORTER OF A FOREIGN‐MADE PRODUCT

31.15 TRIMMING THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TREE

31.16 ESSAY ON INNOVATION MANAGEMENT

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Les Paul. SOLID BODY ELECTRIC GUITAR

32 “Sue the Bastards”—Business Factors Controlling Intellectual Property Litigation Strategies

32.1 INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LITIGATION STRATEGIES AND TACTICS

32.2 THE DAWN OF AN IP RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT LAWSUIT. 32.2.1 Got IP?

32.2.2 A Potential Infringement of Your IP Rights Bubbles to the Surface

32.2.3 Conducting an Audit of Your IP

32.3 LITIGATION CONSIDERATIONS IN IP RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT. 32.3.1 The Pre‐Filing Investigation. 32.3.1.1 Patent Enforcement. 32.3.1.1.1 Infringement Analysis

32.3.1.1.2 Validity and Enforcement Analysis

32.3.1.1.2.1 The Statutory Bars

32.3.1.1.2.2 Disclosure of Known Prior Art During Prosecution of the Patent Application

32.3.1.1.2.3 True Inventorship and Correct Ownership

32.3.1.1.2.4 Updating the Prior Art Search

32.3.1.1.3 Injunction and Damages Analysis

32.3.1.2 Trademark/Service Mark Enforcement

32.3.1.2.1 The Three Legal Avenues For Protection Of Trademarks. 32.3.1.2.1.1 The Federal Lanham Act

32.3.1.2.1.2 The State Trademark Laws

32.3.1.2.1.3 The Common Law

32.3.1.2.1.4 Injunctive Relief

32.3.1.2.2 Ensuring You Have Enforceable Trademark Rights Prior to Filing a Lawsuit Against an Infringer

32.3.1.2.3 The Likelihood of Confusion

32.3.1.2.3.1 Survey Evidence

32.3.1.2.3.2 Actual Confusion

32.3.1.2.3.3 Arguments Establishing a Likelihood of Confusion

32.3.1.3 Copyright Litigation

32.3.1.4 Trade Secret Enforcement. 32.3.1.4.1 Establishing the Existence of a Trade Secret Right

32.3.1.4.2 Proving Acts of Misappropriation

32.3.2 The Benefits Of Litigation v. The Costs

32.3.2.1 Value of Potential Benefits of Litigation

32.3.2.1.1 An Injunction and the Potential Value

32.3.2.1.2 Potential Infringement Damages

32.3.2.1.3 Your Reputation for Aggressive Enforcement of Your IP Rights

32.3.2.1.4 The Possibility of a Licensing Outcome from Litigation

32.3.2.2 Litigation Costs

32.3.2.3 The Disruption to Employees and Normal Business Activities

32.3.2.3.1 The Pre‐Filing Investigation

32.3.2.3.2 Marshaling Information to Furnish to Your Opponent Under the Discovery Rules

32.3.2.3.3 Responding to the Opposition’s Discovery Requests

32.3.2.3.4 Preparation for and Taking Depositions from You and Your Employees

32.3.2.3.5 Preparation for and Testifying at Trial

32.3.2.4 Preventing the Disclosure of Trade Secret, Proprietary, and Confidential Information to Your Competitor or to the Public During Litigation. 32.3.2.4.1 Protective Orders and Court Rules

32.3.2.4.2 Depositions

32.3.2.4.3 Use of Confidential and Highly Confidential Data During Trial

32.3.2.5 Short Notes on Other Litigation Factors

32.3.2.5.1 Start‐Up Business Litigation Concerns

32.3.2.5.2 Licensing as a Litigation Strategy

32.3.2.5.3 Settlement Analysis

32.3.2.5.4 Avoiding IP Litigation—Brief Comments

32.3.2.5.4.1 Patent Infringement Avoidance

32.3.2.5.4.2 Trademark/Service Mark Infringement Avoidance

32.4 CONCLUSION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Igor Sikorsky. HELICOPTER

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Frank Zamboni. ICE RESURFACER

33. Technology Transfer—Universities, Hospitals, and Research Centers. 33.1 INTRODUCTION

33.2 OWNERSHIP OF INSTITUTION‐DEVELOPED INNOVATIONS

33.2.1 Typical University Ownership Policies and Provisions

33.2.1.1 What Is Owned by the University

33.2.1.2 Copyrights and the Academic Exception

33.2.1.3 Ownership of Intellectual Property Created by University Students

33.3 A TYPICAL UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM. 33.3.1 Purpose of the OTM

33.3.2 The Bayh–Dole Act

33.3.3 Sponsored Research

33.3.4 Patent Filing Decisions

33.3.5 Intellectual Property Disclosures/Reports of Research Progress

33.3.6 Screening, Evaluation, and Assessment

33.3.7 Market Assessment

33.3.8 Release by License or Assignment to Inventor

33.3.9 Marketing or Seeking Partners

33.3.10 Marketing and Related Agreements or Pre‐Licensing

33.3.11 Licensing

33.3.12 License Compliance

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Ferdinand von Zeppelin. RIGID AIRSHIPS

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Bernard Silver and Norman Joseph Woodland. OPTICALLY SCANNED BAR CODE

34. International Intellectual Property Creation, Protection, and Enforcement Strategies. 34.1 INTRODUCTION

34.2 IP CREATION STRATEGIES TO MAXIMIZE GLOBAL IP PROTECTION

34.2.1 Investment Sources

34.2.2 Technology Development Location Choices

34.2.3 Product Production Location Choices

34.2.4 Marketing Considerations

34.3 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING WHERE TO OBTAIN IP PROTECTION. 34.3.1 Legal Concerns

34.3.2 Procedural Concerns

34.4 MARKETING AND BUSINESS CONCERNS

34.4.1 Potential Market Size

34.4.2 Product Life Cycle and Other Factors

34.4.3 Taxes

34.5 NON‐PARIS CONVENTION AND NON‐PCT COUNTRY PATENT PROTECTION

34.6 FILING A PCT PATENT APPLICATION FIRST

34.7 JOINT VENTURE RELATIONSHIPS. 34.7.1 Why Create a Joint Venture

34.7.2 Drawing Investment to the Joint Venture. 34.7.2.1 The Strength of IP Assets

34.7.2.2 Reassuring Investors

34.7.2.3 Technology Licensing

34.7.2.4 IP as a Foundation of Marketing Strategies

34.7.2.5 IP and Buyout Strategies

34.8 FORMING A JOINT VENTURE BASED ON IP

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Godfrey Hounsfield and Allan Cormack. CAT SCANNER

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

35. The Future. 35.1 RATIONAL THOUGHT APPLIED TO PROBLEM SOLVING

35.2 WHAT INVESTORS WILL LOOK FOR IN THE FUTURE RELATIVE TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

35.3 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

35.4 UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

35.5 MASTER OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT DEGREES AT U.S. UNIVERSITIES

35.6 CONCLUSION

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Harry Coover. SUPER GLUE®

INVENTORS AND INVENTIONS. Spencer Silver. POST‐IT® NOTES

36. Entrepreneurship Law. 36.1 INTRODUCTION

36.2 TRANSITION FROM EMPLOYEE TO EMPLOYER

36.2.1 Restrictions Emanating from Your Current Employment. 36.2.1.1 During and after Employment

36.2.1.2 Fiduciary Duties

36.2.1.3 Trade Secrets

36.2.1.4 Unfair Competition

36.2.2 Restrictions Arising from an Employment Contract

36.2.2.1 Moonlighting Provisions

36.2.2.2 Non‐Competition and Non‐Solicitation Restrictive Covenants

36.2.2.3 Protection of Intellectual Property and Confidential Information of the Employer

36.3 ORGANIZING THE NEW BUSINESS. 36.3.1 Overview

36.3.1.1 Sole Proprietorship

36.3.1.2 General Partnership

36.3.1.3 Limited Partnership

36.3.1.4 Limited Liability Partnership

36.3.1.5 Corporation

36.3.1.6 Limited Liability Company

36.3.2 Brief Comments on Choosing an Advantageous Business Entity Structure

36.4 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSETS

36.5 FINANCING. 36.5.1 Introduction and Overview

36.5.2 Equity Financing

36.5.3 Bank Financing

36.6 EMPLOYMENT LAW. 36.6.1 Employee or Independent Contractor?

36.6.2 Employment Statutes

36.6.2.1 The Fair Labor Standards Act

36.6.2.2 Worker’s Compensation Laws

36.6.2.3 Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)

36.6.2.4 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

36.6.2.5 The Americans with Disabilities Act

36.6.2.6 Age Discrimination in Employment Act

36.6.3 Employment Agreements

36.6.4 Compensation with Equity in the New Venture

36.7 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

36.7.1 The Purpose of Financial Statements

36.7.2 Basic Accounting Concepts

36.7.3 The Types of Financial Statements. 36.7.3.1 The Balance Sheet

36.7.3.2 The Income Statement

36.7.3.3 The Cash Flow Statement

36.8 RECOMMENDATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

37. Current Events. 37.1 AC VERSUS DC

Bibliography. ELI WHITNEY

CHARLES BABBAGE

FRANK J. SPRAGUE

MARY ANDERSON

CHAPTER 2

CHARLES GOODYEAR

JOHN BOYD DUNLOP

CHAPTER 3

GEORGE WESTINGHOUSE

GIDEON SUNDBACK

CHAPTER 4

JOHN DEERE

ERASTUS BRIGHAM BIGELOW

CHAPTER 5

ALFRED NOBEL

CHAPTER 6

LOUIS PASTEUR

ELISHA OTIS

CHAPTER 7

ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL

CHAPTER 8

THOMAS EDISON

CHAPTER 9

GEORGE EASTMAN

EMILE BERLINER

CHAPTER 10

OTTMAR MERGENTHALER

THEODORE MAIMAN & GORDON GOULD

CHAPTER 11

NIKOLAUS OTTO AND RUDOLF DIESEL

CHAPTER 12

NIKOLA TESLA

CLARENCE BIRDSEYE

CHAPTER 13

HEDY LAMARR

HERMAN HOLLERITH

CHAPTER 14

ROSALIND FRANKLIN, JAMES WATSON, FRANCIS CRICK, & MAURICE WILKINS

HERBERT W. BOYER & STANLEY N. COHEN

CHAPTER 15

YVONNE BRILL

LUTHER BURBANK

CHAPTER 16

WILBUR AND ORVILLE WRIGHT

CHAPTER 17

ROBERT GODDARD

C. DONALD BATEMAN

CHAPTER 18

CHARLES KETTERING

CALVIN SOUTHER FULLER, GERALD PEARSON AND DARYL CHAPIN

CHAPTER 19

PHILO T. FARNSWORTH

ROBERT ADLER

CHAPTER 20

WILLIS CARRIER

IVAN A GETTING, ROGER L. EASTON AND BRADFORD W. PARKINSON

CHAPTER 21

GRACE HOPPER

HUBBLE TELESCOPE

CHAPTER 22

JOHN BARDEEN, WALTER BRATTAIN AND WILLIAM SHOCKLEY

CHAPTER 23

JACK KILBY AND ROBERT NOYCE

CHAPTER 24

FEDERICO FAGGIN, MARCIAN HOFF, AND STANLEY MAZOR

JOSEPHINE COCHRANE

CHAPTER 25

STEVE WOZNIAK

HAARTSEN – BLUE TOOTH

CHAPTER 26

STEPHANIE KWOLEK – KEVLAR

PERCY JULIAN

CHAPTER 27

CHESTER F. CARLSON

CHAPTER 28

SAMUEL BLUM, JAMES WYNNE AND RANGASWAMY SRINIVASAN

CHAPTER 29

JOHN MAUCHLY AND JOHN PRESPER ECKERT

CHAPTER 30

GEORGE DE MESTRAL

JOHN A. ROEBLING

CHAPTER 31

LES PAUL

CHAPTER 22

IGOR SIKORSKY

FRANK ZAMBONI

CHAPTER 33

FERDINAND VON ZEPPELIN

BERNARD SILVER AND NORMAN WOODLAND

CHAPTER 34

GODFREY HOUNSFELD & ALLAN CORMACK

PAUL LAUTERBUR & PETER MANSFIELD

CHAPTER 35

HARRY COOVER

SPENCER SILVER

CHAPTER 36

CURRENT EVENTS

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

IEEE Press 445 Hoes Lane Piscataway, NJ 08854

.....

The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest tribunal in the United States. The final court of appeal, the Supreme Court is established under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides for a Supreme Court and whatever inferior federal courts that Congress may from time to time require. Since the Constitution mentions “a” Supreme Court, all nine justices sit at one time on all cases, and the court is not divided into smaller panels, although this procedure would at least triple the ability of the Supreme Court to hear cases.

There are certain situations in which the Supreme Court has direct jurisdiction to handle cases. These are the ones involving ambassadors, public ministers, counsels, cases in which a state is a party, and a few others. In all other cases, matters reach the Supreme Court by appeal, and the Supreme Court has the ability to accept or not accept an appeal. Cases are appealed to the Supreme Court from either U.S. appellate courts or from the state’s highest courts in the normal course of events. An appeal from an appellate court in the federal system is usually made to the Supreme Court by seeking a “writ of certiorari.” If the writ is accepted by the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court will hear the case and render a decision. Only a very small number of such writs of certiorari are accepted by the Supreme Court, presently in the range of 1–20. In those cases where the Supreme Court does not accept certiorari, it may be understood that the Supreme Court agrees that the appellate court decision being appealed from is correct and should be allowed to stand.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Intellectual Property Law for Engineers, Scientists, and Entrepreneurs
Подняться наверх