Оглавление
Immanuel Kant. THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
Reading suggestions
Table of Contents
Preface to the First Edition, 1781
Preface to the Second Edition, 1787
Introduction. I. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge
II. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions “a priori”
III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge “a priori”
IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements
V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements “a priori” are contained as Principles
VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason
VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason
I. Transcendental Doctrine of Elements
First Part. Transcendental Aesthetic
§§ 1. Introductory
Section I. Of Space
§§ 2. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception
§§ 3. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space
§§ 4. Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions
Section II. Of Time
§§ 5 Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception
§§ 6 Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time
§§ 7 Conclusions from the above Conceptions
§§ 8 Elucidation
§§ 9 General Remarks on Transcendental Aesthetic
§§ 10 Conclusion of the Transcendental Aesthetic
Second Part. Transcendental Logic. Introduction. Idea of a Transcendental Logic. I. Of Logic in General
II. Of Transcendental Logic
III. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic
IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic
Transcendental Logic. First Division. Transcendental Analytic
§§ 1
Book I. Analytic of Conceptions
§§ 2
Chapter I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. Introductory. §§ 3
Section I. Of defined above Use of understanding in General. §§ 4
Section II. Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in Judgements. §§ 5
Section III. Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or Categories. §§ 6
§§ 7
§§ 8
Chapter II. Of the Deduction of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. Section I. Of the Principles of a Transcendental Deduction in general. §§ 9
Transition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. §§ 10
Section II. Transcendental Deduction of the pure Conceptions of the Understanding. §§ 11
Of the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception. §§ 12
The Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest Principle of all exercise of the Understanding. §§ 13
What Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is. §§ 14
The Logical Form of all Judgements consists in the Objective Unity of Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein. §§ 15
All Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions under which alone the manifold Content of them can be united in one Consciousness. §§ 16
Observation. §§ 17
In Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only legitimate use of the Category. §§ 18
§§ 19
Of the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in general. §§ 20
§§ 21
Transcendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. §§ 22
Result of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding. §§ 23
Book II. Analytic of Principles
Introduction. Of the Transcendental Faculty of judgement in General
Transcendental Doctrine of the Faculty of Judgement Or, Analytic of Principles. Chapter I. Of the Schematism of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding
Chapter II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding
System of the Principles of the Pure Understanding. Section I. Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgements
Section II. Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgements
Section III. Systematic Representation of all Synthetical Principles of the Pure Understanding
A. FIRST ANALOGY. Principle of the Permanence of Substance
B. SECOND ANALOGY. Principle of the Succession of Time According to the Law of Causality
C. THIRD ANALOGY. Principle of Coexistence, According to the Law of Reciprocity or Community
THEOREM
Chapter III. Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena
Appendix
Transcendental Logic. Second Division. Transcendental Dialectic
Introduction. I. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance
II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance
Book I. Of the Conceptions of Pure Reason
Section I. Of Ideas in General
Section II. Of Transcendental Ideas
Section III. System of Transcendental Ideas
Book II. Of the Dialectical Procedure of Pure Reason
Chapter I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason
Chapter II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason
Section I. System of Cosmological Ideas
Section II. Antithetic of Pure Reason
Section III. Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions
Section IV. Of the necessity imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a Solution of its Transcendental Problems
Section V. Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented in the four Transcendental Ideas
Section VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to the Solution of Pure Cosmological Dialectic
Section VII. Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problem
Section VIII. Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the Cosmological Ideas
Section IX. Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason with regard to the Cosmological Ideas
I. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Composition of Phenomena in the Universe
II. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division of a Whole given in Intuition
III. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes
IV. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Dependence of Phenomenal Existences
Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason. Section I. Of the Ideal in General
Section II. Of the Transcendental Ideal (Prototypon Trancendentale)
Section III. Of the Arguments employed by Speculative Reason in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being
Section IV. Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God
Section V. Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God
Section VI. Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof
Section VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative Principles of Reason
Appendix. Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason
Of the Ultimate End of the Natural Dialectic of Human Reason
II. Transcendental Doctrine of Method
Chapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason
Section I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism
Section II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics
Section III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis
Section IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs
Chapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason
Section I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason
Section II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason
Section III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief
Chapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason
Chapter IV. The History of Pure Reason
