Engaging Ideas

Engaging Ideas
Автор книги: id книги: 2076089     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 4348,96 руб.     (42,8$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Купить бумажную книгу Электронная книга Жанр: Учебная литература Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119705383 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Use your course's big ideas to accelerate students’ growth as writers and critical thinkers The newly revised third edition of Engaging Ideas delivers a step-by-step guide for designing writing assignments and critical thinking activities that engage students with important subject-matter questions. This new edition of the celebrated book (now written by the co-author team of Bean and Melzer) uses leading and current research and theory to help you link active learning pedagogy to your courses' subject matter. You'll learn how to: Design formal and informal writing assignments that guide students toward thinking like experts in your discipline Use time-saving strategies for coaching the writing process and handling the paper load including alternatives to traditional grading such as portfolio assessment and contract grading Help students use self-assessment and peer response to improve their work Develop better ways than the traditional research paper to teach undergraduate reading and research Integrate social media, multimodal genres, and digital technology into the classroom to promote active learning This book demonstrates how writing can easily be integrated with other critical thinking activities such as inquiry discussions, simulation games, classroom debates, and interactive lectures. The reward of this book is watching students come to class better prepared, more vested in the questions your course investigates, more apt to study purposefully, and more likely to submit high-quality work. Perfect for higher education faculty and curriculum designers across all disciplines, Engaging Ideas will also earn a place in the libraries of graduate students in higher education.

Оглавление

John C. Bean. Engaging Ideas

Table of Contents

List of Tables

Guide

Pages

ENGAGING IDEAS. The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom

Preface

John's Introduction of Coauthor Dan Melzer

Dan's Perspective on the Third Edition of Engaging Ideas

Recent Developments Influencing the Third Edition

Field‐Specific Scholarship in Writing and Pedagogy

The “Writing about Writing/Transfer of Knowledge” Movement in Writing Studies

Use of Metacognition and Reflection for Self‐Assessment and Improved Peer Review

Emergence of a Translingualist Approach to Diversity in Language Practices, Media, and Genres

Growing Interest in Alternatives to Traditional Grading

Expanding Affordances of Classroom Technology and Social Media

What's New in the Third Edition?

What Hasn't Changed?

Signature Features of Engaging Ideas

Intended Audience

Structure of the Book

Thanks and Acknowledgments

From John

From Dan

From Both of Us

About the Authors

1 Using Writing to Promote Thinking : A Busy Professor's Guide to the Whole Book

Steps for Integrating Writing and Critical Thinking Activities into a Course

Step 1: Become Familiar with Some of the General Principles Linking Writing to Learning and Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking Rooted in Problems

Disciplinary versus Generic Domains for Critical Thinking

The Link between Writing and Critical Thinking

Step 2: Design Your Course with Critical Thinking Objectives in Mind

Step 3: Design Critical Thinking Tasks for Students to Address

Step 4: Develop a Repertoire of Ways to Give Critical Thinking Tasks to Students and to Coach Critical Thinking

Step 5: Develop Strategies to Include Exploratory Writing, Talking, and Reflection in Your Courses

Step 6: Develop Strategies for Teaching the Genres of Your Discipline and the Ways That These Genres Use Evidence to Support Claims

Step 7: When Assigning Formal Writing, Treat Writing as a Process

Four Discouraging Beliefs and Some Encouraging Responses

Misconception 1: Emphasizing Writing and Critical Thinking in My Courses Will Take Time Away from Content

Misconception 2: Writing Assignments Are Unsuitable in My Course

Misconception 3: Adding More Writing to My Course Will Bury Me in Paper Grading

Misconception 4: I Am Not Knowledgeable Enough about Writing and Grammar to Help Students with Their Own Writing

Conclusion: Engaging Your Students with the Ideas of Your Course

2 How Writing Is Related to Critical Thinking

Overview of the Writing Across the Curriculum and Critical Thinking Movements

Writing, Thinking, and a Dialogic View of Knowledge

The View of Knowledge Underlying Academic Writing

Teaching Multiple Drafts as a Thinking Process

Avoiding a Thesis: Three Cognitively Immature Essay Structures

“And Then” Writing, or Chronological Structure

“All About” Writing, or Encyclopedic Order

Data Dump Writing, or Random Organization

What Causes These Organizational Problems?

Pedagogical Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking

Create Cognitive Dissonance for Students

Present Knowledge as Dialogic Rather Than Informational

Teach the Academic “Moves” and Genres That Are Important in Your Discipline

Give Students Frequent Problem‐Solving Tasks Requiring Writing or Discussion

Teaching Thinking through Teaching Revision

A Positivist Model of the Writing Process

Why Don't Students Revise?

Fifteen Suggestions for Encouraging Revision

Conclusion: The Implications of Writing as a Means of Thinking in the Undergraduate Curriculum

Note

3 Helping Writers Think Rhetorically

Helping Students Think about Audience and Purpose

Helping Students Think about Genre

EXHIBIT 3.1 Examples of Genres

Genre Awareness and Student Learning

Genre Awareness Promotes Transfer

Different Genres Tap Different Kinds of Strengths, Allowing More Students to Succeed

The Value of Writing in Different Genres Seems to Be Supported by Brain Research

EXHIBIT 3.2 Assignments throughout the Learning Cycle

Teaching Genre in the Context of Discourse Communities

Conclusion: Thinking Rhetorically as a Transferable Skill

4 Formal Writing Assignments Situated in Rhetorical Contexts

Thinking Rhetorically: Five Variations on the Same Assignment

EXHIBIT 4.1 Considering the Effects of Variations in Assignment Design Using the Framework of Rhetorical Situation, Genre, and Discourse Community

Assignment Option 1

Assignment Option 2

Assignment Option 3

Assignment Option 4

Assignment Option 5

Discussion Questions

Articulation of Learning Goals as Preparation for Designing Assignments

Planning Your Course Backward by Designing the Last Assignment First

Best Practices in Assignment Design

The NSSE/WPA Research on Writing and Deep Learning

The Meaningful Writing Project

“Meaning‐ Constructing” Tasks and the Problem of Student Freedom

Designing an Effective Assignment Prompt

Meaning‐Constructing Task

Disciplinary Problem

Role or Purpose

Audience

Genre and Implied Discourse Community

Interactive Components

Evaluation Criteria

Example of an Effective Assignment Handout

EXHIBIT 4.2 McLeod's Assignment Handout for First‐Year Seminar

Problem‐Focused Versus Topic‐Focused Task

Task‐Only versus Task‐with‐Rhetorical‐Context

Disciplinary versus MLA Documentation Style (for a General Education Course)

Same Task for All Students versus Freedom of Choice

A Common Problem: Asking Too Many Questions

Confusing Task Statement

Improved Task Statement

Asking a Colleague to “Peer‐Review” Your Assignment Handout

EXHIBIT 4.3 Questions for Collegial Peer Review of an Assignment Handout

Giving the Assignment in Class

Assignments Leading to Closed‐Form Thesis‐Governed Writing

Present a Proposition (Thesis) for Students to Support, Refute, or Modify

Give Students a Problem or Question That Demands the Student's “Best Solution” Answer

Assign a Thesis‐Governed Paper Requiring Analysis of Raw Data

Create “Strong Response” Assignments Based on One or More Scholarly Articles or Other Readings

Let Students Develop Their Own Questions

Microtheme Assignments for Writing‐to‐Learn

Examples of Microtheme Assignments

Using Microthemes for Formative Assessment

High‐Scoring Microtheme

Student A's Microtheme

Student B's Microtheme

More Open Forms: Alternatives to the Thesis‐Governed Paper

Formal Exploratory Essays

Reflections

A Potpourri of Other Kinds of Alternative Formal Assignments

Multimodal Alternatives to Formal Assignments

Conclusion: Writing Assignments in the Context of the Whole Course

5 Informal, Exploratory Writing Activities

Why We Find Exploratory Writing Valuable

Common Objections to Exploratory Writing

Requiring Exploratory Writing Will Take Too Much of My Time

Students Regard Exploratory Writing as Busywork

Exploratory Writing Is Junk Writing That Promotes Bad Writing Habits

Logistics, Media, and Methods for Assigning Exploratory Writing

Explaining Exploratory Writing to Students

EXHIBIT 5.1 Explanation of Exploratory Writing for Students

Some Examples of Psychology Journal Tasks

EXHIBIT 5.2 John's Method of Explaining and Assigning Exploratory Writing. Explanation of “Thinking Pieces” from Syllabus for a Shakespeare Course

Excerpts from Daily Schedule

Using Blogs or Online Discussion Forums with Threaded Responses

Twenty Ideas for Incorporating Exploratory Writing into a Course

In‐Class Writing

Out‐of‐Class Journals, Thinking Pieces, Blogs, or Electronic Discussion Forum Postings

Tasks to Deepen Students' Responses to Course Readings

Change‐of‐Pace Creativity Exercises

Invention Tasks for Formal Assignments

Low‐Stakes “Shaped Exercises” to Practice Structured Academic Writing

Evaluating Exploratory Writing

Using a Check/Plus/Minus System or Simple Numeric Scale

Check/Plus/Minus Scale

Five‐Point Scale

Weighing Exploratory Writing into the Course Grade

Managing the Workload

Conclusion: Engaging Ideas through Exploratory Writing

Note

6 Designing Tasks to Promote Active Thinking and Learning

Ten Strategies for Designing Critical Thinking Tasks

1. Tasks Linking Course Concepts to Students' Personal Experience or Previously Existing Knowledge

2. Explanation of Course Concepts to New Learners

3. Thesis Support Assignments

4. Problem‐Posing Assignments

5. Data‐Provided Assignments

6. Template Assignments

7. Assignments Requiring Role‐Playing of Unfamiliar Perspectives or Imagining “What If” Situations

8. Summaries or Abstracts of Articles or Course Lectures

9. Dialogues or Argumentative Scripts

10. Cases and Simulations

Conclusion: Strategies for Designing Critical Thinking Tasks

7 Helping Students Read Mindfully across the Disciplines

Research on Reading Practices across the Disciplines

Cultural Obstacles to Mindful Reading

Decline in Print Reading

A School Culture That Rewards Surface Reading

Teachers' Willingness to Lecture over Reading Material

Students' Resistance to the Time on Task Required for Mindful Reading

The Rhetorical Component of Reading Mindfully

The Metacognitive Component of Reading Mindfully

Being Aware of One's Own Purposes for Reading

Understanding Need to Vary Speed and Reading Strategies According to One's Own Purposes

Appreciating Reading Difficulties Caused by Being an “Outsider” to the Text

Lack of Assumed Cultural Knowledge

Unfamiliar Vocabulary

Unfamiliar Genre

Understanding How Visualization of a Text's Structure Improves Comprehension of Meaning

Suggested Strategies for Helping Students Become More Mindful Readers

Develop a Course Design, Assignments, and Grading Methods That Reward Mindful Reading

Assignment

Not Using Quizzes to Motivate Reading

Not Lecturing over Readings

Making Students Responsible for Texts Not Covered in Class

Empower Students by Helping Them See Why Texts Are Difficult

Consider Some Variation of Monte Carlo Quizzes Rather Than Traditional Quizzes to Motivate Mindful Reading

Consider the QDAFI Method of Teaching Students to Read Experimental Reports

Have Students Reverse Engineer a Secondary Source to Uncover Original Primary Data

Explain to Students How Your Own Reading Process Varies

Show Students Your Own Note‐Taking and Responding Process

Help Students Get the Dictionary Habit

Help Students Discern the Structure of a Text by Writing “What It Does” and “What It Says” Statements about Each Paragraph

EXHIBIT 7.1 Writing Does/Says Statements

Awaken Students' Curiosity about Upcoming Readings

Show That All Texts Reflect the Author's Frame of Reference

Show Students the Importance of Knowing Cultural Codes

Help Students See That All Texts Are Trying to Change Their View of Something

Create “Reading Guides”

EXHIBIT 7.2 Reading Guide for a Scientific Article for a First‐Year Seminar on Nature/Nurture Controversy in Gender Identity

Teach Students to Play the “Believing and Doubting Game”

Developing Assignments That Require Students to Interact with Texts

Marginal Notes Approach

Open‐Ended Reading Logs

Guided Reading Logs, Journals, or Thinking Pieces Prompted by Teacher‐Posed Questions

Summary Writing Approach

Summary/Response or Double‐Entry Notebooks

Imagined Interviews with the Author

Graphic Organizers

EXHIBIT 7.3 Student's Graphic Organizer for “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers”

Writing “Translations”

Conclusion: Promoting Mindful Reading

8 Using Small Groups to Coach Thinking and Teach Disciplinary Argument

The Advantages of a Goal‐Oriented Use of Small Groups

Sequence of Activities for Using Small Groups During a Class Period

Designing the Task

Forming Groups

Assigning the Task

Less Effective

More Effective

Completing the Task

Group Reporting

Plenary Discussion and Critiquing of Group Reports

Relating the Task to the Learning Sequence

Suggestions for Designing Productive Small‐Group Tasks

The Thesis‐Proposing Strategy

The Template Strategy

The Question‐Generating Strategy

The Believing and Doubting Strategy

The Evidence‐Finding Strategy

The Case Strategy

The Norming Session Strategy

The Peer Review Workshop Strategy

The Metacognitive Reflection Strategy

The Group Paper Strategy

EXHIBIT 8.1 Instructions for Group Project

Making Small Groups Work

What Is the Best Size for Groups?

Should You Form Groups at Random or According to Some Distributive Scheme?

How Do You Teach Groups to Work Well Together?

What Are Best Practices for Groups in Online and Hybrid Courses?

EXHIBIT 8.2 Example of a Netiquette Statement. Community Standards for Online Communication in First-Year Composition Classes

The Controversy over Using Small Groups: Objections and Responses

Using Small Groups Takes Minimal Teacher Preparation or Skill

Small‐Group Work Reduces the Amount of Productive Class Time Spent with the Teacher

Small‐Group Work Devalues Eccentricity and Teaches Social Conformity

Conclusion: Some Additional Advantages of Small Groups

9 Bringing More Critical Thinking into Lectures and Discussions

Increasing Active Learning in Lecture Classes

Using Classroom Response Systems (CRS) to Awaken Interest and Activate Prior Learning

Exhibit 9.1 Examples of Clicker Questions

Develop Exploratory Writing Tasks Keyed to Your Lectures

Break the Pace of a Lecture Using “Minute Papers”

Ask Students to Write Summaries of One or More of Your Lectures

Ask Students to Question Your Lectures

Design a Formal Writing Assignment Requiring Students to Integrate Lecture Material

Deliver Narrative Lectures That Model the Thinking Process

Increasing Active Learning in Discussion Classes

Increase Wait Time by Using Freewriting

Use Out‐of‐Class Exploratory Writing to Prime the Pump

During Heated Discussions, Consider Time‐Outs to Let Students Freewrite Their Ideas

Have Students Generate the Questions to Be Discussed

Stagger Due Dates for Short Formal Papers to Allow Daily Paper Presentations

Have Students Complete a Weekly Critical Incident Questionnaire

Early in the Course, Hold a Discussion about Discussions

Extend the Classroom by Initiating Online Discussion Forums

Conclusion: Engaging Ideas through Active Learning

10 Designing and Sequencing Assignments to Teach Undergraduate Research

From Research Paper to Research Project: A Metacognitive Overview of Academic Research across the Disciplines

Students' Misperceptions about Research

Replacing Student Misperceptions with an Authentic View of Research

A Snapshot Overview of Research across the Disciplines: Carter's Metadisciplines and Metagenres

EXHIBIT 10.1 Metadisciplines, Metagenres, and Examples

A Functional Overview of Research Sources: Bizup's BEAM

EXHIBIT 10.2 Bizup's BEAM

Asking Students to Write to Wider Audiences

Journals That Publish Undergraduate Student Writing in Any Discipline

Information Literacy Skills Needed to Do Undergraduate Research

Developing Information Literacy

Information Literacy Skills Needed for Research Writing

1. How to Ask Discipline‐Appropriate Research Questions

2. How to Establish a Rhetorical Context (Audience, Purpose, Genre, Discourse Community)

3. How to Find Sources

4. Why Find Sources

5. How to Incorporate Sources into the Paper

6. How to Take Thoughtful Notes

7. How to Cite and Document Sources

Pedagogical Strategies for Teaching Authentic Undergraduate Research

Help Students Learn to Ask Research Questions in Your Discipline

EXHIBIT 10.3 Asking Determinate Research Questions in Empirical Disciplines

EXHIBIT 10.4 Asking Questions about Literary Texts through Theoretical Lens. Political Criticism (Marxist, Feminist, Queer Theory)

Deconstruction

To Teach Searching Strategies, Consider Teaming with a Subject Matter Librarian

Give Students a Metacognitive Overview of Academic Research (Carter's Metadisciplines, Bizup's BEAM)

Consider Designing Short Assignments to Teach Analysis of Exhibit Sources

Example Assignments: Drawing Evidence from Exhibit Sources

Consider Designing Short Assignments to Teach Engagement with the Scholarly Literature (Bizup's “Argument” Sources)

“Establishing a Controversy” (Common in Humanities)

Humanities Assignments: “Establishing a Controversy” Literature Review

“State of the Art” Literature Review (Common in Problem‐Solving Disciplines)

Problem‐Solving Discipline Assignments: “State of the Art” Literature Review

“Gap in Knowledge” Literature Review (Common in Empirical Disciplines)

Empirical Discipline Assignments: “Gap in Knowledge” Literature Review

Consider Designing a Guided Mini‐Research Project

Consider Adding an Exploratory Paper as Scaffolding

For Major Projects Ask for a Research Prospectus

Academic Research Article Project Proposal

Help Students Understand the Rhetorical Function of Academic Titles and Introductions

Explaining the “Moves” in an Academic Introduction

Money and Growth: An Alternative Approach

Explaining the Function of Academic Titles

Provide Models of Effective Research Work from Previous Students

Backward Design Your Course by Creating the Last Assignment First and Then Build in Scaffolding

Souza's Final Project (Designed First)

Final Project

Souza's Use of Backward Design: Skill‐Building Scaffolding Assignments

Short Paper I

Short Paper II

Souza's Further Scaffolding for the Final Project

Research Prospectus

Adapting Souza's Method to Other Disciplines

Departmental Collaboration to Teach Undergraduate Research in the Major

MacDonald's Four‐Stage Schema of Students' Development as Writers

Skills and Knowledge Needed for Expert Insider Prose

EXHIBIT 10.5 Skills/Knowledge Needed to Produce Expert Insider Prose in a Discipline

Teaching the Genres of Your Discipline

EXHIBIT 10.6 Structural Template for Practical Proposal

EXHIBIT 10.7 Structural Template for Empirical Research Report (APA Style)

EXHIBIT 10.8 Structural Template for an Interpretive Paper (Humanities) Title

EXHIBIT 10.9 Structural Template for Performance Reflection or Critique

Designing the Curriculum Backward

Conclusion: Engaging Students in Research

11 Helping Students Use Self‐Assessment and Peer Review to Promote Revision and Reflection

The Benefits of Student Self‐Assessment

Using Reflective Writing to Foster Metacognition

Typical Metacognitive Moves

Areas of Student Learning Amenable to Metacognitive Reflection

Self

Subject Matter

Writing Process

Rhetorical Knowledge

Self‐Assessment and Evaluation

Easy‐to‐Implement Ways of Integrating Reflection Assignments into a Course

Learning Inventories

Learning Style Questionnaires/Inventories

Process Memos Accompanying a Draft

Revision Plans

Summative Reflection Essays

Excerpt from Dan's Portfolio Reflection Essay Assignment. Purpose

Genre

Format

Making Self‐Assessment a Part of the Classroom Culture

Essay Assignment

The Research on Why Peer Review Can Be as Useful as Instructor Response

Positive Findings on Peer Review

Problem Areas for Peer Review

Ways to Conduct Peer Review

In‐Class Peer Review Workshops

Response‐Centered Reviews (Face‐to‐Face)

EXHIBIT 11.1 Classroom Procedure for Response‐Centered Reviews

Response‐Centered Reviews (Guided by Teacher‐Prepared Peer Review Sheets)

EXHIBIT 11.2 Judgment versus Descriptive Questions for Peer Reviews

Advice‐Centered Reviews

EXHIBIT 11.3 Classroom Procedure for Advice‐Centered Reviews

Out‐of‐Class Electronic Peer Review

Exchanges on Course Discussion Boards

Calibrated Peer Review

Multiple Peer Reviews through Peerceptiv

Eli Review

Conclusion: Shifting the Focus of Response from Teachers to Students

12 Using Rubrics to Develop and Apply Grading Criteria

Controversies about Evaluation Criteria

An Overview of Different Kinds of Rubrics

Analytic versus Holistic

Generic versus Task‐Specific

Different Methods of Describing Performance Levels

EXHIBIT 12.1 Generic Writing Rubric Using Analytic Method

EXHIBIT 12.2 Generic Rubric for Summary Writing Using Holistic Method

Rubric

EXHIBIT 12.3 Task‐Specific Rubric for a Genre: Practical Proposal

EXHIBIT 12.4 Task‐Specific Rubric for an Assignment Requiring Graphics

Grids versus No Grids

Controversies about Rubrics

The Problem of the Universal Reader

EXHIBIT 12.5 Analytic Rubric with Non‐Grid Design: Argument Assignment

The Problem of the Generic Rubric

The Problem of Implied Precision

John's Approach to Using Rubrics

Dan's Approach to Using Rubrics

EXHIBIT 12.6 Dan's Negotiated Rubric for an Academic Research Article Portfolio Project

Deciding on an Approach to Grading That Works for You

Finding What Works for You—From Simple to Elaborate Rubrics

EXHIBIT 12.7 Simple Rubric for an Introductory Literature Course Assignment on The Secret Sharer

EXHIBIT 12.8 Holistic Scale for Grading Physics Microthemes

EXHIBIT 12.9 Elaborate Rubric for a Scientific Paper in Chemistry. Introduction

Conducting a Group Norming Session

Determining Grades

Conclusion: The Role of Rubrics in Coaching the Writing Process

13 Coaching the Writing Process and Handling the Paper Load

1. Design Good Assignments

2. Clarify Your Grading Criteria

Develop Task‐Specific Rubrics

Hold an In‐Class Norming Session

3. Build in Exploratory Writing or Class Discussion to Help Students Generate Ideas

Collaborative Small‐Group Tasks

EXHIBIT 13.1 Paired Interview Questions

Paired Interviews

4. Have Students Submit Something Early in the Writing Process

A Prospectus

Two Sentences: Question and Thesis

Abstracts

Rough Drafts

5. Have Students Conduct Peer Reviews of Drafts

6. Refer Students to Your Institution's Writing Center

7. Make One‐on‐One Writing Conferences as Efficient as Possible

Distinguish between Early, Higher‐Order Concerns and Later, Lower‐Order Concerns

Try to Make the Conference Interactive with the Student Doing Most of the Talking

Start the Conference by Establishing Rapport, Reading the Draft, and Setting a Mutual Agenda

Starting the Conference

Reading the Draft while Student Makes Notes on Draft's Argument and Problem Areas

Setting an Agenda and Beginning the Discussion

Develop a Repertoire of Conferencing Strategies

If You Can Understand the Sentences but Cannot See the Point

Use an Idea Map for Brainstorming

Use a Tree Diagram to Help with Structure

EXHIBIT 13.2 An Idea Map

EXHIBIT 13.3 A Tree Diagram

EXHIBIT 13.4 Use of Placeholders to Stimulate Invention

When Working on Sentence Concerns, Focus on One or Two Paragraphs

8. Hold Occasional Group Brainstorming Conferences Early On

9. Use Efficient Methods for Giving Written Feedback

Comment on Drafts Rather Than Final Products, or Allow Rewrites

Make Limited, Focused Comments and Avoid Marking Errors

Use Models Feedback on Short Assignments

Use a Rubric

10. Put Minimal Comments on Finished Products

Conclusion: A Review of Time‐Saving Strategies

14 Providing Effective and Efficient Feedback

Students' Responses to Teachers' Comments

The Purpose of Commenting: To Coach Revision

General Strategy for Commenting on Drafts: A Hierarchy of Questions

Does the Draft Follow the Assignment?

Does the Draft Address a Problem/Question? Does It Have a Thesis?

What Is the Overall Quality of the Writer's Ideas/Argument?

Is the Draft Effectively Organized?

Use Marginal Comments to Note Where You Get Lost or Confused

Comment on the Title and Introduction

Comment on Paragraph Topic Sentences and Transitions

Does the Draft Effectively Manage Old and New Information?

EXHIBIT 14.1 Student Revision of a Draft in Response to Teacher Commentary

Student's Revised Paragraph

EXHIBIT 14.2 Thought Exercise on the Old/New Contract

Version 1

Version 2

EXHIBIT 14.3 Student Revision to Fix Problems with Old/New (O/N) Contract

Student's Revised Paragraph

Is the Draft Carefully Edited?

Is the Draft's Style Appropriate for Genre, Purpose, and Audience?

Suggestions for Writing End Comments That Encourage Revision

Alternatives to Written Response: Audio and Video Feedback

Conclusiown: A Review of General Principles

General Procedures

Marking for Ideas

Marking for Organization

Marking for Sentence Structure

Some Further Principles

15 Responding to Grammar and Other Sentence‐Level Concerns

The Difficulty of Teaching Editing

What Does It Mean to “Know Grammar”?

The Politics of Grammar and Language Difference

What Teachers across the Curriculum Need to Know about Recent Studies of Error

College Teachers Have Always Railed against Errors in Student Writing

Students' Prose Contains Fewer Mistakes Than Teachers Sometimes Perceive

Our Students Have More Linguistic Competence in Edited Academic English Than the Surface Features of Their Prose Sometimes Indicate

Errors in Student Writing Increase with Greater Cognitive Difficulty of the Assignment

Errors Often Disappear in Students' Prose as They Progress through Multiple Drafts

Teachers Can Expect to See Sentence Problems in First Drafts and on Essay Exams

Traditional Procedures for Grading and Commenting on Student Papers May Exacerbate the Problem

Responding to Error: Policies and Strategies for Teachers across the Disciplines

Help Students Appreciate That Unintentional Sentence‐Level Errors May Harm the Rhetorical Effectiveness of Their Writing

Shift from “Editing‐Oriented” Comments on Papers to “Revision‐Oriented” Comments

EXERCISE: COMMENTING ON STUDENT PAPERS

Hold Students Responsible for Finding and Fixing Their Own Errors

EXHIBIT 15.1 Editing‐Oriented Commenting Strategy

EXHIBIT 15.2 Revision‐Oriented Commenting Strategy

A Further Note about International Students

A Note about Spell‐Checkers and Grammar‐Checkers

Conclusion: Keeping an Eye on Our Goals

16 Alternatives to Traditional Grading: Portfolio Assessment and Contract Grading

Five Problems with Traditional Grading of Student Writing

Problem 1: Grades Undermine Learning

Problem 2: Students Pay More Attention to the Grade Than to Comments Connected to the Grade

Problem 3: Grades Often Fail to Factor in Process and Growth

Problem 4: Grades Discourage Risk‐Taking

Problem 5: Grades Often Reflect Unconscious Bias

Portfolio Assessment as an Alternative to Traditional Grading

EXHIBIT 16.1 Professor Emily Carruthers's Public Affairs Internship Portfolio Assignment

EXHIBIT 16.2 Professor Marissa Landrigan's Intro to Professional Writing Portfolio Assignment. Final Digital Portfolio

Choosing Your Writing Samples

Revising Your Samples

Reflective Cover Letter

Building the Website

Advice for Designing and Assessing Portfolios

Ask Student to Make Choices about What to Include in the Portfolio

Ask Students to Include Evidence of Their Writing Processes in their Portfolios

Ask Students to Reflect on Their Portfolio Artifacts and Their Writing Processes in a Portfolio Reflection Essay

Take Advantage of the Affordances of e‐Portfolios

Provide a Midterm Portfolio Progress Report

Use a Rubric to Manage the Portfolio Assessment Workload

Strategies for Contract Grading

Labor Contract with Instructor Gate

EXHIBIT 16.3 Sarah Faye's Portfolio‐Emphasis Grading Contract

Labor Contract without Instructor Gate

EXHIBIT 16.4 Dan's Labor‐Emphasis Grading Contract

Contract Grading as Critical Pedagogy

Conclusion: Harmonizing Assessment and Instruction

References

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

More than any single text, Engaging Ideas has had a profound and lasting influence on the writing‐across‐the‐curriculum movement in the United States and around the world. This third edition, now written collaboratively by John Bean and Dan Melzer, promises to extend that influence with several new areas of coverage while retaining all the original features that have made it such a groundbreaking work.

—Dr. Chris M. Anson, Distinguished University Professor; Director, Campus Writing & Speaking Program, North Carolina State University

.....

Unfortunately, educators in America have a long tradition of rewarding “all about” writing. Teachers encourage such writing whenever they assign topics rather than problems. Typical topic‐centered examples include assigning a “report on North Dakota” in fifth‐grade social studies, a “library paper on General Rommel” in eleventh‐grade history, or “a term paper on schizophrenia” in college psychology. Assignments like these have endured because they have one major virtue: they increase students' general store of knowledge about North Dakota, General Rommel, or schizophrenia. But they often do little to increase students' maturity as writers and thinkers.

Consider the difference between a student who is asked to write a traditional term paper on, say, Charles Darwin versus a student who is asked to write a research paper on Darwin that must begin with the presentation of a problem or question that the writer will investigate and try to resolve.

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Engaging Ideas
Подняться наверх