Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
John Spargo. Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Bolshevism: The Enemy of Political and Industrial Democracy
Table of Contents
PREFACE
BOLSHEVISM
CHAPTER I
THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
CHAPTER II
FROM REVOLUTION TO REVOLUTION
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
CHAPTER III
THE WAR AND THE PEOPLE
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
CHAPTER IV
THE SECOND REVOLUTION
I
II
III
IV
V
CHAPTER V
FROM BOURGEOISIE TO BOLSHEVIKI
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
CHAPTER VI
THE BOLSHEVIK WAR AGAINST DEMOCRACY
I
II
III
IV
V
Declaration Of The Right's Of The Toiling And Exploited People
Russia's Form Of Government
Democratic Peace
VI
VII
CHAPTER VII
BOLSHEVIST THEORY AND PRACTICE
I
II
III
THE RIGHT TO VOTE. Chapter Thirteen
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
POSTSCRIPTUM: A PERSONAL STATEMENT
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
AN APPEAL TO THE PROLETARIAT BY THE PETROGRAD WORKMEN'S AND SOLDIERS' COUNCIL
APPENDIX II
HOW THE RUSSIAN PEASANTS FOUGHT FOR A CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY[91]
I. Organization of the Peasants after the Revolution in Soviets of Peasant Delegates
II. The Difficulties of the Beginning of the Revolution
III. The Insurrection of Kornilov
IV. The Bolsheviki and the Constituent Assembly
V. The Fight Concentrates Around the Constituent Assembly
VI. The Bolshevist Insurrection
VII. The Fight Against the Bolsheviki
VIII. The Second Peasant Congress
Bulletin of Members of the Constituent Assembly Belonging to the Socialist-Revolutionist Fraction. No. 5, Dec. 31, 1917
IX. The Manifestation of January 5th at Petrograd
X. At the Taurida Palace on the Day of the Opening of the Constituent Assembly
XI. The Dissolution of the Third All-Russian Peasants' Congress
Procès-verbal of the Session of the III National Congress of Soviets Of Peasants' Delegates, United on the Principle of the Defense of the Constituent Assembly
XII. Conclusion
APPENDIX III
FORMER SOCIALIST PREMIER OF FINLAND ON BOLSHEVISM
FOOTNOTES:
Отрывок из книги
John Spargo
Published by Good Press, 2019
.....
It signified something else, also. There were many who remembered the scandals of the Turkish War, in 1877, when Bessarabia was recovered. At that time there was a perfect riot of graft, corruption, and treachery, much of which came under the observation of the zemstvos of the border. High military officials trafficked in munitions and food-supplies. Food intended for the army was stolen and sold—sometimes, it was said, to the enemy. Materials were paid for, but never delivered to the army at all. The army was demoralized and the Turks repulsed the Russians again and again. Now similar stories began to be circulated. Returning victims told stories of brutal treatment of the troops by officers; of wounded and dying men neglected; of lack of hospital care and medical attention. They told worse stories, too, of open treachery by military officials and others; of army supplies stolen; of shells ordered which would fit no guns the Russian army ever had, and so on. It was suggested, and widely believed, that Germany had connived at the systematic corruption of the Russian bureaucracy and the Russian army, to serve its own imperialistic and economic ends.
Such was the state of Russia at the end of the year 1904. Then came the tragic events of January, 1905, which marked the opening of the Revolution. In order to counteract the agitation of the Social Democrats among the city workers, and the formation by them of trades-unions, the government had caused to be formed "legal" unions—that is, organizations of workmen approved by the government. In order to give these organizations some semblance to real labor-unions, and thereby the better to deceive the workers, strikes were actually inspired by agents of the government from time to time. On more than one occasion strikes thus instigated by the government spread beyond control and caused great alarm. The Czar and his agents were playing with fire.
.....