The People’s Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Группа авторов. The People’s Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age
PREFACE
1. A PEASANT’S KINGDOM
2. FOR LOVE OR MONEY
3. WHAT WE WANT
4. UNEQUAL UPTAKE
5. THE DOUBLE ANCHOR
6. DRAWING A LINE
CONCLUSION
NOTES
INDEX
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Also by Astra Taylor
Copyright
About the Publisher
Отрывок из книги
Cover
Title Page
.....
When all is said and done, the notion of a hybrid economy turns out to be nothing more than an upbeat version of digital sharecropping, a scenario in which all of us have the right to remix sounds and images and spread them through networks that profit from our every move. The vision of cultural democracy upheld by new-media thinkers has us all marinating in commercial culture, downloading it without fear of reprisal, repurposing fragments and uploading the results to pseudo-public spaces—the privately owned platforms that use our contributions for their own ends or sell our attention and information to advertisers. Under this kind of open system, everything we do gets swept back into a massive, interactive mash-up in the cloud, each bit parsed in the data mine, invisible value extracted by those who own the backend.
In a way, this is the epitome of what communications scholar Henry Jenkins calls “convergence culture”—the melding of old and new media that the telecom giants have long been looking forward to, for it portends a future where all activity flows through their pipes. But it also represents a broader blurring of boundaries: communal spirit and capitalist spunk, play and work, production and consumption, making and marketing, editorializing and advertising, participation and publicity, the commons and commerce. The “old rhetoric of opposition and co-optation” has been rendered obsolete, Jenkins assures us.24 But if there is no opposition—no distinction between noncommercial and commercial, public and private, independent and mainstream—it is because co-optation has been absolute.
.....