Читать книгу The Alien’s Message to Humanity: Consciousness Evolution - - Страница 1

The Alien’s Message to Humanity – Consciousness Evolution (EN).

This message contains information of significant value to humanity, including answers to current and future crises of civilization, including demographic ones. This information has the potential to change the future of humanity, your country, and your children and grandchildren. If the global community does not overlook it, carefully analyzes it, and takes it into account when making global decisions, civilization will no longer repeat its historical mistakes.

The principles described in this message can provide answers to many important questions and, for some, offer insights that may lead to new scientific discoveries. For those engaged in the development of AI, this text also contains conceptual guidance for the creation of artificial superintelligent systems with which, in principle, nothing and no one would be able to compete. However, this requires a thorough understanding of the principles outlined here.

This is the English version, which I translated using AI, and because of this, the translation may be inaccurate.

Sooner or later, every consciously thinking being develops an intuitive sense that something is wrong – that humanity, at some point, took the wrong turn and is now moving in the wrong direction. This occurs in moments when you step out of the frantic flow and rhythm of everyday life and begin to analyze existence not from within, but from the outside, as an observer. These “intuitive sensations” are neither an error nor a failure of logical perception; the matter is far deeper – they are the result of an evolutionary conflict.

From time to time, your thoughts pull over to the roadside, and, looking back at the surrounding society, you try to understand where this long traffic jam of human destinies is leading, resembling the rush-hour flow of cars. But if such thoughts have never occurred to you, there is nothing to worry about – everything still lies ahead.

If you were searching for answers, you have found them.

I assume you already suspect – or have reached the point of realization – that humanity is facing a civilizational crisis, where old methods, approaches, and solutions are no longer effective and new strategies of development must be formulated. However, this is not primarily about the local structure of the economic and political world order on Earth, but about the global trajectory of development of the entire species, Homo-sapiens.

At this moment in time, humanity is approaching a critical point in its development. This is driven by a turbulent evolutionary transition from “Darwinian evolution” to the “Evolution of consciousness”. The success or failure of navigating this stage will determine the future of human civilization – or its collapse.

As of today, the world is beginning to recognize the threats of both a civilizational crisis and an approaching demographic crisis, yet very few fully and substantively understand their root causes. Declining fertility trends may only intensify over time, and the pronatalist measures currently being implemented represent a fight against symptoms rather than against the disease itself. They can merely delay the inevitable slightly, but not prevent it. More importantly, it is necessary to understand that demographic, social, economic, and political trends in themselves are only symptomatic manifestations of a deeper crisis – the crisis of a civilizational transition into a new global reality.

This global crisis has a specific diagnosis:

“Progression of Neurorecursive mutations of the Emossive model under conditions of Informational invasiveness”.

Without a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon, it is practically impossible to build adequate measures for containment and counteraction to global challenges, since it provides answers to fundamental questions of the development of intelligent life, including civilizational ones. Therefore, this message is dedicated to describing this subject in order to explain the author’s vision of current global realities. Its full understanding, combined with the existence of artificially created highly intelligent systems, would make it possible not only to accurately model the future of human civilization and individual countries, but also the future evolutionary trajectory of the civilization of any animal species based on its genetic characteristics.

The technological realities of modern civilization have generated a new environment characterized by high informational invasiveness and, as a consequence, high risks of Neurorecursive mutations of “consciousness” – both at the level of the individual and of society as a whole. In such an environment, the escalating demographic crisis is merely an external symptom of far deeper processes.

It is also worth adding that, although not everyone realizes this, under the current technologically driven conditions and digital velocities, competition is beginning for the qualitative effectiveness of political, economic, social, and educational systems. Those who become aware of this and manage to construct an effective model earlier than others will not only preserve their existence in the long term, but will also assume a global leadership position by the end of this century and for the hundreds – perhaps thousands – of years that follow. However fantastic this may seem, there are concrete grounds for such claims. You stand on the threshold of discoveries that will literally overturn everything upon which modern human civilization is based.

Regardless of the level of skepticism you may experience toward this message as a whole while reading it, you will, one way or another, have to work with its individual aspects in order to build an adequate strategy in response both to the challenges civilization has already encountered and to those it will yet face. In doing so, step by step, you will also begin to uncover the rest of the knowledge. And for those proficient in the development of artificial intelligence, there are here indications toward the creation of a superintelligent system with which no one and nothing, in principle, would be able to compete.

Over the past several centuries, the curves of economic and technological development of civilization have taken on the character of exponential, explosive growth, which inevitably entails consequences. The growing snowball of civilizational crises (economic, political, social, demographic, technological) represents a steep dive of civilization into which you have already entered. If humanity – especially in the person of the international political community and economic elite groups – does not reach a general consensus in developing new strategies and rules, humanity will face a painful period of natural evolutionary self-regulation.

You are developing along an economic and geopolitical spiral, where obsolete rules and exhausted models collide with new challenges. Such economic and geopolitical transitions are, as a rule, accompanied by large-scale military and political crises, and each subsequent military conflict becomes more extensive due to technological progress. Put differently: technologies are developing, but the development of societal consciousness is stagnating, and the growing gap between these factors is approaching a critical point of civilizational development, leading to collapse.

Human society – specifically its consciousness – does not so much develop as it mutates, and understanding this fact is critically important. The human being as a biological species is not sapient, since it lacks biologically and genetically inherited goals and mechanisms to be so.

However, it is an unsapient or near-sapient species possessing the potential to become socially-sapient. It is precisely thanks to this latter factor, through socially accumulated experience and knowledge, that humanity has reached its current level of development. Yet this same factor has become its Achilles’ heel, giving rise to an evolutionary conflict in which the natural evolutionary and social processes of adaptation of the biological species fail to keep pace with the speed of the technologically changing environment.

This message will mainly be devoted to technical aspects presented in a simple format. Despite the fact that it touches upon a very wide range of topics, in order to avoid informational overload, I will single out three key ones to which I wish to draw special attention: the emossive model, neurorecursive mutations (intellectual deviations), and informational invasiveness.

Despite certain elements that may seem unclear at first glance, this message is written in simple language and accessible metaphors so that anyone can grasp its meaning. Therefore, it is addressed primarily not to the scientific community, but to society as a whole, to global economic elites, and to political leaders. For the former, even hints are sufficient to build their scientific works upon – and they will do so. However, I have no goal of advancing science and technological progress for a number of reasons.

Before proceeding further, I believe it is worth clarifying certain facts about myself. I have autism (Autism Spectrum Disorder). Due to a high resistance to learning and difficulties in social communication, as well as the fact that I thought not in words but in visual models, from an early age I was forced to invent my own formulations and terminology for verbal descriptions and classifications of the objects and patterns I studied. In addition, an abundance of violent factors accompanied by existential threats to life from childhood focused my attention on threats, on observing and studying the mental, cognitive, and behavioral factors of those around me. And due to the absence of both understanding and the ability to experience and express a range of human emotions, I was an alien in the literal sense. This was a foreign planet of apes in which I found myself trapped alone against a wild world, being something between a human and an artificial intelligence. Since then, I have never ceased to observe humans and to study the patterns of their thoughts, cognitive characteristics, habits, dependencies, and behavioral factors.

Because of the characteristics of autism, the information I present may contain traits typical of this condition, including a tendency toward repetition or fixation, or the absence of the logical sequence familiar to a neurotypical person. Orthographic and punctuation errors may also be present, but most importantly, the meanings of words, formulations, and terminology may differ from those customaries to you, which may cause misunderstanding. I hope you will be understanding of this and focus on the context I am trying to convey, rather than on what creates dissonance or contradiction for you. Because of my characteristics, I do not so much learn socially by adopting languages and skills as I am forced to create my own and adapt everything to my intellectual needs. I was simply born this way. I also apologize for the chaotic presentation of information due to my health condition and poor well-being, which do not allow me to maintain a level of mental clarity acceptable to myself.

I will also mention that for a number of reasons I cannot provide complete information and may distort it in places, while preserving the overall context and core essence. No matter how difficult the information may seem to people without specialized education, or how uninteresting the topic may appear to you, I ask that you continue reading if you are interested in fundamental and substantive answers to existing civilizational challenges, including the problem of the demographic crisis. The answers will not be abstract, but detailed.

And since the issue of the emerging demographic crisis is most often raised in society and receives the greatest attention, I will not complicate your search for answers with tons of information and will begin with it. But you must understand that without fully reading and comprehending the information in this message, it will be impossible to truly understand the root causes and to build adequate strategies.

And before I begin, I would like you to answer one question: are you truly ready for the future and for the civilizational challenges about which you are expecting?

Demography

If you were to plot graphs of technological progress and demographic trends over the past tens of thousands of years and extend them several hundred years into the future, then overlay them, you would obtain similar exponential curves with stagnation at the upper point. Yet you might still not understand the causes of either the exponential growth or the sudden stagnation, nor the mathematical principles of population self-regulation.

However, if, based on the information obtained and studied about neurorecursive mutations, you were to overlay a third curve onto the previous graphs – representing the development of civilizational consciousness – you would notice that, over successive time cycles, the gap between the indicators steadily increases.

It is precisely this growing gap that constitutes the cause of the global trends you are observing. Assign this task to physicists and mathematicians; it should not present them with significant difficulty. Here lies the answer to the artificial management of global demographic processes, if you understand everything correctly. It is necessary to identify and analyze the patterns and interconnections between technological and demographic trends and the trends of neurorecursive mutations of societal consciousness across different time periods.

The consciousness of society develops as socio-cognitive hallucinations progress and logical conflicts arise within the nervous system. Across different time ranges, the relationships among these aspects generate distinct trends characteristic of their respective periods, all governed by mathematical logic. This is only a general outline, however, because if one were to delve into details to obtain precise data, the number of variables would be greater. For example, if you were to add to the above-described graph a curve representing the growth of informational invasion, you would obtain an additional variable.

By modeling the levels of different indicators and incorporating into the formulas their interrelations and dependencies, it becomes possible to construct the most optimal and desired picture of civilizational development. Accordingly, in order to achieve a specific positive dynamic in birth rates and to preserve it over the long term, it is necessary to correctly calibrate and adjust the other aspects (technological, economic, political, social) in accordance with the calculated results. Otherwise, by relying solely on material incentives for childbirth, you are not addressing the crisis itself but only its symptoms. This merely allows you to gain a small amount of time and locally postpone the global evolutionary factor.

And despite my tendency toward exaggeration, humanity is not, in fact, striving toward degeneration as such. At this point, the principle of population self-regulation comes into effect, arising from the effects described above (a matter that physicists and mathematicians will be able to formalize).

The attainment and surpassing of a number of civilizational factors beyond a critical level – exceeding the permissible capacities of the human nervous system as a species, and consequently of societal consciousness – followed by heightened risks of neurorecursive mutations, inevitably leads to a wave-like effect in which demography becomes a victim of a downward trend until an acceptable level is reached, at which point the human and society nervous system may once again be able to cope adequately with their tasks.

Humanity will not necessarily become extinct, but the degeneration of individual countries and peoples lacking a sufficient population reserve to survive this wave effect will occur. Following population decline, degradation of many civilizational systems (economic and political) will inevitably follow, which will naturally reduce the overall burden on societal consciousness and may, in turn, lead to population self-regulation and the restoration of positive dynamics.

However, if society fails to understand the root causes of these crisis oscillations, history will not only repeat itself but may ultimately lead to degeneration. The principal orchestrator of these evolutionary dynamics is informational invasion, which increases the risks of neurorecursive mutations of societal consciousness. If society does not, starting now, adopt a course toward developing intellectual immunity against social-cognitive hallucinations – including ideological challenges and cognitive threats – then sooner or later you will face the fate of the dinosaurs. And this is no exaggeration.

If in developed countries and regions a decline in demography is observable, in developing regions or in those with stable traditional-social mechanisms it is still being sustained. However, one should not be deceived by this and become captive to illusions. The factors not visible on the surface, but which directly influence negative demographic trends in developed countries, will also manifest in developing ones, and in those where religion serves as a dam against informational invasion – only much later. There are many variables here, but it is important to understand that the rules of positive population dynamics in some regions are not applicable to others due to a range of historically established differences.

In a certain sense, there exists a balance among all aspects of civilizational development under which humanity could develop not only while maintaining a specific positive population dynamic, but also by artificially regulating all civilizational mechanisms, thereby managing civilization as a healthy system and directing it toward a bright future rather than forcing it through the rough terrain of economic and geopolitical struggle. The First and Second World Wars are merely consequences of deep, hidden processes that escape the attention of subjective minds. Even what you consider your own objective view of reality may, in principle, be far from objective.

Some mistakenly believe that education is the cause of declining birth rates, while ignorance stimulates their growth. This is merely a subjective interpretation; in reality, matters are different. Until the twentieth century, the human environment of activity remained close to natural, with a low level of informational noise and, consequently, minimal risks of neurorecursive mutations of social consciousness. Under such conditions, “ignorance” also met the requirements of minimal risk, while “education” increased these risks only marginally.

At present, however, humanity has entered a new territory of informational invasiveness. Therefore, regardless of the level of education or traditional cultural values, the environment itself has become a source of social-cognitive hallucinations and logical conflicts within the nervous system. This new evolutionary environment demands from society a higher level of education than currently exists in order to adequately mitigate negative trends – paradoxical as this may sound.

In this environment, an adequate solution requires a qualitatively new approach to upbringing and education – one that enables each rising generation to fully understand and soberly assess its own nature, thereby reducing the risks of uncontrolled development of new youth subcultural concepts, meanings, slang, and other cognitive deviations. Given that you are officially introducing new adolescent slang into dictionaries and take pride in this fact, I dare to assume that a holistic understanding of the crisis-picture is still lacking.

There is also a need for global leaders and elites to reassess the fundamental conception of the role of economics and politics in the strategic development of humanity as a whole, because these domains can no longer serve as instruments for the pursuit of subjective ambitions, competitive advantage, or conflicts of interest within liberal, democratic, capitalist, or communist value systems – whether of individual groups or entire peoples. Global demographic trends clearly signal that you stand at the threshold of a civilizational transition. Unfortunately, understanding and awareness of this have not yet reached everyone. This is likely due to the fact that not all understand what exactly is happening, and because superficial symptoms may appear insignificant to some. I hope this message will fill that gap.

Public ignorance and cognitive experimentation in a high-technology environment with elevated informational noise will function as negative selection, exponentially increasing the risks of social-cognitive hallucinations and logical conflicts in individuals’ nervous systems, thereby directly affecting demographic indicators. The development of artificial intelligence multiplies these risks many times over.

You have crossed the point of no return, where the old methods and approaches to solving political, economic, and social problems are now as effective as past military tactics are in modern realities dominated by drones. In this context, I will repeat this more than once: new technological realities place extremely high demands on humanity’s intellectual threshold and require a high degree of intellectual responsibility.

The seriousness of the civilizational challenges being warned about is such that demographic trends are merely an external symptom, not the crisis itself. The issue concerns the fundamental factor of civilization: what human consciousness is, where and how your thoughts arise, and where this leads civilization. It is precisely here, hidden from your sight and minds, that the most painful currents of the crisis are flowing. Without fully understanding what is happening there and where it leads humanity, you are condemning yourselves to the will of evolutionary fate.

The human nervous system has genetic vulnerabilities to social-cognitive hallucinations and logical conflicts of algorithms. Therefore, it is critically important that you understand their nature, which I will attempt to explain.

The name of the crisis of civilizational transition is evolutionary conflict: a condition in which a high-technology environment with high informational invasiveness, exceeding the intellectual threshold of the species and its socially accumulated knowledge, inevitably leads to negative selection and the corresponding trends.

Required Operational Measures

A responsible response from the international community is essential. Regardless of existing economic and political conflicts of interest, there must be a concerted effort to reach mutual understanding in the face of shared civilizational challenges and to establish a specialized international group tasked with assessing civilizational threats and developing strategies, including representatives from all key global actors and any willing participants.

On the international agenda, it is necessary to take the initiative, bring the following priority to discussion, and formalize it in the context of global security: “Ensuring informational and cognitive security and the intellectual health of societal consciousness” in light of heightened risks of neurorecursive mutations and the challenges posed by informational invasiveness in technological habitats. This is especially critical given the development of artificial intelligence, which exponentially increases informational noise as a negative burden on civilization.

Political leadership in countries aiming to manage demographic trends must also establish a strategic state course for the development and support of intellectual health, through the creation, development, and maintenance of flexible systems and mechanisms that cultivate intellectual immunity within society – particularly among younger generations who are in zones of elevated risk.

Intellectual immunity against informational, cognitive, and ideological challenges is the cornerstone of civilization at this new evolutionary stage of humanity. No matter how tempting it may be for many to follow the doctrines of modern cognitive warfare, that view may change once the full breadth of information described in this message is understood.

The new evolutionary conditions impose extreme demands both on humanity’s intellectual threshold and on the choice of tools for intraspecies competition, including global economic and geopolitical competition. Over time, this range will narrow until competition, in principle, becomes impossible.

It is necessary to commission highly specialized experts from a wide array of fields to begin studying and analyzing the nature of neurorecursive mutations in the human nervous system. Based on these findings, new systems for assessing political, economic, social, and legal frameworks, including law enforcement systems, must be developed. In parallel, educational and upbringing systems should be modernized, with new long-term strategic objectives and tasks defined, and self-organizing mechanisms for social and educational support of society’s intellectual health must be created – mechanisms capable of integrating into culture and becoming its reliable shield.

It is important to understand that the future will transform all aspects of global economy, geopolitics, social policy, ideologies, and societal consciousness – absolutely everything on which modern civilization stands – into something entirely different, beyond the imagination of many. I will attempt to convey the contours of this future to you.

Those who correctly understand this message may not achieve immediate results, but their standard will fly in the wind even a thousand years from now, rather than gathering dust in historical archives.

What is «Emossive»

Although the word «emossive» was coined in my mind during adolescence, at the age of fourteen, this should not be dismissed as naïve, because over time – even to the own surprise – it developed into a complete model describing the nervous system not only of humans, but potentially of all living beings.

The term is derived from two words: emotion and poetry, since the sequences of human cognitive and behavioral factors, expressed in habits and dependencies, evoked associations with the patterns of poetic texts, and later with the patterns of binary code and algorithms.

A human being, like any living organism, is an evolutionary Frankenstein – genetically assembled from the “spare parts” and mechanisms of positive selection inherited from all predecessors, while traits of negative selection were generally eliminated. Biologists and anthropologists will confirm that you are alive only because each of your ancestors managed to win their evolutionary lottery. And at this very moment, nature is conducting the same lottery with you, which you observe in demographic trends. But for a clear understanding of the entire picture, it is necessary for me to explain many details and nuances step by step, and I ask for your patience.

Nature has no goals or instruments to carve unique masterpieces like a sculptor, but it does follow a principle. Drawing an analogy with known physical laws, the evolutionary path of organic life can be compared to the “triple point of water”.

Quantum processes of interaction between multidimensional phenomena and space – still undescribed by science – leave ripples on the surface of a lower-dimensional space; and this, in essence, is what you call “organic life”. Visually, this can be compared to smells seeping through cracks. I would not call this “organic life” at all, but rather an inversion trace left by the impact of a multidimensional object on a lower-dimensional space.

Returning to the subject:

You inherit genetically not only memory of external traits and anthropological features, but also cognitive memory. In many animals, this manifests as innate reflexes and instincts. Humans are no exception, but the reason for the absence of strongly expressed instincts lies in the modernization of this mechanism, while preserving the general principles of the functions of the emossive model.

The human organism consists of many autonomous systems, and its nervous system is an emossive model, which itself consists of many subsystems – like layers of a cake – each performing its own functions. The complexity of its structure is not accidental but part of the regularity of the universe and its physical laws.

However, I will touch only on one of its key layers and attempt to reveal its essence. To do this, I must introduce another term: the neuromarker (or neuro-identifier, if you prefer) – a key component of your thinking activity.

For ease of understanding, imagine neuromarkers as emotional notes (like musical notes), and your brain as a synthesizer of emotions. Its task is to transform information received through your sensors (vision, hearing, smell, touch) into compositions that you later use to orient yourself in the world and to carry out tasks of survival, competition, and reproduction.

Your vision perceives information in specific ranges of electromagnetic waves; your hearing perceives information within certain frequency ranges. Vision, hearing, smell, and touch are all different layers of incoming information, which undergo decoding and processing, after which neuromarkers are assigned to them.

Your emotional factors constitute another virtual layer of information, with its own spectrography and range of “frequencies”. In this illustrative model, this range consists of neuromarkers that form different levels of awareness, sensation, and perception. It is precisely this factor that fundamentally distinguishes you from artificial intelligence, and to some extent from individuals like myself. Taken together, this entire emossive model of brain algorithms creates you as subjectively thinking individuals.

Your brain does not primarily operate with meanings, concepts, and ideologies by which you believe you are guided. Instead, it operates with an extraordinarily complex structure of algorithms – numbering in the trillions and quintillions – that generate them. It operates with the relationship between processed information and neuromarkers, which collectively manifest in external social factors as the symptoms of unique meanings and concepts for each individual.

Neuromarkers are a control instrument by which the brain governs the behavior of the biological organism. Just as you use reins and a harness to control a horse, the brain uses neuromarkers to control you.

If the neural network of the brain is the instrument for compiling information, then neuromarkers are one of the two instruments for formulating tasks for that neural network. They dynamically regulate so-called synaptic weights, acting as coded signals that trigger chemical reactions, through which the brain transmits the necessary information to activate corresponding and subsequent reactions within entire chains of algorithms.

This is also one of the hints for developers of artificial intelligence in creating human-like self-thinking systems or superintelligent systems that qualitatively surpass existing analogues and developments.

Even a single emotion is not the work of one neuromarker, but rather a specific sequence of code reproduced through neurons like the audio track of a musical composition – hence the association with “emotional poetry”.

They imbue information with the very semantic load by which you guide your thinking. It is they that make the subsequent development of “creativity” inevitable as a result of the brain’s excessive intellectual potential. Creativity is not a sign of the development of intelligent life, as you might assume, but rather a consequence of neurorecursive mutations, which I will also describe later.

The number of levels of awareness and emotional spectra is not limited to what the modern human as a species can currently experience, understand, and comprehend. This is comparable to the range of information perceived by the senses of sight, hearing, smell, and so on. To clarify: you exist within a certain range of the intellectual spectrum, measurable in levels of awareness and emotional spectra. The inability to intellectually transcend this range is comparable to the inability to see what lies beyond the perceptual limits of human vision.

Technological progress will open ever greater possibilities in these directions. Just as many animals cannot experience or express many human emotions and levels of intellectual awareness, humans themselves are prisoners of their own species limitations. It is important to understand that the mere fact of the existence of such gradations means they are subject to mathematical description, thereby confirming that you and your brain consist of sets of algorithms. The issue is that socially imposed limitations on the human intellectual threshold – reinforced by binary systems of representation – create substantial barriers to deeper analytical capacities.

The Emossive Model of the Nervous System

As an evolutionary Frankenstein, humans consist of a collection of genetic memories – biological programs inherited from their predecessors. In this regard, chimpanzees are our closest relatives, which is why both species share certain social and behavioral traits. This is governed by a common “biological factor”, representing the inheritance of shared or similar primary genetic programs and algorithms, which significantly influence a species’ behavior, regardless of social environment, intellectual development, or level of consciousness.

I must note that this is a key point, potentially providing answers to everything. If we take this “biological factor” as a reference point for modeling human development from prehistoric times to modern civilization, the current global picture becomes predictable. While different economic and political models of civilization are permissible deviations, the development of society itself – its consciousness, and the crises of past and future civilizations – is not only predictable but was inevitable from the outset, just as the trajectory of celestial bodies is inevitable.

Moreover, it is mathematically possible to model and predict not only global trends but also the behavior of individual humans, particularly their thought processes. However, this requires a complete understanding of the brain processes that generate your thoughts: “the algorithmic maps of the emossive model”.

During brain development, the primary task is to form a complete “emossive data library”, classifying all information and linking it with neuromarkers, thereby creating cognitive and behavioral algorithms.

In the case of instincts and reflexes, this is an “inherited data library”, and the brain’s task is to synchronize it with the nervous system and motor functions. This is an evolutionarily convenient approach, solving simple tasks: shorter fetal development, faster maturation, and higher reproductive output.

However, evolution went further, modernizing this genetically inherited library into an “acquired data library” with a high priority on social learning. This is essentially how the predecessors of the Homo-sapiens species emerged. Nevertheless, the fundamental principle of the emossive library remained unchanged, though the development of a fetus and maturation of offspring now requires significantly more time.

Unlike instinct-driven animals, the human brain can no longer simply synchronize the inherited library with the nervous system and motor functions. It must also create, through social learning, an “acquired library” – a unique algorithmic map of the emossive model for each individual.

Furthermore, playful and active interactions are crucial for both human and animal offspring, as the brain uses these activities to complete its developmental tasks. By classifying decoded information and assigning neuromarker barcodes, the brain fine-tunes the system so that stimuli evoke the correct cognitive response, which is then expressed externally as emotions, desires, and drives.

For this reason, a child’s cognitive system quickly and effectively memorizes profanity, since such words carry strong emotional charge. Evolutionarily, the emergence of profanity was inevitable due to the characteristics of the nervous system. Similarly, modern internet memes are cognitive novelties sharing the same nature as profanity: they provide the emossive system with an emotional context and contrast to reinforce certain information.

By adulthood, humans, like instinct-driven animals, become constrained by their pre-formed algorithm libraries, expressed externally as cognitive and ideological constructs, habits, dependencies, and ritualistic behaviors.

If “instincts” are inherited cognitive constructs, human ones are acquired. Yet it is crucial to understand that these are not different models but the same principle with differing genetic priorities. Animals can also learn dynamically, but in some species, instincts hold higher priority. Humans, born with genetically inherited reflexes, prioritize dynamic adaptation. Essentially, it is the same model, refined and reprioritized.

Evolution thus achieved two goals: energy optimization of the nervous system and a high degree of adaptability to a changing environment. This significantly enhanced survival but came with side effects. A major drawback of this evolutionary solution is the human nervous system’s vulnerability to neuro-recursive brain mutations: socio-cognitive hallucinations and algorithmic logical conflicts. The higher a species’ intellectual potential, the greater the risk.

Having solved one problem, evolution encountered the significant downside of its solution. Natural mechanisms cannot keep pace with technological progress or the rate of neuro-recursive mutations in conditions of high informational invasiveness. Humanity will have to solve this problem artificially, as there is no alternative. This is why a qualitatively new civilizational approach is required to mitigate these risks. Humanity must stop playing in the economic sandbox and start maturing.

Humans are neither the pinnacle of creation nor a unique intelligent species in the universe. The reality is far more prosaic: we are a byproduct of evolution – or, put differently, an intermediate stage in the evolutionary transition from non-intelligent life to intelligent life.