Why Rome Fell

Why Rome Fell
Автор книги: id книги: 2264097     Оценка: 0.0     Голосов: 0     Отзывы, комментарии: 0 3114,5 руб.     (34,11$) Читать книгу Купить и скачать книгу Электронная книга Жанр: История Правообладатель и/или издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited Дата добавления в каталог КнигаЛит: ISBN: 9781119691389 Скачать фрагмент в формате   fb2   fb2.zip Возрастное ограничение: 0+ Оглавление Отрывок из книги

Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.

Описание книги

Explore an insightful and original discussion of the causes of the fall of the Roman Empire In Why Rome Fell: Decline and Fall, or Drift and Change? , celebrated scholar of Roman history Dr. Michael Arnheim delivers a fascinating and robust exploration of the causes of and reasons for Rome’s fall in the West. Steeped in applications of elite theory to the later Roman Empire, the author discusses several interconnected issues that influenced the decline of Rome, including monarchy, power structure, social mobility, religion, and the aristocratic ethos. Incisive comparisons of the situation in Rome to those in the Principate and the Byzantine Empire shed light on the relative lack of “indissoluble union and easy obedience” (in Gibbon’s phrase) in the later Roman Empire. Instead, the book reveals the divided loyalties of a fractured society that characterized Rome in its later years. Why Rome Fell also includes: A thorough introduction to the transition from the ancient to the medieval world, including discussions of monarchy, Diocletian and his relationship to the aristocracy, and Constantine’s reforms Comprehensive explorations of the rise of the Roman Christian empire and Constantine’s role Practical discussions of conflicting theories of what caused the fall of the Roman empire, including the Pirenne thesis, the malaria hypothesis, Gibbon’s ‘decline and fall’ theory, and the role played by religion An indispensable resource for students, scholars and the general reader with an inquiring mind about history, Why Rome Fell deserves a place on the bookshelves of anyone with an interest in a sophisticated and original take on historical continuity and change.

Оглавление

Michael Arnheim. Why Rome Fell

Why Rome Fell. Decline and Fall, or Drift and Change?

Contents

Guide

Pages

About the Author

Preface

Introduction

Why Did the West Fall?

“Indissoluble Union and Easy Obedience”

Divided Loyalties in a Fractured Society

“The madness of the heretics must be curbed” (CTh 16.5.65.)

So What?

East Is East, and West Is West

Gothia or Romania?

Three Revolutions

Structural or Individual?

The Use of the Past

1 Rome From Monarchy to Monarchy

Section A. From Romulus to Diocletian

Relics of Monarchy

“Republic” and Democracy

From One Brutus to Another

“In the Consulship of Julius and Caesar”

The Fall of the Republic

The Gracchi Brothers

Gaius Marius

Sulla

Pompey

Julius Caesar

Caesar’s Heir

Avoiding Julius Caesar’s Mistake

The Transmogrification of an Equestrian

Augustus’s Autobiography (Res Gestae Divi Augusti)

Did Augustus Wield Sole Power?

Augustus: “Optimi Status Auctor”?

From Tiberius to Diocletian

Section B. Two Disquieting Tendencies

“The Fourth Century and the ‘Conflict of the Orders’ Belong in the Realm of Myth.”

Conflict of the Orders

“Monopoly of Office and Power”

Patronage or Clientela

Polybius Was Right

What Polybius Actually Said

Formal Rights vs. Practical Realization

“Elective Dictatorship”

“Significance of Graduated Voting Absurdly Exaggerated”

“Rem Publicam…in Senatus Populique Romani Arbitrium Transtuli”

Mommsen’s “Dyarchy”

Syme: “A Monarchy Rules through an Oligarchy”

Envoi: Augustus v. Alexander

The Roman Republic as “Direct Democracy”

The Roman Revolution

“The First Emperor”

2 Diocletian Hammer of the Aristocracy

Principate to Dominate

Pomp and Ceremony

The Imperial Cult

The Great Persecution

Julian on Augustus and Diocletian

Imperial Power

Was Diocletian an Autocrat?

Princeps Legibus Solutus Est

The Tetrarchy

Diocletian Chopped the Provinces into Pieces

Titles of Honor

Emperor and Senatorial Aristocracy

Eunuchs

Conclusion

3 Constantine the Reformer

Constantine’s Reforms

Imperial Musical Chairs

Provincial Administration

Praetorian Prefects

Separation of Military and Civilian Posts

Some New Administrative Posts and Honors

Standing Room Only

Fusion or Confusion?

“Lineage Distinguished by its Nobility”

Proculus the Pagan Priest

Some New-style Vicars

Aristocratic Praetorian Prefects

The Maxentius Conundrum

Short-term Appointments

The Senate as an Institution

Constantine and Christianity

Helena Augusta

From Vision to Deathbed Baptism

The Religion of the Senatorial Aristocracy

Constantinople: The “New Rome”

Conclusion: Constantine the Reformer

4 The Christian Empire

Constantine’s Christian Legacy

Communal and Creed Religions

Christian Population Estimates

“Constantine was not Responsible for the Triumph of Christianity”

“Constantine Legislated not Christianity but Toleration.”

Constantine’s Ban on Animal Sacrifice

Christian Intolerance

“What is Truth?”

Constantine’s Kick-start

“The Blending of Civil and Ecclesiastical Authority”

Office-Holders under Constantine’s Sons

Western vs. Eastern Appointees

Noble Office-Holders from Julian to Theodosius

A Bird’s-Eye View of the High Nobility—the Anicii

A Bird’s-Eye View of the High Nobility—the Ceionii

A New Kind of Alliance

Toward a Christian Byzantine Empire

Heresiology “A Recognized Intellectual Discipline”

Constantine’s Legacy

Constantine and Christianity

Constantine’s Administrative Revolution

Constantine, First Byzantine Emperor

5 Continuity and Change

Birth, Land, and Office

“Large Estates Have Ruined Italy, and Now Even the Provinces.”

Peasants, Free and Unfree

The Changing Economy

Land and Office

Patronage

Amicitia

Medieval Survival

Continuity or Change in the West?

Who were the Aristocrats in Early Medieval Europe?

The Law of Fiefs 1037

Oath of Fealty 757

An Exercise in Labeling

When is a Schism Not a Schism and Why Does it Matter?

An Unparadoxical Paradox

Some Real Paradoxes

Continuity and Change in East and West—Roundup. Birth, Land, and Office in the West

The Byzantine Paradox

East vs. West

Power Structure and Ethos

6 Two Models of Government

Preview

Case Study I: Rome

Conclusion: Roman Social Mobility and Ethos

Case Study II: Classical Greek Tyranny

Tyranny and Democracy

Athens: From Tyranny to Democracy

“In Name a Democracy…”

Populist Generals

Who Had the Whip Hand?

Pericles and the Aristocracy

Beneath the Surface of the Athenian Democracy

Whisper vs. Shout

“All Leaders Were Demagogues”

“The New Politicians”

Cleon and the Sycophants

Charismatic Leadership

Government by Discussion?

Greece: Conclusion

Muddled Perception

Case Study III: France

Henry IV: “A Chicken in Every Pot”

Louis XIII (r. 1610–1643)

Louis XIV (r. 1643–1715)

Louis XV (r. 1715–74)

Maupeou (1714–92)

Lebrun (1739–1824)

“The Inevitable Liquidation of an Exhausted Expedient”

“Constitutional Consensus”

“Could Not Have Been Undone”

Run-Up to Revolution

Estates General to Guillotine

Mirabeau (1749–91): “L’indivisibilité Du Monarque Et Du People”

Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821)

From Napoleon to Napoleon and Beyond

Binary Power Structure

Case Study IV: England: 1066 And All That

Prelude to a Power-Struggle

Magna Carta

The Rise of Parliament

Richard II and the Peasants’ Revolt

Henry VII (r. 1485–1509)

Henry VIII (r. 1509–47)

Elizabeth I (r. 1558–1603): “For it is Monstrous that the Feet Should Direct the Head.”

James I (r. 1603–25): “The Judges….may Easily Make of the Law Shipmen’s Hose.”

Charles I (r. 1625–49): “I See the Birds Have Flown.”

Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658)

Was Cromwell a Dictator?

Charles II: “The Merry Monarch”

“The Glorious Revolution”

Case Study V: Cuba

Case Study VI: Argentina

Case Study VII: Imperial China

Case Study VIII: Maoist China

Conclusion. Equality, Equality of Opportunity, and the Aristocratic Ethos

Aristocratic Ethos

Equality vs. Equality of Opportunity

Monarchy vs. Aristocracy

Monarchy: Real and Unreal

Democracy

Prologue to Part Two

Decline and Fall or Drift and Change?

7 Varieties of History

“Proper Historical Writing”

The Skeptical Tendency

Baby and Bathwater

“Drowning the Baby”

Ranke: “Wie Es Eigentlich Gewesen Ist”

History as “One Damned Fact after Another”

“Cleopatra’s Nose”

“An Art of Writing History”

Torpedoing Torpor

The Oligarchy Trap

“A Monarchy Rules through an Oligarchy”

Zero-Sum Game

“Williamanmary Was a Good King”

Causation

Machiavellian History

Machiavelli continues:

And again:

So What?

Conclusion: “Proper Historical Writing”

8 Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

Decline and Fall?

Gibbon’s Treatment of Religion

“The Triumph of Barbarism and Religion”

9 The Malaria Hypothesis

Other Monocausal Explanations

Conclusion

10 The Role of Religion

Communal vs. Creed Religions

Creed Religions

Communal Religions

The Roman “Pagan” State Religion

Religious Toleration, Intolerance, and Persecution

Ruth and Conversion to Judaism

Greek Communal Religion

Roman Freedom of Religion

Bacchanalia

Druids

Cybele/Magna Mater

Isis

Mithras

Roman Attitudes to Atheism

Homosexuality

“Christians to the Lions!”

Nero and the Great Fire of 64

Decius and His Libelli

Valerian: Targeting Upper Crust Christians

“The Great Persecution”

Julian’s Alleged Attack on Christianity

Roman Persecution of the Jews?

Rabbinic Judaism

Christian Dominance: How and Why?

The Rise of Islam

The Impact of Religion on Politics

Religious Continuity and Change down to the Present Day

Roundup

11 The Pirenne Thesis

Periodization

The Pirenne Thesis

The End of Mediterranean Unity?

The Real Question

Conclusion

12 “Late Antiquity”

Late Antiquity: Some of the Chief Claims

“The Barbarian Invasions Brought No Widespread Destruction.”

“Realization that There Was Nothing Wrong about Not Being Roman”

“The Sheer Success of the post-Constantinian State”

“No Determination to Use the Laws to Convert Unbelievers”

“No Evidence for a Generalized, and Inevitable, Trend toward the Victimization of Jews in the post-Constantinian Empire”

“Correct Religion Was the Glory of the Empire”

“Religious Toleration Was, at Best, a Fragile Notion”

“The Unnerving but Mercifully Brief Reign of Julian”

“Slow Shift from One Form of Public Community to Another”

Themistius: “Not for Real”

“[L]arge Bodies of Polytheists… simply Slipped Out of History”

“Christian Intolerance Has Been Overblown”

“[T]he Ability of the Upper Classes to Muffle Religious Conflict”

Aristocratic Ethos

Aristocratic Conversion to Christianity

Pagan Survival among the Senatorial Aristocracy

Round-up

13 Assassination or Accommodation?

Did the Western Empire Come to an End?

Untangling the Threads

The Road to Adrianople

Rome and the Barbarians under Theodosius I

Alaric and the Romans

The Visigoths in Gaul and Spain

Gothia or Romania?

From Visigoths to Franks

Romans, Vandals, and Huns

The Vandal Sack of Rome 455

The Significance of 476

Pulling the Threads Together

“Exceedingly Unpleasant” but “No Catastrophe”

Roundup

So What?

Three Revolutions

Structural or Individual?

14 Conclusion

Constantine: Three Changes

Power Structure

Two Models of Government

Machiavelli

Roman Power Structure

Power Structure: The Principate

Power Structure: The Dominate

Power Structure: The Constantinian Formula

Inflation of Honors or Real Change?

Social Mobility and Ethos

Constantine and Christianity

Christianity Inherently Intolerant

The Severity of Christian Intolerance

Other Arguments Minimizing Christian Intolerance

Christian Influence on Judaism and Islam

Rabbinic Judaism

Islam as a Creed Religion

Constantine’s New Rome

Was Late Antiquity a “Good Thing”?

Assassination or Senile Decay?

The Relevance of the “Fall” of the West

Glossary

Primary Sources and Abbreviations

Select Bibliography

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Отрывок из книги

Dr. Michael Arnheim

Barrister at Law

.....

Even if the details and dates of this protracted struggle as recounted by Livy, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and other ancient sources are fictitious, there can be no doubt that from at least the third century BCE, the dominant elite in the Roman Republic was a combined patricio-plebeian aristocracy, which controlled not only the high magistracies of state, but also the senate, and the state religion. (See Stuart Stavely 2014.) It is significant that, from the fourth century BCE, every senatorial family was forever labeled as either patrician or plebeian, and the only way one could switch from one order to the other was by adoption, though entry to the plebeian part of the aristocracy was open to novi homines from outside.

But the fact that the Republic was dominated by a small elite is not in doubt. In rejecting this position, Millar was flying in the face of the evidence and opposing not only the Gelzer school of German scholars but also his own supervisor in Oxford, Sir Ronald Syme. (Syme 1939, p. 124.)

.....

Добавление нового отзыва

Комментарий Поле, отмеченное звёздочкой  — обязательно к заполнению

Отзывы и комментарии читателей

Нет рецензий. Будьте первым, кто напишет рецензию на книгу Why Rome Fell
Подняться наверх