Civil Rights Movement - Advancement Through Legislation
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
U.S. Government. Civil Rights Movement - Advancement Through Legislation
Civil Rights Movement - Advancement Through Legislation
Emancipation Proclamation & Gettysburg Address (1863)
Emancipation Proclamation (1863)
PROCLAMATION 93
PROCLAMATION 93- Changed by William Seward
PROCLAMATION 95
Gettysburg Address (1863)
LEGISLATION
1. Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1865)
2. Civil Rights Act of 1866
An Act
SECTION II
SECTION III
SECTION IV
SECTION V
SECTION VI
SECTION VII
SECTION VIII
SECTION IX
SECTION X
PRESIDENTIAL VETO
VETO OVERRIDE
3. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1868)
4. Reconstruction Acts (1867-1868)
ACT OF MARCH 2, 1867
ACT OF MARCH 23, 1867
ACT OF JULY 19, 1867
MARCH 11, 1868
5. Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1870)
6. Enforcement Acts (1870-1871)
ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1870
Forty-first Congress of the United States of America. At the Second Session
FIRST ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1871
SECOND INFORCEMENT ACT OF 1871 (KU KLUX KLAN ACT)
7. Civil Rights Act of 1875
Forty-third Congress of the United States of America. At the Second Session
8. Executive Order 9981 (1948)
9. Voting Rights Law of 1965
Eighty-ninth Congress of the United States of America. At the First Session. Begun and held at the city of Washington, on Monday, the fourth day of December, one thousand nine hundred and sixty-five
10. Executive Order 11246 (1965)
PART I- NONDISCRIMINATION IN GOVERNEMNT EMPLOYMENT
PART II- NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT BY GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS
PART III- NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
PART IV- MISCELLANEOUS
11. Fair Housing Act (1968)
12. United States Code Title 18 Chapter 13 (1968, 1976, 1988, 1994, 2009)
Sec. 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
Sec. 243 - Exclusion of jurors on account of race or color
Sec. 244 - Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces
Sec. 245 - Federally protected activities
Sec. 246 - Deprivation of relief benefits
Sec. 247 - Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs
Sec. 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances
Sec. 249 - Hate crime acts
13. The Community Reinvestment Act (1977)
14. Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2007)
SEC. 4701. SHORT TITLE
SEC. 4702. FINDINGS
SEC. 4703. DEFINITIONS
SEC. 4704. SUPPORT FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS BY STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS
SEC. 4705. GRANT PROGRAM
SEC. 4706. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO ASSIST STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SEC. 4707. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN HATE CRIME ACTS
SEC. 4708. STATISTICS
SEC. 4709. SEVERABILITY
SEC. 4710. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION
SEC. 4711. GUIDELINES FOR HATE-CRIMES OFFENSES
SEC. 4712.ATTACKS ON UNITED STATES SERVICEMEN
SEC. 4713. REPORT ON MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCING PROVISIONS
CASE LAW
1. Strauder v. West Virginia (1880)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
DISSENTING OPINION- Field
2. Buchanan v. Warley (1917)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
3. Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
I
II
III
4. Sweatt v. Painter (1950)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
5. Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
6. Boynton v. Virginia (1960)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
DISSENTING OPINION White
7. Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States (1964)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
CONCURRING OPINION- Black
CONCURRING OPINION- Douglas
CONCURRING OPINION- Goldberg
8. Loving v. Virginia (1967)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
I
II
CONCURRING OPINION- Stewart
9. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
CONCURRING OPINION- Douglas
DISSENTING OPINION- Harlan
10. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
CASE SYLLABUS
OPINION OF THE COURT
II
II A
II B
III A
III B
III C
IV
IV A
IV B
IV C
IV D
V A
V B
V C
VI
APPENDIX TO OPINION OF POWELL, J
CONCURRING/ DISSENTING OPINION-Brennan
I
II
II A
II B
II C
III A
III B
IV
IV A
IV B
IV C
IV D
IV E
V
CONCURRING/ DISSENTING OPINION-Stevens
I
II
III
SEPARATE OPINION- White
SEPARATE OPINION- Marshall
I
I B
II
III
III A
III B
IV
SEPARATE OPINION- Blackmun
I
II
11. Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
Syllabus
Held:
I
II
A
B
III
A
B
C
IV
V
I
II
III
I
II
III
IV
Отрывок из книги
U.S. Government, U.S. Supreme Court
A Comprehensive Law Collection: Civil Rights Law and Supreme Court Decisions Involving Race Discrimination -
.....
And be it further enacted, That any person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, shall subject, or cause to be subjected, any inhabitant of any State or Territory to the deprivation of any right secured or protected by the last preceding section of this act, or to different punishment, pains, or penalties on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color or race, than is prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be punished by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, in the discretion of the court.
Sec. 18.
.....