The Trial of Jesus
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Walter M. Chandler. The Trial of Jesus
The Trial of Jesus
Table of Contents
Volume 1
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I. THE RECORD OF FACT
PART II. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW
CHAPTER I. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—MOSAIC AND TALMUDIC
CHAPTER II. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER III. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—COURTS AND JUDGES
CHAPTER IV. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE
CHAPTER V. HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—MODE OF TRIAL AND EXECUTION IN CAPITAL CASES
PART III. THE BRIEF
THE BRIEF
POINT I
THE ARREST OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT II
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT III
THE INDICTMENT AGAINST JESUS WAS, IN FORM, ILLEGAL. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT IV
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SANHEDRIN AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY WERE CONDUCTED AT NIGHT. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT V
THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SANHEDRIN AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE COURT CONVENED BEFORE THE OFFERING OF THE MORNING SACRIFICE. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT VI
THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY WERE CONDUCTED ON THE DAY PRECEDING A JEWISH SABBATH; ALSO ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD AND THE EVE OF THE PASSOVER. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT VII
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT VIII
THE SENTENCE OF CONDEMNATION PRONOUNCED AGAINST JESUS BY THE SANHEDRIN WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE IT WAS FOUNDED UPON HIS UNCORROBORATED CONFESSION. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT IX
THE CONDEMNATION OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE VERDICT OF THE SANHEDRIN WAS UNANIMOUS. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT X
THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL IN THAT: (1) THE SENTENCE OF CONDEMNATION WAS PRONOUNCED IN A PLACE FORBIDDEN BY LAW; (2) THE HIGH PRIEST RENT HIS CLOTHES; (3) THE BALLOTING WAS IRREGULAR. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT XI
FACT AND ARGUMENT
POINT XII
THE CONDEMNATION OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE MERITS OF THE DEFENSE WERE NOT CONSIDERED. LAW
FACT AND ARGUMENT
FOOTNOTES:
INDEX
Volume 2
Table of Contents
PREFACE TO VOLUME TWO
PART I. THE ROMAN TRIAL
CHAPTER I. A TWOFOLD JURISDICTION
CHAPTER II. NUMBER OF REGULAR TRIALS
CHAPTER III. POWERS AND DUTIES OF PILATE
CHAPTER IV. MODE OF TRIAL IN ROMAN CAPITAL CASES
CHAPTER V. ROMAN FORMS OF PUNISHMENT
CHAPTER VI. ROMAN LAW APPLICABLE TO THE TRIAL OF JESUS
CHAPTER VII. PONTIUS PILATE
CHAPTER VIII. JESUS BEFORE PILATE
CHAPTER IX. JESUS BEFORE HEROD
CHAPTER X. JESUS AGAIN BEFORE PILATE
CHAPTER XI. LEGAL ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY OF THE ROMAN TRIAL OF JESUS
PART II. GRÆCO-ROMAN PAGANISM
CHAPTER I. GRÆCO-ROMAN PAGANISM
1.—THE GRÆCO-ROMAN RELIGION
II.—GRÆCO-ROMAN SOCIAL LIFE
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I. CHARACTERS OF THE SANHEDRISTS WHO TRIED JESUS
The Moral Characters of the Personages who Sat at the Trial of Christ
I. The Chamber of the Priests
II. Chamber of the Scribes
III. Chamber of the Elders
APPENDIX II. ACTS OF PILATE
Lardner's Remarks on the Acts of Pilate
Tischendorf's Comments on the Acts Of Pilate
The Acts of Pilate
FOOTNOTES:
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
Отрывок из книги
Walter M. Chandler
Account from a Lawyer's Standpoint
.....
In the first place, the Evangelists tell us that Pontius Pilate sat in judgment on the Christ. Both Josephus and Tacitus tell us that Pilate was governor of Judea at that time.[29]
In John xviii. 31 we read: "Then said Pilate unto them, Take ye him, and judge him according to your law. The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death." From many profane historians, ancient and modern, we learn that the power of life and death had been taken from the Jews and vested in the Roman governor.[30]
.....