Expansion and Conflict
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
William Edward Dodd. Expansion and Conflict
Expansion and Conflict
Table of Contents
PREFACE
MAPS
EXPANSION AND CONFLICT
EXPANSION AND CONFLICT
CHAPTER IToC
ANDREW JACKSON
CHAPTER IIToC
THE WEST
CHAPTER IIIToC
THE EAST
CHAPTER IVToC
CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE
CHAPTER VToC
THE TRIUMPH OF JACKSON
CHAPTER VIToC
DISTRESS AND REACTION
CHAPTER VIIToC
THE MILITANT SOUTH
CHAPTER VIIIToC
WAR AND CONQUEST
CHAPTER IXToC
THE ABOLITIONISTS
CHAPTER XToC
PROSPERITY
CHAPTER XIToC
AMERICAN CULTURE
CHAPTER XIIToC
STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS
CHAPTER XIIIToC
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
CHAPTER XIVToC
THE APPEAL TO ARMS
CHAPTER XVToC
ONE NATION OR TWO?
CHAPTER XVIToC
THE COLLAPSE OF THE CONFEDERACY
FOOTNOTES:
INDEXToC
Отрывок из книги
William Edward Dodd
Published by Good Press, 2019
.....
If we turn now to the chances of Clay and Adams, we must look to a part of Maryland, to Delaware and New Jersey evenly divided, it seems, between the “forward and the backward-looking” men, and to New England. Connecticut abandoned her State Church in 1818 and extended the electoral franchise to all who enrolled in the militia. Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine were border States and distinctly Western in their ideals, though they were in no way inclined to desert the New England leader. Massachusetts, the great State of the East, held firmly to her conservative moorings. In the constitutional convention of 1820 the liberals had failed at every point. Webster and Story had defeated the proposition for abolishing the property qualification for membership in the State Senate; and the more radical plan for overthrowing the established Congregational Church, the bulwark of steady habits in Massachusetts, was similarly voted down. Webster, like Randolph, of Virginia, and Rhett, of South Carolina, urged that property should rule in every well-ordered community, and what Webster, Randolph, and Rhett urged, their respective States adopted. Even more reactionary was little Rhode Island, where privilege and inequality were as firmly intrenched as anywhere else in the country. The suffrage was limited to freeholders and representation was denied the majority of the people. The control of governor, legislature, and courts was in the hands of the minority. In 1821, 1822, and 1824 leaders of the majority endeavored to secure reforms, but without success.
From Augusta, Maine, to Baltimore stretched the long strip of country which could be relied on to vote for John Quincy Adams and to sustain conservative ideals in government. Western New York was also inclined to Adams, and Clay was confident that he could carry Ohio and Kentucky, the conservative communities of the West, for his ally. In the main the men who supported the Administration were those who feared the rough ways of plain men, the ideals of equality and popular initiative so dear to the American heart.
.....