Читать книгу Beating Endo - Dr Iris Kerin Orbuch - Страница 8

Remember the first time you heard the word endometriosis?

As with any new word—especially one so multisyllabic—you probably tucked it into your brain and forgot about it, until suddenly it seemed you were hearing it everywhere. Maybe a friend said it ran in her family. Or another friend said her physical therapist thought it might be the cause of her pelvic pain. Or someone said her urologist told her to ask her gynecologist about it. Somebody somewhere even said that her nutritionist mentioned it.

Then a few celebrities announced they had it, so for a couple of days, it was in the news and in the blogosphere—the latest social media meme. The sudden attention unleashed a volley of pronouncements: Endometriosis is all about bad cramps . . . Birth control pills cure it . . . Surgery cures it . . . Only a hysterectomy can cure it.

All untrue, by the way.

Yet despite all the mentions and myths, we’ll bet you nevertheless will be shocked to learn that endo, as it is routinely called, is estimated to affect one-tenth of all the girls and women on earth.

Think about that. The next time you’re walking along a crowded sidewalk, or are on a bus, or are part of the audience at a movie or concert or some other event, look around you. Pick out the first ten females you see and tell yourself that one of them is likely to suffer from endometriosis. Her suffering might range from mild discomfort to intense pain, from an occasional nuisance to chronic agony, from something she can put up with to something that stunts her life.

What is this disease whose symptoms attract the attention of urologists as well as gynecologists, acupuncturists, pain psychologists, and specialist surgeons, a disease that wears so many different hats and shows up in so many different forms? Since it is known traditionally, if at all, as a “female disease”—and therefore is not much discussed except in whispers—why is a nutritionist talking about it? What do muscle pain and physical therapy have to do with it? And if it does “run in the family” and is therefore genetically transmitted, doesn’t that mean that one in ten of us are just destined to get endometriosis and can’t do much about it once we do?

No. We can answer with certainty that while endometriosis can indeed be genetically transmitted, many other factors may influence its development, and whatever the cause, there is a great deal you can do about the disease. That is what we will tell you about in this book, in which we will arm you with the most powerful weapon you can wield to beat this disease and live the life you deserve—namely, the knowledge you’ll gain in the pages that follow. Understanding the disease—knowing what you’re up against—is crucial to beating the disease. It’s the starting point.

We are a gynecologist and a physical therapist linked by a shared and passionate commitment to caring for the women and girls who suffer from endometriosis. We came to this shared commitment from different healthcare specialties, as you can see from the initials attached to our names, and we arrived at it from different beginnings and along different paths. Pretty much from the start of our careers as medical doctor and doctor of physical therapy, each of us found ourselves caring for female patients whose symptoms ranged from pelvic pain to abdominal bloating to painful periods to diarrhea or constipation to fatigue and depression to infertility. Not particularly unusual in either practice, yet in too many instances, the ailments did not seem to yield to the standard treatments our specialties prescribed. And while each of us focused intently on doing whatever we could with the expertise we possessed, we sensed there had to be more we should be doing if we were to achieve a comprehensive cure. Patients got better. Substantially better. Often vastly better. But not 100 percent better.

Until, drawing not only on our own expertise and experience but also on that of scores of other practitioners, we devised a multifaceted and integrated approach that beats the disease known as endometriosis, an approach that gets past precisely what was afflicting these patients. The approach does not cure endometriosis; there is not yet a known cure. But it does empower those who have the disease to keep it from taking over their lives so they can reclaim the quality of life they want and deserve.

We don’t remember precisely when and how we first connected across the gap between our separate professional silos. It’s a bit puzzling because the healthcare community in New York City, where both of us began our careers, is still a closely defined world in which practitioner names are exchanged swiftly and easily along lines of shared professional focus. We suspect that we might have been introduced to or encountered each other or at least have noted each other’s name tags at a large and busy conference about pelvic pain, a key marker of endo. Or it’s possible that a colleague known to us both suggested a patient referral to the other—a sort of secondhand and oblique connection.

But however vague its origins, what forged the connection could not have been more compelling. By the time we did finally find each other, the suffering that endometriosis caused in our patients was very much on both of our minds, and each of us had concluded that a new and more comprehensive way to confront this disease was needed.

Our individual journeys to this conclusion help explain how we were able to create the integrated, multimodal approach to beating endometriosis that is the focus of this book. It’s a pair of stories worth telling.

THE GYNECOLOGIST

Iris is the daughter of a cardiologist father. Medicine as a calling was no abstraction when she was growing up; it was more or less the air she breathed. From watching her father at work, she learned what became a mantra for her own future practice: first listen, then examine. Hear what the patient is telling you, then probe the body.

Iris carried the mantra with her through college and medical school to her residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Along the way, she married a fellow gynecologist, and she had her first child, a daughter; a second daughter would follow three years later.

Meanwhile, her residency completed, Iris went on to a fellowship in Advanced Laparoscopic and Pelvic Surgery with Dr. Harry Reich and Dr. C. Y. Liu, pioneers in endometriosis excision surgery. It was an incredible opportunity to work in their technologically advanced operating room, but what made the fellowship really special was the tutelage of the two men who had made significant advancements in the minimally invasive procedure that is the only proper treatment for the disease—excision surgery that cuts out of the body the misplaced tissue that caused the endo and confirms the presence of the disease. Reich and Liu mentored the young woman who shared their passion for the surgery they had perfected. Like her father, they listened closely to their patients. Sitting beside one or the other of them day after day as they heard patients tell of their pain and indeed their fears became for Iris an unforgettable introduction to the very real suffering that endo inflicted.

In 2005, Iris began her own practice, often operating along with Dr. Liu in those early years. Like her mentors, she made excision surgery her signature procedure, and as both they and her father had taught her, she spent whatever time it took to listen to her patients. The more she heard about their debilitating pain, overreliance on opioids and other painkillers, bladder and bowel ailments that seemed never to go away, pain during sex, depression—and sometimes all of those things together—the more she committed herself to doing whatever it took to restore their quality of life.

The issue became even more pressing when Iris read about a study¹ that had tracked the long-term progress of women who had undergone excision surgery. The finding that particularly resonated was an almost passing remark in the discussion that even after “meticulous removal of all endometriosis,” a number of patients continued to be “symptomatic.” The removal of the endo tissue was not, as both patients and doctors had hoped, a complete cure. Instead, noted the study, “another cause of (a patient’s) pain should be considered.” To Iris, this statement struck a chord, prompting her to consider whether surgery alone was enough; perhaps more was needed if these patients were to regain the quality of their lives.

The study ignited Iris’s intellectual curiosity even as it touched a deep emotional chord. The question seemed simple: What was keeping these women from getting 100 percent better? What was the final piece of the puzzle that would return them to the kind of robust vigor and well-being their age and their dreams required? The medical literature offered no answers, while research findings reported at medical conferences focused on technology and drugs—and seemed to Iris to miss the point. She reviewed patterns of symptoms that her patients told her kept recurring—rectal spasms, shooting pains down the legs, pain after sex that lasted hours and sometimes days and ultimately produced anxiety and depression—but was unable to uncover any explanation. The question haunted her. Despite all the firepower being aimed at endometriosis, why were women still suffering?

THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST

At a similar point in her career, Doctor of Physical Therapy Amy Stein was asking herself the same question, arrived at along a somewhat different trajectory. As a little girl growing up in a suburb along Philadelphia’s Main Line, Amy thought she might like to become a veterinarian one day. College changed all that; by her own count, she went through five majors, eventually getting a degree in Spanish literature before going on to a master’s in physical therapy. The doctorate took a little longer, thanks to her giving birth to two kids two years apart, and to her expanding medical practice—she opened her first private office in 2003, her second in 2018—and her growing prominence as a pioneering expert in addressing pelvic pain through biomechanics, manual therapy, and stretching and strengthening exercises.^* Yet from the vantage of that expertise, she found herself puzzled by a particular group of patients whose pain did not improve further once they had reached a certain plateau.

* Amy is the author of Heal Pelvic Pain, published in 2008 by McGraw Hill; she has served since 2008 on the board of the International Pain Society and as its president in 2017.

Like Iris, who flouted much of standard medical practice by spending all the time needed to listen to her patients—well over the times “assigned” by insurance or hospital guidelines—Amy began her therapeutic approach by considering the whole body. To Amy, that meant hearing and, as physical therapists do, literally touching a patient’s pain.

But also like Iris, Amy found herself perplexed by the group whose progress seemed to slow and then virtually come to a halt once they got past a particular point. She was disheartened too by the misdiagnoses and subsequent medical mismanagement she observed in so many of those patients. Most had been referred to her following considerable time in treatment by urologists, gynecologists, colorectal specialists, gastroenterologists, or orthopedists; some of them had undergone surgery—sometimes unnecessarily. Many had been diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome or interstitial cystitis, as it was then called—painful bladder syndrome as it is better known today—or with urinary dysfunction or just with pain. Some had been told they had a mental health disorder. Many had been prescribed unnecessary medications that resulted in greater dysfunction, and far too many had been prescribed opioids that had brought minimal and temporarily relief at best—and which became problematic in other ways.

Certainly in most of the cases referred to Amy, whatever the cause, the biomechanics of the patient’s pelvic area had been adversely affected. Amy’s treatment of manual therapy, stretching, and strengthening—plus nutritional support and other self-care practices—did mitigate these patients’ pain and bring them relief. But among the women in this particular group, the improvement they realized through physical therapy then leveled off; they simply stopped advancing. The very question that Iris was asking herself hung in the air for Amy as well: Why weren’t these women getting 100 percent better? What was keeping them from advancing past the plateau? Patients would arrive at her office ranking their pain as 8 or 9 on a scale from 1 to 10—where 10 is the worst pain conceivable—and in time, the PT and behavioral changes brought it down to anywhere from 4 to 2. But it seemed that nothing she tried with these patients could eliminate the pain entirely. In her own eyes, Amy wasn’t achieving the complete healing she wanted for them.

She was haunted by the memory of a 2005 meeting in Sydney, Australia, of the International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS). Dr. Fred Howard, a prominent American gynecologist and a co-founder of IPPS, was giving a presentation to an audience of other gynecologists, urologists, physical therapists like Amy, nurse practitioners, and primary care physicians. The heart of his talk was a deck of slides showing different conditions in the pelvic area. “Raise your hand if you think what you’re looking at is endometriosis,” Dr. Howard instructed his audience. The pictures varied; some looked perfectly bland, some troubled. In all, some 15 to 25 percent of the audience raised their hands at some of the slides, yet all of the slides in fact pictured endometriosis at different stages of progression. It meant that 75 percent to 85 percent of the specialists and practitioners in attendance got it wrong or simply did not recognize what they were looking at. “Endo is being misdiagnosed,” Howard concluded, and he added, “We have to make a change.”

For the attendees at the conference, that presentation also made it clear that endo could only be reliably diagnosed via biopsy. The change Howard was calling for was for the practitioners in the audience to keep endo in mind when coming up against a puzzling condition in female patients—especially if the condition proved intractable and was related to their menstrual history.

Amy had for some time suspected that a number of these patients she was seeing might have endo, especially those patients who were frustrated by the recurrence of their pain, or by the fact that the physical therapy relieved certain symptoms while others persisted. She concentrated on making a concerted effort to raise the endo issue in reaching out to other practitioners. By now, in order to confirm the diagnosis of the condition, she was referring patients almost exclusively to the small handful of gynecologists she was aware of nationwide who seemed to understand endometriosis. At the same time, to address the pain in those patients who had plateaued in their treatment, she referred them on to the equally minuscule number of physiatrists she was aware of at the time—specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation aimed at restoring function in the case of a disabling or chronic impairment. She kept making connections among these practitioners, introducing herself, via email or in accompanying a patient to a doctor’s appointment, representing herself as a member of the Board of the International Pelvic Pain Society and asking to chat. She wanted to be sure there was a meeting of the minds before she referred patients onward.

TEAMING UP

We think that Iris received one of those emails and replied right back that she was convinced that physical therapy was a “huge missing link” in the whole pelvic pain/endometriosis picture. We think that is what brought Amy into Iris’s office one day to talk about the work she was doing, the results she was seeing, and the limits she came up against. What we both know is that not too long into our conversation, light bulbs lit up in both our brains. Here was a kindred spirit—a practitioner on the same wavelength and asking the same question about far too many women who were not getting better and who very likely, in both our views, suffered from endometriosis.

From Amy’s point of view, Iris was one of perhaps a handful of surgeons throughout the United States who did not think surgery was the immediate go-to solution for the pain and discomfort she witnessed in her endo patients. At last, here was a New York City medical expert—a prominent specialist in endo—who took a holistic approach. From Iris’s point of view, Amy was a practitioner who actually brought pain relief to endo sufferers through PT techniques that managed the biomechanical and tissue dysfunctions, through basic nutrition, and through other forms of self-care—without drugs—and who understood that more was needed.

She gets it! Iris decided. So does she! thought Amy. In a kind of mutual relief, a professional partnership was born.

We had and have a lot in common in our personal and professional lives, but what binds us together absolutely is this shared passion for caring for women with endo. We have seen how the disease can sharply limit the scope of a woman’s capabilities, curb her physical activities, restrict her opportunities for work and school and play, burden her spirit and emotional well-being, blunt the pleasure or satisfaction of daily life with family and friends, and diminish the most physically and mentally robust decades available to her.

Starting in about 2010, we began to mesh our specialties and to expand our portfolio of therapeutic resources. Our aim was first to understand the disease process in greater depth and detail, then to create an effective approach to dealing with it. We constantly talked to each other about what we were seeing and about what worked and what didn’t work to bring relief. And we reached out to practitioners and researchers across the healthcare spectrum, exploring what they were doing that was pertinent. Their input became part and parcel of the integrated approach this book presents, and you will hear directly from a number of them in the pages that follow.

We also will take a closer look at the impact the disease of endometriosis can have on a woman’s life. We’ll note the treatments typically offered by a fragmented medical profession that often sees only through its separate specialties and fails to look at the whole patient, and we will show you why so many of those treatments fail to provide sustained relief.

What we’ll arrive at instead is an integrated multimodal strategy that will equip you with the knowledge you need to begin to beat endo and reclaim your life. By “multimodal” we mean that our protocol comprises different actions; by “integrated” we mean the actions are purposefully linked in an individual “set” or “arrangement” that is right for you. It includes, when needed and at the right time in your treatment process, the excision surgery that is the sole known method for removing endometriosis from the body.

While we are both sympathetic to the contemporary reader’s tendency to jump to the chapter that seems most personally relevant, we urge you to read the chapters of Beating Endo in order. Understanding the full implications of what this disease can do is the first essential for beating it, and that understanding unfolds almost as a narrative. At the same time, we put in your hands the tools to combat every theft of life endo represents, and we show you how, if you use the tools right, you can take back your life from the disease and live it to the fullest.

Our own bottom line is that no girl or woman need feel that she is defined by her endometriosis, nor should any girl or woman be robbed of her strength, her comfort, her joy in her own body, and sometimes her fertility by this disease. This book is our prescription for ensuring that.