Читать книгу Optimizations and Programming - Bouchaib Radi, Ghias Kharmanda, Michel Ledoux - Страница 30
1.7. Interior-point algorithm
ОглавлениеThe simplex algorithm moves along a sequence of vertices of the polyhedron and converges rapidly on average. However, Klee and Minty [KLE 72] found pathological examples where the simplex algorithm visits almost every vertex, which can potentially be an enormous number. The existence of theoretical linear programs that derail the simplex algorithm motivated research to find an algorithm that has polynomial complexity in m and n, even in the worst-case scenarios. Khachian [KHA 79] found the first such algorithm, based on the ellipsoid method from nonlinear optimization. Although it is faster than the simplex method in Minty’s problems, it never succeeded in establishing itself because it tended to be much slower than the simplex algorithm on real problems in practice. Nevertheless, as a mathematical result, it inspired research into interior-point algorithms.
In 1984, Karmarkar [KAR 84] found a new algorithm. The computation time in the worst-case scenario is proportional to n3.4L, where L denotes the number of bits required to encode the tableaus A, b and c that define the linear program. The algorithm is too complicated for computations by hand; known as the interior-point algorithm, it enters into the polyhedron itself to converge on the optimal vertex more quickly.
Today, some variants of this algorithm are able to compete with the simplex algorithm. Some software programs already include an interior-point algorithm in addition to the simplex algorithm. On some types of linear programs, interior-point algorithms can be 10 times faster than the simplex algorithm, but nevertheless, there are still many cases where the simplex algorithm is quicker [PRI 11].
EXAMPLE 1.9.– Consider the LP
The optimum is x* = (2, 2)T with cost z* = 6. Starting from the interior point x0 = (1, 1)T and without a safety factor, the algorithm performs two iterations: it considers the point x1 = (2, 1.591)T, followed by the point x*.