Читать книгу NEONOO, or PARADISE IN THE NOOSPHERE - Alexander Cherenov - Страница 9

So, for the «zero cycle» in the construction, I can be calm.

No, this is not the classic one – the «zero cycle» from clearing the site and the foundation. I mean more extensive work. If to speak the language of the military: «mobilization and deployment». That is, a colleague, Stalin, must find people, mobilize them, create their brains with tools, equipment and materials – and «give a five-year plan in three years!» And I have no doubt: colleague Stalin will «give»! Everything will «give»: both the five-year plan, and «coal for the country»!

And the next is already no less serious questions. And not only those, what’s on my agenda. I feel their approach is classically: «by liver». At least, one of them directly echoes the social order issue on my agenda. We decided to build a state. This means that there is nothing to «reinvent the wheel». Here is either or. Either it will be a socialist state, or a capitalist state: there is no third.

Only one circumstance makes the task easier: if we build the State «with a capital letter», then it is doomed to be… well, okay: not socialist, but socially oriented, because the state «with a capital letter» is the patron of its citizen.

And the patron is not declarative: actual. No sponsors, no individual philanthropists! The state itself is the sponsor, the philanthropist, and the donator in one person! And all this is in the general context of caring for a person! Again: worries not in words but in deeds! Cares are not patron in general», but substantive, or, as it has become fashionable to say: targeted! Not for TV, but for life… behind life and TV!

This State is not a state of anarchist souls, but the state of totalitarian type! Just do not immediately grab the heart and at the same time for the interpretation of «Voice of America»! It is necessary to listen not to the «Voice of America», but the voice of the mind, in the extreme case, of the heart! Do not make a scarecrow out of the term! Totalitarian state – it’s from the verb «total»: common, universal. «Common» does not mean: «split equally for everyone», as well as «stripping everyone with the same brush», not to mention «strangling everyone»! The motto «Big Brother is watching you!» is not the quintessence of a truly totalitarian state. This is the quintessence of «fairy tales on the theme». More than that: this is slander! And the quintessence of the totalitarian state is the slogan «One for all, and all for one!»

Yes, of course, our people are different, and we still have to tinker with our comrades. Although the idea of a misinterpreted totalitarianism should be close to them… as it is… a priori. After all, each of them – both in the soul, and in manifestations – is the true dictator. Well, except that the canonical Jesus falls out of the friendly ranks. And all the others are «good fellows», everything is like a selection!

Okay: This is only in the song: «now we have a respite, tomorrow we will return to the fights». Unfortunately, in real… afterlife, the respite ends prematurely – and I will not return to «battles» tomorrow, but right now. That’s because «strike the iron»… without departing from the chair table, no matter until conditional: everything else should be unconditional! Victory of common sense is above all!

I bypass a look of colleagues. I have to admit: some are supporters only «at face value». Yes, go far: Jesus! I have no doubt, that the comrade has not yet said his last word. I have no doubt, that this last word he would like to say over my «repeated» grave: the guy is so convincing in his «sympathies»! Here to you – «love your enemy…"! Truly: here you are not there!

«Comrades, I will ask everyone for the second half!»

Someone familiar with the original source laughs. No doubt in details: Caesar. His company is even more movie buff Stalin. Both of them probably got acquainted with the original source in the retelling: from the authors credited to the balance of the Noosphere.

Time-scattered people again group around me. No, the table is a must! It is vital! It feels like I haven’t yet succeeded to make everyone friends. For now everyone is on its own. Caesar is right: I am the only link. But this will not work. In the sense, that if it does not go, all the others will stand still. Noosphere and me – sorry, Your Majesty, for impudence! – need a strong, cohesive team, a team of like-minded people, it does not matter, that each of them «in the past life» was «the greatest».

«We proceed to the next question on the agenda: what will we build? I am now – not about houses: with this everything is more or less clear. I am about the state. What should it be? So, where the slogan is «one for all – and all for one» or such, where «one is in the forest, the other is for firewood»? We will give the state to the will of the occasion or choose ourselves once again?

I have already said: the correct formulation of the question is, at least, half the battle! It seems, I hit the target once again: the people react instantly and in the right «key». I press residual doubts:

«Will we build a rich state or a state of the rich men? Recall the story: the state of the rich is a colossus with feet of clay, because it’s weak: all power belongs to others, who do not want to share neither by force, nor by others!»

I have no doubt that colleagues stand for the need for a strong state. The reason is historical experience, no longer mine: them. All of them created the empire «in the past life». The method is unprincipled, at least, now. The exception is one again: Jesus. The guy persistently combines his hostility to the earthly kingdom with delight at the address of «My Father’s House» due to historical experience also: he experienced the power of the state on my own skin. Hence there is such a negative. And then – I, as an additional factor!

Although… Well, he did not object to the title «King of Judea»! It is unlikely that the rank of the tribal leader was understood. And Jesus also hardly wanted to be the king of the operetta-puppet type! Surely, he dreamed of uniting the North and the South under one scepter! And this is not speculation. At a minimum, I am not alone in the opinion: the «comrades ancient romans» shared it long before my birth!

So, all but Jesus, stand for the need for a strong state. But not everyone is the same, and «on the same platform». Caesar, for example, does not show enthusiasm. And I see it not only in his eyes: the whole «appearance» actively participates in the «non-manifestation». Although from Caesar I least expected the «soul of a beautiful rush». «When he was there,» Caesar littered with millions, despite the fact, that the legionary did not earn even thousands a year! The support of Crassus – the main «purse» of the empire – is also not necessary discounted. «Hand washes the hand» and so on.

It is urgent to seek allies. It does not matter, what kind of «bottling»: ideological disintegrating or those, who prefer power to gold. Although what to look for them: everything is in sight. The Buddha with Mohammed is the brightest representatives of the «clan of the disintegrated». True, unlike Muhammad, who built the kingdom not only of God, but also on earth, Prince Shakyamuni, before leaving for nirvana, did not show any inclination to engage in public affairs. But, at least, he did not interfere with showing them to others. Let him to give a voice for me here. No offense, be it said, but I didn’t introduce him into the Supreme Council so that he would sleep at meetings, not to mention the sabotage of worldly life!

Karl Marx, as a representative of the «clan of non-possessors» type of interest to me is brighter than the Buddha. He is a fighter, and not for nirvana! But, alas: Marx, although it has a voice, but cannot give it for me legally give: on voting. So, we must bet on other comrades.

In order of priority, I turn to the «coverage of the issue» of representatives of the second category. They are: Charlemagne, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, Napoleon. Two of them: Genghis Khan and Tamerlane are with a decisive vote. True, when earthlings were men, though they preferred power to gold, they did not refuse the metal at all: they combined it. Lenin, Stalin and Mao are the brightest of all on the «line of refusal»: that’s not Izzy, who did not care, called for the collection of treasures, even heavenly. Here, for whom power was everything: dad, mom, and spiritual food. «Satan ruled there was» – this is not about them! Joseph Vissarionovich, for example, was laid to the eternal rest in the damn tunic. Due to his rubbed elbows Satan could only bite his own elbows!

I glance with a look on Stalin. He grins understandingly.

«Colleague Chairman is absolutely right. You all, of course, have the right to argue that, he says, we are «poisoned by the poison of socialism». Both are from there: I am by upbringing, he is by birth. That’s maybe, so. But, believe, colleagues, «poisoned. Here, one comrade once said: «To us the smoke of the Fatherland is sweet and pleasant». Let me rephrase the author – not rhyme, but from a pure heart: «To us «the poison of socialism» is sweet, and pleasant!»

Thanks, colleague Stalin: «the ice has broken», it seems! The soil has already been prepared – and the word is given… to me again.

«Do not be alarmed, citizens! Colleague Stalin had no intentions neither mislead you nor impose your views by force. Yes, and speech is not about the Soviet model of socialism.»

I see how Stalin actively «misunderstands» me with his eyes, but I am already «in the saddle»:

«We are talking now about socialism as a system, the best way ensuring the dominant role of the state and its social function.»

Beautifully identified! Even, Joseph Vissarionovich seems pleased. While the people are thinking, I’m going further, including in his doubts.

«As Chairman Mao once said…»

I make reverence towards the fragrant Mao.

«… „Let a hundred flowers bloom“. We are not against private property… in the form of personal property.»

I contradict the basics, but it’s for the benefit only! I hope that the comrades «did not finish the academies»: I do not need «creative discussions»!

«That is, I want to say, that we do not mind wealth, provided by personal work.»