Читать книгу Orange vs. Brown. Fascisms - Алмаз Браев - Страница 4

Different fascisms and different communisms

Fascism as a system emerged in the first quarter of the 20th century. The history of communism, and its principles, are more ancient. Even European scientific communism is a hundred years older than fascism in the sense of involving the ruling regime of the masses of the petty bourgeoisie in its goals.

Fascism differs from previous empires in patriotism. The inferiority complex of the petty bourgeoisie under the old fascism is maintained by the regime and turns into a means, into a battering ram, to the imperial seizures. It is inconceivable that any aristocracy would seek an alliance with the lower classes, with the rabble. Fascism pushed aside the internal caste hierarchy and moved it outside – to external aggression because people from the beginning of human history want to organize and dominate (since the time of monkeys to show superiority).

That is, the old fascism, aka fascism of the 20th century, is organized nationalism, (there was no nationalism before that). So fascism is organized nationalism. Ethnically, there have been skirmishes at all times, but only an organized market has simultaneously organized ethnic groups that have now become nations – armies against other nations and subhumans.

It so happened that the old fascism was formed later than the official Russian communism.

Russian Revolution of 1917. The Russian world did not have enough development – capitalism and organization. Russian peasants lived in the village as a community. But there was no cult of money in Russian culture. From this, the bourgeois nation was replaced by a new type of Russian community. The Russian nobility did not see the need to organize the bourgeoisie on the principles of superiority for them the feudal hierarchy was enough. The Russian bourgeoisie did not have the power and influence that bankers and stockbrokers had in Europe. To a lack of money (and the power of money over people’s minds), Russian capitalism organized itself into a proletarian dictatorship at the first crisis. Thus, Marxism helped the Russian elite embody the patriarchal hierarchy as innate, inherent in humanity, into the dictatorship of the workers.

There is such a difference between fascism and communism in the 20th century. The fascist elite rallied the nation, realized the idea of superiority, and deployed the bourgeoisie outside. The communist elite in Moscow transformed the Russian community into a dictatorship of the proletarian lower classes over any aristocracy, that is, inside the community.

The Russian elite would not have enough bourgeois contagion and energy to push its plebs to conquer the world. But Karl Marx’s scientific communism helped preserve the Russian Empire (after under the name of the USSR). Greed is the main feeling that allowed Europe to abandon Marxism – communism: most Europeans have fled from their villages and forgotten the community and kinship. Greed is a feeling familiar to every trader in general. In the traditional world, the opposite money did not have that power and authority therefore, socialism was the only way to develop conventional people in the 20th century.

In the 20th century, the world was divided into two camps – NATO and the Warsaw Pact. There were many Third World countries else that had not yet joined them. In these countries, there was no power of banks, and no elite for Marxism was formed, that is, the tradition was more substantial than both money and passion. Former peasants could not contradict their feudal lords. In any case, any top management of the Third World learned in one direction or another or pretended because the world was coming together technologically. The socialist system was closer to traditional peoples, at the same time, each local elite did not want to give everything to the people. This is how hybrid regimes of the «third way» turned out – in the form of a combination of the market, which inevitably led to the power of local bankers and regular coups of black colonels against them as it was in Latin America, or as it was happening in the Middle East and North Africa where Arab officers all the time proclaimed the «people’s system». In fact, these countries lacked Zeremids like in Russia to create a planned economy, or Refags men to create a coherent banking system and abandon traditional culture and communism.

In this form, the whole world has crawled into the 21st century.

Due to globalization and the dominance of money, a new fascism began to raise its head. But this fascism is completely non-national, as fascism was in the 20th century. This fascism of the global bank, that is, non-national. There was a subordination of all countries and governments to a single currency, where national banks, so their governments turned out to be branches of the World Bank. All the countries of the world turned out to be vassals of the world government. De jure they are independent and with «human rights», de facto, any country, its leader that does not obey the world plan, falls under sanctions. At first, the most perfect outcasts like Cuba, North Korea, and Iran fell under sanctions in the form of a test of strength and influence. Now Russia falls under Western sanctions, its government behaved like an arrogant Third World elite in the 20th century.

In the 20th century, communism beat fascism.

But what kind of communism was it?

It was rural communism because of the so-called dictatorship of the proletariat. The proletariat is the former peasants disguised in working clothes. With the help of a new discipline and dictatorship, the Soviet government redirected the rebellious energy of the people into creation. But first, it allowed to kill the old feudal, then the new revolutionary Lenin’s guard elite. This is the same fascist chthonic energy as that of the European petty bourgeoisie. But this energy was directed at the internal extermination of castes and competitors. The old fascist idea unites all lovers and owners of money and directs it against «strangers», rural communism conversely unites the crowd against «parasites» and all people with character and snobbery fall under the name of parasites. The elite of rural communism used the Zerefs for their power, the dictatorship of the party nomenclature. The result was a system of official communism as a counterweight to rising fascism. In fact, the peak of rural fascism and the peak of rural communism fell at the peak of world party building – party against party. Former peasants are gathered in both detachments. Therefore, not only the old communism but also the fascism of the 20th century is also rural. In the 20th century, rural communism opposed rural fascism and even defeated it in 1945. But rural communism fell by itself in an evolutionary way in 1991, together with the USSR. The fall of the USSR was a warning to other «rural» Third World countries: «you’ll end up like us, too, if you go our way.» Objectively, the barbarians also finished off Ancient Rome with its culture, organization, and military machine. The leading elite of the Soviet nomenclature was barbaric, that is, peasants. And they weren’t building socialism. They didn’t know what they were building. Although the elements of the plan and mass organization and discipline worked wonders at first. All barbarians copy the best organization. The Soviet barbaric elite objectively returned to the path of world evolution, from which it turned in 1917, thereby proving that any fascism lacks just a culture of money and its carriers – Zeremids and Refags. Only 30 years have passed and modern Russia has received the population necessary for rural fascism.

What is the difference between rural fascism and rural communism in general?

Replacing any hierarchy (by nobility under the tsar, by position under the soviets) with a culture of money. Since the maturation of the generation of money, and private property, when the rootless townspeople become an organized force (with the help of patriotic slogans), rural fascism evolutionarily matures from this moment – whether you want it or not. Let no one is confused by the accompaniment of rural fascism by the townspeople. Citizens quickly mastered competition, cynicism, and hatred. Accompanying the old fascism with a rural definition is necessary for understanding – communism and fascism of the 20th century is created by the mass of the former traditional population, the Zerefs.

But if there is a world fascism of financiers, why is there no world civil communism?

The past rural communism is no good. It defeated the rural national fascism of Germany and Japan in 1945 but it disappeared with the USSR.

Being only a branch of the world fascism of bankers, rural fascism cannot resist the united world of money the world fascism. Every leader, every official, and every person who recognizes money as the main value and meaning of life will lose in advance. We need another global idea to form a new discipline and organization. Another value system is very much in solidarity with the conservative values preached by all the traditional communities of the world. All past stereotypes are dismissed as outdated and interfering see the new global fascism of financiers.