Читать книгу Bats of Southern and Central Africa - Ara Monadjem - Страница 46

Bat species exhibit great diversity in how and where they fly. The most important ecological constraint on foraging insectivorous bats is clutter, that is, the number of obstacles a bat has to detect and avoid (Fenton 1990). Vegetation structure has an overriding control over the relative clutter of the habitats exploited by foraging bats. Perceptually, bats are constrained by the capabilities of their sensory mechanisms (e.g. echolocation, vision, olfaction, hearing) to detect, classify, and localise potential prey near clutter. Echolocation is ineffective over long ranges, and therefore sets spatial limits on where bats can forage. Geometric and atmospheric attenuation severely reduce the intensity of echolocation echoes with increasing target distance (Pye 1980, Lawrence and Simmons 1982). Furthermore, the intensity of the target echo depends on the size and shape of the target (Barclay and Brigham 1991, Waters et al. 1995). Mechanically, bats are constrained by the capabilities of their flying ability (Figure 37). These factors explain why the flight morphology and echolocation systems of bats are adapted specifically to the habitat structure in which they forage (Aldridge and Rautenbach 1987, Norberg and Rayner 1987, Roemer et al. 2019). For example, a wing shape that allows fast flight would be useless if coupled with echolocation calls that are effective only at short range. Such a bat would not be able to detect prey soon enough to capture it. Similarly, wing morphology adapted for slow, manoeuvrable flight in clutter needs to be coupled with echolocation signals that can distinguish prey from clutter echoes. Wing morphology and echolocation signals are therefore part of the same adaptive complex (Arita and Fenton 1997). Based on these adaptations, sympatric bats can be classified into three broad functional foraging groups: open, clutter-edge, and clutter foragers (Crome and Richards 1988, Fullard et al. 1991, Schnitzler and Kalko 2001, Schoeman and Jacobs 2008).

Figure 37. Adaptations of wing shape and the resulting flight style to different foraging habitats. Fast fliers (e.g. Tadarida) hunt above the vegetation (open-air functional foraging group). These bats have narrow, long wings, wide wingspans, and high wing loading. Species that are highly manoeuvrable (e.g. Hipposideros) forage in and near vegetation (clutter functional foraging group). These bats have short, broad wings and low wing loading. Bats that hunt insects between vegetation (clutter-edge functional foraging group) have intermediate-sized wings, wingspans, and wing loading (e.g. Scotophilus). Fruit-eating bats (e.g. Rousettus) have large wings and high wing loading (modified after Neuweiler 2000). Ef Epomops franqueti; Eh Eptesicus hottentotus; Na Neoromicia anchietae; Hc Hipposideros caffer; Mn Miniopterus natalensis; Ra Rousettus aegyptiacus; Rcl Rhinolophus clivosus; Sd Scotophilus dinganii; Ta Tadarida aegyptiaca; Tm Taphozous mauritianus.

Open-air foragers that feed on flying prey high above the ground and far from vegetation have no problems with clutter echoes and obstacles. Masking problems are not likely to affect echolocation signals, as long as the emitted signal does not overlap with the returning echo. Nevertheless, bats that forage in open habitats must find relatively small prey in a big space. Hence, their echolocation signals are optimised for detection, and their wing morphology is geared for speed and agility (Norberg and Rayner 1987, Schnitzler and Kalko 1998, 2001). Some of the species in this functional group fly at considerable heights above ground; in Zimbabwe, Fenton and Griffin (1997) revealed that six species of molossids and Taphozous mauritianus feed at heights over 500 m above ground.

Clutter-edge foragers are bats that hunt for insects near the edges of clutter such as forest edges and gaps. Clutter-edge bats therefore experience perceptual and mechanical constraints at the same time. They must distinguish insect echoes from clutter-edge echoes, and navigate along these edges avoiding collision. Clutter-edge bats solve these problems by using mixed signals (Schnitzler and Kalko 1998, 2001). Typically, search-phase echolocation consists of low duty-cycle QCF signals alternated with FM signals. QCF signals increase detection distance, while FM signals allow the bats to localise and distinguish between clutter echoes and insect echoes. Wing morphology is variable, but most species have average wingspans and wing areas. Consequently, some bats are very flexible in their foraging and echolocation behaviour and often switch between open and clutter-edge habitat space (Fenton 1990).

Clutter foragers are bats that search for and capture insects in highly cluttered space close to the ground or vegetation, and therefore experience more perceptual and mechanical constraints than clutter-edge foragers. Clutter foragers must distinguish insect echoes buried in clutter echoes, and at the same time know their exact spatial position to navigate and avoid collision with the clutter. Bats have evolved two different echolocation sensory strategies to solve this problem (Schnitzler and Kalko 2001). On the one hand, HD-CF bats use overlap-insensitive CF signals of long duration to hunt fluttering insects. On the other hand, LD-FM bats, which glean prey from surfaces, use overlap-sensitive uni- or multi-harmonic FM signals of short duration at low intensities (< 100 dB). Short-duration and low-intensity calls do not overload the sensory system with clutter echoes (Schnitzler and Kalko 2001). In addition, many of these bats have long ears that listen for prey-generated acoustic cues, such as the calls of crickets and frogs (Tuttle and Ryan 1981, Bell 1982, Fenton et al. 1983). All clutter-foraging bats have similar short and broad wings associated with the slow, manoeuvrable flight necessary to hunt in clutter habitats (Norberg and Rayner 1987).

In this book, open-air foragers include insectivorous bat species from the families Molossidae and Emballonuridae. These LD-CF and LD-QCF bat species are characterised by long and narrow wings with high wing loading and aspect ratio (> 10.9), coupled with narrowband echolocation calls at low frequencies (< 30 kHz) and of long duration (> 8 ms).

Clutter-edge foragers include insectivorous bat species from the families Vespertilionidae, Cistugidae and Miniopteridae. In general, these bat species are characterised by average wingspans, and wing areas with low to intermediate wing loading and aspect ratio (between 7 and 10.9), coupled with echolocation calls at intermediate frequencies (30–70 kHz), ranging from broadband (> 20 kHz) to narrowband signals (< 20 kHz) of intermediate duration (3–8 ms).

Clutter foragers are divided into two groups: HD-CF bats of the families Hipposideridae, Rhinonycteridae and Rhinolophidae, which emit CF signals of long duration (10–100 ms), and medium to high peak frequency (> 30 kHz); and LD-FM bats of the families Nycteridae and Megadermatidae, which use FM signals of short duration (1–3 ms) at low intensities (< 100 dB). Despite having very different echolocation systems, the wings of all clutter feeders are relatively short and broad with low wing loading and aspect ratio (< 7).