The Politics of Mapping
Реклама. ООО «ЛитРес», ИНН: 7719571260.
Оглавление
Bernard Debarbieux. The Politics of Mapping
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Illustrations
Guide
Pages
The Politics of Mapping
Introduction
I.1. Theoretical and conceptual debates
I.1.1. The “Harleyian turning point”
I.1.2. Pluralism and taking perspectives further
I.1.3. Toward process- and practice-centered approaches
I.2. Political practices and uses of maps
I.2.1. New modalities, new actors: the questioning of cartographic state sovereignty
I.2.2. From domination to resistance strategies
I.2.3. The issue of participation
I.3. The structure of this book
I.4. References
1. The Map as a Legitimate Space: Cartography as a Language, a Stage and an Issue
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Map truth regimes
1.3. The new spaces of the electoral map
1.4. Cartographic turn, geographic turn and political space
1.5. Ethical turn and mapping
1.6. Mapping, citizen science
1.7. References
2. Cartography and Spatial Production of Society
2.1. The map, politics and morality
2.2. The map, territory and globe
2.3. The map, order and modernity
2.4. The map, reason and rhetoric…
2.5. The map, constraint and self-organization…
2.6. The map, production and society
2.7. References
3. Farewell to Maps: Reformulating Critical Cartography in the Digital Age
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Farewell to maps: when the digital world disrupts the objects and questions of a research current
3.2.1. The main issues of conventional critical mapping
3.2.2. What the digital world does to critical mapping: Russian doll-like difficulties
3.2.2.1. Explosion of objects and categories
3.2.2.2. Difficulties in understanding the effects of territorialization and acculturation
3.2.3. Methods maladapted to digital technology changes
3.3. The shortcomings of critical mapping exacerbated by digital technology
3.3.1. The “Harlesian” of reflections on the finished product
3.3.2. The taste for successful maps
3.3.3. A taste for great narratives
3.4. Reformulating critical mapping in the digital age
3.4.1. Three priority disciplinary alliances
3.4.2. Making political sense of what does not work: investigating “maps for nothing” in the digital age
3.4.3. The political meaning of cartographic modesty: what do the “small maps of the Web” tell us?
3.4.4. Circulation and policy
3.5. Conclusion
3.6. References
4. Mapping and Participation in the Topos and Chora Test
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Participatory mapping tested by topos and chora
4.3. Toward a reflective approach to participatory mapping
4.4. From solicited mapping to collaborative systems and digital traces
4.5. The new boundaries of collaborative mapping systems produced by geolocation technologies
4.6. Representing the spatiotemporal dimension of urban mobility using data produced by inhabitants
4.7. Toward a reflective and chorographic approach to collaborative mapping systems
4.7.1. Solicited mapping systems with active participation
4.7.2. Voluntary and participatory mapping systems
4.7.3. Derivative and passive participatory map systems
4.8. Conclusion
4.9. References
5. The Cartographic Factory of Modern States
5.1. Introduction
5.2. The invention of spatial modernity in the Renaissance
5.3. State imaginaries of space and territory
5.4. The construction of the nation-state through the map
5.5. The colonial adventure: a counter-illustration?
5.6. Maps and the government of things and people
5.7. Current state of the issue
5.8. References
6. Statistical Cartography and International Governance in the Age of Big Data
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Birth and internationalization of statistical cartography
6.3. International statistical mapping. 6.3.1. Statistics and mapping by international organizations
6.3.2. Coordination of statistical and geographical information
6.3.3. Is the aggregation of national data outdated?
6.4. Cartography in the digital age. 6.4.1. Computerization and dissemination of cartographic resources. 6.4.1.1. The computerized turning point of cartography
6.4.1.2. Beginning to open
6.4.1.3. Data deluge and web access since the 1990s
6.4.2. A global information space based on the Web and Big Data. 6.4.2.1. A global web-based data infrastructure
6.4.2.2. New transnational data worlds
6.4.2.3. Spillover from Big Data
6.4.2.4. Opening, standardization and sharing of data
6.5. Mapping the SDGs. 6.5.1. A set of non-binding targets for 2030
6.5.2. Governance of the SDG indicators
6.5.3. Information coverage of the SDGs
6.5.4. Cartographic visualizations of the SDGs
6.5.5. The SDG indicator process challenged by Big Data
6.6. (Re)configurations of international cartography
6.6.1. From the visual paradigm to the datamatic paradigm
6.6.2. Informational alignments
6.6.3. Political alignments
6.7. Conclusion
6.8. References
7. Indigenous Mapping: Reclaiming Territories, Decolonizing Knowledge
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Conceptual and theoretical milestones
7.2.1. Indigenous counter-mapping: a struggle for concrete and symbolic spaces
7.2.2. Indigenous mapping as a field of academic thinking
7.3. Using maps to claim rights and reclaim territories
7.3.1. Brief history of the political use of maps
7.3.2. Indigenous mapping in the Americas: similarities and differences between North and South
7.3.3. The aporias of the “cartographic-legal strategy”
7.3.4. Controlling the flow of geographic information
7.3.5. The ambiguous role of the digital giants
7.4. Decolonizing maps and cartography
7.4.1. Toward an inclusive definition of maps
7.4.2. “Reconstructing” maps
7.4.3. Representing “Indigenous depth of place”
7.5. Conclusion
7.6. References
8. Chorematic Representations in Participatory Processes of Territorial Projects
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Methodological choices
8.3. Three illustrations of the use of choremes in territorial projects
8.3.1. The Pikogan forest in Quebec or choremes for communicating
8.3.2. The Western Pacific Islands or the choremes for integrating the issues
8.3.3. The gardens of the Billom area in France or the choremes for acting
8.4. How can we evaluate this co-construction of territories?
8.5. References
9. National Territorial Prospective Maps
9.1. Introduction
9.2. DATAR, foresight and mapping
9.3. The Paris Basin White Paper
9.3.1. Cartographic design
9.3.2. The graphic vocabulary
9.3.3. Translating, visualizing and expressing intentions
9.4. The first maps of the great national debate on regional planning
9.5. France in 2015
9.6. France in 2020
9.6.1. Three “deterrent” scenarios
9.6.2. The “connected polycentrism” scenario
9.7. Lessons from a wealth of experience
9.8. References
10. Making Maps to Fight Unjust Migration Policies
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Actors and objectives of cartographic productions
10.2.1. From respect to emancipation of semiological conventions
10.2.2. The two network compasses
10.3. Mapping experiments undertaken
10.3.1. Carrying knowledge and claims
10.3.2. New modes of representation
10.3.3. The words on the maps are also important
10.3.4. The issue of esthetics
10.4. Conclusion
10.5. References
List of Authors
Index. A, B
C
D, E
G
H, I
L, M
N, O, P
R, S
T, V, W
WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
Отрывок из книги
Geography and Demography, Field Director – Denise Pumain
.....
Debarbieux, B. and Lardon, S. (eds) (2003). Les figures du projet territorial. Éditions de l’Aube and Datar, La Tour d’Aigues.
DelCasino, V. and Hanna, S. (2006). Beyond the “binaries”: A methodological intervention for interrogating maps as representational practices. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), 34–56.
.....