Читать книгу Fichte's Science of Knowledge - Charles Carroll Everett - Страница 12

Table of Contents

1 ↑ Kant’s Works, Rosenkranz’ Edition, II, 196.

2 ↑ In treating of Fichte in his “History of Philosophy.”

3 ↑ Kant’s Works, Rosenkranz’ Edition, II, 209 et 784.

4 ↑ Sämmtliche Werke, I, 486. The term Transcendental, which must not be confounded with Transcendent, is here used to indicate the contradictory nature of the view described. The object is transcendental, because it is assumed as a necessity of thought; yet it is further assumed to be external. It cannot, Fichte would say, be both, and this is what makes the view ascribed to Kant so absurd.

5 ↑ Hume’s Philosophical Works, I, 16.

6 ↑ Kant’s Werke, Rosenkranz’ Edition, II, 235.

7 ↑ Kant’s Werke, Rosenkranz’ Edition, VIII, 261.

8 ↑ Nachgelassene Werke, II, 103.