Читать книгу Dermatopathology - Christine J. Ko - Страница 9

Recognizing a disease process on a histopathologic slide becomes instantaneous, with increasing familiarity. Breaking this process down into the “how” is difficult, especially given that the steps may not be the same for each individual. Nonetheless, on a basic level, it is important to separate a solitary growth (“tumor” or “lesion”) from a rash (“inflammatory” process; Figures 1–3), focus on the most obvious pathologic finding, and run through a differential diagnosis. With experience, that “obvious” pathologic finding (i.e., where to start) becomes second nature. The diseases in this atlas are grouped, arbitrarily, by such findings (see the Index by Pattern). Notably, basic algorithms are ultimately overly simplistic, and there is overlap of the two major divisions in Figure 1 (tumor versus rash). For example, clear cell acanthoma can architecturally mimic psoriasis, mycosis fungoides can appear to be a dermatitis, and epithelioid sarcoma can be confused with a palisading granulomatous process.

Key concepts in cognitive psychology come into play during visual recognition, and having some understanding of how the brain processes visual information can be helpful in training the eye to see (Table 1). In figure–ground separation, the brain focuses on a perceived figure and tends to ignore the background. Thus, an important initial step in diagnosing disease when viewing microscopic slides is to train the brain to accurately identify the most important features (“figure”). In order to make sense of visual stimuli, the brain also automatically groups information. With all else being equal, similar objects will be grouped together, closer objects will be grouped together, and objects perceived as having a similar color/texture or common enclosure (“common region”) will be grouped together. Clues such as body site (Figure 4) and absence of obvious pathology (Figure 5 and Table 2) can also be useful.

Table 1 Visual recognition in dermatopathology as related to cognitive psychology.

Dermatopathology		Cognitive psychology concept
Overview (2×/4× ocular)	“Tumor” versus “rash”ArchitectureBody siteCell type	GestaltFigure–ground separationGrouping
Higher magnification (10×/20×/40× ocular)	Confirm cell type/morphologyFiner details of architecture	Grouping using finer detailsSimilarityProximityCommon region

Figure 1 Gestalt impression of a slide

 A major initial breakpoint in evaluating a specimen on a slide is the determination of the type of process: tumor/growth versus rash/inflammatory

Note In some cases, it is not readily apparent if the process is a tumor or an inflammatory process (examples include mycosis fungoides, a form of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, as well as deep fungal infections, which can induce florid epidermal hyperplasia mimicking a squamous cell carcinoma).

Figure 2(A) Location of the tumor

 Important characteristics to consider for a tumor/growth include location (A), architecture (B), cell type (C), and benignancy versus malignancy (D). The eye can be trained to focus in on the blue areas (figure–ground separation; grouping)

Figure 2(B) Architecture of an epidermal tumor/process

 Dermal tumors can have various architectural patterns

Note Benign tumors are often symmetric with a pushing border, and malignant tumors may be asymmetric and infiltrative.

Figure 2(C) Different tumors are predominantly composed of a particular cell type

 Keratinocytic: rectangular/polygonal shape, intercellular bridges, round nucleus and small nucleolus

 Melanocytic: may be nested/clustered; nevomelanocytes (red arrow): oval nuclei, small nucleolus, pseudonuclear inclusions or melanin pigment may be evident; dendritic melanocyte (green arrow): thin cytoplasmic processes extending away from cell center

 Smooth muscle: spindle cell with abundant cytoplasm, perinuclear clear space, cigar‐shaped nucleus

 Adipocytic: thin membrane with compressed nucleus

 Neural: spindle cell with tapered nucleus, pink cytoplasm (green arrows)

 Fibroblast: spindle cell with oval nucleus (yellow arrows)

 Endothelial: blue nuclei surrounding vascular spaces (red arrows)

 Hair follicle: matrical cells are round to oval and dark blue (red arrow); outer root sheath cells are pale pink (green arrow)

 Sebocytes: bubbly cytoplasm (yellow arrow) and central nucleus that may be star‐shaped (scalloped)

 Eccrine gland and duct: the gland has clear cells (blue arrow); the duct has an eosinophilic pink cuticle

 Apocrine gland and duct: the gland often shows decapitation secretion (black arrow)

Figure 2(D) Cytologic features are important in pointing toward a benign versus malignant tumor

 Malignant cells have high nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, irregular chromatin pattern, irregular nuclear contours, irregular nucleolar shape and size

 Primarily nuclear details suggest cytologic malignancy

 Cytoplasmic features point to differentiation: keratinocytes – eosinophilic, hyalinized cytoplasm, melanocytes – fine brown pigment

Benign nevomelanocytes (left)	versus	Melanoma cells (right)
Small nucleus, abundant cytoplasm		Large nucleus, relatively little cytoplasm
Smooth nuclear border		Irregular nuclear border
Chromatin pattern nondescript		Irregular, chunky nuclear contents (chromatin)
Inconspicuous nucleolus		1 or more large, purple nucleoli

“Rash”: key concepts

 The eye can be trained to focus in on the blue areas (figure–ground separation; grouping)

 Key features include epidermal changes (A), distribution of inflammation (B), and inflammatory cell type (C)

 Parakeratosis is often present in spongiotic and papulosquamous disorders; dry parakeratosis without serum but with neutrophils is suggestive of psoriasis

 Simplistically, a dermatitis can be categorized as spongiotic, papulosquamous, or interface

Figure 3(A) Key epidermal changes

 Parakeratosis: retained nuclei in the stratum corneum

 Spongiosis: increased intercellular spaces and sometimes vesicles

 Papulosquamous: thickened epidermis with parakeratosis

 Interface (vacuolar): spaces in basal cells, which may be polygonal (squamatized), lymphocytes at junction

 Interface (lichenoid): dense band of lymphocytes between epidermis and dermis with necrotic keratinocytes

Figure 3(B) Distribution of inflammation – major patternsSee Figure 3(A) for lichenoid

Figure 3(C) The morphology of key inflammatory cells

 Lymphocyte: round blue nucleus, little cytoplasm

 Neutrophil: multilobed nucleus

 Eosinophil: bilobed nucleus with bright pink‐red cytoplasmic granules

 Histiocyte: oval nucleus

 Giant cell: multiple nuclei in one cell

 Plasma cell: clock‐faced nucleus on one side of cell, perinuclear clear space

Characteristic body sites

 The location on the body (body site) can often be determined by training the eye/brain to perceive certain features

 Figure 4: Acral (A), mucosal (B), eyelid (C), axilla (D)

Figure 4(A) Acral skin

Note Meissner’s corpuscles (black arrow), Pacinian corpuscles (red arrow), and thick stratum corneum with a stratum lucidum (green arrow).

Figure 4(B) Cutaneous lip (top row) has keratin and a granular layer (green arrow) as well as adnexal structures

 Skeletal muscle is often present (black arrows)

 Normal mucosal lip (bottom row) lacks keratin and a granular layer; the keratinocytes are pale pink with abundant cytoplasm

 The mucosa shown is abnormal as there is subtle parakeratosis (black arrow bottom right image)

Figure 4(C) Eyelid skin has a thin epidermis with dermal vellus hairs (red arrow) and skeletal muscle (black arrow)

Figure 4(D) Axilla

 The epidermis is undulating, often with basilar melanin pigment. There are apocrine glands in the deep dermis

Table 2(see page 22) shows a differential of “normal”‐appearing skin. Some entities, like vitiligo, require special stains (i.e., a melanocytic marker).

Figure 5(A) Argyria

 There are fine black granules in the basement membrane of hair follicles and eccrine glands

 Black granules are also deposited on elastotic fibers, so‐called “pseudo‐ochronosis”

Source: Case courtesy of James E. Fitzpatrick, MD.

Figure 5(B) Ichthyosis vulgaris

 This example from an older patient has solar elastosis in the dermis

 There is hyperkeratosis above an attenuated granular layer

Source: Case courtesy of Jeff D. Harvell, MD.

Figure 5(C) Tinea versicolor

 Yeast and hyphal forms in the stratum corneum

Figure 5(D) Urticaria

 Urticaria can appear “normal” at low power, particularly when inflammation is sparse

 There are perivascular and interstitial lymphocytes and eosinophils

Table 2 Some entities to consider for a gestalt impression of “normal” skin.

“Normal” skin	Look for
Argyria	Flecks of black material around eccrine glands; elastic fibers may be discolored (Figure 5A)
Ichthyosis vulgaris	Hyperkeratosis above hypogranulosis or absent granular layer (Figure 5B)
Macular amyloidosis	Amorphous, smooth pink globules in the papillary dermis Pigment incontinence
Scleredema	“Square”/rectangular biopsy shape Increased space +/‐ mucin between collagen bundles
Tinea versicolor	Spores and pseudohyphae in the stratum corneum (Figure 5C)
Urticaria	Mixed inflammation (interstitial and perivascular) (Figure 5D)