Читать книгу Google Applications A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you catch Google applications definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
2. How does the Google applications manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
3. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Google applications?
<--- Score
4. Are accountability and ownership for Google applications clearly defined?
<--- Score
5. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
6. What is in scope?
<--- Score
7. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
8. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Google applications goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
9. Are the Google applications requirements testable?
<--- Score
10. What are the Google applications use cases?
<--- Score
11. How do you think the partners involved in Google applications would have defined success?
<--- Score
12. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Google applications changes?
<--- Score
13. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
14. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
15. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
16. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
17. Who are the Google applications improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
18. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
19. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Google applications work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
20. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
21. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
22. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
23. How do you hand over Google applications context?
<--- Score
24. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
25. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
26. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of Google applications?
<--- Score
28. When is/was the Google applications start date?
<--- Score
29. Is Google applications currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
30. How can the value of Google applications be defined?
<--- Score
31. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
32. Is Google applications required?
<--- Score
33. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
34. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
35. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
36. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
37. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
38. What Google applications requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
39. Is the Google applications scope manageable?
<--- Score
40. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
41. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
42. What are the Google applications tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
43. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
44. How would you define Google applications leadership?
<--- Score
45. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
46. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
47. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
48. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
49. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
50. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
51. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
52. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
53. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
55. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
56. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
57. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
58. How do you gather Google applications requirements?
<--- Score
59. Has a Google applications requirement not been met?
<--- Score
60. What is the scope of the Google applications effort?
<--- Score
61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
62. How do you manage changes in Google applications requirements?
<--- Score
63. Who approved the Google applications scope?
<--- Score
64. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
65. What was the context?
<--- Score
66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
67. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
68. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
69. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Google applications? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
73. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Google applications leverage and how?
<--- Score
74. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
75. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
76. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
79. Is Google applications linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
80. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
81. Have all basic functions of Google applications been defined?
<--- Score
82. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
83. Will a Google applications production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
84. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
85. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Google applications brings?
<--- Score
86. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
87. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
88. How have you defined all Google applications requirements first?
<--- Score
89. Is the scope of Google applications defined?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering Google applications information?
<--- Score
91. What are the core elements of the Google applications business case?
<--- Score
92. What is the scope?
<--- Score
93. What system do you use for gathering Google applications information?
<--- Score
94. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
95. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
96. How will the Google applications team and the group measure complete success of Google applications?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
98. What Google applications services do you require?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. Is there a critical path to deliver Google applications results?
<--- Score
101. Are the Google applications requirements complete?
<--- Score
102. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
103. How did the Google applications manager receive input to the development of a Google applications improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
104. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
105. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
106. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
107. Has the Google applications work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
108. What is the scope of the Google applications work?
<--- Score
109. What would be the goal or target for a Google applications’s improvement team?
<--- Score
110. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
111. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
112. Is there any additional Google applications definition of success?
<--- Score
113. What is the definition of Google applications excellence?
<--- Score
114. What sources do you use to gather information for a Google applications study?
<--- Score
115. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
116. Is there a clear Google applications case definition?
<--- Score
117. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
118. What gets examined?
<--- Score
119. Do you have a Google applications success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
120. What are (control) requirements for Google applications Information?
<--- Score
121. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
122. How do you manage unclear Google applications requirements?
<--- Score
123. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Google applications results are met?
<--- Score
124. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
125. Do you all define Google applications in the same way?
<--- Score
126. What is the context?
<--- Score
127. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
128. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
129. How are consistent Google applications definitions important?
<--- Score
130. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Google applications Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
