Читать книгу Infrastructure As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
2. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
3. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
4. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
5. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
6. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
7. What is in scope?
<--- Score
8. What is the scope of the Infrastructure-as-a-service effort?
<--- Score
9. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
10. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
11. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
12. What is the context?
<--- Score
13. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
14. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
15. What sources do you use to gather information for a Infrastructure-as-a-service study?
<--- Score
16. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
17. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
18. What system do you use for gathering Infrastructure-as-a-service information?
<--- Score
19. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
20. Is there a critical path to deliver Infrastructure-as-a-service results?
<--- Score
21. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
22. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
23. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
25. Is there any additional Infrastructure-as-a-service definition of success?
<--- Score
26. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
27. Will team members perform Infrastructure-as-a-service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
28. How does the Infrastructure-as-a-service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
29. Who approved the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope?
<--- Score
30. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
31. Do you have a Infrastructure-as-a-service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
32. Is the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
33. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
34. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
35. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
36. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
37. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
38. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
39. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Infrastructure-as-a-service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
40. Are the Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
42. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of Infrastructure-as-a-service excellence?
<--- Score
44. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
45. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
46. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
47. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
48. When is/was the Infrastructure-as-a-service start date?
<--- Score
49. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
50. Is there a clear Infrastructure-as-a-service case definition?
<--- Score
51. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
52. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
53. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
54. Are improvement team members fully trained on Infrastructure-as-a-service?
<--- Score
55. Are the Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements testable?
<--- Score
56. What would be the goal or target for a Infrastructure-as-a-service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
57. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Infrastructure-as-a-service changes?
<--- Score
58. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
59. What are the Infrastructure-as-a-service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
60. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Infrastructure-as-a-service?
<--- Score
61. How do you gather Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements?
<--- Score
62. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
63. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Infrastructure-as-a-service brings?
<--- Score
64. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Infrastructure-as-a-service leverage and how?
<--- Score
65. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
66. Is Infrastructure-as-a-service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Infrastructure-as-a-service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
68. What are (control) requirements for Infrastructure-as-a-service Information?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope?
<--- Score
70. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
71. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
72. How do you catch Infrastructure-as-a-service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
73. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
74. What Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
75. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
76. How do you manage unclear Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements?
<--- Score
77. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
80. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
81. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
82. Is Infrastructure-as-a-service currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
83. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
84. What are the record-keeping requirements of Infrastructure-as-a-service activities?
<--- Score
85. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
86. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
87. Is there a Infrastructure-as-a-service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
88. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
89. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Infrastructure-as-a-service results are met?
<--- Score
90. What happens if Infrastructure-as-a-service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
91. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
92. How can the value of Infrastructure-as-a-service be defined?
<--- Score
93. Are accountability and ownership for Infrastructure-as-a-service clearly defined?
<--- Score
94. What gets examined?
<--- Score
95. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
96. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
97. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
98. Will team members regularly document their Infrastructure-as-a-service work?
<--- Score
99. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
100. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
101. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
102. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
103. Has a Infrastructure-as-a-service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
104. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
105. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
106. Will a Infrastructure-as-a-service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
107. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
108. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
109. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
110. How did the Infrastructure-as-a-service manager receive input to the development of a Infrastructure-as-a-service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
111. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
112. Who is gathering Infrastructure-as-a-service information?
<--- Score
113. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
114. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
115. Is the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope manageable?
<--- Score
116. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
117. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
118. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Infrastructure-as-a-service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
119. Have all basic functions of Infrastructure-as-a-service been defined?
<--- Score
120. How do you hand over Infrastructure-as-a-service context?
<--- Score
121. What was the context?
<--- Score
122. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
123. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
124. What is the scope of the Infrastructure-as-a-service work?
<--- Score
125. How will the Infrastructure-as-a-service team and the group measure complete success of Infrastructure-as-a-service?
<--- Score
126. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
127. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
128. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
129. Who are the Infrastructure-as-a-service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
130. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
131. Is the scope of Infrastructure-as-a-service defined?
<--- Score
132. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
133. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
134. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
135. What Infrastructure-as-a-service services do you require?
<--- Score
136. Has the Infrastructure-as-a-service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
137. How do you think the partners involved in Infrastructure-as-a-service would have defined success?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Infrastructure-as-a-service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
