Читать книгу Risk Assessments A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
2. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
3. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk assessments?
<--- Score
4. What is the context?
<--- Score
5. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
6. Will a Risk assessments production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
7. Is Risk assessments currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
8. How do you think the partners involved in Risk assessments would have defined success?
<--- Score
9. Who are the Risk assessments improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
10. When is/was the Risk assessments start date?
<--- Score
11. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
12. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
13. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
14. How does the Risk assessments manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
15. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
16. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk assessments work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
17. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
18. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
19. Do you all define Risk assessments in the same way?
<--- Score
20. What is in scope?
<--- Score
21. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk assessments?
<--- Score
22. What is the definition of Risk assessments excellence?
<--- Score
23. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
24. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
25. Is the Risk assessments scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
26. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
27. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
28. What are (control) requirements for Risk assessments Information?
<--- Score
29. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
30. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
31. Is the Risk assessments scope manageable?
<--- Score
32. Has the Risk assessments work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
33. Are the Risk assessments requirements complete?
<--- Score
34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
35. Is special Risk assessments user knowledge required?
<--- Score
36. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
37. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
38. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
39. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
40. What was the context?
<--- Score
41. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
42. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk assessments brings?
<--- Score
43. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
44. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk assessments results are met?
<--- Score
45. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
46. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
47. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
48. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
49. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk assessments study?
<--- Score
50. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
51. How are consistent Risk assessments definitions important?
<--- Score
52. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk assessments goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
53. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
54. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk assessments leverage and how?
<--- Score
55. How do you catch Risk assessments definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
56. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk assessments results?
<--- Score
57. How did the Risk assessments manager receive input to the development of a Risk assessments improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
58. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
59. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
60. How do you manage unclear Risk assessments requirements?
<--- Score
61. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
62. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
63. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
64. How do you gather Risk assessments requirements?
<--- Score
65. Will team members regularly document their Risk assessments work?
<--- Score
66. How will the Risk assessments team and the group measure complete success of Risk assessments?
<--- Score
67. What is the scope of the Risk assessments effort?
<--- Score
68. Are employees required to attend information security awareness training?
<--- Score
69. Will team members perform Risk assessments work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
70. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
71. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Risk assessments improvements?
<--- Score
72. Are systems required to block system access after a pre-determine number of unsuccessful logon attempts?
<--- Score
73. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
74. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
75. Is there a Risk assessments management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
76. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
79. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
80. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
81. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
82. What would be the goal or target for a Risk assessments’s improvement team?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
84. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
85. Do you have a Risk assessments success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
87. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
90. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
91. What system do you use for gathering Risk assessments information?
<--- Score
92. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
93. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
94. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk assessments? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
95. Is there any additional Risk assessments definition of success?
<--- Score
96. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk assessments activities?
<--- Score
97. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
98. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
101. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
102. What Risk assessments requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
103. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
104. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
105. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
106. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
107. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
108. What are the core elements of the Risk assessments business case?
<--- Score
109. Have all basic functions of Risk assessments been defined?
<--- Score
110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
111. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
112. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
113. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
114. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
115. How do you manage changes in Risk assessments requirements?
<--- Score
116. Is Risk assessments linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
117. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
118. What happens if Risk assessments’s scope changes?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of Risk assessments?
<--- Score
120. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
121. How have you defined all Risk assessments requirements first?
<--- Score
122. Are users locked out for a defined time period after unsuccessful attempts?
<--- Score
123. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
124. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Risk assessments Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
