Читать книгу Game As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Why are you doing Game as a service and what is the scope?
<--- Score
2. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
3. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
4. How do you hand over Game as a service context?
<--- Score
5. Is the Game as a service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
6. Has the Game as a service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
7. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
8. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
9. Is Game as a service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
10. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
11. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
12. Is there a critical path to deliver Game as a service results?
<--- Score
13. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
14. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
15. Is special Game as a service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
16. Will team members perform Game as a service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
17. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
18. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
19. Is the Game as a service scope manageable?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage unclear Game as a service requirements?
<--- Score
21. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
22. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
23. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
24. How did the Game as a service manager receive input to the development of a Game as a service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
25. What Game as a service requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
26. What are the core elements of the Game as a service business case?
<--- Score
27. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
28. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Game as a service leverage and how?
<--- Score
29. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
30. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
31. Is Game as a service currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
32. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
33. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
34. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
35. How do you manage changes in Game as a service requirements?
<--- Score
36. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
37. What system do you use for gathering Game as a service information?
<--- Score
38. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
39. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
40. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
41. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Game as a service changes?
<--- Score
42. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
43. Do you all define Game as a service in the same way?
<--- Score
44. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
45. Is Game as a service required?
<--- Score
46. Have all basic functions of Game as a service been defined?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope?
<--- Score
48. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
49. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
50. What gets examined?
<--- Score
51. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
52. Do you have a Game as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
53. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
54. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Game as a service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
55. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
56. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
57. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
58. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
59. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
60. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
61. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
62. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
63. Will team members regularly document their Game as a service work?
<--- Score
64. How do you catch Game as a service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
65. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Game as a service?
<--- Score
66. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
67. Has a Game as a service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
68. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
69. Who approved the Game as a service scope?
<--- Score
70. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
71. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
72. What are (control) requirements for Game as a service Information?
<--- Score
73. When is/was the Game as a service start date?
<--- Score
74. Are the Game as a service requirements testable?
<--- Score
75. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
76. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
77. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
78. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
79. How do you think the partners involved in Game as a service would have defined success?
<--- Score
80. Is there a clear Game as a service case definition?
<--- Score
81. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
82. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
84. What sources do you use to gather information for a Game as a service study?
<--- Score
85. Are the Game as a service requirements complete?
<--- Score
86. What was the context?
<--- Score
87. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
88. What is the scope of Game as a service?
<--- Score
89. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
90. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Game as a service results are met?
<--- Score
91. Is the scope of Game as a service defined?
<--- Score
92. What would be the goal or target for a Game as a service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
93. How have you defined all Game as a service requirements first?
<--- Score
94. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
95. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
96. What is the definition of Game as a service excellence?
<--- Score
97. What are the Game as a service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
98. What happens if Game as a service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering Game as a service information?
<--- Score
100. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
101. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
102. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
103. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
104. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
105. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
106. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Game as a service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
107. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
108. How are consistent Game as a service definitions important?
<--- Score
109. Are accountability and ownership for Game as a service clearly defined?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
112. How do you gather Game as a service requirements?
<--- Score
113. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
114. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Game as a service brings?
<--- Score
115. What is the scope of the Game as a service work?
<--- Score
116. What are the Game as a service use cases?
<--- Score
117. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
118. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
119. What is in scope?
<--- Score
120. How would you define Game as a service leadership?
<--- Score
121. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Game as a service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
122. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
123. Is there a Game as a service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
124. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
125. What are the record-keeping requirements of Game as a service activities?
<--- Score
126. How will the Game as a service team and the group measure complete success of Game as a service?
<--- Score
127. Who are the Game as a service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
128. What is the scope of the Game as a service effort?
<--- Score
129. Is there any additional Game as a service definition of success?
<--- Score
130. How does the Game as a service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
131. What is the context?
<--- Score
132. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
133. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
134. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
135. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
136. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
137. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
138. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
139. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
140. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Game as a service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
