Читать книгу Environmental Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 8
ОглавлениеCRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are the Environmental finance requirements complete?
<--- Score
2. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental finance changes?
<--- Score
3. What is the scope of the Environmental finance effort?
<--- Score
4. Who is gathering Environmental finance information?
<--- Score
5. How do you manage unclear Environmental finance requirements?
<--- Score
6. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
7. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
8. What Environmental finance services do you require?
<--- Score
9. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
10. Who are the Environmental finance improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
11. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
12. What is the scope of the Environmental finance work?
<--- Score
13. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
14. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
15. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
16. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental finance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
17. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
18. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental finance?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope?
<--- Score
21. Will a Environmental finance production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
22. What are the Environmental finance use cases?
<--- Score
23. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
24. Is there a clear Environmental finance case definition?
<--- Score
25. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental finance leverage and how?
<--- Score
26. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
27. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
28. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
29. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental finance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
30. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
31. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
32. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
33. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
35. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
36. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
37. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
38. What are (control) requirements for Environmental finance Information?
<--- Score
39. Do you have a Environmental finance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
40. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental finance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
41. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
42. Why are you doing Environmental finance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
43. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
44. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental finance results are met?
<--- Score
45. Is Environmental finance required?
<--- Score
46. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
47. Is special Environmental finance user knowledge required?
<--- Score
48. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
49. Is the Environmental finance scope manageable?
<--- Score
50. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
51. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental finance results?
<--- Score
52. Are the Environmental finance requirements testable?
<--- Score
53. How do you manage changes in Environmental finance requirements?
<--- Score
54. How have you defined all Environmental finance requirements first?
<--- Score
55. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
56. What is in scope?
<--- Score
57. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
58. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
59. Who approved the Environmental finance scope?
<--- Score
60. Has the Environmental finance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
61. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
62. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
63. Do you all define Environmental finance in the same way?
<--- Score
64. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. What system do you use for gathering Environmental finance information?
<--- Score
66. Is Environmental finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
68. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
71. Is Environmental finance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
72. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
73. How can the value of Environmental finance be defined?
<--- Score
74. Is the scope of Environmental finance defined?
<--- Score
75. What are the core elements of the Environmental finance business case?
<--- Score
76. What is the definition of Environmental finance excellence?
<--- Score
77. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
78. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
79. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
81. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
82. What was the context?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
85. How would you define Environmental finance leadership?
<--- Score
86. Is the Environmental finance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
87. How will the Environmental finance team and the group measure complete success of Environmental finance?
<--- Score
88. What Environmental finance requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
89. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
91. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental finance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
92. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
93. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
94. How did the Environmental finance manager receive input to the development of a Environmental finance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
95. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental finance brings?
<--- Score
96. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
97. What is the scope of Environmental finance?
<--- Score
98. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
99. When is/was the Environmental finance start date?
<--- Score
100. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
101. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
102. Has a Environmental finance requirement not been met?
<--- Score
103. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
104. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
105. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
106. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Environmental finance management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
108. What are the Environmental finance tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
109. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
110. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
111. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
112. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
113. What are the record-keeping requirements of Environmental finance activities?
<--- Score
114. What sources do you use to gather information for a Environmental finance study?
<--- Score
115. How do you hand over Environmental finance context?
<--- Score
116. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental finance clearly defined?
<--- Score
117. How does the Environmental finance manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
118. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
119. Have all basic functions of Environmental finance been defined?
<--- Score
120. Is there any additional Environmental finance definition of success?
<--- Score
121. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
122. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
123. What happens if Environmental finance’s scope changes?
<--- Score
124. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
125. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
126. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
127. How are consistent Environmental finance definitions important?
<--- Score
128. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
129. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
130. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
131. What gets examined?
<--- Score
132. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
133. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Environmental finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
