Читать книгу Microsoft Health A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk - Страница 9
ОглавлениеCRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How will the Microsoft Health data be analyzed?
<--- Score
2. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
3. Are missed Microsoft Health opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
4. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
5. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
6. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
7. Does the Microsoft Health task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
8. How do you measure efficient delivery of Microsoft Health services?
<--- Score
9. Is the scope of Microsoft Health cost analysis cost-effective?
<--- Score
10. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
11. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
12. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
13. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
14. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
15. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
16. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
17. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
18. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
19. Does Microsoft Health analysis isolate the fundamental causes of problems?
<--- Score
20. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
21. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
22. How do you do risk analysis of rare, cascading, catastrophic events?
<--- Score
23. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
24. How frequently do you verify your Microsoft Health strategy?
<--- Score
25. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
26. How frequently do you track Microsoft Health measures?
<--- Score
27. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
28. Can you do Microsoft Health without complex (expensive) analysis?
<--- Score
29. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
30. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
31. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
32. What are the Microsoft Health key cost drivers?
<--- Score
33. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
34. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
35. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
36. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
37. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
38. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Microsoft Health services/products?
<--- Score
39. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
40. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
41. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
42. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
43. What is the Microsoft Health business impact?
<--- Score
44. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
45. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
46. What are the Microsoft Health investment costs?
<--- Score
47. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
48. How can you measure Microsoft Health in a systematic way?
<--- Score
49. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
50. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
51. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
52. What are hidden Microsoft Health quality costs?
<--- Score
53. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
54. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
55. How will you measure your Microsoft Health effectiveness?
<--- Score
56. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
57. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
58. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
59. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
60. How is the value delivered by Microsoft Health being measured?
<--- Score
61. What is your Microsoft Health quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
62. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
63. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
64. How do you verify if Microsoft Health is built right?
<--- Score
65. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
66. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
67. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
68. How do your measurements capture actionable Microsoft Health information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
69. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
70. What kind of analytics data will be gathered?
<--- Score
71. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
72. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
73. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
74. What is the cause of any Microsoft Health gaps?
<--- Score
75. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
76. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
77. Have you included everything in your Microsoft Health cost models?
<--- Score
78. Why a Microsoft Health focus?
<--- Score
79. At what cost?
<--- Score
80. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
81. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
82. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
83. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
84. What are the costs?
<--- Score
85. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
86. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
87. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
88. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
89. Will Microsoft Health have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
90. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
91. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
92. Are Microsoft Health vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
93. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
94. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
95. What are your key Microsoft Health organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
96. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
97. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Microsoft Health results?
<--- Score
98. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
99. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
100. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
101. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
102. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
103. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
104. What potential environmental factors impact the Microsoft Health effort?
<--- Score
105. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
106. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
107. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
108. What are the costs of delaying Microsoft Health action?
<--- Score
109. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
110. The approach of traditional Microsoft Health works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
111. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
112. Was a life-cycle cost analysis performed?
<--- Score
113. What details are required of the Microsoft Health cost structure?
<--- Score
114. How can a Microsoft Health test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
115. How sensitive must the Microsoft Health strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
116. Does a Microsoft Health quantification method exist?
<--- Score
117. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
118. How does cost-to-serve analysis help?
<--- Score
119. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
120. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
121. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
122. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
123. When is Root Cause Analysis Required?
<--- Score
124. Is a follow-up focused external Microsoft Health review required?
<--- Score
125. What is your cost benefit analysis?
<--- Score
126. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
127. Are indirect costs charged to the Microsoft Health program?
<--- Score
128. How do you know that any Microsoft Health analysis is complete and comprehensive?
<--- Score
129. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Microsoft Health? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
130. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
131. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
132. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
133. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
134. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
135. Does Microsoft Health analysis show the relationships among important Microsoft Health factors?
<--- Score
136. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
137. Among the Microsoft Health product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
138. What is the total cost related to deploying Microsoft Health, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
139. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
140. Which Microsoft Health impacts are significant?
<--- Score
141. Are there competing Microsoft Health priorities?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Microsoft Health Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
