Читать книгу Race Distinctions in American Law - Gilbert Thomas Stephenson - Страница 27

Table of Contents

56. Laws of Md., 1846–47, chap. 27.

57. Art. III, sec. 43.

58. Revised Stat., 1852, pp. 143–46.

59. Laws of Mo., 1847, pp. 103–04.

60. Wilson: “The Rise and Fall of the Slave Power in America,” II, p. 170.

61. Const., 1852, Art. XIII.

62. This was held to be in violation of the Federal Constitution in Smith v. Moody, 1866, 26 Ind. 299, on the ground that the Negro had become a citizen and, as such, entitled to migrate from one State into another.

63. The section of the statute which related to colonization was repealed in 1865 because the legislature thought that those authorized to act under the statute were not rendering any adequate service to the State. Laws of Ind., 1865, p. 63.

64. Wilson: “The Rise and Fall of the Slave Power in America,” II, pp. 183–85.

65. Pub. Laws of Ill., 1853, p. 57.

66. Repealed Feb. 7, 1865. Pub. Laws of Ill., 1865, p. 105.

67. Laws of Ia., 1850–51, pp. 172–73.

68. Repealed in 1864. Laws of Ia., 1864, p. 6.

69. Gen. Laws of Ore., 1850–51, pp. 181–82.

70. Flack: “The Adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment,” 1908, John Hopkins Press, pp. 20, et seq.

71. Art. IV, sec. 19.

72. Art. VIII.

73. Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 271.

74. Art. II, sec. 5, par. 1.

75. Laws of Ky., 1863, p. 366.

76. Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 276.

77. In three places, at least, in North Carolina a Negro is not allowed to stay over night. They are Canton (Haywood County), Mitchell, and Madison Counties, all in the western part of the State. Negroes may work unmolested all day, but, if they linger after nightfall, they are reminded that it would not be healthy for them to remain during the night. The Raleigh, N. C., News and Observer, Aug. 19, 1906. Also see The Independent, vol. 59, p. 139, for a similar situation in Syracuse, Ohio, and Baker: “Following the Colour Line,” pp. 71–73 and 126.

78. Code, 1867, sec. 1237.

79. Code, 1867, sec. 1233; Laws of Ala., 1865–66, p. 105.

80. Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 275.

81. Ibid., p. 299.

82. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 82–83.

83. Laws of Tenn., 1865, p. 23.

84. Laws of Fla., 1865, pp. 25 and 37.

85. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 165–66.

86. Laws of S. C., 1865, p. 275.

87. Laws of Ala., 1865–66, p. 55.

88. Laws of Ky., 1865–66, pp. 68–69.

89. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 165–66.

90. Laws of Ariz., 1867, p. 19; 1873, p. 78.

91. Ibid., 1883, p. 114.

92. Laws of Idaho, 1879, p. 31.

93. Laws of Dak. Ty., 1864–65, p. 192.

94. Laws of Neb., 1881, p. 274; 1891, p. 267.

95. Gen. Laws of N. M., 1880, p. 427; act 1876, chap. 28.

96. Laws of Utah, 1882, p. 32.

97. Laws of Ore., 1868, pp. 18–19.

98. Laws of Wash., 1867, pp. 95–96.

99. Revised Stat., 1903, p. 202.

100. Laws of Fla., 1865, pp. 32–33.

101. Ibid., 1866, p. 22.

102. Laws of Ky., 1865–66, p. 52.

103. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 83–84.

104. Laws of Va., 1865–66, p. 83; repealed in 1871—Laws of Va., 1870–71, p. 147.

105. Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 295–299 and 275–76.

106. Laws of Ala., 1865–66, pp. 128–31.

107. Laws of Ky., 1865–66, pp. 49–50.

108. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 86–90. This was repealed Feb. 1, 1867—Laws of Miss., 1866–67, pp. 443–44.

109. Laws of N. C., 1874–75, p. 92.

110. Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 292–95.

111. Revised Code, 1852, as amended in 1893, p. 609.

112. In re Turner, 1867, Fed. Case No. 14,247.

113. Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 303–04.

114. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 90–93.

115. Laws of S. C., 1865, pp. 299–303.

116. Laws of Miss., 1865, pp. 92–93.