Читать книгу Administrative Records for Survey Methodology - Группа авторов - Страница 12

Оглавление

Acknowledgments

The origin of this book can be traced to the 2017 meeting of the European Survey Research Association and the session “Administrative Records for Survey Methodology” (https://www.europeansurveyresearch.org/conference/programme2017?sess=81). Dr. Asaph Young Chun (then of the U.S. Bureau of the Census). was the lead organizer and chair. Additional coordinators of that session included Drs. Michael Larsen (then at George Washington University, Washington, DC), Ingegerd Jansson (Statistics Sweden), Manfred Antoni (Institute for Employment Research, IAB, Germany), and Daniel Fuss and Corinna Kleinert (Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, Germany). Papers presented at the conference included “Evaluation of the Quality of Administrative Data Used in the Dutch Virtual Census” (Schulte et al. 2017), “Evaluating the Accuracy of Administrative Data to Augment Survey Responses” (Berzofsky, Zimmer, and Smith 2017), and “Assessing Administrative Data Quality: The Truth is Out There” (Chun and Porter 2017).

Dr. Chun with Dr. Larsen proposed the book entitled Administrative Records for Survey Methodology to Wiley publishing. The intent of the book was to follow on the conference and reach further into topics and applications in additional countries and disciplines. Dr. Jerry Reiter (Duke University) and Dr. Gabriele Durrant (University of Southamptom) joined the team as assistant editors. Since the inception of this book, Dr. Chun has joined Statistics Korea and Dr. Larsen has moved to Saint Michael’s College in Vermont.

The topics described by authors in this book have been described by these authors and others at international conferences since the 2017 ESRA meeting. Dr. Chun organized panel sessions at the Joint Statistical Meetings in 2019 entitled “Linked Data to Advance Evidence Building in Public Policy” (https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2019/onlineprogram/ActivityDetails.cfm?SessionID=218399) and in 2018 entitled “Administrative Records for Survey Methodology and Evidence Building” (https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2018/onlineprogram/ActivityDetails.cfm?SessionID=215012). Some contributors to the current book participated in these panels.

We wish to thank individuals who have contributed toward bringing this volume to fruition. Many people have worked together to make this book possible. First, editors made comments and suggestions to improve the several chapters in this book. Second, a few individuals served as anonymous reviewers on individual chapters. Third, eight anonymous reviews on the overall scheme of the book were provided by the publisher Wiley. Fourth, the individual authors have been attentive to comments and suggestions from the editors and reviewers and generous with their time in improving their contributions. Fifth, authors and reviewers have contributed to these efforts with the support of their government agencies, educational institutions, sponsored funding organizations, and companies. Together all involved have made the present work a reality. We apologize if we have failed to mention any contributors.

Finally, we wish to thank individuals at Wiley who agreed to publish this manuscript and who have helped us along the way. Their reminders of deadlines and encouragements have kept us going through some transitions. Specifically, we wish to thank Associate Editor Kathleen Santoloci, Project Editors Blesy Regulas and Linda Christina, support person Mindy Okura-Marszycki, Managing Editor Kimberly Monroe-Hill, and Content Refinement Specialist Viniprammia Premkumar of Wiley Knowledge & Learning.

We hope you find the chapters in this book interesting and useful. We look forward to new developments with the use of administrative records and other data sources with sample surveys.

References

1 2017 Berzofsky, M., Zimmer, S., and Smith, T. (2017). Evaluating the accuracy of administrative data to augment survey responses. Presentation at the 7th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA).

2 2017 Chun, A.Y., and Porter, S. (2017). Assessing administrative data quality: the truth is out there. Presentation at the 7th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA).

3 2017 Schulte, E., Daas, P., Tennekes, M., and Ossen, S. (2017). Evaluation of the quality of administrative data used in the Dutch virtual census. Presentation at the 7th Conference of the European Survey Research Association (ESRA).

Administrative Records for Survey Methodology

Подняться наверх