Читать книгу A Companion to Chomsky - Группа авторов - Страница 50

References

Оглавление

1 Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. PhD diss., MIT.

2 Adger, D., D. Harbour, and L. Watkins. 2009. Mirrors and Microparameters: Phrase Structure Beyond Free Word Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3 Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Evereart. 2004. The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax‐Lexicon Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4 Aoun, J., N. Hornstein, and D. Sportiche. 1980. “Some Aspects of Wide Scope Quantification.” Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 69–95.

5 Bach, E. 1977. “Review article on Postal, On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications.” Language 53, 621–54. DOI: 10.2307/413179

6 Baltin, M. 1981. “Strict bounding.” In The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, edited by C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy, 257–295. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

7 Barss, A. 2001. “Syntactic Reconstruction Effects.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, edited by M. Baltin and C. Collins, 670–696. London: Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9780470756416.ch21.

8 Bresnan, J. 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

9 Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical‐Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

10 Bruening, B. 2014. “Precede‐and‐Command Revisited.” Language 90, 342–388. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0037.

11 Burzio, L. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD diss., MIT.

12 Cable, S. 2010. The Grammar of Q: Q‐Particles, Wh‐Movement and Pied‐Piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13 Cheng, L. L.‐S. 1991. On the Typology of Wh‐Questions. PhD diss., MIT.

14 Choe, Jae W. 1987. “LF Movement and Pied‐Piping.” Linguistic Inquiry 18, 348–353.

15 Chomsky, N. 1955. Transformational Analysis. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.

16 Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

17 Chomsky, N. 1958. “Linguistics, Logic, Psychology, and Computers.” In Computer Programming and Artificial Intelligence, edited by J. W. Carr, 429–454. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University College of Engineering.

18 Chomsky, N. 1959. “Review of Skinner (1957).” Language 35, 26–58. DOI: 10.2307/411334.

19 Chomsky, N. 1964. “Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.” In The Structure of Language, edited by J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

20 Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

21 Chomsky, N. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, edited by R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.

22 Chomsky, N. 1973. “Conditions on Transformations.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, edited by S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

23 Chomsky, N. 1977. “On wh‐movement.” In Formal Syntax, edited by P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, 71–133. New York: Academic Press.

24 Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.

25 Chomsky, N. 1986a. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.

26 Chomsky, N. 1986b. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

27 Chomsky, N. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by K. L. Hale, and S. J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Chomsky (1995a).

28 Chomsky, N. 1995b. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

29 Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, edited by R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

30 Chomsky, N. 2001a. “Derivation by Phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, edited by M. Kenstowicz, 1–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31 Chomsky, N. 2001b. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20, 1–28.

32 Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

33 Chung, S. 1994. “Wh‐agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro.” Linguistic Inquiry 25, 1–44.

34 Culicover, P. W. and M. J. Rochemont. 1990. “Extraposition and the Complement Principle.” Linguistic Inquiry 21, 23–47.

35 Culicover, P. W. and R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36 D'Alessandro, R. 2019. “The Achievements of Generative Syntax: A time chart.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics [Special Issue: Generative Syntax. Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges], 7–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.232.

37 Edelman, S. and M. Christiansen. 2003. “How Seriously Should We Take Minimalist Syntax?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 60–61. DOI: 10.1016/s1364‐6613(02)00045‐1.

38 Emonds, J. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

39 Engdahl, E. 1983. “Parasitic Gaps.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 5–34. DOI: 10.1007/BF00868088.

40 Fanselow, G. 1990. “Scrambling as NP Movement.” In Scrambling and Barriers, edited by G. Grewendorf and W. Sternefeld, 113–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.5.07fan.

41 Featherston, S. 2007. “Data in Generative Grammar: The Stick and the Carrot.” Theoretical Linguistics 33, 269–318. DOI: 10.1515/TL.2007.020.

42 Felser, C. 2004. “Wh‐copying, Phases, and Successive Cyclicity.” Lingua 114, 543– 574. DOI: 10.1016/S0024‐3841(03)00054‐8.

43 Ferreira, F. 2005. “Psycholinguistics, Formal Grammars, and Cognitive Science.” The Linguistic Review 22, 365–380. DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2‐4.365.

44 Fukui, N. 1986. A Theory of Category Projection and Its Applications. PhD diss., MIT.

45 Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum and I. A. Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

46 Gibson, E. and E. Fedorenko. 2010. “Weak Quantitative Standards in Linguistics Research.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14, 233–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.005.

47 Gibson, E. and E. Fedorenko. 2013. “The Need for Quantitative Methods in Syntax and Semantics Research.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28, 88–124. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.515080.

48 Grimshaw, J. 2000. “Locality and Extended Projection.” In Lexical Specification and Insertion, edited by P. Coopmans, M. Everaert, and J. Grimshaw, 115‐133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.197.07gri.

49 Hagstrom, P. 1998. Decomposing Questions. PhD diss., MIT.

50 Haider, H. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

51 Haïk, I. 1987. “Bound VPs that Need to Be.” Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 503–530. DOI: 10.1007/BF00628068.

52 Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1991. On the Syntax of Argument Structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers 34, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.

53 Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1993. “On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations.” In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, 59–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

54 Harizanov, B. and V. Gribanova. 2019. “Whither head movement?” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37, 461–522. DOI: 10.1007/s11049‐018‐9420‐5.

55 Harley, H. 2013. “Diagnosing Head Movement.” In Diagnosing Syntax, edited by L. Cheng and N. Corver, 112–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0006.

56 Harris, Z. S. 1952. “Discourse Analysis.” Language 28, 1–30. DOI: 10.2307/409987.

57 Harris, Z. S. 1957. “Co‐occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure.” Language 33, 283–340. DOI: 10.2307/41115.

58 Hiemstra, I. 1986. “Some Aspects of Wh‐questions in Frisian.” Nowele 8, 97–110. DOI: 10.1075/nowele.8.06hie.

59 Hill, A. A. 1961. “Grammaticality.” Word 17, 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659742.

60 Hockett, C. F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company.

61 Jackendoff, R. 1977. X′‐Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

62 Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001.

63 Karimi, S. 2008. “Scrambling.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2/6, 1271–1293. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749‐818X.2008.00095.x.

64 Klima, E. 1964. “Negation in English.” In The Structure of Language, edited by J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

65 Koster, J. 1978. “Conditions, Empty Nodes, and Markedness.” Linguistic Inquiry 9, 551– 593.

66 Landau, I. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

67 Langacker, R. 1969. “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command.” In Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, edited by D. Reibel and S. Schane, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.

68 Larson, R. 1988. “On the Double Object Construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–392.

69 Lasnik, H. 1976. “Remarks on Coreference.” Linguistic Analysis 2, 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/978‐94‐009‐2542‐7_4.

70 Lechner, W. 1998. “Two Kinds of Reconstruction.” Studia Linguistica 52, 276–310. DOI: 10.1111/1467‐9582.00037.

71 Mahajan, A. 1990. The A/A′ Distinction and Movement Theory. PhD diss., MIT.

72 May, R. 1977. The Grammar of Quantification. PhD diss., MIT.

73 McCloskey, J. 2001. “The Morphosyntax of WH‐extraction in Irish.” Journal of Linguistics 37, 67–100. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226701008775.

74 McDaniel, D. 1989. “Partial and Multiple Wh‐movement.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 565–604. DOI: 10.1007/BF00205158.

75 Nishigauchi, T. 1986. Quantification in Syntax. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.

76 Perlmutter, D. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, edited by J. Jaeger et al., 157–189. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.

77 Pesetsky, D. 1987. “Wh‐in‐situ: Movement and Unselective Binding.” In The Representation of (In)definiteness, edited by E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

78 Pollard, C. J. and I. A. Sag. 1994. Head‐driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

79 Postal, P. 1971. Cross‐over Phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

80 Postal, P. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English grammar and Its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

81 Potsdam, E. and M. Polinsky. 2012. “Backward Raising.” Syntax 15, 75–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467‐9612.2011.00158.x.

82 Reinhart, T. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. PhD diss., MIT.

83 Riemsdijk, H. van and E. Williams. 1981. “NP‐structure.” The Linguistic Review 1, 171–217. DOI: 10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.171.

84 Rosenbaum, P. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

85 Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD diss., MIT.

86 Sag, I. A. and C. J. Pollard. 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.” Language 67, 63–113. DOI: 10.2307/415539.

87 Schütze, C. T. 2020. “Acceptability Ratings Cannot Be Taken at Face Value.” In Linguistic Intuitions, edited by S. Schindler, A. Drozdzowicz, and K. Brøcker 189–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

88 Schütze, C. T. and J. Sprouse. 2013. “Judgment Data.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, edited by R. J. Podesva and D. Sharma, 22–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

89 Speas, M. 1986. Adjunctions and Projections in Syntax. PhD diss., MIT.

90 Sprouse, J. and D. Almeida. 2012. “Assessing the Reliability of Textbook Data in Syntax: Adger's Core Syntax.” Journal of Linguistics 48, 609–652. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226712000011.

91 Sprouse, J. and D. Almeida 2013. “The Empirical Status of Data in Syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28, 222–228. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.703782.

92 Sprouse, J. and D. Almeida. 2017a. “Design Sensitivity and Statistical Power in Acceptability Judgment Experiments.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 (1), e14. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.236.

93 Sprouse, J. and D. Almeida. 2017b. “Setting the Empirical Record Straight: Acceptability Judgments appear to be Reliable, Robust, and Replicable.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40, e311. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X17000590.

94 Sprouse, J., C. T. Schütze and D. Almeida. 2013. “A Comparison of Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments Using a Random Sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010.” Lingua 134, 219–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002.

95 Travis, L. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD diss., MIT.

96 Wasow, T. and J. Arnold. 2005. “Intuitions in Linguistic Argumentation.” Lingua 115, 1481–1496. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.001.

97 Webelhuth, G. 1992. Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A Companion to Chomsky

Подняться наверх