Читать книгу The Esophagus - Группа авторов - Страница 229

1 1 Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol 1991; 261(4 Pt 1):G677–84.

2 2 Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, et al. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95(10):2720–30.

3 3 Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103(1):27–37.

4 4 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):160–74.

5 5 Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, et al. High‐resolution manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111(3):372–80.

6 6 Carlson DA, Ravi K, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders: esophageal pressure topography vs. conventional line tracing. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110(7):967–77; quiz 78.

7 7 Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005; 128(1):209–24.

8 8 Herregods TV, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Normative values in esophageal high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):175–87.

9 9 Simren M, Silny J, Holloway R, et al. Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. Gut 2003; 52(6):784–90.

10 10 Tutuian R, Castell DO. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(6):1011–9.

11 11 Nguyen NQ, Holloway RH, Smout AJ, et al. Automated impedance‐manometry analysis detects esophageal motor dysfunction in patients who have non‐obstructive dysphagia with normal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25(3):238–45, e164.

12 12 Lin Z, Imam H, Nicodeme F, et al. Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high‐resolution impedance‐manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 307(2):G158–63.

13 13 Omari TI, Rommel N, Szczesniak MM, et al. Assessment of intraluminal impedance for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing in healthy adults. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290(1):G183–8.

14 14 Kraichely RE, Arora AS, Murray JA. Opiate‐induced oesophageal dysmotility. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31(5):601–6.

15 15 Ratuapli SK, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK, et al. Opioid‐induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) in patients on chronic opioids. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110(7):979–84.

16 16 Marsh JK, Hoffman SM, Dmuchowski CF. Effect of intravenous midazolam on esophageal motility testing in normal human volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88(6):860–3.

17 17 Fung KP, Math MV, Ho CO, et al. Midazolam as a sedative in esophageal manometry: a study of the effect on esophageal motility. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 15(1):85–8.

18 18 Penagini R, Bianchi PA. Effect of morphine on gastroesophageal reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology 1997; 113(2):409–14.

19 19 Savilampi J, Magnuson A, Ahlstrand R. Effects of remifentanil on esophageal motility: a double‐blind, randomized, cross‐over study in healthy volunteers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59(9):1126–36.

20 20 Babaei A, Lin EC, Szabo A, et al. Determinants of pressure drift in Manoscan esophageal high‐resolution manometry system. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):277–84.

21 21 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012.

22 22 Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodeme F, et al. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(10):e509–16.

23 23 Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, et al. Normative values and inter‐observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23(6):509–e198.

24 24 Tolone S, Savarino E, Zaninotto G, et al. High‐resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6(7):981–9.

25 25 Nicodeme F, Pipa‐Muniz M, Khanna K, et al. Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ‐contractile integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non‐responders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(3):353–60.

26 26 Hoshino M, Sundaram A, Juhasz A, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry findings in patients with nutcracker esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27(3):592–7.

27 27 Pandolfino JE, Bianchi LK, Lee TJ, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology predicts susceptibility to exercise‐induced reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(8):1430–6.

28 28 Jasper D, Freitas‐Queiroz N, Hollenstein M, et al. Prolonged measurement improves the assessment of the barrier function of the esophago‐gastric junction by high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(2).

29 29 Wang D, Patel A, Mello M, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ‐CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(5):639–46.

30 30 Xie C, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractility integral reflect the anti‐reflux barrier dysfunction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23(1):27–33.

31 31 Ham H, Cho YK, Lee HH, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high‐resolution manometry metrics of the anti‐reflux barrier. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32(8):1443–9.

32 32 Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 2001; 49(1):145–51.

33 33 Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290(5):G1033–40.

34 34 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293(4):G878–85.

35 35 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290(5):G988–97.

36 36 Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, et al. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol 2011.

37 37 Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ, et al. High‐resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107(11):1647–54.

38 38 Behar J, Biancani P. Pathogenesis of simultaneous esophageal contractions in patients with motility disorders. Gastroenterology 1993; 105(1):111–8.

39 39 Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Carlson D, et al. Distal esophageal spasm in high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. Gastroenterology 2011; 141(2):469–75.

40 40 Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, et al. Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106(3):443–51.

41 41 Pandolfino JE, Leslie E, Luger D, et al. The contractile deceleration point: an important physiologic landmark on oesophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22(4):395–400, e90.

42 42 Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high‐resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5):1526–33.

43 43 Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144(4):718–25; quiz e13–4.

44 44 Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high‐resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17(1):48–53.

45 45 Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, et al. The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14(11):1635–45.

46 46 Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62(1):35–44.

47 47 Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ, et al. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: a heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13(12):2219–25.

48 48 van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(9):1310–6.

49 49 Clayton SB, Patel R, Richter JE. Functional and anatomic esophagogastic junction outflow obstruction: manometry, timed barium esophagram findings, and treatment outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14(6):907–11.

50 50 Schupack D, Katzka DA, Geno DM, et al. The clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus in high resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(10):1–9.

51 51 Babaei A, Shad S, Szabo A, et al. Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31(9):e13668.

52 52 Perez‐Fernandez MT, Santander C, Marinero A, et al. Characterization and follow‐up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(1):116–26.

53 53 Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, et al. Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(8):e356–63.

54 54 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high‐resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15(5):323.

55 55 Gyawali CP, Sifrim D, Carlson DA, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31(9):e13584.

56 56 Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 2018; 67(7):1351–62.

57 57 Gyawali CP, Roman S, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro‐esophageal reflux disease: Conclusions from an international consensus group. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29(12).

58 58 Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, et al. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high‐resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108(11):1706–12.

59 59 Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance‐manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2(3):230–6.

60 60 Omari TI, Dejaeger E, van Beckevoort D, et al. A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. Gastroenterology 2011; 140(5):1454–63.

61 61 Myers JC, Nguyen NQ, Jamieson GG, et al. Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(9):812–e393.

62 62 Rommel N, Van Oudenhove L, Tack J, et al. Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(5):636–45.

63 63 Omari TI, Ciucci M, Gozdzikowska K, et al. High‐resolution pharyngeal manometry and impedance: protocols and metrics‐recommendations of a high‐resolution pharyngeal manometry international working group. Dysphagia 2019.

64 64 Omari TI, Dejaeger E, Van Beckevoort D, et al. A novel method for the nonradiological assessment of ineffective swallowing. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106(10):1796–802.

65 65 Rohof WO, Myers JC, Estremera FA, et al. Inter‐ and intra‐rater reproducibility of automated and integrated pressure‐flow analysis of esophageal pressure‐impedance recordings. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(2):168–75.

66 66 Singendonk MJ, Lin Z, Scheerens C, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry parameters in the evaluation of esophageal function of non‐obstructive dysphagia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018:e13505.

67 67 Lin Z, Nicodeme F, Lin CY, et al. Parameters for quantifying bolus retention with high‐resolution impedance manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(7):929–36.

68 68 Carlson DA, Beveridge CA, Lin Z, et al. Improved assessment of bolus clearance in patients with achalasia using high‐resolution impedance manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16(5):672–80 e1.

69 69 Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry metrics of the esophagogastric junction for the assessment of treatment response in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111(12):1702–10.

70 70 Carlson DA, Omari T, Lin Z, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non‐obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(3).

71 71 Cho YK, Lipowska AM, Nicodeme F, et al. Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high‐resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109(6):829–35.

72 72 Stanghellini V, Chan FK, Hasler WL, et al. Gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150(6):1380–92.

73 73 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high‐resolution manometry and impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(12):e573–9.

74 74 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Objective manometric criteria for the rumination syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109(1):52–9.

75 75 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Velosa M, et al. Supragastric belches are the main determinants of troublesome belching symptoms in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35(9):1073–9.

76 76 Yadlapati R, Tye M, Roman S, et al. Postprandial high‐resolution impedance manometry identifies mechanisms of nonresponse to proton pump inhibitors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017.

77 77 Halland M, Parthasarathy G, Bharucha AE, et al. Diaphragmatic breathing for rumination syndrome: efficacy and mechanisms of action. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(3):384–91.

78 78 Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, et al. Upright integrated relaxation pressure facilitates characterization of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019.

79 79 Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R, et al. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21(7):718–e41.

80 80 Martinucci I, Savarino EV, Pandolfino JE, et al. Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(2):243–50.

81 81 Hasak S, Brunt LM, Wang D, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with postfundoplication dysphagia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17(10):1982–90.

82 82 Daum C, Sweis R, Kaufman E, et al. Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23(6):517–e200.

83 83 Elvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D, et al. Usefulness of low‐ and high‐volume multiple rapid swallowing during high‐resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47(2):103–7.

84 84 Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, et al. Rapid drink challenge in high‐resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(1).

85 85 Marin I, Cisternas D, Abrao L, et al. Normal values of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in healthy subjects: results of a multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(6).

86 86 Biasutto D, Mion F, Garros A, et al. Rapid drink challenge test during esophageal high resolution manometry in patients with esophago‐gastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018; 30(6):e13293.

87 87 Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(4):543–53.

88 88 Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high‐resolution esophageal manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(10):e489–96.

89 89 Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, et al. Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(8):e364–72.

90 90 Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Butikofer S, et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2(9):644–53.

91 91 Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, et al. Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2014; 26(2):215–28.

92 92 Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of high‐resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2(9):654–61.

93 93 Wang YT, Tai LF, Yazaki E, et al. Investigation of dysphagia after antireflux surgery by high‐resolution manometry: impact of multiple water swallows and a solid test meal on diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13(9):1575–83.

94 94 Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, et al. Normal values for esophageal high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25(9):762–e579.

95 95 do Carmo GC, Jafari J, Sifrim D, et al. Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill‐Unisensor high‐resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):285–92.

96 96 Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, et al. Variant parameter values‐as defined by the Chicago Criteria‐produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):188–94.