Читать книгу Surgical Management of Advanced Pelvic Cancer - Группа авторов - Страница 17
Evolution of the Uretero‐Ileal Conduit
ОглавлениеBy the late 1950s, the ileal conduit became the established urinary diversion technique, and the high mortality and morbidity rates associated with pelvic exenteration began to decline [30]. In particular the procedure avoided the complications of implanting ureters into an intact colon and could be fashioned from ileum that was undisturbed by any pre‐existing radiotherapeutic field [31]. Despite these benefits, the complex nature of exenterative surgery made significant postoperative complications associated with urinary diversion were considered unavoidable, particularly the development of urinary fistulas [15, 32]. Brunschwig observed that, in patients who survived > 5 years “the most frequent subsequent cause of death is the deterioration of the diverted urinary tract” [33]. He advocated continuous surveillance of the urinary diversion and for the early use of temporary or permanent nephrostomy tubes for any evidence of obstruction [33].
Today, en‐bloc cystectomy is required in approximately half of all patients undergoing pelvic exenteration [34–37]. Despite much progress, postoperative urological complications remain a major cause of morbidity, prolonging hospital admission and impacting on quality of life [35]. Major complication rates between 9 and 24% are reported, with urinary leak rates occurring in 7–16% of patient [35–37]. Newer techniques for continent urinary diversion, such as the internal ileal pouch reservoir [38, 39], remain controversial. Alternatives like the Indiana pouch and the Miami pouch are suitable in highly selected patients [40, 41].