Читать книгу Surgical Management of Advanced Pelvic Cancer - Группа авторов - Страница 62
Optimization of Nutritional Status
ОглавлениеCancer‐related malnutrition is multifactorial, including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and metabolic disorders. It is not uncommon in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Although there is a lack of a standardized definition, it is well known that malnutrition is a significant risk factor of postoperative complications. Nutritional status can be measured using several tools. The gold standard for the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) is the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), based on performance status and physical examination. It is widely used, but the main disadvantage is the high interobserver variability [19]. In 2003, the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) adopted Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS‐2002) to screen patients for malnutrition in the hospital. NRS‐2002 is based on oral food intake, weight loss, patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), and severity of underlying disease (Table 5.1) [4].
According to the ESPEN guidelines, a minimum of seven days of preoperative nutritional support that provides at least 10 kcal/kg/day is considered adequate for patients who are nutritionally at risk (NRS score at least 3) [4]. Oral nutrition support with a standard whole protein formula enriched with immune modulating substrates (arginine, ɷ‐3 fatty acids, and nucleotides) is strongly recommended [20]. Whenever feasible, enteral feeding should be preferred to parenteral nutrition [21]. Combination with parenteral nutrition may be considered in patients in whom 60% of caloric requirement cannot be achieved with the enteral route.
Table 5.1 Nutritional Risk Screening (based on NRS‐2002) [4].
Impaired nutritional status | Severity of disease | ||
---|---|---|---|
Absent – Score 0 | Normal nutritional status | Absent – Score 0 | Normal nutritional requirements |
Mild – Score 1 | Weight loss > 5% in three months or food intake below 50–75% of normal requirement in preceding week | Mild – Score 1 | Chronic patients, in particular with acute complications: cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic hemodialysis, diabetes, oncology |
Moderate – Score 2 | Weight loss > 5% in two months or BMI 18.5–20.5 plus impaired general condition or food intake 25–60% of normal requirement in preceding week | Moderate – Score 2 | Major abdominal surgery, severe pneumonia, hematologic malignancy |
Severe – Score 3 | Weight loss > 5% in one month (> 15% in three months) or BMI < 18.5 plus impaired general condition or food intake 0–25% of normal requirement in preceding week | Severe – Score 3 | Intensive care patients (APACHE > 10) |
Age | If ≥ 70 years: add 1 to total score above | = Age‐adjusted total score | |
Score ≥ 3: the patient is nutritionally at‐risk and a nutritional care plan is initiated | |||
Score < 3: weekly rescreening of the patient. If the patient, for instance, is scheduled for a major operation, a preventive nutritional care plan is considered to avoid the associated risk status |