Читать книгу Bone and Soft Tissue Augmentation in Implantology - Группа авторов - Страница 56
Cone beam computed tomography
ОглавлениеIn addition to spiral CT, CBCT has been available to the dentist for more than 20 years as a continuative method of radiologic imaging.59 Today, devices from various manufacturers are offered that enable a 3D diagnosis in the oral and maxillofacial area.66 Since CBCT devices are much cheaper than CT devices, they have become increasingly common in dental practices oriented toward implantology.
In CBCT, the patient is usually positioned standing or sitting (only a few devices require a horizontal position similar to that used for spiral CT). The radiologic beam is cone shaped so that the radiation source moves on one level around the patient (Fig 2-19a and b). The volume is then reconstructed from 200 to over 500 single images. The applied energy and the resolution of the detector determine the quality of information, with the volume size and resolution of the recording. Depending on the detector technology, the field of view, the radiation exposure with a continuous or pulsed beam, and the filters used, a large variation of the effective dose is possible (between 3 µSv and about 800 µSv).
Fig 2-18a Panoramic radiograph showing two foreign bodies (suspected to be overfilled root filling mass) in the region of the maxillary left sinus: incidental findings without symptoms in the context of pre-implant diagnosis.
Fig 2-18b A round foreign body is clearly visible on the lower (caudal) layer of this CT image. In addition, the left maxillary sinus is completely shadowed.
Fig 2-18c A second foreign body is also clearly visible on the higher layer. Also on this level, the complete shading of the maxillary left sinus is clearly visible.
Fig 2-18d The maxillary left sinus is also completely shadowed in this image, even in the upper area. The suspected diagnosis is aspergillosis infection due to root filling material.
Due to the specific target of CBCT – the high contrast imaging of bone – the soft tissue structures can only be evaluated to a limited extent. The disadvantage of reduced soft tissue visualization is compensated for by appropriately designed prosthetic planning templates or additionally placed cotton rolls to separate the soft tissue of the alveolar crest from the tongue or floor of the mouth (Fig 2-19c). The diagnostic validity could be optimized by special reconstruction algorithms, so that the same diagnostic value is available when compared with CT.59 In particular, the automatic reconstruction of the known panoramic layer from the 3D volume allows for the usual dental radiologic diagnosis.97
Fig 2-18e The intraoperative findings, and later also the pathohistologic findings, confirm the suspected diagnosis.
Fig 2-19a Functional principle of cone beam technology, with a conical beam that revolves on one level, compared with a spiral CT that has a line-like and moving beam path.
Fig 2-19b Device for CBCT for positioning the standing or sitting patient.
Fig 2-19c CBCT for implant planning in the posterior mandible, with cotton rolls to separate the mobile soft tissue of the mouth floor from the alveolar crest.
Fig 2-19d Distribution of frequency of septa in the maxillary sinus per patient.
Fig 2-19e CBCT detection of an important undercut in the mandibular premolar area.
Fig 2-19f CBCT of area of undercut in the mandibular molar area for the purposes of 3D planning.