Читать книгу North American Agroforestry - Группа авторов - Страница 102

References

Оглавление

1 Albaugh, J. M., Albaugh, T. J., Heiderman, R. R., Leggett, Z., Stape, J. L., King, K., . . . King, J. S. (2014). Evaluating changes in switchgrass physiology, biomass, and light‐use efficiency under artificial shade to estimate yields if intercropped with Pinus taeda L. Agroforestry Systems, 88, 489‐503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐014‐9708‐3

2 Allen, S. C., Jose, S., Nair, P. K. R., Brecke, B. J., Nair, V. D., Graetz, D. A., & Ramsey, C. L. (2005). Nitrogen mineralization in a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 41, 28–37.

3 Allen, S. C., Jose, S., Nair, P. K. R., Brecke, B. J., Nkedi‐Kizza, P., & Ramsey, C. L. (2004a). Safety‐net role of tree roots: Evidence from a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 192, 395–407.

4 Allen, S. C., Jose, S., Nair, P. K. R., Brecke, B. J., & Ramsey, C. L. (2004b). Competition for 15N‐labeled fertilizer in a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. Plant and Soil, 263, 151–164.

5 Alley, J. L., Garrett, H. E., McGraw, R. L., & Blanche, C. A. (1998). Forage legumes as living mulches for trees in agroforestry practices: Preliminary results. Agroforestry Systems, 44, 281–291.

6 Altieri, M. A. (1991). Increasing biodiversity to improve pest management in agro‐ecosystems. In D. L. Hawksworth (Ed.), The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: Its role in sustainable agriculture (pp. 165–182). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

7 Artru, S., Garré, S., Dupraz, C., Hiel, M. P., Blitz‐Frayret, C., & Lassois, L. (2017). Impact of spatio‐temporal shade dynamics on wheat growth and yield, perspectives for temperate agroforestry. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 60–70.

8 Asbjornsen, H., Shepherd, G., Helmers, M., & Mora, G. (2008). Seasonal patterns in depth of water uptake under contrasting annual and perennial systems in the Corn Belt region of the midwestern US. Plant and Soil, 308, 69–92.

9 Atangana, A., Khasa, D., Chang, S., & Degrande, A. (2014). Tropical agroforestry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Nature.

10 Bagley, W. T. (1964). Responses of tomatoes and beans to windbreak shelter. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 19, 71–73.

11 Baraldi, R., Bertazza, G., Bogino, J., Luna, V., & Bottini, R. (1995). The effect of light quality on Prunus cerasus: II. Changes in hormone levels in plants grown under different light conditions. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 62, 800–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751‐1097.1995.tb08732.x

12 Bobryk, C. W., Rega, C. C., Bardhan, S., Farina, A., He, H., & Jose, S. (2016). Assessing structural and compositional resources in temperate agroforestry systems using soundscape analysis. Agroforestry Systems, 90, 997–1008.

13 Bonilla, C. A., Muñoz, J. F., & Vauclin, M. (1999). Opus simulation of water dynamics and nitrate transport in a field plot. Ecological Modelling, 122, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304‐3800(99)00119‐2

14 Boring, L. R., & Swank, W. T. (1984). The role of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) in forest succession. Journal of Ecology, 72, 749–766.

15 Brandle, J. R., Hodges, L., & Zhou, X. (2004). Windbreaks in sustainable agriculture. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 65–78.

16 Brenner, A. J. (1996). Microclimatic modifications in agroforestry. In C.K. Ong and P. Huxley (Eds.), Tree–crop interactions: A physiological approach (pp. 159–187). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

17 Brooker, R. W., & Callaghan, T. V. (1998). The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: A model. Oikos, 81, 196–207.

18 Bugg, R. L., Sarrantonio, M., Dutcher, J. D., & Phatak, S. C. (1991). Understory cover crops in pecan orchards: Possible management systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 6, 50–62.

19 Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., & Ong, C. K. (1998). The redistribution of soil water by tree root systems. Oecologia, 115, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050521

20 Burner, D. M. (2003). Influence of alley crop environment on orchardgrass and tall fescue herbage. Agronomy Journal, 95, 1163–1171. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1163

21 Caldwell, M. M., & Richards, J. H. (1989). Hydraulic lift: Water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia, 79, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378231

22 Cannell, M. G. R., van Noordwijk, M., & Ong, C. K. (1996). The central agroforestry hypothesis: The trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agroforestry Systems, 34, 27–31.

23 Casper, B. B., & Jackson, R. B. (1997). Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545

24 Chifflot, V., Bertoni, G., Cabanettes, A., & Gavaland, A. (2006). Beneficial effects of intercropping on the growth and nitrogen status of young wild cherry and hybrid walnut trees. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 13–21.

25 Cleugh, H. A. (2002). Field measurements of windbreak effects on airflow, turbulent exchanges and microclimates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42, 665–677.

26 Corak, S. J., Blevins, D. G., & Pallardy, S. G. (1987). Water transfer in an alfalfa–maize association: Survival of maize during drought. Plant Physiology, 84, 582–586.

27 Davis, J. E., & Norman, J. M. (1988). Effects of shelter on plant water use. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22–23, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167‐8809(88)90034‐5

28 Davis, M. H., & Simmons, S. R. (1994a). Tillering response of barley to shifts in light quality caused by neighboring plants. Crop Science, 34, 1604–1610. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060033x

29 Davis, M.H, & Simmons, S. R. (1994b). Far‐red light reflected from neighboring vegetation promotes shoot elongation and accelerate flowering in spring barley plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 17, 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐3040.1994.tb00177.x

30 Dawson, L. A., Duff, E. I., Campbell, C. D., & Hirst, D. J. (2001). Depth distribution of cherry (Prunus avium L.) tree roots as influenced by grass root competition. Plant and Soil, 231, 11–19.

31 Dawson, T. E. (1993). Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: Implications for water balance, performance and plant–plant interactions. Oecologia, 95, 565–574.

32 Delate, K., Holzmueller, E., Mize, C., Frederick, D., & Brummer, C. (2005). Tree establishment and growth using forage ground covers in an alley‐cropped system. Agroforestry Systems, 65, 43–52.

33 Dupraz, C., Simorte, V., Dauzat, M., Bertoni, G., Bernadac, A., & Masson, P. (1998). Growth and nitrogen status of young walnuts as affected by intercropped legumes in a Mediterranean climate. Agroforestry Systems, 43, 71–80.

34 Ehret, M., Graß, R., & Wachendorf, M. (2015). The effect of shade and shade material on white clover/perennial ryegrass mixtures for temperate agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 89, 557–570.

35 Espeleta, J. F., West, J. B., & Donovan, L. A. (2004). Species‐specific patterns of hydraulic lift in co‐occurring adult trees and grasses in a sandhill community. Oecologia, 138, 341–349.

36 Fisher, R. F. (1978). Juglone inhibits pine growth under certain moisture regimes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 801–803. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200050030x

37 Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., . . .Zaks, D. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452pmid:21993620

38 Ford, M., Zamora, D., Current, D., Magner, J., Wyatt, G., Walter, D., & Vaughan, S. (2019). Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: The potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 67–79.

39 Funabashi, M. (2018). Human augmentation of ecosystems: Objectives for food production and science by 2045. npj Science of Food, 2, 16. https//doi.org/10.1038/s41538‐018‐0026‐4

40 Gakis, S., Mantzanas, K., Alifragis, D., Papanastasis, V. P., Papaioannou, A., Seilopoulos, D., & Platis, P. (2004). Effects of understory vegetation on tree establishment and growth in a silvopastoral system in northern Greece. Agroforestry Systems, 60, 149–157.

41 Garcia‐Barrios, L., & Ong, C. K. (2004). Ecological interactions, management lessons, and design tools in tropical agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 221–236.

42 Garrett, H. E., McGraw, R. L., & Walter, W. D. (2009). Alley cropping practices. In H. E. Garrett (Ed.), North American agroforestry: An integrated science and practice (2nd ed., pp. 133–162). Madison, WI: ASA.

43 Garrity, D. P. (2004). Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 5–17.

44 Gause, G.F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

45 Geyer, W. A., & Fick, W. H. (2015). Yield and forage quality of smooth brome in a black walnut alley‐cropping practice. Agroforestry Systems, 89, 107–112.

46 Gibbs, S., Koblents, H., Coleman, B., Gordon, A., Thevathasan, N., & Wiliams, P. (2016). Avian diversity in a temperate tree‐based intercropping system from inception to now. Agroforestry Systems, 90, 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐016‐9901‐7

47 Gillespie, A. R., Jose, S., Mengel, D. B., Hoover, W. L., Pope, P. E., Seifert, J. R., . . .Benjamin, T. J. (2000). Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 1. Production physiology. Agroforestry Systems, 48, 25–40.

48 Gillespie, A. R., Miller, B. K., & Johnson, K. D. (1995). Effects of ground cover on tree survival and growth in filter strips of the Cornbelt region of the midwestern US. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 53, 263–270.

49 Goldberg, D. E. (1990). Components of resource competition in plant communities. In J. B. Grace & D. Timan (Ed.), Perspectives on plant competition (pp. 27–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

50 Gómez‐Gutierrez, J. M., & Pérez‐Fernández, M. (1996). The “dehesas”: Silvopastoral systems in semiarid Mediterranean regions with poor soils, seasonal climate and extensive utilisation. In M. Etienne (Ed.), Western European silvopastoral systems (pp. 55–70). Paris: INRA Editions.

51 Gravel, D., Mouquet, N., Loreau, M., & Guichard, F. (2010). Patch dynamics, persistence, and species coexistence in metaecosystems. The American Naturalist, 176, 289–302.

52 Hardin, G. (1960). The competitive exclusion principle. Science, 131, 1292–1297.

53 Holmgren, M., Scheffer, M., & Huston, M. A. (1997). The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 1966–1975.

54 Horton, J. L., & Hart, S. C. (1998). Hydraulic lift: A potentially important ecosystem process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169‐5347(98)01328‐7

55 Hubbell, S. P. (2001). The unified neutral theory of species abundance and diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

56 Inderjit, & Mallik, A. U. (2002). Chemical ecology of plants: Allelopathy in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.

57  Isabelle, B., Damien, G., & Wilfried, T. (2014). FATE‐HD: A spatially and temporally explicit integrated model for predicting vegetation structure and diversity at regional scale. Global Change Biology, 20, 2368–2378.

58 Johnson, R. J., & Beck, M. M. (1988). Influences of shelterbelts on wildlife management and biology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22–23, 301–335.

59 Jose, S. (1997). Interspecific interactions in alley cropping: The physiology and biogeochemistry (Doctoral dissertation). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.

60 Jose, S. (2002). Black walnut allelopathy: Current state of the science. In Inderjit & A. U. Mallik (Eds.), Chemical ecology of plants: Allelopathy in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (pp. 149–172). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.

61 Jose, S. (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforestry Systems, 76, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐009‐9229‐7

62 Jose, S., & Dollinger, J. (2019). Silvopasture: A sustainable livestock production system. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐019‐00366‐8

63 Jose, S., & Gillespie, A. R. (1998). Allelopathy in black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) alley cropping: I. Spatio‐temporal variation in soil juglone in a black walnut–corn (Zea mays L.) alley cropping system in the mid‐western USA. Plant and Soil, 203, 191–197.

64 Jose, S., Gillespie, A. R., & Pallardy, S. G. (2004). Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 237–255.

65 Jose, S., Gillespie, A. R., Seifert, J. R., & Biehle, D. J. (2000). Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the mid‐western USA: 2. Competition for water. Agroforestry Systems, 48, 41–59.

66 Jose, S., Gillespie, A. R., Seifert, J. R., Mengel, D. B., & Pope, P. E. (2000). Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the mid‐western USA: 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics. Agroforestry Systems, 48, 61–77.

67 Jose, S., & Holzmueller, E. J. (2008). Black walnut allelopathy: Implications for intercropping. In R. S. Zeng, A. U. Mallik, & S. M. Luo (Eds.), Allelopathy in sustainable agriculture and forestry. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐0‐387‐77337‐7_16

68 Jose, S., Williams, R., & Zamora, D. (2006). Belowground ecological interactions in mixed‐species forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 233, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.014

69 Kallenbach, R. L., Kerley, M. S., & Bishop‐Hurley, G. J. (2006). Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a pine–walnut silvopasture. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 43–53.

70 Kelty, M. J. (2000). Species interactions, stand structure, and productivity in agroforestry systems In M. S. Ashton & R. Montagnini (Eds.) The silvicultural basis for agroforestry systems (pp. 183–203). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

71 Kort, J. (1988). Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22–23, 165–191.

72 Kozlowski, T. T., & Pallardy, S.G. (1997). Physiology of woody plants (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

73 Krueger, W. C. (1981). How a forest affects a forage crop. Rangelands, 3, 70–71.

74 Kumar, B. M., & Jose, S. (2018). Phenotypic plasticity of roots in mixed tree species agroforestry systems: Review with examples from peninsular India. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 59–69.

75 Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S., III, & Pons, T. L. (1998). Plant physiological ecology. New York: Springer.

76 Lee, K. H., Isenhart, T. M., & Schultz, R. C. (2003). Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi‐species riparian buffer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 58, 1–8.

77 Lehmkuhler, J. W., Felton, E. E. D., Schmidt, D. A., Bader, K. J., Garrett, H. E., & Kerley, M. S. (2003). Tree protection methods during the silvopastoral‐system establishment in midwestern USA: Cattle performance and tree damage. Agroforestry Systems, 59, 35–42.

78 Li, F. D., Meng, P., Dali, F., & Wang, B. P. (2008). Light distribution, photosynthetic rate and yield in a Paulownia–wheat intercropping system in China. Agroforestry Systems, 74, 163–172.

79 Lin, C. H., McGraw, R. L., George, M. F., & Garrett, H. E. (1999). Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agroforestry Systems, 44,109–119.

80 Lin, C. H., McGraw, R. L., George, M. F., & Garrett, H. E. (2001). Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 269–281.

81 Lovell, S. T., Dupraz, C., Gold, M., Jose, S., Revord, R., Stanek, E., & Wolz, K. J. (2017). Temperate agroforestry research: Considering multifunctional woody polycultures and the design of long‐term field trials. Agroforestry Systems, 92, 1397–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐017‐0087‐4

82 Martin‐Chave, A., Béral, C., & Capowiez, Y. (2019). Agroforestry has an impact on nocturnal predation by ground beetles and Opiliones in a temperate organic alley cropping system. Biological Control, 129, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.009

83 Mayer, A. C., Stockli, V., Konold, W., & Kreuzer, M. (2006). Influence of cattle stocking rate on browsing of Norway spruce in subalpine wood pastures. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐005‐5460‐z

84 Mcadam, J. H., Sibbald, A. R., Teklehaimanot, Z., & Eason, W. R. (2007). Developing silvopastoral systems and their effects on diversity of fauna. Agroforestry Systems, 70, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐007‐9047‐8

85 Miller, A. W., & Pallardy, S. G. (2001). Resource competition across the crop–tree interface in a maize–silver maple temperate alley cropping stand in Missouri. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 247–259.

86 Miller, T. E., Burns, J. H., Munguia, P., Walters, E. L., Kneitel, J. M., Richards, P. M., . . .Buckley, H. L. (2005). A critical review of 20 years’ use of the resource ratio theory. The American Naturalist, 165, 439–448.

87 Moreno Marcos, G., Obrador, J. J., García, E., Cubera, E., Montero, M. J., Pulido, F., & Dupraz, C. (2007). Driving competitive and facilitative interactions in oak dehesas through management practices. Agroforestry Systems, 70, 25–40.

88 Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An introduction to agroforestry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

89 Nair, P. K. R., Buresh, R. J., Mugendi, D. N., & Latt, C. R. (1999). Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: Myths and science. In L. E. Buck, J. P. Lassoie, & E. C. M. Fernandes (Eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems (pp. 1–31). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

90 Nair, V. D., Nair, P. K. R., Kalmbacher, R. S., & Ezenwa, I. V. (2007). Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse‐textured soils of Florida, USA. Ecological Engineering, 29, 192–199.

91 NeSmith, D. S., & Ritchie, J. T. (1992a). Effects of soil water deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield component of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research, 28, 251–256.

92 NeSmith, D. S., & Ritchie, J. T. (1992b). Short‐ and long‐term responses of corn to pre‐anthesis soil water deficit. Agronomy Journal, 84,107–113. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400010021x

93 Ng, H. Y. F., Drury, C. F., Serem, V. K., Tan, C. S., & Gaynor, J. D. (2000). Modeling and testing of the effect of tillage, cropping and water management practices on nitrate leaching in clay loam soil. Agricultural Water Management, 43, 111–131.

94  Nowak, J., Blount, A., & Workman, S. (2002). Integrated timber, forage and livestock production: Benefits of silvopasture (UF/IFAS Circ. 1430). Gainesville, FL: Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.

95 Ong, C. K., Black, C. R., Marshall, F. M., & Corlett, J. E. (1996). Principles of resource capture and utilization of light and water. In C. K. Ong & P. Huxley (Eds.), Tree–crop interactions: A physiological approach (pp. 73–158). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

96 Ong, C. K., Corlett, J. E., Singh, R. P., & Black, C. R. (1991). Above and belowground interactions in agroforestry systems. Forest Ecology and Management, 45, 45–57.

97 Ong, C. K., Deans, J. D., Wilson, J., Mutua, J., Khan, A. A. H., & Lawson, E. M. (1999). Exploring belowground complementarity in agroforestry using sap flow and root fractal techniques. Agroforestry Systems, 44, 87–103.

98 Orefice, J., Caroll, J., Conroy, D., & Ketner, L. (2017). Silvopasture practices and perspectives in the northeastern United States. Agroforestry Systems, 91, 149–160.

99 Pang, K., Van Sambeek, J. W., Navarrete‐Tindall, N. E., Lin, C.‐H., Jose, S., & Garrett, H. E. (2019a). Responses of legumes and grasses to non‐, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA: I. Forage yield and its species‐level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐017‐0067‐8

100 Pang, K., Van Sambeek, J. W., Navarrete‐Tindall, N. E., Lin, C.‐H., Jose, S., & Garrett, H. E. (2019b). Responses of legumes and grasses to non‐, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA: II. Forage quality and its species‐level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems, 93:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457‐017‐0068‐7

101 Pardon, P., Reheul, D., Mertens, J., Reubens, B., De Frenne, P., De Smedt, P., . . .Verheyen, K. (2019). Gradients in abundance and diversity of ground dwelling arthropods as a function of distance to tree rows in temperate arable agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 270, 114–128.

102 Passarge, J., Hol, S., Escher, M., & Huisman, J. (2006). Competition for nutrients and light: Stale coexistence, alternative stable states, or competitive exclusion? Ecological Monographs, 76, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1890/04‐1824

103 Penuelas, J., & Filella, I. (2003). Deuterium labeling of roots provides evidence of deep water access and hydraulic lift by Pinus nigra in a Mediterranean forest of NE Spain. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 49, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098‐8472(02)00070‐9

104 Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360, 987–992.

105 Powell, G. W., & Bork, E. W. (2006). Aspen canopy removal and root trenching effects on understory vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management, 230, 79–90.

106 Quinteros, C. P., Bava, J. O., Bernal, P. M. L., Gobbi, M. E., & Defosse, G. E. (2017). Competition effects of grazing‐modified herbaceous vegetation on growth, survival and water relations of lenga (Nothofagus pumilio) seedlings in a temperate forest of Patagonia, Argentina. Agroforestry Systems, 91, 597–611.

107 Ramsey, C. L., & Jose, S. (2002). Management challenges of pecan and pine based alley cropping systems of the Southern United States. In W. Schroder & J. Kort (Eds.), Temperate agroforestry: Adaptive and mitigative roles (pp. 158–163). Regina, SK, Canada: Plains and Prairie Forestry Association.

108 Reynolds, P. E., Simpson, J. A., Thevathasan, N. V., & Gordon, A. M. (2007). Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree‐based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering, 29, 362–371.

109 Rivest, D., & Vézina, A. (2015). Maize yield patterns on the leeward side of tree windbreaks are site‐specific and depend on rainfall conditions in eastern Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 89, 237–246.

110 Robin, C., Hay, M. J. M., Newton, P. C. D., & Greer, D. H. (1994). Effect of light quality (red:far‐red ratio) at the apical bud of the main stolon on morphogenesis of Trifolium repens L. Annals of Botany, 74, 119–123.

111 Root, R. (1973). Organization of a plant–arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs, 43, 95–124.

112 Sanchez, P. A. (2002). Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science, 295, 2019–2020.

113 Schroth, G. (1999). A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focusing on mechanisms and management options. Agroforestry Systems, 43, 5–34.

114 Seiter, S., Ingham, E. R., William, R. D., & Hibbs, D. E. (1995). Increase in soil microbial biomass and transfer of nitrogen from alder to sweet corn in an alley cropping system. In J. H. Ehrenreich, D. L. Ehrenreich, & H. W. Lee (Eds.), Growing a sustainable future (pp. 56–158). Boise, ID: University of Idaho.

115 Shainsky, L. J., & Radosevich, S. R. (1992). Mechanisms of competition between Douglas‐fir and red alder seedlings. Ecology, 73, 30–45.

116 Sharrow, S. H. (1999). Silvopastoralism: Competition and facilitation between trees, livestock, and improved grass–clover pastures on temperate rainfed lands. In L. E. Buck, J. Lassoie, & E. C. M. Fernandez (Eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems (pp. 111–130). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

117 Silva‐Pando, F. J., Gonzalez‐Hernandez, M. P., & Rozados‐Lorenzo, M. J. (2002). Pasture production in a silvopastoral system in relation with microclimate variables in the Atlantic coast of Spain. Agroforestry Systems, 56, 203–211.

118 Singh, R. P., Ong, C. K., & Saharan, N. (1989). Above and below ground interactions in alley cropping in semiarid India. Agroforestry Systems, 9, 259–274.

119 Smil, V. (1999). Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13, 647–662.

120 Smil, V. (2000). Phosphorus in the environment: Natural flows and human interferences. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 53–88.

121 Smith, M. W., Arnold, D. C., Eikenbary, R. D., Rice, N. R., Shiferaw, A., Cheary, B. S., & Carroll, B.L. (1996). Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biological Control, 6, 164–176.

122 Smith, M. W., Wolf, M. E., Cheary, B. S., & Carroll, B. L. (2001). Allelopathy of bermudagrass, tall fescue, redroot pigweed, and cutleaf evening primrose on pecan. HortScience, 36, 1047–1048.

123 Söderström, B., Svensson, B., Vessby, K., & Glimskär, A. (2001). Plants, insects and birds in semi‐natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiversity & Conservation, 10, 1839–1863. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013153427422

124 Thevathasan, N. V., & Gordon, A. M. (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the north temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029003.00933.6d

125 Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., & Voroney, R. P. (1998). Juglone (5‐hydroxy‐1,4 napthoquinone) and soil nitrogen transformation interactions under a walnut plantation in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 44, 151–162.

126 Tilman, D. (1980). A graphical‐mechanistic approach to competition and predation. The American Naturalist, 116, 362–393.

127 Tilman, D. (1982). Resource competition and community structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

128  Tilman, D. (1990). Constraints and tradeoffs: Toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos, 58, 3–15.

129 Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.

130 Todhunter, M. N., & Beineke, W. F. (1979). Effect of fescue on black walnut growth. Tree Planters’ Notes, 30, 20–23.

131 Troeh, F. R., & Thompson, L. M. (1993). Soils and soil fertility (5th ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.

132 Tsonkova, P., Böhm, C., Quinkenstein, A., & Freese, D. (2012). Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: A review. Agroforestry Systems, 85, 133–152.

133 van Noordwijk, M., Lawson, G., Soumaré, A., Groot, J. J. R., & Hairiah, K. (1996). Root distribution of trees and crops: Competition and/or complementarity. In C. K. Ong & P. Huxley (Eds.), Tree–crop interactions: A physiological approach (pp. 319–364). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

134 Von Kiparski, G. R., Lee, L. S., & Gillespie, A. R. (2007). Occurrence and fate of the phytotoxin juglone in alley soils under black walnut trees. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 709–717.

135 Wanvestraut, R., Jose, S., Nair, P. K. R., & Brecke, B. J. (2004). Competition for water in a pecan–cotton alley cropping system. Agroforestry Systems, 60, 167–179.

136 Waring, H. D., & Snowdon, P. (1985). Clover and urea as sources of nitrogen for the establishment of Pinus radiata. Australian Forest Research, 15, 115–121.

137 Wojtkowski, P. (1998). The theory and practice of agroforestry design. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.

138 Yang, L. L., Ding, X. Q., Liu, X. J., Li, P. M., & Egrinya Eneji, A. (2016). Impacts of long‐term jujube tree/winter wheat–summer maize intercropping on soil fertility and economic efficiency: A case study in the lower North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy, 75, 105–117.

139 Zamora, D., Jose, S., & Nair, P. K. R. (2006). Interspecific interaction in a pecan–cotton alleycropping system in the southern United States: The production physiology. Canadian Journal of Botany, 84, 1686–1694.

140 Zamora, D., Jose, S., & Nair, P. K. R. (2007). Morphological plasticity of cotton roots in response to interspecific competition with pecan in an alleycropping system in the southern United States. Agroforestry Systems, 69, 107–116.

141 Zhang, W., Wang, B. J., Gan, Y. W., Duan, Z. P., Hao, X. D., Xu, W. L., & Li, L. H. (2018). Different tree age affects light competition and yield in wheat grown as a companion crop in jujube–wheat agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 653–664.

North American Agroforestry

Подняться наверх