Читать книгу The Science of Reading - Группа авторов - Страница 93

1 Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(232). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232.

2 Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001.

3 Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual‐route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509.

4 Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851.

5 Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low‐frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2(3), 419–463. doi: 10.1075/ml.2.3.06baa.

6 Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent‐Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single‐syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096‐3445.133.2.283.

7 Ben‐Shachar, M., Dougherty, R. F., Deutsch, G. K., & Wandell, B. A. (2011). The development of cortical sensitivity to visual word forms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2387–2399. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21615.

8 Berg, K., & Aronoff, M. (2017). Self‐organization in the spelling of English suffixes: The emergence of culture out of anarchy. Language, 93(1), 37–64. doi: 10.1353/lan.2017.0000.

9 Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 489–511. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.26.2.489.

10 Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(7), 1306–1326. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656661.

11 Beyersmann, E., Grainger, J., Casalis, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2015). Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.001.

12 Boudelaa, S., & Marslen‐Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81(1), 65–92. doi: 10.1016/S0010‐0277(01)00119‐6.

13 Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116.

14 Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Thornton, A. M., & Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo‐words. In G. Booji, & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 55–72). Dordrecht, Springer.

15 Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 18(4), 342–352.

16 Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010‐0277(88)90017‐0.

17 Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005.

18 Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 151–179). Hove, UK; New York: Psychology Press.

19 Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271.

20 Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/0749‐596X(89)90025‐9.

21 Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi: I0.1037//0033‐295X.108.1.204.

22 Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). “Fell” primes “fall,” but does “bell” prime “ball”? Masked priming with irregularly‐inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002.

23 Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 645–654. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000485.

24 Dehaene‐Lambertz, G., Monzalvo, K., & Dehaene, S. (2018). The emergence of the visual word form: Longitudinal evolution of category‐specific ventral visual areas during reading acquisition. PLoS Biology, 16(3), e2004103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004103.

25 Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(41), 14984–14988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403766101.

26 Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen‐Wilson, W. D. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003.

27 Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 680–698. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.10.4.680.

28 Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99. doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.123.1.71.

29 Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked‐priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 829–856. doi: 10.1037/0278‐7393.23.4.829.

30 Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4‐5), 421–444. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119652.

31 Gold, B. T., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 1983–1993. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983.

32 Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.111.3.662.

33 Hoffman, P., Ralph, M. A. L., & Woollams, A. M. (2015). Triangulation of the neurocomputational architecture underpinning reading aloud. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), E3719–E3728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502032112.

34 Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in Psychology, 94. Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

35 Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 811–816. doi: 10.1037/a0028960.

36 Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Ktori, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2020). Morphemes as letter chunks: Discovering affixes through visual regularities. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, 104152. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104152.

37 Lewis, G., Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2011). The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words. Brain and Language, 118(3), 118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.04.004.

38 Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008.

39 Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036.

40 Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 107–128. doi: 10.1037//0096‐3445.123.2.107.

41 Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3), 485–515. doi: 10.1037/a0039267.

42 Marslen‐Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.101.1.3.

43 McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 293–299. doi: 10.1016/S1364‐6613(03)00134‐7.

44 McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a “fete” in “fetish”? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho‐orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 307–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006.

45 Melby‐Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta‐analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322–352. doi: 10.1037/a0026744.

46 Mousikou, P., Beyersmann, E., Ktori, M., Javourey‐Drevet, L., Crepaldi, D., Ziegler, J. C., Grainger, J., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross‐linguistic study. Developmental Science, e12952. doi: 0.1111/desc.12952.

47 Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. doi: 10.2307/747823.

48 Nation, K. (2009). Form–meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3665–3674. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0119.

49 Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41539‐017‐0004‐7.

50 Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.004.

51 Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non‐semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 445–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661.

52 Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi‐regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi: 10.1037//0033‐295X.103.1.56.

53 Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2000). Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6(3), 207–213. doi: 10.1002/1098‐2779(2000)6:3<207::AID‐MRDD8>3.0.CO;2‐P.

54 Rastle, K. (2019a). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex, 116, 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.

55 Rastle, K. (2019b). EPS mid‐career prize lecture 2017: Writing systems, reading, and language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 677–692. doi: 10.1177/1747021819829696.

56 Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002.

57 Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730.

58 Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time‐course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689.

59 Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho‐orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742.

60 Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6(1), 26–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.1995.tb00300.x.

61 Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 110–117. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2106.

62 Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew mental lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(5), 383–403. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.571327.

63 Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, B. Miller, J. R. Lee, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), The extraordinary brain series. Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain–gene–behavior link (pp. 146–168). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

64 Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661859.

65 Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042–2057. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21296.

66 Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. doi: 10.3758/BF03197599.

67 Taft, M. (1994). Interactive‐activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 271–294. doi: 10.1080/01690969408402120.

68 Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1(2), 183–199. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.2.02taf.

69 Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. doi: 10.1016/S0022‐5371(75)80051‐X.

70 Taft, M., & Nguyen‐Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296. doi: 10.1080/01690960903043261.

71 Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2015). From specific examples to general knowledge in language learning. Cognitive Psychology, 79, 1–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.003.

72 Taylor, J. S. H., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2019). Mapping visual symbols onto spoken language along the ventral visual stream. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17723–17728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818575116.

73 Taylor, J. S. H., Duff, F. J., Woollams, A. M., Monaghan, P., & Ricketts, J. (2015). How word meaning influences word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 322–328. doi: 10.1177/0963721415574980.

74 Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta‐analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 766–791. doi: 10.1037/a0030266.

75 Treiman, R., Wolter, S., & Kessler, B. (2020). How sensitive are adults to the role of morphology in spelling? Morphology. doi: 10.1007/s11525‐020‐09356‐4.

76 Ulicheva, A., Harvey, H., Aronoff, M., & Rastle, K. (2020). Skilled readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English writing. Cognition, 195, 103810. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.013.

77 van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 181–198. doi: 10.3758/BF03197716.

78 Whiting, C., Shtyrov, Y., & Marslen‐Wilson, W. (2014). Real‐time functional architecture of visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 246–265. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00699.

79 Yablonski, M., Rastle, K., Taylor, J. S. H., & Ben‐Shachar, M. (2019). Structural properties of the ventral reading pathways are associated with morphological processing in adult English readers. Cortex, 116, 268–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.011.