Читать книгу Sea-Birds - James Fisher - Страница 10

GEOLOGISTS DIFFER in their opinions of the origin of the Atlantic Ocean. The followers of the geomorphologist Alfred Wegener believe that it is a real crack in the earth’s crust whose lips have drifted away from each other, and this opinion is lent verisimilitude by the neat way in which the east coast of the Americas can be applied to, and will fit with extraordinary exactitude, the west coast of Europe and Africa. It must be stated that, while the present opinion of most geographers is that the resemblance of the Atlantic to a drifted crack is purely coincidental, this is not shared by all students of animal distribution and evolution, some of whom, find the Wegener theory the most economical hypothesis to account for the present situation.

Whatever the truth is, there is no doubt that the boundaries of the Atlantic, and their interconnections, have varied considerably; thus halfway through the Cretaceous Period, about ninety million years ago (during this long period nearly all the principal orders of birds evolved), there were bridges between Europe, Greenland and Eastern North America cutting the Arctic Ocean from the North Atlantic completely; and from then until the late Pliocene—perhaps only two million years ago—there was no continuous Central American land bridge, but a series of islands.

Our present knowledge of the tree of bird evolution owes much to Alexander Wetmore and his school, who have so notably added to our knowledge of fossil birds during the last twenty years, especially in North America. Birds do not appear very frequently in the sedimentary rocks—their fossil population does not generally reflect their true population in the same way as that of mammals is reflected. However, if land-birds are rare in the beds, water-birds are relatively common, and the periods and epochs in which all our sea-bird orders, and many of our sea-bird families and genera, originated are quite well known. A recent paper by Hildegarde Howard (1950), of the school of Wetmore, enables us to show a diagrammatic family tree of birds (Fig. 3), with special reference to sea-birds, and to collate its branching with the approximate time scale of the epochs, so cleverly established by geomorphologists in recent years from studies of sedimentation-rate and the radioactivity of rocks. It will be seen that the primary radiation of birds and the great advances into very different habitats consequent upon the first success of the new animal invention—feathered flight—took place in the Cretaceous period, the first birdlike feathered animals having been found as fossils in Jurassic deposits of the previous period, over a hundred and twenty million years old. In the Cretaceous period—the period of reptiles—ostriches were already foreshadowed, as were grebes and divers, and the pelican-like birds, and the ducks.

In the Cenozoic period—the period of mammals—the radiation of birds into all nature’s possible niches continued rapidly, especially in the first two of its epochs—Eocene and Oligocene—from sixty to thirty million years ago. In these epochs grebes can be distinguished from divers, and a bird of the same apparent genus (Podiceps, or, as the North Americans have it, Colymbus) as modern grebes has been found. Gannet-boobies of the modern genus Sula have been found in the Oligocene, as have cormorants of the modern genus Phalacrocorax. The only penguin fossils known are later—of Miocene age—but it seems probable that they share a common stem with the tubenoses, which would mean that their ancestors branched off in the Eocene. The tubenoses diversified in the Oligocene—from this epoch we have a shearwater of the modern genus Puffinus; and from the Miocene Fulmarus and albatrosses. The ducks started their main evolution in the Cretaceous, and by the Oligocene we find modern genera such as Anas (mallard-like) and Aythya (pochard-like); in the Pliocene we have Bucephala (Charitonetta)—one of the tribe of sea-ducks.

For the Lari-Limicolae, the order which includes waders, gulls and auks, the fossil record is rather indefinite, mainly owing to the difficulty of distinguishing the present families by bones alone. However, we know that the auk family was early—an Eocene offshoot; that the waders and gulls diverged in the Oligocene; and that the gulls, terns and skuas probably diverged in the Miocene—which means that an important part of the adaptive radiation of this order was comparatively late. One of the early auks, the Pliocene Mancalla of California, out-penguined the great auk, Alca (Pinguinus) impennis, for it had progressed far beyond it in the development of a swimming wing.

FIG. 3

Diagrammatic family tree of sea-birds, mainly after Hildegarde Howard (1950)

According to Howard (1950) a few living species of birds have been recorded from the Upper Pliocene, but large numbers of modern forms occurred in the Pleistocene. Of course in the Pleistocene the oceans approximated very closely to what they are today, with the Central American land-bridge closed, the Norwegian Sea wide open between Arctic and Atlantic Oceans, the Mediterranean a blind diverticulum of the North Atlantic. We need this picture as a background to a consideration of the North Atlantic’s present sea-bird fauna, for we shall find that it has few sea-bird species of its own, and only two genera; for the primary sea-bird species which now breed in the Atlantic (and Mediterranean) and in the neighbouring parts of the Arctic, and nowhere else in the world, are no more than twelve: the Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus^*; the very rare diablotin and cahow of the West Indies and Bermuda (Pterodroma hasitata and P. cahow); the storm-petrel Hydrobates pelagicus; the North Atlantic gannet Sula bassana; the shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis; the lesser black-back Larus fuscus; the great blackback L. marinus; the Mediterranean gulls L. melanocephalus and L. audouinii; the Sandwich tern Thalasseus sandvicensis; the razorbill Alca torda, the puffin Fratercula arctica; besides the extinct Alca impennis, the great auk. The two present genera peculiar to the North-Atlantic-Arctic are Hydrobates and Alca.

The sea-birds which qualify by birth and residence to be members of the North Atlantic fauna (excluding purely Arctic and Mediterranean species) include thirteen tubenoses, seventeen cormorant-pelicans, fourteen gulls, nineteen terns, two skimmers, four skuas and five auks (besides various secondary sea-birds, notably about eighteen ducks, three divers and two phalaropes). If we are to understand how these have got into the North Atlantic we should analyse the present distribution of the sea-bird orders and groups as between the different oceans.

The most primitive group of sea-birds, yet the most specialized, is that of the penguins. The Sphenisci have fifteen species in all, of which eight breed in the South Pacific, seven in the Antarctic Ocean, five in the South Atlantic and two in the Indian Ocean. One (and one only) reaches the Equator, and thus the North Pacific, at the Galapagos Islands. No live wild penguin has ever been seen in the North Atlantic.^* It seems certain that the evolution of this order of birds has taken place in Antarctica and in the neighbouring sectors of the South Pacific.

The great order of Tubinares the albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters, probably originated in what is now the South Pacific. Nobody knows exactly how many species belong to this order, as there is a good deal of disorder in the published systematics of this very difficult group; but the number is certainly eighty-six, and may be over ninety. Of these fifty-four breed in the South Pacific, twenty-seven in the Antarctic, twenty-five in the North Pacific, twenty-four in the South Atlantic, seventeen in the Indian Ocean, thirteen in the North Atlantic, three in the Mediterranean, and only one, the fulmar, in the Arctic Ocean.

The Steganopodes are an order which is particularly well represented in the South Pacific and Indian Oceans. The pelicans, gannets, cormorants, darter, tropic– and frigate-birds number fifty-four species in all. Thirty-one breed in the South Pacific. Twenty-eight breed in the Indian Ocean. The North Pacific has twenty-three, the South Atlantic twenty, the North Atlantic sixteen, the Mediterranean six, the Antarctic three, and the Arctic two. The present distribution suggests that the order radiated from what is now the East Indian region—from south-east Asia or Australasia.

In the order Laro-Limicolae the family Chionididae, two curious pigeon-like sheathbills, Chionis, are found in Antarctica; and one also breeds in the South Atlantic and South Pacific.

In the family Laridae the gulls (subfamily Larinae) number forty-two. In the North Pacific sixteen of these breed, in the North Atlantic fourteen, in the Arctic eleven, in the South Pacific nine, in the Indian Ocean six, in the South Atlantic five, in the Mediterranean five, in the Antarctic two. Besides these two breed inland only in North America, one inland only in South America, and three inland only in the Palearctic Region. This appears to be the only group of sea-birds whose evolutionary radiation may have taken place from the north; the Arctic and neighbouring parts of the North Pacific and Atlantic appears to be the origin of the gulls. The terns (subfamily Sterninae) number thirty-nine, of which twenty-three breed in the North and twenty-two in the South Pacific, nineteen in the Indian Ocean, nineteen in the North Atlantic, fifteen in the South Atlantic, ten in the Mediterranean, two in the Antarctic, two in the Arctic and one inland only in South America. The radiation of terns appears to be pretty general over the world’s seas, and they may have originated in the tropics, perhaps in the Indian Region. The skuas (subfamily Stercorariinae) have only four species, one of which (Catharacta skua, the great skua) has its breeding-headquarters in the Antarctic; it also breeds in the South Pacific, South and North Atlantic. The other skuas have an arctic breeding-distribution which extends into the North Pacific and North Atlantic. The three skimmers Rynchops belong to a separate family, Rynchopidae; North Atlantic, South Atlantic and South Pacific each have two; the Indian Ocean has one. Some workers regard them as all of one species.

The family Alcidae (the auks) take the place in the north of the penguins of the south. Undoubtedly their origin has been in or not far from the Bering Sea. Of the twenty-two species, sixteen belong to the northern part of the North Pacific, twelve to the Arctic Ocean north of the Circle, and six to the northern part of the North Atlantic.

This concludes the list of sea-birds belonging to groups of super-family or higher status whose evolution has been marine. There are several further (secondarily marine) groups which contain sea-birds, or part-time sea-birds; thus all four members of the order Gaviae the divers, breed in the Arctic, and North Atlantic and Pacific regions, and winter at sea on the coasts of the oceans. Many of the twenty species of grebes, order Podicipedes, are marine outside the breeding-season, and six of them visit the coasts of the North Atlantic at that time. Among the geese and ducks many (see Appendix, see here) are partly marine, and some (e.g. eiders and scoters) are largely marine in the breeding—as well as in the off-season: two eiders and three scoters breed in the North Atlantic-Arctic. Among the waders (Charadriidae) the subfamily Phalaropinae contains only three members, all of which breed in the Arctic, North Atlantic and North Pacific, and two of which winter in the open sea.

If we ignore these secondary sea-birds, and consider the 267 species of the primary marine groups, we find that the hierarchy is this: South Pacific 128 (51 per cent.); North Pacific 107 (40 per cent.); North Atlantic 74 (28 per cent.); South Atlantic 73 (27 per cent.); Indian Ocean 73 (27 per cent.); Antarctic 44 (16½ per cent.); Arctic 31 (11½ per cent.); Mediterranean 24 (9 per cent.); and purely inland only 7 (2½ per cent.).

It can be seen that the North Atlantic, with its seventy-four species, is much lower than either half of the Pacific than would appear warranted by its area. There is not the faintest hint, from the radiation of any of the sea-bird groups, that either North or South Atlantic has been the arena of any great evolutionary changes. The Atlantic has been colonised from without; by penguins from the Antarctic; by petrels from the South Pacific; by pelecaniform birds and terns probably from the Indian Ocean; by gulls and auks from the Arctic. The North Atlantic and the immediately neighbouring parts of the Arctic have but two present sea-bird genera and only thirteen species of their own. We need not be surprised at this indication that the Atlantic’s bird fauna is derived from that of other oceans if we accept Wegener’s theory of the origin of the Atlantic; but whether the Wegener theory is true or not it is quite clear that the North Atlantic has not been the home in which any important group of sea-birds has evolved. This is not to say that there has been no sea-bird evolution in the North Atlantic; but it has not usually gone beyond the differentiation of species. Of this it has, indeed, much to show. Some of the classic examples which E. Mayr (1942) has discussed are North Atlantic species. Mayr’s thesis is that one species can only become two after it has been differentiated geographically. He opposes the notion which has found favour in some quarters that speciation may occur by ecological differentiation or by the differentiation of behaviour.

So far the available evidence appears to uphold Mayr’s view—at all events, for birds. During the present century much systematic work in the description and measurement of birds has been conducted in American and European museums, and much practical and theoretical work on evolution has also been done. But it needed the persuasions of Mayr and Julian Huxley (1942), amongst a few others, to collate the work of the systematists and the evolutionary zoologists. Sea-birds lend themselves to evolutionary study because they are so largely confined to coasts for breeding purposes. This makes their distribution often linear rather than of the ordinarily spatial two-dimensional type; and this linear distribution makes it easy to apply Huxley’s concept that the characteristics of animals tend to grade from one part of their range to another in an orderly way. Some of these gradations had been recognised long before Huxley thought of the word “cline” because they are adaptations to the environment. For instance Bergmann’s Rule states that from the warmer parts of an animal’s distribution-area to the colder parts there tends to be an increase in its size. Thus the puffins, black guillemots and eider-ducks of the Arctic are considerably bigger than those of Britain. The main adaptive reason for this is that larger animals have less surface in proportion to their weight, and consequently heat is not lost from them (if warm-blooded) so rapidly as it is from small animals. Another rule, Allen’s Rule, states that warm-blooded animals of cold climates tend to have their heat-radiating surfaces decreased by a reduction in size of their extremities and limbs such as ears, tails, necks, legs and noses. There is also a general tendency (Gloger’s Rule) for animals to become darker as humidity increases.

If we examine those sea-birds which are widely distributed, we find clines in various characteristics, notably in size, i.e. total size, and also size of limbs and extremities, beak-length, wing-length, etc., and in colour. There are also clines in shape; for instance the fulmars of the north-east Atlantic have very thick bills, those of Baffin Island rather more slender bills, those of the North Pacific more slender bills still, and those of the Antarctic very slender bills indeed. No sea-bird is arranged quite evenly in its geographical distribution. Just as the distribution in space is never even, so are the gradations in character never even. From one part of the geographical distribution of a species to the other, change often occurs more as a series of steps rather than as continuous ramp.

Most working ornithologists today will agree that there are more subspecific names about than a true understanding of bird evolution requires. It is the species which has reality and significance. In this book we have tried to be sparing in the use of subspecies, and have rejected some that appear in many current text-books. Nevertheless, a study of the geographical races of the species of the North Atlantic sea-birds will lead us to examine here some of the more fascinating examples of geographic differentiation. The classic example among the sea birds is the chain of the Larus argentatus and fuscus group, the herring-gulls and lesser blackbacks, which may include some birds which are regarded as separate species, e.g. the California gull L. californicus, and the so-called ‘Iceland’ gull, or better the Greenland herring-gull, L. glaucoides or leucopterus. The relationships of this superspecies (Fig. 4a) were first worked out by B. Stegmann (1934): we have included the results of subsequent systematic work in this map (Fig. 4b) and in the discussion which follows.

It will be seen that the subspecies is composed of three chains of subspecies which unite in Central Siberia, where the resident breeding subspecies is Birula’s herring-gull Larus argentatus birulai. The two northerly chains link round the Polar Basin, the two end links of one overlapping with the two end links of the other. Where they overlap, the two races of one chain-end are ‘herring-gulls,’ of the other ‘lesser blackbacks.’ These behave as different species. It can be found convenient to make the ‘species’ separation in the chain, between the two races birulai and heuglini, thus calling the latter Larus fuscus heuglini (it is the first really dark-mantled gull in the chain). This is more practical than splitting the chain into argentatus and fuscus in the Bering Strait area, though this is probably the place of origin of the ancestral gull that gave rise to the whole chain; for if all the palearctic group were fuscus some confusion would surround the light-mantled Mediterranean forms.

Special comments can be made on various members of the chain. In the zone of overlap in Western Europe the herring-gulls are distinguished from the lesser blackbacks not only by form but by many habits. The lesser blackbacks breed often inland on moors, and when coastal tend to colonise flattish ground set back from the cliff-tops beloved of the herring-gulls. While the herring-gulls are dispersive in winter, the lesser blackbacks are almost entirely migratory, wintering south of all but their most southerly breeding-places, though some of the dark L. f. fuscus of Scandinavia winter in Britain, and recently a minority of the British race L. f. graellsii has ‘revived’ an old habit of wintering in England, especially in Cheshire and Lancashire. Both species are also extending their breeding-range north; L. a. argentatus has colonised east and north-east Iceland since 1909, and a herring-gull of this or the Scandinavian race omissus was breeding on Bear Island in 1932, though not 1948. The graellsii lesser blackback has established itself in south Iceland since about 1925, and a group intermediate between graellsii and fuscus in Denmark since 1922.

The North American situation is of great interest. As the herring-gulls range north-east they become generally paler in colour. The much-discussed Kumlien’s herring-gull L. a. kumlieni was for a long time held to be a hybrid between the ‘Iceland’ gull of Greenland and L. a. thayeri, Thayer’s gull of the Canadian Arctic and Thule corner of north-west Greenland. But there seems no doubt that it is a valid race (Taverner, 1933) with its own discrete breeding-distribution in southern Baffin Island, though on the western marches of its distribution there are apparently some forms intermediate between it and thayeri (Hørring, 1937) and colonies off south-west Baffin Island have been described as mixed (Soper, 1928).

FIG. 4

Breeding distribution and relationships of all subspecies of Larus fuscus, L. argentatus and related forms. a Diagram of forms, with leg and mantle-colour

The palest of all the herring-gulls is the ‘Iceland’ gull. Unquestionably this extremely pale bird, with pale flesh legs, is a herring-gull, and conspecific with the other herring-gulls of North America. Reports of its breeding in the Canadian arctic archipelago are due to confusion with thayeri; there is no evidence whatever of its overlapping with this or any other subspecies of L. argentatus anywhere; and its similarity in size, structure and plumage is obvious. It is just a very pale kind of herring-gull; and at the same time happens, through convergence, to be extraordinarily similar to, though smaller than, the glaucous gull.^* It is entirely confined to Greenland, breeding north to Melville Bay on the west (this inhospitable coast separates it from thayeri) and to Kangerdlugssuaq (at the south end of the Blosseville coast) on the east. Evidence of its breeding farther north in east Greenland, and elsewhere (e.g. Franz Josef Land, Novaya Zemlya) is quite unsatisfactory, and probably due to confusion with the glaucous gull; on Jan Mayen it was stated by F. Fischer to be as abundant as the glaucous gull in 1882–83, and to be nesting on low ledges, but it has not been proved to breed there since.

FIG. 4bBroken line: in Eurasia, L. fuscus; in North America southern limit of possible area of overlap between L. californicus and L. argentatus smithsonianus. Fig. 4a gives the key to the numbered forms.

In a complex situation, such as this, a confusion of scientific names is to be expected. In other cases it is often found that the vernacular name is less equivocal, and certainly more stable, than the scientific name! Such is not the present case, however; for the name ‘Iceland gull’ makes confusion worse confounded. It has never bred in Iceland. Hørring and Salomonsen (1941) have already used the English name Greenland Gull to describe it, and regard it as a race of Larus argentatus. We commend to our readers, and to the compilers of the Lists of the American and British Ornithologists’ Union : the Greenland Herring-Gull, Larus argentatus glaucoides (= L. a. leucopterus).

FIG. 5

Breeding distribution of Larus canus, the common gull, and the closely related L. delawarensis, the ring-billed gull

Among the North Atlantic sea-birds are others whose species have differentiated geographically and whose range-end populations have become different enough to occupy the same geographical area—but separate ecological niches, and thus preserve their identity. For instance, it is probable that the ring-billed gull Larus delawarensis, of North America, and the common gull of the Old World, L. canus, have not long since shared a common ancestor, though a subspecies of the common gull, which has probably spread across the Bering Straits from the Old World, now occupies Alaska and parts of the Canadian North-West, where it overlaps with the western element of the ring-billed gull (Fig. 5). Here the two act as different species. The glaucous gull and the great blackback, which overlap in eastern North America, Iceland and parts of the European Arctic (Fig. 6) may be not long ago descended from a common ancestor. They very rarely hybridise. How the three species of terns—the arctic, common and Forster’s—which are very closely related, arrived at their present distribution (Fig. 7) is difficult to imagine at this stage of their evolution, but they all may be descended from a common tern of north-east Asia or an arctic tern of the North Pacific—from which part of the world the species has probably spread, differentiated and overlapped.

Various suggestions could be made as to the origins of the two guillemots, the common and Brünnich’s guillemot (Fig. 8). Possibly the original guillemot was a common guillemot (Uria aalge) type which got divided into two subspecies in the Atlantic and Pacific by the Ice Age, but not before it had had time to give rise to an arctic race adapted to the harder life. After the Ice Age, with the ameliorating conditions, perhaps both the Atlantic and the Pacific guillemots began pushing north again, this time to meet and overlap with their arctic descendant, which, meantime, had differentiated sufficiently to offer no direct competition. It is interesting to note that the most arctic of the common guillemot races, Uria aalge hyperborea of Iceland, Novaya Zemlya, and Lapland, has a very thick bill and a considerable resemblance to Brünnich’s guillemot, with which it, however, does not interbreed, nor apparently compete. Perhaps it is recapitulating some of the early stages in the origin of Brünnich’s guillemot. To some extent Brünnich’s guillemot, with its razorbill-like beak, appears to replace the razorbill in the arctic, where it may occupy the same ecological (feeding and breeding) niche in relation to the common guillemot as the razorbill does in relation to that bird in the south part of the common guillemot’s range.

The student of variation will find much material for his researches among the North Atlantic sea-birds. Several species of North Atlantic birds, notably the common guillemot, the three smaller skuas and the fulmar, are polymorphic or dimorphic. They exist in several so-called phases. Some common guillemots have a white ring embracing their eye from which a white line runs back towards the back of their heads. These are called ‘bridled’ guillemots, and were for long actually thought to be of a different species. The phases of the skuas range from very light phases with yellow over their ears and the back of their necks, white throats and bellies, to those which are almost uniformly brown. The breeding fulmar population of Britain, the Faeroes, Iceland, Jan Mayen and West Greenland are all light-coloured with white bellies, necks and breasts, but in Baffin Island, Spitsbergen and Franz Josef Land the fulmars are nearly all very dark coloured. Between the light forms of Britain, etc., and the dark forms of Spitsbergen, there are a number of puzzling intermediates, most in evidence on Bear Island (and often to be seen at sea in the Rockall area), and the situation among the fulmars is therefore one not of dimorphism but of polymorphism, as it is among the skuas.

FIG. 6

Breeding distribution of a group of closely-related gulls: Larus occidentalis, the western gull: L. glaucescens, the glaucous-winged gull; L. schistisagus, the slaty-backed gull; L. hyperboreus, the glaucous gull; and L. marinus, the great black-back. Areas of overlap shaded. Black areas in Canadian Arctic represent outpost breeding-places of L. marinus

Southern, who has carefully studied the problem of the differential distribution of the bridled guillemot, thinks that its ‘bridle’ is probably controlled by a single Mendelian factor, which appears to control also a slight difference in the skull structure and the shape of the tail-feathers. He organised counts of the percentage of bridled guillemots throughout Britain in the years round 1939 and again in those round 1949; and he has also collected as much evidence as he could from the rest of the guillemot’s range. Two main conclusions are apparent: first, the percentage of bridled birds increases from SSE to NNW (with a reversal in Iceland); and secondly the percentage is not always constant at any one place—there are signs of trends towards increase or decrease, and of shifts, or drifts, of the balance. Possibly the possession of a bridle gives a guillemot an advantage over other guillemots in some environments, and a disadvantage in others, though we do not know why: the alternative is that possession of the bridle is the result of an advantageous mutation that is spreading through the population; which is unlikely to be the case on the evidence, though Southern has been careful to show that the possibility still exists. There is no indication that bridled guillemots prefer to mate with each other rather than with unbridled guillemots; mating in a mixed colony appears to be completely, or almost completely, at random.

FIG. 7

Breeding distribution of three closely-related terns: Sterna hirundo, the common tern; S. paradisaea, the arctic tern; S. forsteri, Forster’s tern. Areas of overlap shaded. S. h. turkestanica is a doubtful subspecies

Southern shows that the percentage of bridled birds marches fairly closely with humidity and cloudiness; but, as he points out, many other factors may be involved. The changes between c.1939 and c.1949 may be linked with the climatic amelioration, but “might very well be due to random fluctuation.” The actual percentages as recorded in the paper of Southern and Reeve (1941) and Southern (1951), and in a few notes published by other observers, are shown on the maps (Figs. 9a, 9b). The results of Southern’s enquiry of 1949 have shown that out of the very many colonies studied in Britain at only five has a significant^* change been recorded in ten years, four of which show decreases of the percentage of bridled birds and one an increase. One of the decreases is at St. Kilda, where the expedition of 1939 found 16.5 per cent. of the guillemots bridled and that of 1948 only 10.3 per cent. (one of us took part in both counts). Other decreases in Britain have been significant, as at the Isle of May, 5.3 to 3.2 in ten years; and at Unst in Shetland—23.8 to 16.9 per cent. in the same period. There has also been a significant decrease—of about one-third—in Iceland; thus at Grimsey in the north, from 8.7 in 1939 to 6.9 per cent. in 1949; at Hafnaberg, in south-west Iceland, from 29 per cent. in 1939 to 18.1 per cent. in 1949; in the Westmann Islands a parallel decline from 75 per cent. in 1935 (Lockley, 1936) to 50 per cent. in 1949.

FIG. 8

Breeding distribution of two closely-related guillemots or murres: Uria aalge, the common guillemot; and U. lomvia, the arctic guillemot (Brünnich’s guillemot^* in the Atlantic, Pallas’s murre in the Pacific). Areas of overlap shaded.

Increases noted in the 1939–1949 enquiries were several, but only one, at Foula in Shetland, was significant and by checked observers (from 24 per cent. in 1938 to 29.4 per cent. in 1948–49). Increases on the margin of significance were recorded from St. Bee’s Head in Cumberland, Marwick Head in Orkney, and the Fair Isle. Apart from these small increases in the last decade, there was a significant increase of the percentage on Noss in Shetland from 15.5 in 1890 to 26.5 in 1938, which seems great enough to embrace a possible slight observer-error.

Unfortunately, too few of the early bridled guillemot counts are reliable, though some from Berneray and Mingulay (‘Barra Head’) in the Outer Hebrides may be so. This had 20.2 per cent. in 1871; 12 in 1939; 9.8 in 1949; 12.6 in 1950. The decrease between 1871 and 1939 is significant, though the other apparent changes are not so. Elsewhere we have followed Southern in discarding such vague records as ‘about one in every nine or ten.’

Nothing is yet known about the percentage of bridled guillemots along the coast of Norway, except that it has remained slightly over 50 per cent., at Bear Island from 1932 to 1948. At the Karlov Islands off the Murmansk coast the percentage was 42 in 1938. It seems likely, from the rather scanty figures from Novaya Zemlya, which Southern slightly misdates and misplaces, that the percentage may be about the same on islets in Pukhovy and Bezymiannaya Bays off that island (36.4 and 50).

These changes are curious and it is clear that much remains to be solved about this interesting problem in distribution and evolution. Nor is much known about the distribution of the bridled form in the New World, save the following: H. F. Lewis found 128 bridled out of a sample of 724 (17.7 per cent.) in the colonies along Quebec Labrador in 1929. One of us found 51 bridled out of a sample of 295 (17.3 per cent.) at Cape St. Mary, on the south-west corner of the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland, in 1953. In June, 1940 at Funk Island and other parts of the east coast of Newfoundland within forty miles of it W. Templeman (1945) collected twelve common guillemots (? at random) of which six (50 per cent.) were bridled. When Hørring and Salomonsen (1941) compiled a list of all the common guillemots that had been then collected on the west coast of Greenland they recorded six out of thirty-two (18.7 per cent.) as bridled, but knew of no breeding-colony. Soon afterwards Salomonsen (1944) became aware of the colony in the Sukkertoppen district; but no count has apparently yet been made there.

FIG 9a The principal breeding-colonies of the common guillemot in Britain. The percentages of bridled forms in the breeding-populations, as determined chiefly by H. N. Southern and his colleagues, are shown. Minus and plus signs in brackets indicate changes in the decade c. 1939–c. 1949 which are significant, or on the borderline of significance. Crossed circles mark sites of former colonies.

FIG. 9b The distribution of bridled guillemots in the East Atlantic breeding-populations: O: no bridled birds observed. A: under 1 per cent bridled. B: under 2 per cent bridled. C: under 5 per cent bridled. D: under 10 per cent bridled. E: under 20 per cent bridled. F: under 50 per cent bridled. G: over 50 per cent bridled.

All the four skuas appear to vary in plumage; the bonxie (great skua) particularly in the amount of rufous colour, especially among some of its southern forms; the three smaller skuas have a ‘normal’ pale phase of plumage with light breast and underparts, and yellowish or buff on the sides of their necks; and a ‘dark’ phase which is almost uniformly, or uniformly, dusky; and intermediates. The dark phase of the long-tailed skua is so rare that it has hardly ever been seen. Among the population of pomarine skuas, wherever they may breed, from five to twenty per cent. are dark; the distribution of dark birds is even, in the sense that there is no detectable gradient. Southern’s detailed analysis (1944) shows that no geographical area contains significantly more dark pomarine skuas than any other. Among the arctic skuas (Southern, 1943), however, the situation is quite different. In the southern parts of this bird’s breeding-range about three-quarters of the birds are dark; in the middle parts about half, in the Low Arctic less than half, and in the High Arctic a quarter or less. In north-east Greenland, indeed, the dark form is unknown. There are a few, rare, birds intermediate in colour between the pale and dark forms. This looks like a quivering balance between two ‘stable’ types. The proportion of the colour-forms in the British colonies is (Southern points out) subject to rather special considerations, since the colonies are generally small and scattered, and thus liable to random fluctuations—in fact between the limits of 50 and 86 per cent. dark. The mean probably lies at about 75 per cent.

Southern has attempted to correlate the distribution of the dark arctic skuas (Fig. 10) with temperature, relative humidity and various ecological factors. His material carries darkness with humidity over a considerable part of the bird’s total range; but the correlation breaks down in Norwegian Lapland—also, good meteorological figures are not available for all the arctic regions.

FIG. 10

Distribution of colour-phases of the arctic skua, Stercorarius parasiticus, from H. N. Southern (1943), showing isolines for percentage of the pale phase in the breeding population.

We found the same difficulty in correlating the distribution of the colour phases of the fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis, with climate and other environmental factors. In the Atlantic (though not the Pacific) part of the fulmar’s range the situation is in many ways the opposite of that among the arctic skuas; where the surface of the sea is above freezing (i.e. in the Low Arctic and rest of the range) the fulmars are nearly all light. The gradient runs from 0 per cent. dark in Britain to a hundred per cent. (probably) in the High Arctic of Spitsbergen and Franz Josef Land; in West Greenland (Low Arctic) the fulmars are very nearly all light. Finn Salomonsen suggested to Fisher (1952) a correlation between this distribution (Fig. 11) and surface water-temperature. Dark fulmars are only found in the areas where the water is nearly freezing, or freezing, in July, in which month the adults collect food for the chick fulmar. It is interesting to note that approximately the fifty-fifty situation in the distribution of colour-phases of the fulmar (as also of the bridling in the guillemot) is found at Bear Island, whose position is between Low and High Arctic. However, the Pacific fulmar appears to reverse the situation found in the Atlantic; the dark fulmars are found in the warmer parts of the Pacific fulmar’s range, and the light fulmars progressively towards the colder parts, though nowhere does this race of the fulmar breed in truly High Arctic waters.

FIG. 11

Breeding distribution of the fulmar, showing the approximate preponderance of dark birds in the populations, indicated by the dark parts of the circles (from Fisher, 1952)

The existence of these polymorphic forms of some birds constitutes a problem of the greatest interest, which travellers and amateur naturalists might well help to solve by collecting simple counts of the relative proportions of easily recognisable forms.