Читать книгу The February 2015 Assassination of Boris Nemtsov and the Flawed Trial of his Alleged Killers - John B. Dunlop - Страница 3
ОглавлениеTable of Contents
Preface
Chapter One A Self-Blinded Murder Investigation
Missing Surveillance Tapes Discussed at the Trial of Nemtsov’s Accused Killers
Other Withheld Materials
A Brief Window
The Nemtsov Family Attorneys on the Missing Tapes
A New “Zapruder Film”
Protecting “State Secrets”
The “Kulagin Dashcam Tape”: Video Evidence Spurned by the Authorities
Journalist David Satter Discusses the “Kulagin Tape”
A Videotape from 3 Veernaya Street in Moscow
A November 2017 Update from Igor Murzin
Conclusion
Chapter Two A Seemingly Endless Flawed Trial
What is Media-zona?
Interviews of Three Jurors
A Transparent Hint from Putin as the Trial was Winding Down
The Role of Torture in Obtaining Confessions from the Accused
The Defense Cites the Alleged Torture of the Accused
The European Court for Human Rights Identifies Torture in the Case of One of the Accused
Economist Andrei Illarionov Emphasizes the Use of Torture
The Persecution of Defense Attorney Zaurbek Sadakhanov
Conclusion
Chapter Three The Version of the Prosecution
A Report by Kommersant One Week after the Murder
“Patriots of Russia and Her Enemies”
The Significance of this Leaked Version
A Prestigious State Award
The Version Favored by Putin—A “Ukrainian Trace”
Tatyana Stanovaya on the “Ukrainian Trace”
Spreading Putin’s Preferred Version of the Crime
Postscript: Two Assassination Attempts in 2017
Putin Tribune Sergei Markov Discusses the “Ukrainian Trace”
A Ukrainian Pistol
A Second Novaya gazeta Report on the Assassination
Preparing the Murder
The Carrying Out of the Murder
The Arrest and Afterwards
After the Murder
Concerning the Motives for the Murder
The Significance of this Second Novaya gazeta Report
The Early Course of the Investigation
Duritskaya’s 28 February 2015 Account
Fact-checking Duritskaya’s Testimony
Taking Stock Forty Days after the Murder
The Chekist Version Forty Days On
The Crime Is Declared to Have Been Solved
Eyewitnesses, Gone Missing for Months, Suddenly Appear
The Court Testimony of Evgenii Molodykh
Molodykh and the Facts of the Case
The Prosecution’s Final Argument
Muddying the Waters
The Jury Finds the Accused Guilty--the Judge Then Passes Sentence
Conclusion
Postscript: One year after the Verdict, the Investigations Committee and FSB Reopen the Case
Chapter Four The Version of the Nemtsov Family Attorneys
Commentary
A Second Major Prokhorov Interview
Commentary
Prokhorov Debunks the “Ukrainian Trace” in the Murder
The Position of Attorney Olga Mikhailova
Identifying Chechen MVD and FSB Personnel among the Alleged Hitmen
Prokhorov’s February 2017 Interview with TheIns.ru
Questioning other Witnesses
Petitions submitted by Olga Mikhailova
Commentary
The Nemtsov Family Attorneys Attempt to Intercede for the Accused
Witnesses called by the Family Attorneys
Gennadii Gudkov’s Testimony
The Testimony of Ryklin, Yashin and Gudkov
Summary of Findings
Prokhorov’s Summation
Assessing the Final Arguments of the Nemtsov Family Attorneys
An Interview with Vadim Prokhorov Five-and-a-Half Months after the Trial
Assessing Prokhorov’s December 2017 Conclusions
Chapter Five The Versions of Vladimir Milov and Andrei Illarionov
Part One: The Findings of Economist Vladimir Milov
Milov’s Blog of 2 March 2015
Subsequent Milov Commentary
Milov on the Murder Investigation as of the Summer of 2016
Conclusion
Part Two: The Findings of Economist Andrei Illarionov
Positing a Second Shooter
Illarionov’s March 2 Interview with GordonUA.com
Two Years On--Countering Ilya Yashin’s Alleged “False Testimony”
Illarionov’s View of the Crime as of April 2017
Conclusion
Chapter Six The Versions of Leonid Martinyuk and Andrei Piontkovskii
Part One: The Conclusions of Filmmaker Leonid Martinyuk
Identifying the Mastermind behind the Murder
Part Two: The Findings of Mathematician Andrei Piontkovskii
Why the FSB Attack on the “Kadyrov Project”?
Subsequent Commentary
Bulldogs Fighting under a Rug
Information Uncovered by Journalist David Satter
Conclusion
Chapter Seven The Version of an Outlier
Novaya gazeta Assails Murzin
Murzin Encounters Kuznetsov
Dmitrii Muratov of Novaya gazeta excoriates Murzin
Attorney Vadim Prokhorov Dismisses Murzin’s findings
Murzin Rebuts Prokhorov
Piontkovskii and Martinyuk on Murzin’s Writings
Comments by Leonid Martinyuk
The Nemtsov Assassination: a “Sacral Sacrifice”
Mining the “Materials of the Case”
David Satter in late October 2017 Discusses Murzin’s Evidence
Murzin on Material from “Potok”
Murzin’s April 2017 Comments on an Alleged “Ukrainian Trace” in the Murder
Conclusion
Chapter Eight The Version of the Defense
Treatment of Defense Attorney Khadisov
Belittling Defense Attorney Byurchieva
The Treatment of Defense Attorney Tsakaev
A Gambit by the Defense--Shift the Blame for the Murder onto the Deceased Shavanov
The “Toptuny”
Chain of Custody of the Shell Casings
Questions concerning the Purchase of a ZAZ Shans Getaway Vehicle
Duritskaya’s Testimony
Bridge Video
The Key Kulagin Dashcam Video
The Questioning of Zaur Dadaev in Court
Beslan Shavanov’s Arrival in Moscow
Dadaev’s Activities on the Day of the Murder
The Judge Excludes Surveillance Videos from the House Camera at Veernaya 3
Mark Kaverzin Makes the Defense’s Case for Dadaev
Defense Attorney Tsakaev Speaks
Final Plea to the Jury
Final Pleas of the Gubashev Brothers
Dadaev’s Final Plea
Media-zona Sums up the Defense’s Case at the Conclusion of the Trial
A Crushing Verdict for the Defense
Chapter Nine The Author’s Version
SPPS Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society
Copyright