Читать книгу Our Puppet Government - John R. Krismer - Страница 7

1

The Anti-American &

Anti-Semitic Bigotry

In going to war with Iraq, Congress inadvertently chose to support the current Bush Dynasty (Shrub Dynasty) and their alliance with Israel, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and their Likud-Zionist Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon - generating a new frontier of worldwide anti-Americanism and anti-Semitic bigotry of global proportions. Yes, Republican conservatives and the liberal Democrats were unknowingly forced into this predictably unsuccessful alliance with little or no understanding of the complex conflict that was raging between Judaism and Zionism; nor the religious, racial, or ethnic issues that are currently disrupting the entire Muslim and European cultures throughout the world. Here are some of the dishonest fabrications that were presented to the public to push the Shrub Dynasty’s agenda:

- Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons. (10/07/02) Bush

- Saddam Hussein is seeking quantities of uranium from Africa. (10/28/030 Bush

- Saddam has reconstituted nuclear weapons. (03/16/03) Cheney

- The CIA has solid reporting of senior-level contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade. (10/07/02) Tenet/Bush

- Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and deadly gases, and their alliances with terrorists could allow Iraq to attack America. (10/07/02) Bush

- Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could disperse chemical or biological weapons. (10/07/02) Bush

- We have seen intelligence over many months that Iraq has dispersed chemical and biological weapons, and that command control arrangements have been established. (02/08/03) Bush

- Our conservative estimate is that Iraq has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agents to fill some 16,000 rockets. (02/05/02) Powell

- We know where Iraq’s WMD are, around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, south, and north somewhat. (03/30/03) Rumsfeld

- We found a biological laboratory in Iraq, which the UN prohibited.(06/01/03) Bush (1)

- The Scooter Libby statements to a Grand Jury.

- Blaming Iraq for the Trade Center destruction.

- And the “Top Gun” saying on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln under the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner:

“The tyrant has fallen and Iraq is free . . . Major combat operations in Iraq have ended . . . The United States and our allies have prevailed . . . And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country.”…and on and on!

Although our national security interests relating to the destruction of the World Trade Center suggested some form of retaliation against the terrorists, perhaps it was irresponsible for this country to add to the fear, anger, and resentment between Judaism and Zionism, without first obtaining the facts - a problem, which is rapidly gaining more and more momentum in Iraq and its neighboring states of Iran, Afghanistan, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, as well as Germany and France. And in that Iran now controls the Shiite population in both Iran and Iraq, they will inevitably blame the resulting religious war on America. A religious war called the “Rapture” or an “Apocalyptic Event” in which God will destroy the ruling powers of evil. In other words, they actually believe that all these suicides we see are acting in behalf of God, and will go to heaven in an unending war that culminates with the end of the earth.

Most of the world, outside of the United States, now recognizes the Iraqi war is not a matter of “win or lose,” and we’re just now realizing that it was a huge mistake for the United States to ignore the real terrorist. [Al Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden] Yet, President Bush suggests, “we’re going to stay the course,” not even having a clue of what the course involves in this endless conflict. Could it be that he’s still trying to prove his father failed where he plans to succeed at all cost? Even a few ethical politicians have been asking themselves - “Just how could we have been so stupid as to authorize a unilateral act of aggression without a clear understanding of the facts?” Richard Pearl and co-author Douglas Feith had completed writing “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” well before the Trade Center’s destruction in New York, and these two strongly oriented Zionist authors played a major role in influencing the start of this religious war with Iraq. Pearl and Feith had also presented this document to the former Israeli Prime Minister, Netanyahu for his approval well before the war. Their strategy called for the elimination of Israel’s enemy “Saddam Hussein,” and the September 13, 1993 “Oslo Accord,” which defined the interim self-government arrangements between the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), and Israel. In fact, Pearl proposed to install a Hashemite monarchy in Baghdad to destabilize the governments of Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Iran - recommending a regional dominance by Israel over that entire area, which he referred to as, “The Greater Israel.” Of course Iran would have none of this, and is now prepared to reach heaven by dying in an Apocalyptic War if necessary. So, instead of hunting down terrorists like Osama bin Laden, President Bush, on the advice of Karl Rove, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Richard Pearl, Douglas Feith, and George Tenet - chose to take steps toward promoting a Zionist state called Greater Israel, which they thought would soon become the sole power in the Middle East. Yes, it was this small group of Neoconservatives that played a major role in this unilaterally criminal act of aggression in Iraq - Israel’s arch enemy. Worse yet, they did this without the support of any of the neighboring countries, or the Muslims, estimated to be between 1.2 to 1.4 billion people throughout the world. Since the start of this war, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), a Pearl organization, has been trying to explain to the press and the bewildered public why the United States will soon spend more than a trillion dollars instead of the originally projected $50 to $80 billion to fight this war that promotes Greater Israel. And more recently, Israel defiantly and intentionally escalated its perpetual religious conflict with Lebanon and Jerusalem, a conflict this closely knit Zionist inner circle planned well before they took office. In fact, no one even mentioned or discussed this dangerous Zionist Israeli conflict with Judaism that they created throughout the entire Islamic world or the anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism that is now on the rise in the Middle East, Germany, France, as well as the entire world - and now Mr. Pearl is openly trying to distance himself from this administration.

THE WORLD OF ISLAM

To better understand this important issue, one needs to understand what “Islam” is all about. The word “Islam” means peace and the Islam religion means the submission to one God, as well as to live in harmony with other people and the environment. A Muslim is one whose obedience, allegiance and loyalty are to God, Lord of the Universe, and one who strives to live in accordance with God’s laws. Muslims may be Arabs, Turks, Persians, Indians, Pakistanis, Indonesians, Europeans, Africans, Americans, Chinese or any other nationality not limited to race. Yet, far too many Americans are still under the impression that Judaism and Zionism are synonymous, believing that being a Jew means to be a Zionist, which implies a certain loyalty to the State of Israel. What’s not understood are the terms Judaism and Zionism are completely incompatible. Jews are not a religion, a nation, or a race. According to their own belief they are the “Chosen People,” but they are not chosen for domination; they are not elected to rule over people; they are chosen to serve the Creator of the Universe and the Father, thereby serving all of mankind. According to the Jewish beliefs, there are only seven laws that are binding, and they follow some 613 commandments that were derived from the Five Books of Moses, constituting the Rabbinic and Halachic literature, which is obligatory to everyone born of a Jewish mother or one who has accepted the Jewish beliefs. Political Zionism only started in Europe in the 1930s in response to anti-Semitism, and is a complete departure from Judaism. The aim of the Zionists is to provide a country for the Jewish people, where they can speak Hebrew under a government or nation, which can have an army, navy and air force. Yet, this concept defies the Jewish beliefs. The creation of Greater Israel as a secular Jewish State is treason to the Jewish people that were constituted on Mount Sinai. By supporting Greater Israel in its quest to establish and control Iraq and its neighboring Jewish nations, the United States has blindly waded right into the middle of a “perpetual conflict with Judaism,” and they, as well as Russia and China actually believe we are becoming a “Dictator State,” which they must protect themselves from. In other words, if we had left them with their own dignity and some respect, we may have had no problem. The last country to consider the Jews a race was the Nazis, whose irrational racism and dictatorship attempted to annihilate an indefinable culture of perhaps a billion or more Jews, under a Dictator State that left a scar on all humanity, which will long be remembered. The United States can only hope that George “W” has not created another form of bigotry that we may someday regret, just as Germany now regrets Hitler’s atrocities. By foolishly embracing Israeli Zionism through wars that are intended to create a Greater Israel, the Bush Dynasty and our Puppet Government revealed an abysmal ignorance of Jewish history, which could eventually rekindle anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism to a level never before seen throughout this world.

Many of George W. Bush’s speeches have frequently threatened Iraq, Iran and North Korea with bully like fear phrases such as: “Axis of Evil” - as he constantly reminds us to be fearful of the always present WMD threats - while we ignore the fact that our own “Shock and Awe” has now killed, injured, and disrupted the lives of millions of innocent human beings and their families in both the United States and Iraq. As of this date, two million Iraqi’s have left Iraq, and 1.8 million have relocated, while current estimates of Iraqi’s killed to date exceed 655,000. Here again, we really don’t know, nor do we seem to even care. And as the United States continues to secure the realm for Israel, it can be expected that our military and CIA agents will certainly kill and injure many more as this out of control unilateral act of aggression mushrooms throughout the Middle East. More recently, rather than negotiate with our enemies, we’ve moved three aircraft carriers with warheads into the Caspian Sea, in still another bully like tactic that only further escalates any disagreements that may exist with Iran and Syria.

THE COST OF VIOLATING

INTERNATIONAL LAW

Yes, it’s time for Americans to demand that our Congress face up to this terrible blunder we’ve made. Hasn’t the entire world been exhausted by our pathetic and dysfunctional political rhetoric that prevents an unbiased investigation of our own potential violation of international law, such as:

- Our unilaterally act of aggression without being attacked.

- Our bombing of the Iraqi people with radioactive material.

- Our prisoner torture tactics.

Hasn’t our bully like “War Crimes” embarrassed the United States throughout the entire world? And more recently, the possible treasonous outing of one of our own CIA agent’s only further questions our ethics. Although our President suggests these decisions are his to make, [even though he works for us] none of these acts fall within sound political judgment. Shouldn’t Saddam’s trial and hanging been authorized by the International World Court in The Hague? - just as this country once demanded in the Nuremberg Trials that were held from 1945 to 1949, involving the Nazi Holocaust and the corrupt German officers of World War II. In retrospect, it’s now obvious that the United States has failed the world, by pushing our close allies to the brink with our ridiculous demands that ignore the Geneva Convention, as well as all six of the previous Geneva related agreements we’ve signed. Just how could we, as a leading nation, openly degrade our once flawless image? And aren’t we even angered by this new definition of torture? Weren’t we embarrassed by this country’s demand for absolute immunity for all U.S. Military personnel and civilian officials prior to the Iraq war - just so we could remain free from prosecution for war crimes by the International Criminal Court? Hasn’t the Patriot Act taken us back to the Alien & Sedition Act of 1796, where the Federalist elite previously attempted to take full control of our government, using the threat of attack by hostile forces as the excuse to enact the Sedition Act, which created the following laws?

- branded their political opponents as traitors

- made it a crime for American citizens to “print, utter, or publish . . . any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the Government

- imprisoned their most outspoken verbal critics

- allowed aliens to be imprisoned or deported at the whim of the president

- had the intent of keeping the Federalists in power indefinitely, perpetuating its control of the government (2)

Isn’t this similar to our Patriot Act, which attempts to brainwash the working class into believing our appointed tribunals can convict people on circumstantial evidence?

Do we really believe a free nation, should ever use “Gestapo” like tactics to torture ones victims into false confessions?

The infamous Hitler Storm Trooper “Hermann Goering” said it very well at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II:

“Why of course the people don’t want war ... But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship . . . Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.”(3)

The Financial Times of London published a commentary on July 2, 2002 under the headline “US Takes Chance to Target Peacekeeping,” saying:

“Donald Rumsfeld [US Defense Secretary] and John Bolton [US under-secretary for arms control and international security] are smiling like the cat who swallowed the canary. They’ve got two of their demons in sight . . . hard line conservatives, such as Mr. Bolton, Mr. Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice - believe they can ‘kill peacekeeping and the ICC with one stone.’ . . .

Condoleezza Rice, Bush’s national security advisor at that time, spelled out her outlook in an article in Foreign Affairs magazine, saying:

‘The president must remember that the military is a special instrument. It is lethal and is meant to be. It is not a civilian police force. It is not a political referee. And it is most certainly not designed to build a civilian society.’” (4)

Does all this sound like the United States is really promoting freedom for Iraq? Shouldn’t we be asking ourselves why this nation ever promoted and passed, “The Netherlands Invasion Act,” which allows our U.S. Military to rescue any U.S. Personnel brought to trial in “The Hague.” Doesn’t this expose the complete lack of equality for other nations, while destroying the very basic freedoms so many of us once fought for? Didn’t this nation once set a shining example to others, rather than this steady diet of embarrassing acts and preemptive wars that we’re now all ashamed of?

During World War II, those soldiers that returned, all experienced the terrible aftermath of killing and vowed that war should only be a last resort after all other alternatives were exhausted. Shouldn’t we be evaluating why our twentieth century closed with almost thirty-five thousand American-air sorties bombing Serbia and Kosovo, under the direction of the United Nations? And although those particular acts of war may have been justified, do we really understand that we destroyed almost all of the Yugoslavian power and water filtration plants, railroads, bridges, and a majority of their petroleum reserves - essentially annihilating the Yugoslavian culture and its small industrial and social infrastructures for years to come. Paradoxically, the twenty-first century started with a similar destruction of Afghanistan - and now, more recently, the United States has unilaterally initiated this ridiculous preemptive act of religious aggression against Iraq, a country of less than twenty-six million people, with Lebanon, Jerusalem, Iran, and Syria and the entire region of the Middle East probably next in line. As a result, North Korea, China, and even Russia are all taking steps to protect themselves from our apparent worldwide colonization and policing tactics. Yes, America is once again becoming very familiar with the scars of war, scars that will never heal for the thousands of families both here and abroad that have been touched by death or injury, all because of our reckless decision to take this country to war before all other efforts were exhausted. Could it be that these Shadowed Money Barons intentionally create these endless skirmishes so they can make huge profits? Current estimates for rebuilding all these countries exceed trillions of dollars per state, which is far more than any of these now dependent colonies can ever afford. And since their GNP has dropped so dramatically, the United States, and particularly “We the People,” [the working class] will never be able to regain the minimal prosperity we once enjoyed. Therefore, our tax dollars will play a major role in the recovery of so many countries well into the future and certainly well into the twenty-first century. But worse yet, while we as Americans are spending enormous amounts of tax dollars on revitalizing and redirecting all these other nations, we’re not revitalizing our own floundering economy, which is presently riddled with corrupt un-audited no-bid contracts for these wealthy Money Barons; trillions of dollars in loans and deficits; the decentralization of human services to humankind; and the obvious deregulation of standards while our dysfunctional government over regulates our own citizens. And since all these small foreign states were actually stripped of their sovereignty, our military occupation will be required for years and years, as more and more American soldiers are being forced to leave their families and perhaps even die to protect almost eight hundred military bases we currently operate in other countries, which aren’t very happy that we Americans are there. Iraq, the Middle East, France, Germany, Russia and China, all wonder if the United States isn’t unilaterally deploying this country’s military force for geopolitical and economic advantage. And many now question this unrealistic quest for “Worldwide Freedom,” under a “One World Order” when it’s very likely these Invisible Money Barons are only interested in their profits and the total control of the rich mineral deposits of the Middle East. An article entitled “US preparing full-scale invasion of Iraq” by Bill Vann on July 10, 2002 stated:

“Vice President Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Assistant Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, reportedly were in agreement with the Israeli regime of Ariel Sharon that the US military force can effectively subjugate Iraq, providing the US with an alternative to Saudi Arabia as a source of oil and a site for our military bases. CIA Director George Tenet reportedly warned this administration that, “there was little or no chance of a successful coup against the Iraqi leader,” counseling that, “only an all-out US military assault can realize American aims.”(5)

And this was published well before the Trade Center bombing and the war ever began in Iraq. In any event, all these perpetual skirmishes are becoming more and more difficult to identify as wars, when in actuality they massacre thousands. Isn’t it becoming obvious that when a hostile conflict occurs between a super-power and a small state like Iraq, it’s just not appropriate to call it a war - more likely it becomes a massacre, where one side can only attempt to defend itself? And the political price that’s paid for this type of super power aggression is the deterioration of our once respected image. Former Secretary of State, Lawrence Eagleburger said it very well:

“We’ve presented to the rest of the world a vision of the bully on the block who pushes a button - that’s going to haunt us in terms of trying to deal with the rest of the world in the years ahead, a fact that carries with it a serious political price.”(6)

What he was referring to was this Big Bully Syndrome we’ve recently taken on. Even The United Nation’s Security Council, as well as much of the world, no longer supports our preemptive and unilateral tactics that inflict irreparable damage to others. Why can’t we meet with troubled states like North Korea, Iran and Syria, rather than jump into war? Perhaps it’s because too many insiders, like Halliburton and Carlyle become wealthy when we foot the bill. After all, why should they care if they provoke a growing mass of humanity to cry out against these senseless acts of totalitarianism? Many feel the world would anxiously unite, if we’d only ask them to help fight terrorism, rather than pursue all these self-serving interests like marketing war materials, oil, or creating strategic air bases. Americans have always supported a morally just war - but Christianity, Authoritarianism, the Inquisition, the Crusades, the bloody Reformation and Counter Reformation and persecutions, purges, heresy, witch burnings, religious tribunals of penance, self immolation, flagellation, and mass murders of uncounted millions of indigenous people under the guise of some form of religious, political or anti-Semitic conflict have plagued humankind for centuries. And now, we’ve intentionally plunged our politicians, the fundamentalists, and the religious right into an era of universal religious strife between Judaism and Zionism. By force-feeding Israel’s Zionist theocracy into both Iraq and American politics, defies the separation of church and state, which both liberal and conservative politicians have long protected. Yes, we need to expel these theocratic issues from politics, if sanity is to ever return to America.

SO WHY WAS URAQ INVADED?

The U.S. and the U.K. had been bombing northern and southern Iraq since 1991, and although these Invisible Money Barons knew that our sanctions and containment efforts were working - they were well aware that these sanctions were soon going to be lifted, with Saddam still in charge. In other words, the Money Barons stood to be shut out of getting any financial benefit at all. Also the Food for Oil Program had switched to the Euro in November 2000 — and Saddam would be selling his oil for Euros when these sanctions were lifted. Everyone knew Saddam was sitting on top of the second largest oil reserves in the world - and because the US was a debtor nation, [meaning their currency was no longer backed up by the gold standard] their currency would most likely shift confidence in the dollar if a very solid commodity like oil was traded in Euros. That’s why one of the first executive orders that President Bush signed in May [2003] changed trading of Iraq’s oil back to the dollar, as these Money Barons took over Iraq’s Central Bank and shrewdly bought Iraqi companies at a penny on the dollar.

On the flip side, the Shrub Dynasty that was now growing in power, and was no longer on good terms with Saudi Arabia, since the questionable death of Salem bin Laden in an unexplained airplane accident outside of San Antonio, Texas on May 29, 1988. [Salem was Osama bin Laden’s oldest brother, who had been an original investor in George W. Bush’s oil company] And on top of all of this, the Invisible Money Barons were also very dissatisfied with the Saudi’s restrictions on US bases in Saudi Arabia, which they desperately needed to secure the energy resources in that region.

Notes

1 Christopher Scheer, AlterNet 6/27/03 Ten Appalling Lies Were Told About Iraq

http://www.alternet.org/story/16274

2 Alexander James, The Hidden History of Money p. 6

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/03/282679.shtml

3 Ibid p. 6

4 Bill Vann, US pushes Europe to the brink on international court, 4 July 2002

www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jul2002/icc-j04.shtml

5 Bill Vann, US preparing full-scale invasion of Iraq, 10 July 2002

www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jul2002/iraq-j10.shtml

6 Robert Elias, Professor of sociology , University of San Francisco, California- Terrorism and American Foreign Policy, September 25, 2001

http://www.tanbou.com/2001/fall/USForeignPolicyElias.htm