Читать книгу Andrea Mantegna and the Italian Renaissance - Joseph Manca - Страница 2

1. The Holy Family with St Elizabeth and the young St John, c. 1485–1488. Tempera and gold on canvas, 62.9 × 51.3 cm. Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth.

The art of Andrea Mantegna (born c.1431, died 1506) has long maintained a broad and deep appeal. From the impressive illusionism of his earliest works (Fig. 4) to the narrative power of his mature paintings (Fig. 2), Mantegna’s art remained vivid and heroic, dramatic and emotional. They are also painted in stunning detail: pebbles, blades of grass, veins, and hair are rendered with excruciating care, and he depicted even in his great narrative works the mundane particulars of earthly existence, showing laundry hanging out to dry and buildings fallen into disrepair. He had a deep interest in human nature and issues of moral character. Perhaps most strikingly, Mantegna’s pictures are filled with references to classical antiquity. No other painter of the fifteenth century so thoroughly understood and abundantly included in his art the costumes, drapery folds, inscriptions, architecture, subject matter, ethical attitude, and other aspects of ancient classical civilisation. And instead of the cool classicism of later centuries, his vision of Greco-Roman civilisation is lively and has a familiar and nostalgic air about it. For him, antiquity was a near, palpable presence, one which he sought constantly to bring to colourful existence in his pictures. It is this thirst for a vanished classical past that places Mantegna most firmly in the context of his time, as his art was favoured most warmly by Renaissance contemporaries who shared his visionary quest to revive the moral strength and naturalism which marked the art of antiquity.

Mantegna was a leader in the renewal of culture occurring during his time, a movement we call the Renaissance, or “rebirth.” In the fifteenth century, classical civilisation was a whole universe open to rediscovery. It offered an alternative to the confining, medieval world of scholastic thought and Christian theology. Classicism meant the liberation of the mind and the joys of literary study. The writers and artists of antiquity indulged freely in the delights of the material world, an attitude shared by Mantegna and many of his contemporaries. Renaissance men found spiritual ancestors from centuries past who had similar ideas about virtue and vice, and whose secular sensibility embraced a naturalistic art that was idealised in its formal perfection and its harmonious proportions. Mantegna painted his classical visions for enthusiasts, men and women who were dilettantes in the original sense of the word, delighting in their new discoveries. His life and works contributed to the air of celebration and self-congratulation characterising much of Renaissance culture. Some modern scholars avoid using the word “Renaissance” and, rather than see the period as being an age of confidence and a glorious rebirth of values, they describe Italian culture from 1400 to 1600 as one of conflicting interests, a hesitant and contradictory world in which the men and women cautiously “negotiated” their places in society. Period texts, however, reveal a mentality not as tentative and fearful as modern scholarship would have us believe. To be sure, the Renaissance had its political crises and social dislocations. It is important to bear in mind the larger picture: leading patrons, intellectuals, and artists in Italy felt they were living in a period of rebirth, and were forcibly helping to shape a new order of things. In the visual sphere, Renaissance writers about art – Lorenzo Ghiberti, Leon Battista Alberti, and Giorgio Vasari, for example – were quite clear in seeing the Middle Ages as a dark period, and their own age as one of enlightenment and human improvement. They looked back with admiration towards the achievement of the Greeks and Romans, and called for, not a bland imitation of antiquity, but an embracing of the ideals and values which made ancient societies superior to the cultural decline that followed: reason, an acceptance of natural law, and ethical moderation.

2. The Descent into Limbo, c. 1490. Tempera on panel, 38.2 × 42.3 cm. Private collection.

The rebirth of the art of painting was one of the major aspects of the Renaissance period. Mantegna’s pictures – embracing a vivid realism and a learned antiquarianism – epitomised the art of the Early Renaissance period perhaps better than the works of any other artist of the fifteenth century. This is an extraordinary claim to make for a painter who was born, trained, and lived in the relatively provincial cities of Padua and Mantua, removed from the flourishing cultural centres of Florence, Venice, and Rome. But somehow Mantegna managed to seize on the avant-garde intellectual ideas of his time and forge a style which set him apart from his contemporaries. His greatest achievement was that he did not accommodate medieval tradition in his art; he fought against it. The older Gothic painters, active in the early fifteenth century, clung to the dreamy, soft, gentle vision we associate with the late medieval world. Moreover, many of the so-called Renaissance painters of the fifteenth century chose not to eradicate this idyllic and elegant tradition. Painters such as Fra Angelico, Alessandro Botticelli, Pietro Perugino, and even Leonardo da Vinci continued to incorporate some of the elegant and decorative aspects of the Gothic manner in their artistry. But Mantegna confronted the medieval style, and he set out already at an early age to destroy an older tradition and create a new one. Soft surfaces and languorous movement gave way to sharp definition and virile action.

Mantegna had other painters in his camp who were revolutionaries, some of whom preceded him. Masaccio, Piero della Francesca, and Andrea del Castagno are among the central Italian artists who first turned to a new tough and monumental style. These painters also reacted against the sweet Gothic manner, and Mantegna was greatly indebted to several older masters for blazing a trail. Yet, Mantegna was more thoroughly engaged than any previous painter of the Quattrocento (1400s) in archaeological study and a conscious revival of Greco-Roman civilisation. The result of this historical attitude made Mantegna’s art striking for his contemporaries, as it is for us. Mantegna neglected no detail in his art, and his works are based on intense and enthusiastic study. The young painter from Padua created a manner which epitomised the Early Renaissance, combining a plausible realism and cogent narrative style with a thoughtful attempt to re-create the visual world of antiquity. His special achievement as an antiquarian-painter was recognised by many observers, including Giovanni Santi, the father of the painter Raphael, who said observantly of Mantegna: “No man ever took or used the brush or other pencil, who was a clear successor of ancient times, as he is, with such truth.”[1]

3. Sandro Botticelli, St Augustine in his Cell, 1494. Tempera on panel, 41 × 27 cm. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.

Why was Mantegna among the revolutionaries of his time, so intent on establishing a new artistic vision? For many Renaissance artists it would be difficult to guess the origins of their style, because we lack sufficient biographical information or documentation. Yet, we do know a great deal about Mantegna’s personality, artistic training, and social relations; it is possible to hypothesise why Mantegna’s art looks the way it does. For example, it is telling that he was known to have been argumentative, territorial, and sometimes cruel; surely the stony, incisive, and at times violent world he created as an artist is appropriate for one with such a temperament. It is difficult to imagine Mantegna having embraced the languid narrative and sweet lyricism that remained in vogue throughout the fifteenth century in many quarters. On the whole, both his personality and his art were hard-edged and aggressive. Renaissance viewers who wanted prettier, less detailed, or less historical pictures could have found them elsewhere, and there were surely many who disliked Mantegna’s art. He was not interested in painting slender angels with pink cheeks, long blonde hair, and pious, vapid expressions. His art is rarely charming, and those who favoured the suave elegance of Alessandro Botticelli or the gentle piety of Pietro Perugino perhaps found little to enjoy in Mantegna. Nor did he, like some of the painters in the northern Italian court at Ferrara, establish an extravagant and self-conscious manner; his paintings are more straightforward and naturalistic than that. Avoiding both the pedestrian naturalism of a Domenico Ghirlandaio and the sweet or fantastic style, Mantegna – strong willed and tough minded – developed a manner based on incisive narrative and classical revivalism.

It is also clear from the beginning that Mantegna was an intellectual artist, if not in an academic way at least in the sense that he was curious about literary as well as visual ideas. He associated with scholars and other writers, and the results appear in his poetic and well researched art. Indeed, he was drawn to words during his whole lifetime, enjoying the study of Roman inscriptions and depicting Greek and Hebrew lettering in his works. His timely art found a ready following in Quattrocento Italy, and he drew support from contemporaries who favoured the revival of classical culture. Importantly, he had a ready affinity for allegory and historical accounts, and was able to follow literary programs and illustrate stories successfully, avoiding the awkwardness plaguing many Renaissance artists who based their art on detailed verbal programs. Mantegna bridged the gap between the written and the pictorial worlds.

4. St Mark, c. 1448–1449. Casein on canvas, 82 × 63.7 cm. Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt.

Finally, in seeking the source of his artistry in his personality, it is worth pointing out Mantegna was extraordinarily ambitious and he worked hard. His dedication to his craft and his physical energy led him to study, learn, and borrow ideas from other artists, whether from antiquity or from around the Europe of his time. He can hardly be called an eclectic artist, but he did absorb different styles and forge them together to create a distinct style of his own. Mantegna had the drive to get ahead and the will to create a striking artistic style which would catch the attention of his contemporaries. As it turns out, he had a teacher of note who himself was attracted to antiquity, and who imparted to his students progressive ideas.

The Renaissance period, with its ever-waxing secularism, presented a challenge to traditional Christian civilisation. Yet there was apparently no contradiction in Mantegna’s mind between Christian and secular thought. Most of Mantegna’s oeuvre consisted of sacred works, and in them he applied his keen observation of the natural world and his interest in pagan antiquity, the sculpture, architecture, clothing, and figural types of which fill his religious pictures as part of his historical approach. There were varying attitudes in fifteenth-century Italy, and some clerics and laymen too were puzzled as to why anyone would want a painting of Mars and Venus or would be vain enough to desire a self-portrait. Mantegna worked for a range of clients, and each had different expectations and needs. Some shunned the revival of classical culture and the expansion of the secular spirit, but for his part Mantegna moved freely from the sacred to the worldly. His liberal attitude won out, and by the end of Mantegna’s long life a peaceful coexistence held sway. A nearly seamless fusion of the sacred and profane came to form a chief aspect of Italian Renaissance culture.

In the following pages, we will look at Mantegna’s life and art. While only scattered documents exist for his earliest period, Mantegna’s mature years are better recorded, and we know more about him than any other Italian Renaissance artist before Leonardo da Vinci. We can trace his associations with patrons and public, friends and foes, teachers and colleagues in a way not possible with most other painters of the fifteenth century. We can explore the context of his artistry and establish the historical background and the nature of an art that has endured.