Читать книгу Ford Differentials - Joseph Palazzolo - Страница 27
9⅜-Inch
ОглавлениеThe Ford 9⅜-inch axle is often mistaken as a 9-inch. A 9⅜-inch axle has an obvious visual difference in the third-member casting rib structure of the curved top horizontal rib. Carefully inspect the axle, so you do not buy the wrong one. There’s more than a few of these at swap meets and scrap yards that may be unknowingly misrepresented as a 9-inch, and these axles are not ideal for high-performance applications. Therefore, don’t make the mistake and assume that every Ford banjo-style axle is a 9-inch. The age-old advice applies—buyer beware—as these axles have very few parts interchangeable with the 9-inch.
The 9⅜-inch axle can typically be found on 1961 to about 1972 larger cars, such as the Lincolns and LTDs, and the high-powered pickup trucks from about the mid 1960s to the mid 1970s. These axles had large carrier bearings with an outside diameter of 3.265 inches. Some of these use the unique 3.250-inch outside-diameter wheel end bearings as compared to the typical large bearings, which are 3.150 inches. These axles are still not as strong as nodular iron 9-inch axles. There is no aftermarket support for these axles, so there’s no reason to buy one for a high-performance or racing application. Therefore, the only reason to use one of these is for a concours-type restoration for originality.
There are no performance upgrades so you are stuck with used parts or, if you are lucky, new old stock. As a result, I highly recommend that you avoid this axle for any performance application buildups. You will be better off in the long run.
But there is one good side to this axle; you can swap the third member with a 9-inch unit and retain the rest. So if your vehicle already has this housing and you want to upgrade the gears and differential, you have choices. You can even put the larger 9⅜-inch third member in a 9-inch housing but you need to machine some additional ring gear clearance in the axle housing. The bolt pattern for the third member is common between the two axle housings. I am not sure why you would ever want to do that but it is physically possible.